ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05101161Updated Sep 14, 2026

Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes

An interventional study of Neurofeedback in Parkinson Disease, Epilepsy and Essential Tremor, sponsored by ETH Zurich. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by ETH Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2021; still recruiting 5 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a gold-standard symptomatic treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD) and is also explored for a variety of other neurological disorders. The implantation of electrodes into deep brain areas has not only enabled the application of electrical stimuli, but has also provided researchers and clinicians with an unprecedented window to investigate aberrant neuronal activity right at the core of pathological brain circuits. Local field potentials (LFP) have already been readily investigated through externalised DBS electrode wires prior to internalisation and connection to an implantable neurostimulator. In the case of PD, motor symptoms have been evidenced to correlate with exaggerated beta oscillatory activity (13-35 Hz) in the LFP recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Firstly, beta activity recorded in the STN at rest in patients withdrawn from their medication has been correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) across patients. Secondly, a reduction of signal power in the beta-band was correlated with clinical improvements of motor symptoms. Thirdly, the two main therapeutic strategies, the administration of L-Dopa, and high-frequency DBS both lead to a suppression of beta-synchronicity in the STN. Furthermore, beta-oscillations show fast and movement-dependent modulation over time and can serve as a biomarker and feedback signal to control the delivery of DBS. The investigators recently implemented deep brain electrical neurofeedback to provide real-time visual neurofeedback of pathological STN oscillations through externalised DBS electrodes and showed that PD patients were able to volitionally control and reduce subthalamic activity within a single 1 hour session. Moreover, neurofeedback-learnt strategies accelerated movements and could be retained in the short- and mid-term. Only recently, a newly developed neurostimulator, the Percept™ PC (Medtronic Neurological Division, Minneapolis, MN, USA), has been clinically approved, which can not only apply electrical impulses, but also enable the measurement and transmission of brain activity. This neurostimulator is now the first choice for implantations at the University Hospital Zurich and is used for a variety of neurological disorders. The investigators' goal is to investigate whether neurofeedback through a fully implanted deep brain stimulation device is possible and can lead to a better control of pathological oscillations as well as symptom mitigation. Having shown that endogenous control over deep brain oscillations is possible, the investigators will also test this novel therapeutic approach for pathologies other than PD that are also treated with DBS. Neurofeedback using implanted DBS electrodes will have the advantage of enabling longer and multiple-day training sessions, which the investigators hypothesise to have a larger impact on control over pathological deep brain oscillations and neurological symptoms, as such a fully implanted neurofeedback system no longer requires the externalisation of DBS wires and is as such no longer limited to the first two days after electrode implantation. All in all, the investigators will not exceed a total streaming time of 7 hours per patients (7 d of battery time), which the investigators deem justifiable with respect to a battery life of > 5 years. This proposed research is highly significant as it will help our understanding of various neurological diseases that are highly prevalent in society (PD being, for instance, the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease) and might culminate in novel, endogenous treatment strategies. The overall risk for patients is minimal to non-existent, as stimulation parameters are unaffected and the intended changes in brain activity are self-induced while DBS stimulation is off.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease
  • Epilepsy
  • Essential Tremor
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is above the median of 40 across 3,353 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

ETH Zurich is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

patients undergoing clinically indicated implantation of a Percept™ PC neurostimulator, age ≥ 18 years as well as planned hospitalisation of ≥ 3 days after operation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

minimal prognosticated survival of less than 1 year, reduced state of consciousness (i. e. Glasgow Coma Scale \< 15), inability to communicate (in terms of hearing, seeing, speaking and understanding), other significant concomitant diseases (e. g. cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, isolation), inability to follow procedures, insufficient knowledge of project language, inability to give consent and unlikeliness to follow protocol.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bidirectional Neurofeedback

    Behavioral: Neurofeedback

Interventions

  • BehavioralNeurofeedback

    Modulating brain oscillations based on visual neurofeedback

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Amount of endogenous neuromodulation (difference in oscillatory power)

    The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation). Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions \[unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations\].

    Time frame: 60 Minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. performance in motor activity tasks

    The investigators will assess the 'performance in motor activity tasks' (= name of the measurement) using the measurement tools of wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and motion detectors. The following units of measure (physiological parameters) could be extracted from the recorded data: speed of movement, smoothness of movement, extent of movement.

    Time frame: 60 min

  2. transfer of neurofeedback-learnt strategies

    The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation) in the ABSENCE of active neurofeedback. Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions \[unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations\].

    Time frame: 60 min

  3. agency as measured on a visual scale (1-10)

    the subjectively perceived ability to control deep brain oscillatory activity. Patients will be asked to indicate the perceived ability (agency) to control the neurofeedback parameter on a visual scale from 0 (no control) to 10 (perfect control).

    Time frame: 60 min

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05101161
Lead sponsor
ETH Zurich
Responsible party
Oliver Bichsel (Principal Investigator, ETH Zurich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2021
Start date
Sep 23, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 23, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 23, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Oliver Bichsel, MD, MSc ETH
Contact
oliver.bichsel@hest.ethz.ch
+41 44 510 72 34
Oliver Bichsel, MD, MSc ETH
principal investigator · ETH Zurich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion