CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05095363Updated May 12, 2023

Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner)

An interventional study of PCplanner in Interstitial Lung Disease and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-12.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and evidence for clinical impact of a mobile app-based program called Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) in addressing needs and promoting advance care planning discussions among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and their clinicians.

Read the detailed description

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects roughly 6.3 to 76 per 100,000 people of predominantly older adult patients worldwide and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with such idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis suffer symptom burdens similar to patients with cancer and commonly experience long, costly hospitalizations that often include care in an intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the presence of numerous unmet needs, ILD patients uncommonly receive palliative care because of lack of symptom recognition, supports to provide advanced care planning (ACP) and symptom control, and processes to promote collaboration between primary teams and palliative care specialists to deliver the appropriate level of care. To address this important clinical gap, we propose adapting our existing needs-targeted PCplanner (Palliative Care planner) mobile app platform to the outpatient setting. PCplanner Outpatient will allow patients to report their needs, provide video content to stimulate knowledge of and discussion about more advanced care planning, and assist primary physicians in recognizing the optimal timing of specialist palliative care referral.

02

Conditions studied

  • Interstitial Lung Disease
  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

  • palliative care
  • advance care planning
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient has diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
  • Patient has GAP (gender, age, physiology) index score ≥ 4
  • Patient is established in interstitial lung disease clinic (i.e., has had at least 1 previous clinic visit)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient lacks fluency in English sufficient to complete study surveys
  • Patient is already seeing palliative care or enrolled in hospice
  • NEST score \<10 at baseline T1
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PCplanner mobile app platform

    Participants who are randomized to the intervention arm will complete surveys at 3 timepoints and will be given resources on advance care planning via PCplanner, the mobile app platform. They will receive a telephone call by the study team about a week after enrollment to answer any questions about the resources provided. If needs and questions are not resolved quickly after the clinic visit, then another layer of patient support with a telephone call by a palliative care specialist will be provided to the participant to help develop potential management plans.

    Behavioral: PCplanner

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    Participants who are randomized to the usual care arm will complete surveys at 3 timepoints and receive usual care by pulmonary clinician.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPCplanner

    A mobile app platform that will display participant survey results to clinicians to facilitate communication on specific needs as well as provide resources on advance care planning to participants.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of intervention

    Number of participants who stated intervention was easy to use as measured by patient survey.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  2. Acceptability of intervention

    Number of participants who stated they were satisfied with the intervention as measured by patient survey.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  3. Completion of intervention

    Number of participants who completed all three surveys and intervention telephone visits.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  4. Change in Needs; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale

    Scale ranges from 0 to 130 with lower score indicates less unmet needs and higher score indicates more unmet needs on issues such as communication, symptoms, social support, and financial stress.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  5. Documentation of advance care planning in electronic health record

    Includes all or any of the following: code status, healthcare power of attorney, advance directive

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Needs; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale

    Scale ranges from 0 to 130 with lower score indicates less unmet needs and higher score indicates more unmet needs on issues such as communication, symptoms, social support, and financial stress.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  2. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score

    Score ranges from 0 to 27 with lower score indicates no or mild depression and higher score indicates more severe depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  3. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score

    Score ranges from 0 to 27 with lower score indicates no or mild depression and higher score indicates more severe depression.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  4. Change in General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score

    Score ranges from 0 to 21 with lower score indicates no or mild anxiety and higher score indicates more severe generalized anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  5. Change in General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score

    Score ranges from 0 to 21 with lower score indicates no or mild anxiety and higher score indicates more severe generalized anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  6. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-10 (PHQ-10) score

    Scores range from 0 to 20 with lower score indicates less bothersome symptoms and higher score indicates more bothersome symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  7. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-10 (PHQ-10) score

    Scores range from 0 to 20 with lower score indicates less bothersome symptoms and higher score indicates more bothersome symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  8. Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score

    Scores generally range from 0 (poor quality of life) to 1 (best quality of life possible)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  9. Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score

    Scores generally range from 0 (poor quality of life) to 1 (best quality of life possible)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  10. Change in Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (QOL VAS)

    Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicates worse imaginable quality of life and higher score indicates better imaginable quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  11. Change in Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (QOL VAS)

    Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicates worse imaginable quality of life and higher score indicates better imaginable quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

  12. Change in Therapeutic Alliance score

    Score ranges from 16 to 64 with lower score indicates lower perceived alliance between patient and their provider and higher score indicates better therapeutic alliance.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  13. Change in Therapeutic Alliance score

    Score ranges from 16 to 64 with lower score indicates lower perceived alliance between patient and their provider and higher score indicates better therapeutic alliance.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 16

Other outcomes

  1. Number of hospitalizations during study

    Admission to a hospital abstracted from electronic health record

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  2. Referral to palliative care specialist during study

    Referral to palliative care specialist during study abstracted from electronic health record

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  3. Referral to hospice during study

    Referral to inpatient or home hospice during study abstracted from electronic health record

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Olson A, Hartmann N, Patnaik P, Wallace L, Schlenker-Herceg R, Nasser M, Richeldi L, Hoffmann-Vold AM, Cottin V. Estimation of the Prevalence of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review and Data from a Physician Survey. Adv Ther. 2021 Feb;38(2):854-867. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01578-6. Epub 2020 Dec 14. PubMed 33315170 ↗
  • Moens K, Higginson IJ, Harding R; EURO IMPACT. Are there differences in the prevalence of palliative care-related problems in people living with advanced cancer and eight non-cancer conditions? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):660-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 May 5. PubMed 24801658 ↗
  • Gore JM, Brophy CJ, Greenstone MA. How well do we care for patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparison of palliative care and quality of life in COPD and lung cancer. Thorax. 2000 Dec;55(12):1000-6. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.12.1000. PubMed 11083884 ↗
  • Au DH, Udris EM, Fihn SD, McDonell MB, Curtis JR. Differences in health care utilization at the end of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and patients with lung cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):326-31. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.3.326. PubMed 16476873 ↗
  • Bausewein C, Booth S, Gysels M, Kuhnbach R, Haberland B, Higginson IJ. Understanding breathlessness: cross-sectional comparison of symptom burden and palliative care needs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer. J Palliat Med. 2010 Sep;13(9):1109-18. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0068. PubMed 20836635 ↗
  • Bajwah S, Higginson IJ, Ross JR, Wells AU, Birring SS, Patel A, Riley J. Specialist palliative care is more than drugs: a retrospective study of ILD patients. Lung. 2012 Apr;190(2):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9355-7. Epub 2012 Jan 5. PubMed 22218887 ↗
  • Rabow MW, Dibble SL, Pantilat SZ, McPhee SJ. The comprehensive care team: a controlled trial of outpatient palliative medicine consultation. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 12;164(1):83-91. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.1.83. PubMed 14718327 ↗
  • Higginson IJ, Bausewein C, Reilly CC, Gao W, Gysels M, Dzingina M, McCrone P, Booth S, Jolley CJ, Moxham J. An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec;2(12):979-87. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70226-7. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed 25465642 ↗
  • Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ryu JH, Tomassetti S, Lee JS, Poletti V, Buccioli M, Elicker BM, Jones KD, King TE Jr, Collard HR. A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):684-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00004. PubMed 22586007 ↗
  • Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ley B, Lee JS, Mooney JJ, Jones KD, Elicker BM, Wolters PJ, Koth LL, King TE Jr, Collard HR. Predicting survival across chronic interstitial lung disease: the ILD-GAP model. Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):723-728. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1474. PubMed 24114524 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05095363
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2021
Start date
Mar 16, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2023
Completion
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
May 12, 2023

Study contacts

Christopher Cox, MD
principal investigator · Duke Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion