CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05113771ENLIGHTENUpdated May 15, 2025Results posted

A Biomarker-Guided, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Liafensine in Patients With TRD

A Phase 2 interventional study of Liafensine and Placebo in Treatment Resistant Depression, sponsored by Denovo Biopharma LLC. Completed at 45 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by Denovo Biopharma LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
197
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center Phase 2b study. Approximately 180 subjects with treatment resistant depression who meet all eligibility criteria will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is to demonstrate liafensine is superior to placebo in DGM4 positive patients with TRD.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of liafensine. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive liafensine 1 mg QD, liafensine 2 mg QD, or placebo QD. The main objectives of this study are as follows:

Primary Efficacy Objective: To demonstrate that liafensine was superior to placebo in DGM4 positive patients with TRD as assessed by the change in MADRS total score from baseline to Day 42 of double blind treatment

Key Secondary Efficacy Objective: To evaluate the change from baseline to Day 42 in DGM4 positive patients with TRD treated with liafensine vs placebo on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI S)

Other Secondary Efficacy Objective: To evaluate the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI I) at Day 42 in DGM4 positive patients with TRD treated with liafensine vs placebo

Safety Objective: To compare the safety and tolerability of liafensine vs placebo in all randomized patients with TRD who received at least one dose of study drug during double blind treatment

Psychiatric assessments were performed by a psychiatrist or trained and certified clinical staff member. Neurologic assessments were performed by an experienced clinician. Patients who fulfilled Hy's Law, defined as ALT or AST ≥ 3 × ULN and TBL ≥ 2 × ULN, in the absence of significant increase in ALP and in the absence of an alternative diagnosis that explained the increase in total bilirubin, were discontinued, with medical follow up as appropriate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Treatment Resistant Depression

Keywords

  • TRD, Treatment Resistant Depression
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 197 is above the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Denovo Biopharma LLC is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provide signed informed consent which includes pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing.
  2. Have a diagnosis of MDD without psychotic features, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria, based on clinical assessment and confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
  3. Have a history of TRD within the past 5 years as documented by the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ) (5-year version). That is, within the past 5 years study participants must have had a clinically meaningful inadequate response (estimated \< 50% improvement per Investigator/patient consensus and documented by the Investigator) to at least two treatment courses with antidepressant regimens. These must involve at least two different pharmacologic treatment classes* and have been given at accepted therapeutic doses for an adequate duration (at least 6 weeks). One of these treatment failures must have occurred within the current episode.

    *Note: Non-pharmacological treatment (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, acupuncture) are not counted as treatment regimen.

  4. To be eligible, patients must have DGM4 genotype results obtained from the designated Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) lab, and all eligible DGM4-positive patients and about 20% DGM4-negative patients will be randomly included by an IRT system in order to achieve the appropriate randomization ratio of DGM4-positive vs negative patients.
  5. Pregnancy conception limitations

    • Female patients must be postmenopausal or surgically sterile or, if of childbearing potential and the partner is not vasectomized (6 months minimum), must agree to use a medically acceptable form of contraception from the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF) through at least 60 days following the last administration of study drug. If only the barrier method is used, a double barrier must be employed. Postmenopausal women must have had ≥ 24 months of spontaneous amenorrhea. Surgically sterile women are defined as those who have had a hysterectomy, bilateral ovariectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation. All women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test result before administration of study drug.
    • Male patients must be biologically incapable of having children (eg, vasectomized) or must agree to use the above forms of birth control for themselves and their partner from the time of signing the informed consent form through at least 120 days following the last administration of study drug.
  6. Be fluent in the local language.
  7. Male or female aged 18 to 70, inclusive, at time of enrollment.
  8. Have a HAMD-17 total score ≥ 21 at screening.
  9. Be willing to discontinue the use of antidepressant drugs (including over-the-counter medications to treat depression [eg, St John's Wort]) at least 5 half-lives (or at least 1 week for herbal or other over-the-counter medications for depression) prior to baseline (Day -1). For fluoxetine, a washout period of at least 3 weeks for ≤ 20 mg/day and at least 4 weeks for > 20 mg/day is required.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior participation in a study with liafensine
  2. Used any investigational drug product, device, or biologic within 6 months or five half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to baseline (Day -1).
  3. A positive pregnancy test result or currently breastfeeding.
  4. Clinically significant illness (including chronic, persistent, or acute infection), medical/surgical procedure, or trauma within 30 days prior to screening or between screening and baseline (Day 1) as determined by the investigator.
  5. A history or presence of a clinically significant hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, endocrine, respiratory, immunologic, hematologic, dermatologic, or neurologic abnormality, or any other condition, that in the investigator's opinion, represent potential risk to the patient's safety, full participation in the study, or affect the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of liafensine.
  6. Presence of autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, untreated hepatitis C, active hepatitis B, or any other uncontrolled or unstable liver disease according to local guidance.
  7. Uncontrolled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection according to local guidance.
  8. Uncontrolled abnormal thyroid function according to local guidance.
  9. One or more clinical laboratory evaluations are outside the reference range, at screening, that are in the investigator's opinion, of potential risk to the patient's safety.
  10. Has at the Screening Visit:

    • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels > 1.5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening.
    • Total bilirubin (TBL) > 2 mg/dL (34.2 μmol/L) at screening, unless there is an explained indirect hyperbilirubinemia, eg, Gilbert's syndrome.
    • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 1.5x the ULN at screening. Note: Laboratory tests can be repeated to see if values return to normal range, but any such laboratory abnormality must be resolved by the Baseline Visit (Day -1).
  11. Clinically significant vital sign abnormality at screening. This includes, but is not limited to, the following, in the supine (after at least 5 min rest) and standing (after 1 min and 3 min standing): systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg; or heart rate \< 50 or > 90 beats per minute. If the initial blood pressure is ≥ 140/90 mmHg, the lowest value from up to 3 additional attempts, which also must not be ≥ 140/90 mmHg, should be used. Patients with symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, at the discretion of investigator, will be excluded.
  12. Corrected QT interval measurement according to the Fridericia rule (QTcF) > 450 msec for men and > 470 msec for women during controlled rest at screening, or history of long-QT syndrome.
  13. ECGs containing any of the following readings:

    • Left bundle branch block
    • Right bundle branch block with QRS duration > 140 ms
    • Intraventricular conduction defect with QRS duration > 140 ms
    • Long QT syndrome
  14. History of seizure, other than childhood febrile seizures.
  15. History of clinically significant head trauma, including closed head injury with loss of consciousness, that is, in the opinion of the investigator, likely to affect central nervous system function.
  16. History of clinically significant symptomatic orthostatic hypotension (ie, postural syncope).
  17. History of narrow angle glaucoma.
  18. History of cancer within 2 years prior to screening or between screening and baseline (Day -1), except for non-metastatic basal and/or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
  19. Use of prescription or nonprescription medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), narcolepsy, or cognitive enhancement (eg, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, modafinil, ginkgo biloba, and huperzine A) within 30 days prior to screening or between screening and baseline (Day -1).
  20. Regular consumption of (eg, more days than not) excessive quantities of xanthine-containing beverages (eg, more than five cups of coffee or the equivalent per day) within 30 days prior to screening or between screening and baseline (Day -1).
  21. Urine drug screen (UDS) positive for a drug of abuse, with the exception of cannabis in countries where it is legally available (see Table 3 for list of drugs of abuse). Where legal, prior use of cannabis is permitted provided the patient agrees to abstain from smoking or ingesting cannabis or cannabis products during the study.
  22. Use of potent inducers of CYP3A4 (eg, rifampin, rifabutin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or phenobarbital) within 2 weeks prior to baseline (Day-1).
  23. Current diagnosis or history of a psychotic disorder, MDD with psychotic features, manic or hypomanic episode of bipolar or related disorders.
  24. Current diagnosis of anxiety disorder (if primary), post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (if primary), intellectual disability (DSM-5 diagnostic code 319), borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, or narcissistic personality disorder according to the DSM-5 criteria, or any other psychiatric or neurologic disorder or symptom due to a general medical condition, that, in the judgement of the investigator, could pose undue risk to the patient or compromise the study.
  25. Hospitalized or discharged from psychiatric ward within 8 weeks prior to the screening visit and planned hospitalization for any condition(s) during the study.
  26. Moderate or severe alcohol use disorder or other substance use disorder (except nicotine or caffeine), within 6 months prior to screening, according to the DSM-5 criteria.
  27. Significant risk of suicide determined by:

    1. Acute suicidality as evidenced by answering "yes" to Question 5 ("In the Past Year") on the C-SSRS, indicating active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent for suicide, at screening, or baseline (Day -1); or
    2. History of suicidal behavior as indicated by a "yes" response on the Suicidal Behavior section of the C-SSRS ("In the past year") or
    3. A score ≥ 5 on Item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the MADRS at screening or baseline (Day -1); or
    4. Has attempted suicide within 6 months prior to the initial screening visit.
  28. Previous allogenic bone marrow transplant.
  29. Received non-leukocyte-depleted whole blood transfusion within 4 months prior to PGx testing at Screening.
  30. Currently employed by the sponsor or by a clinical trial site participating in this study, or a first-degree relative of an employee of the sponsor or of an employee at a participating clinical trial site.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
197 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liafensine 1mg

    Patients with TRD were treated with liafensine 1 mg QD for 6 weeks.

    Drug: Liafensine

  • Experimental
    Liafensine 2mg

    Patients with TRD were treated with liafensine 2 mg QD for 6 weeks.

    Drug: Liafensine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Patients with TRD were treated with placebo 1 mg QD for 6 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLiafensine

    Liafensine

    Also known as: DB104

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 42, in DGM4-positive Patients

    The primary objective of this study was change of Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score (range = 0 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) in DGM4 positive patients who were treated with liafensine versus placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 42

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Day 42 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) Score in DGM4 Positive Patients

    The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to Day 42 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale CGI-S score (range = 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater illness) in DGM4 positive patients.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 42

  2. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) (Range = 1-7, With Higher Score Indicating Worsening) Was Assessed in DGM4 Positive Patients

    To evaluate the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI I) (range = 1-7, with higher score indicating worsening) at Day 42 in DGM4 positive patients with TRD treated with liafensine vs placebo

    Time frame: 42 days

07

Results

Posted May 15, 2025

Participant flow

Intent to treat (ITT) population 196 (65 participants in Liafensine 1mg arm, 64 patients in Liafensine 2mg arm, and 67 patients in placebo arm). Total 197 patients were initially randomized, but one patient was not dosed.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLiafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlacebo
Started656567
Intent to treat (itt): all patients who took at least one dose656467
Dgm4positive analysis set: patients who took at least 1 dose study drug & had an efficacy evaluation626163
Completed614952
Not completed41615

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 42, in DGM4-positive Patients

The primary objective of this study was change of Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score (range = 0 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression) in DGM4 positive patients who were treated with liafensine versus placebo.

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 42
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 42, in DGM4-positive Patients
Units on a ScaleLiafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgLiafensine 1mg or 2 mgPlacebo
Change in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 42, in DGM4-positive Patients-15.4 ± 1.25-15.5 ± 1.30-15.4 ± 0.90-11.0 ± 1.31
Statistical analysis
  • Liafensine 1mg or 2 mg vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0056 · Ls mean difference: -4.4 · 95% CI -7.6 to -1.3mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with imputation based on the missing at random (MAR) assumption was used.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Day 42 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) Score in DGM4 Positive Patients

The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to Day 42 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale CGI-S score (range = 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater illness) in DGM4 positive patients.

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 42
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Day 42 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) Score in DGM4 Positive Patients
Units on a scaleLiafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgLiafensine 1mg or 2mgPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Day 42 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) Score in DGM4 Positive Patients-1.5 ± 0.15-1.5 ± 0.16-1.5 ± 0.11-1.1 ± 0.15
Statistical analysis
  • Liafensine 1mg or 2mg vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0189
SecondaryThe Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) (Range = 1-7, With Higher Score Indicating Worsening) Was Assessed in DGM4 Positive Patients

To evaluate the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI I) (range = 1-7, with higher score indicating worsening) at Day 42 in DGM4 positive patients with TRD treated with liafensine vs placebo

Time frame:
42 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) (Range = 1-7, With Higher Score Indicating Worsening) Was Assessed in DGM4 Positive Patients
units on a scaleLiafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgLiafensine 1mg and 2mgPlacebo
The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) (Range = 1-7, With Higher Score Indicating Worsening) Was Assessed in DGM4 Positive Patients2.3 ± 0.882.4 ± 1.082.3 ± 0.972.9 ± 1.28
Statistical analysis
  • Liafensine 1mg and 2mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0026

Adverse events

Collected over 42 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Liafensine 1mg0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)36/65 (55.4%)
Liafensine 2mg1/64 (1.6%)3/64 (4.7%)37/64 (57.8%)
Placebo0/67 (0%)2/67 (3%)38/67 (56.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLiafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlacebo
DepressionPsychiatric disorders0/650/642/67
Ankle FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/651/640/67
Hip FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/651/640/67
Rib FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/651/640/67
Abortion SpontaneousPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/651/640/67
Intestinal HaematomaVascular disorders0/651/640/67
DeathGeneral disorders0/651/640/67
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventLiafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlacebo
HeadachNervous system disorders20/6514/6415/67
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders11/655/647/67
DizzinessNervous system disorders8/652/645/67
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders7/656/640/67
SomnolenceNervous system disorders5/656/641/67
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/656/642/67
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/655/643/67
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders5/650/640/67
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders5/650/642/67
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/653/645/67

Baseline characteristics

Intent to treat (ITT) population is equal to196 (65 participants in liafensine 1mg arm, 64 patients in liafensine 2mg arm, and 67 patients in placebo arm), which is including all patients who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Total of 197 patients were initially randomized and one randomized patient was not dosed.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Liafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years556062177
>=65 years104519
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Liafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlaceboTotal
Mean43.6 ± 15.4742.2 ± 13.9643.9 ± 14.8143.2 ± 14.71
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Liafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlaceboTotal
Female414536122
Male24193174
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Liafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlaceboTotal
Asian33323297
Black or African American1023
white31323295
other0011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Liafensine 1mgLiafensine 2mgPlaceboTotal
United States30333295
Canada3036
China32313295
08

Study locations

45 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • Alea Research
    Phoenix, Arizona 85012, United States
  • Collaborative Neuroschience Research, LLC
    Garden Grove, California 92845, United States
  • Behavioral Research Specialists, LLC
    Glendale, California 91206, United States
  • Sunwise Clinical Research, LLC.
    Lafayette, California 94549, United States
  • Excell Research
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Anderson Clinical Reseach
    Redlands, California 92374, United States
  • Schuster Medical Research Institute
    Sherman Oaks, California 91403, United States
  • Collaborative Neuroscience Research, LLC
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Pacific Clinical Research Management Group
    Upland, California 91786, United States
  • Clinical Research of Brandon, LLC
    Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • Access Research Institute
    Brooksville, Florida 34613, United States
  • The Medicine Medical Research
    Hollywood, Florida 33121, United States
  • Nuovida Research Center
    Miami, Florida 33145, United States
  • SG Research, LLC
    Miami, Florida 33145, United States
  • Aqualane Clinical Research
    Naples, Florida 34105, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Orlando, Florida 32801, United States
  • CenExel Atlanta Center for Medical Research
    Atlanta, Georgia 30331, United States
  • Psych Atlanta, PC
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Revive Research Institute, Inc
    Elgin, Illinois 60123, United States
  • Ascension Via Christi Research, a division of Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita, Inc.
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Pharmasite Research, Inc.
    Baltimore, Maryland 21208, United States
  • CBH Health LLC
    Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877, United States
  • Boston Clinical Trials & Medical Research
    Boston, Massachusetts 02131, United States
  • Neurobehavioral Medicine Group
    Bloomfield, Michigan 48302, United States
  • Alivation Research, LLC
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68526, United States
  • Altea Research Institute, Las Vegas
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, United States
  • Hassman Research Institute
    Marlton, New Jersey 08053, United States
  • Global Medical Institutes, LLC
    Princeton, New Jersey 08510, United States
  • Global Medical Institutes, LLC
    Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
  • Bio Behavior Health
    Toms River, New Jersey 08755, United States
  • IMA Clinical Research
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109, United States
  • Zucker Hillside Hospital
    Glen Oaks, New York 11004, United States
  • The Ohio State University Department of Psychiatry
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Lehigh Center for Clinical Research, LLC
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • Global Medical Institutes, LLC
    Moosic, Pennsylvania 18507, United States
  • FutureSearch Trials of Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • InSite Clinical Research
    DeSoto, Texas 75115, United States
  • North Texas Clinical Trials
    Fort Worth, Texas 76014, United States
  • University of Texas Medical School at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
  • Core Clinical Research
    Everett, Washington 98201, United States
  • OCT Research ULC
    Kelowna, British Columbia V1Y 1Z9, Canada
  • AMNDX Inc.
    Markham, Ontario L3R 1A3, Canada
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B1M4, Canada
  • CAMH-Russell Street Site 250 College Street
    Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 29, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 18, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05113771
Lead sponsor
Denovo Biopharma LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2021
Start date
Jun 29, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2024
Completion
Mar 5, 2024
Results posted
May 15, 2025
Last update
May 15, 2025

Study contacts

Matthew A Spear, M.D.
study director · Denovo Biopharma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion