CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05089175HDP-RPPUpdated Dec 2, 2021

The Investigation of the Prediction Model and Prevention Strategy of Serious Pregnancy Complications in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Based on the Chinese Population

An observational study in Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy and Pregnancy Complications, sponsored by Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-02.

Sponsored by Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4,500
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

  1. Evaluation of the efficacy of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia and its serious complications during pregnancy and postpartum. 2. To establish a risk prediction model for severe pregnancy complications in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Read the detailed description

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is the second leading cause of maternal death in clinical practice. The prediction and prevention of HDP and its serious complications could be a breakthrough to further reduce the maternal mortality rate in China. Aspirin (ASP) is widely used clinically as a first-line prevention program for preeclampsia (PE). However, how to determine the effectiveness of ASP prevention before the onset of PE high-risk pregnant women and adjust the risk monitoring plan accordingly has become a clinical difficult point. Two prospective and observational researches will be lauched in this study. In the first part of this study, ASP resistance test and HDP-related biomarkers will be combined to evaluate the effect of ASP on the prevention of PE from multiple dimensions, and placental pathology will be analyzed to assist evaluate, in order to more comprehensively evaluate the preventive effect of aspirin in high-risk of PE pregnant women in the first and second trimester. In the second part of this study, we aim to reduce the incidence of serious HDP complications and improve maternal and child outcomes for pregnant women with HDP who have missed HDP prediction and prevention opportunities in the first trimester, or aspirin prevention is ineffective. It is planned to establish a risk prediction model for severe pregnancy complications in pregnant women with HDP by adding other biological and physical indicators on the basis of maternal factors, in order to more accurately predict one or several severe complications of HDP over a period of time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications

Keywords

  • Risk prediction
  • Preeclampsia Prevention
  • Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
03

In context

Toxemia

936 studies on the registry are indexed under Toxemia; 155 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 4,500 is above the median of 144 across 460 observational studies indexed under Toxemia.

Browse Toxemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Part I: Evaluation of the efficacy of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia and severe pregnancy complications 1.11-13 + 6 gestational weeks; 2.≥18 years old; 3. Monocyesis, fetal survival; 4. Agree to participate and sign the informed consent. Part II: The establishment of a risk prediction model for severe pregnancy complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 1.20-36 + 6 gestational weeks 2. Diagnosed ≥1 of the following diseases ① Hypertension during pregnancy ② Preeclampsia ③ Pregnancy complicated with chronic hypertension ④ Chronic hypertension with preeclampsia 3.≥18 years old; 4. Monocyesis, fetal survival; 5. Agree to participate and sign the informed consent.

-

Exclusion Criteria:Part I: Evaluation of the efficacy of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia and severe pregnancy complications 1. Twin or multiple pregnancies; 2. Severe fetal malformation/abnormality; 3. Routine aspirin use before enrollment; 4. Have a history of aspirin contraindications, such as salicylic acid allergy, ulcerative disease of the digestive tract, and bleeding, liver cirrhosis, kidney failure, platelet count \< 50 x 109 / L, hematocrit \< 10%, hemophilia, congenital platelet disease, fibrinogen defects, or shortage, taking other antiplatelet agents except for aspirin, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs or the use of warfarin. 5. Patients who have been diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; 6. Severe mental disorder and inability to express will; 7. If she has obvious other abnormal physical signs, laboratory tests, and other clinical diseases, she is not suitable to participate in the study as judged by the researcher; 8. According to the researcher's judgment, childbirth information could not be obtained through observation and follow-up. Part II: The establishment of a risk prediction model for severe pregnancy complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 1. Twin or multiple pregnancies; 2. Severe fetal malformation/abnormality; 3.Severe mental disorder and inability to express will; 4.If she has obvious other abnormal physical signs, laboratory tests, and other clinical diseases, she is not suitable to participate in the study as judged by the researcher; 5. According to the researcher's judgment, childbirth information could not be obtained through observation and follow-up.

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4,500 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
29 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Women at high risk for preeclampsia

    Using FIGO recommended preeclampsia screening model for the first-trimester which combined maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure, placental growth factor, uterine artery pulsatility index to evaluate pregnant's risk for preeclampsia. Risk value≥1/100 is defined as screened high risk.

    Drug: Low-dose aspirin

  • Women at low risk for preeclampsia

    Using FIGO recommended preeclampsia screening model for the first-trimester which combined maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure, placental growth factor, uterine artery pulsatility index to evaluate pregnant's risk for preeclampsia. Risk value\<1/100 is defined as screened low risk.

Interventions

  • DrugLow-dose aspirin

    FIGO adopts and supports that in high-risk women, defined by the first-trimester combined test, aspirin \~150 mg/night should be commenced at 11-14+6 weeks of gestation until either 36 weeks of gestation, when delivery occurs, or when pre-eclampsia is diagnosed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number diagnosed with pre-eclampsia

    According to the ISSHP, PE is defined as systolic blood pressure at ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure at ≥90 mm Hg on at least two occasions measured 4 hours apart in previously normotensive women and is accompanied by one or more of the following new onset conditions at or after 20 weeks of gestation: 1. Proteinuria (i.e. ≥30 mg/mol protein:creatinine ratio; ≥300 mg/24 hour; or ≥2 + dipstick); 2. Evidence of other maternal organ dysfunction, including: acute kidney injury (creatinine ≥90 μmol/L; 1 mg/dL); liver involvement (elevated transaminases, e.g. alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase \>40 IU/L) with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain; neurological complications ; or hematological complications ; or 3. Uteroplacental dysfunction .

    Time frame: After 20th week of gestation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of women with adverse outcomes

    Maternal deaths Eclampsia ,Stroke, Parenteral infusion of third-line antihypertensive required,Myocardial infarction ,Blood oxygen saturation \<90% ,Intubation required ,Pulmonary oedema ,Transfusion of blood products required,Platelet count \<50× 10⁹ platelets per L,Hepatic dysfunction 1 ,Severe acute kidney injury 7 ,Dialysis required ,Placental abruption,Primary diagnosis,Pre-eclampsia ,Superimposed pre-eclampsia,Gestational hypertension,Gestational proteinuria, Small-for-gestational-age infant only,Chronic hypertension only,Chronic hypertension with a small-for-gestational-age infant,Renal disease,Transient hypertension,None of the above,Subsequent diagnosis of pre-eclampsia by adjudication team,Number with pre-eclampsia, diagnosed by adjudication,Severe pre-eclampsia,Time to diagnosis of pre-eclampsia

    Time frame: After 20th week of gestation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, Kapur A, Hadar E, Divakar H, McAuliffe F, da Silva Costa F, von Dadelszen P, McIntyre HD, Kihara AB, Di Renzo GC, Romero R, D'Alton M, Berghella V, Nicolaides KH, Hod M. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12802. Erratum In: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Sep;146(3):390-391. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12892. PubMed 31111484 ↗
  • Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, O'Gorman N, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D, Singh M, Molina FS, Persico N, Jani JC, Plasencia W, Papaioannou G, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Meiri H, Gizurarson S, Maclagan K, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704559. Epub 2017 Jun 28. PubMed 28657417 ↗
  • von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Broughton Pipkin F, Cote AM, Douglas MJ, Gruslin A, Hutcheon JA, Joseph KS, Kyle PM, Lee T, Loughna P, Menzies JM, Merialdi M, Millman AL, Moore MP, Moutquin JM, Ouellet AB, Smith GN, Walker JJ, Walley KR, Walters BN, Widmer M, Lee SK, Russell JA, Magee LA; PIERS Study Group. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):219-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7. Epub 2010 Dec 23. PubMed 21185591 ↗
  • Navaratnam K, Alfirevic A, Jorgensen A, Alfirevic Z. Aspirin non-responsiveness in pregnant women at high-risk of pre-eclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Feb;221:144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.052. Epub 2018 Jan 1. PubMed 29304392 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05089175
Lead sponsor
Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2021
Start date
Nov 30, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2021

Study contacts

Baohua Li, Phd
Contact
lbh19787@zju.edu.cn
13777477364
Baohua Li, Phd
study director · Chief of obstetrics and gynecology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion