CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05081063Updated Aug 8, 2025Results posted

Low-Titer O Positive Whole Blood Versus Component Therapy for Emergent Transfusion in Trauma Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Routine labs in Hemorrhagic Shock, Acute Blood Loss Anemia and Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-08.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
199
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Adult male patients brought to the emergency department as Level A trauma activations who are receiving emergency blood transfusion.

Objectives

  1. Evaluate PRBC equivalents transfused in each group in the first 24 hours (Primary outcome)
  2. Evaluate total transfusion in each group in the first 24 hours (Secondary Outcome) including breakdown by FFP equivalents, platelet units, and cryoprecipitate
  3. Evaluate 6 hour, 24 hour, and hospital mortality (Secondary Outcome)
  4. Evaluate ICU outcomes in each group
Read the detailed description

Based on the results from Cotton et al, median transfusion in the component therapy group was 6 PRBC in the first 24 hours and 4 PRBC equivalents in the whole blood group. The standard deviation (estimated from the interquartile range) was approximately 4. Thus with an expectation of alpha = 0.05 and expected power of 90% to detect a similar 2 unit difference in transfusion volume, a sample size of 190 should be sufficient; thus projected sample size of 200 should be more than adequate. Age range will be 18 years and older, and only males will be included in the study. Expected racial/ethnic distribution will be approximately 60% white, 15% black, 8% Asian, and 18% other race. No actual recruitment will be performed; rather all qualifying patients will be included. Consent waiver is being requested.

b. Objectives

  1. Evaluate PRBC equivalents transfused in each group in the first 24 hours (Primary outcome)
  2. Evaluate total transfusion in each group in the first 24 hours (Secondary Outcome) including breakdown by FFP equivalents, platelet units, and cryoprecipitate
  3. Evaluate 6 hour, 24 hour, and hospital mortality (Secondary Outcome)
  4. Evaluate ICU outcomes in each group:

1. ICU length of stay 2. Ventilator days 3. SOFA score on day of ICU discharge 4. Presence of ARDS 5. Presence of TRALI 6. Presence of DVT/PE 7. Necessity for Dialysis 8. Necessity for Tracheostomy 9. Evaluate viscoelastic testing parameters in both groups when sent on arrival in ICU

1. Percentage of patients with EXTEM clotting time > 80 sec 2. Percentage of patients with EXTEM amplitude at 10 min \< 40mm and FIBTEM amplitude at 10 min ≤ 10mm 3. Percentage of patients with EXTEM amplitude at 10 min \< 40mm and FIBTEM amplitude at 10 min > 10mm 4. Percentage of patients with maximum thrombolysis > 15% 5. Interval analyses to be performed after 6 and 12 months with provision to continue the study out to 24 months.

1. Stopping rule: A statistically significant difference in hospital mortality at 6 months or 12 months

  1. If in favor of LTOWB, consideration of trial termination and making LTOWB the primary standard of care for all trauma patients receiving emergency transfusion except for child-bearing age females (unless Rh immunoglobulin can be administered)
  2. If in favor of component therapy, consideration of trial termination and making component therapy the primary standard care for all trauma patients receiving emergency transfusion
02

Conditions studied

  • Hemorrhagic Shock
  • Acute Blood Loss Anemia
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
03

In context

Shock, Hemorrhagic

78 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Hemorrhagic; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 199 is above the median of 100 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Hemorrhagic.

Browse Shock, Hemorrhagic studies →

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 297 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • all adult male patients brought into the emergency department as LEVEL A trauma activations who are receiving emergency blood transfusions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients (specifically excluded due to risk of alloimmunization of Rh-negative female patients of childbearing age against Rh-positive blood)
  • children
  • prisoners
  • all patients classified as dead upon arrival to the trauma bay
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
199 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low Titer O+ Whole Blood

    Low Titer O+ Whole blood provided to Level A trauma patients

    Combination Product: Routine labs

  • Active comparator
    Component Therapy

    Component Therapy of O+ pRBC and FFP dispatched to trauma bay for level A traumas

    Combination Product: Routine labs

Interventions

  • Combination productRoutine labs

    Routine labs will be performed with CBC, BMP, Fox screen, ROTEM viscoelastic test, PT/INR, PTT and venous lactate for standard of care for all patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Packed Red Blood Cells Equivalents Units Transfused (1 Whole Blood Unit Treated as 1 Packed Red Blood Cell Unit and 1 Fresh Frozen Plasma Unit)

    assessment of pRBC equivalents transfused in each arm, an increase in HGB by 1g/dl per unit transfused will be considered successful A blood draw of 5ml will be obtained and tested to assess HGB level. An increase in HGB by 1g/dl per unit transfused will be considered a successful result.

    Time frame: The total transfusion requirement of packed red blood cells was analyzed for the duration of the inpatient hospitalization for patients surviving at least 24 hours. This time is defined as a time period up to 30 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Assessment of mortality This is a composite measurement which includes the following in order to be assessed as pulseless with no respiratory drive or brain death: 1. there is no evidence of arousal or awareness to maximal external stimuli 2. pupils are fixed in a midsized or dilated position and non reactive to light 3. corneal, oculocephalic and oculovestibular reflexes are absent 4. There is no facial movement to noxious stimuli 5. the gag reflex is absent to bilateral posterior pharyngeal stimuli 6. the cough reflex is absent to deep tracheal suctioning 7. there is no brain mediated motor response to noxious stimuli of the limbs 8. spontaneous respirations are not observed when apnea test targets reach pH \<7.30 and PaCO2 \>60mmhg

    Time frame: In patients surviving at least 24 hours who were included in analysis of outcome measures, we assessed survival to hospital discharge. This means the duration of time in the hospital up to discharge with a maximum of 30 days.

07

Results

Posted Aug 8, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Sample size Difference between size of groups Pragmatic randomization scheme

Participant flow

Male highest-tier trauma activations randomized in 24 hour blocks

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLow Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent Therapy
Started52147
Completed52147
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPacked Red Blood Cells Equivalents Units Transfused (1 Whole Blood Unit Treated as 1 Packed Red Blood Cell Unit and 1 Fresh Frozen Plasma Unit)

assessment of pRBC equivalents transfused in each arm, an increase in HGB by 1g/dl per unit transfused will be considered successful A blood draw of 5ml will be obtained and tested to assess HGB level. An increase in HGB by 1g/dl per unit transfused will be considered a successful result.

Time frame:
The total transfusion requirement of packed red blood cells was analyzed for the duration of the inpatient hospitalization for patients surviving at least 24 hours. This time is defined as a time period up to 30 days.
Reported as:
Mean · units
Packed Red Blood Cells Equivalents Units Transfused (1 Whole Blood Unit Treated as 1 Packed Red Blood Cell Unit and 1 Fresh Frozen Plasma Unit)
unitsLow Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent Therapy
Packed Red Blood Cells Equivalents Units Transfused (1 Whole Blood Unit Treated as 1 Packed Red Blood Cell Unit and 1 Fresh Frozen Plasma Unit)3.8 ± 5.65.7 ± 6.2
SecondaryMortality

Assessment of mortality This is a composite measurement which includes the following in order to be assessed as pulseless with no respiratory drive or brain death: 1. there is no evidence of arousal or awareness to maximal external stimuli 2. pupils are fixed in a midsized or dilated position and non reactive to light 3. corneal, oculocephalic and oculovestibular reflexes are absent 4. There is no facial movement to noxious stimuli 5. the gag reflex is absent to bilateral posterior pharyngeal stimuli 6. the cough reflex is absent to deep tracheal suctioning 7. there is no brain mediated motor response to noxious stimuli of the limbs 8. spontaneous respirations are not observed when apnea test targets reach pH \<7.30 and PaCO2 \>60mmhg

Time frame:
In patients surviving at least 24 hours who were included in analysis of outcome measures, we assessed survival to hospital discharge. This means the duration of time in the hospital up to discharge with a maximum of 30 days.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality
ParticipantsLow Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent Therapy
Mortality413

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected through hospital discharge, meaning the duration of time in the hospital after the injury up to 30 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Low Titer O+ Whole Blood17/52 (32.7%)0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)
Component Therapy37/147 (25.2%)0/147 (0%)0/147 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

This population was all male given the safety constraints listed in the protocol. Baseline data was only collected for patients that survived 24 hours as this was the analyzed group as specified in the protocol.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Low Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent TherapyTotal
Mean39.9 ± 13.642.1 ± 16.941.5 ± 16.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Low Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent TherapyTotal
Female000
Male52147199
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Low Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent TherapyTotal
Count of participants——0
Injury severity score
Injury severity score(units on a scale)Low Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent TherapyTotal
Mean19.6 ± 11.719.3 ± 12.219.4 ± 12.0
Glasgow Coma Scale in ED
Glasgow Coma Scale in ED(units on a scale)Low Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent TherapyTotal
Median13.5 (3 to 15)14.0 (3 to 15)14 (3 to 15)
First systolic blood pressure in ED
First systolic blood pressure in ED(mm Hg)Low Titer O+ Whole BloodComponent TherapyTotal
Mean91.2 ± 50.498.4 ± 44.696.5 ± 46.2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Loma Linda University Health
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Williams J, Merutka N, Meyer D, Bai Y, Prater S, Cabrera R, Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Love JD, Cotton BA. Safety profile and impact of low-titer group O whole blood for emergency use in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):87-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002498. PubMed 31464874 ↗
  • Murphy C, Silva de Leonardi N. The use of low-titer group O whole blood is independently associated with improved survival compared to component therapy in adults with severe traumatic hemorrhage. Transfusion. 2021 Apr;61(4):1341-1342. doi: 10.1111/trf.16266. No abstract available. PubMed 33831229 ↗
  • Seheult JN, Anto V, Alarcon LH, Sperry JL, Triulzi DJ, Yazer MH. Clinical outcomes among low-titer group O whole blood recipients compared to recipients of conventional components in civilian trauma resuscitation. Transfusion. 2018 Aug;58(8):1838-1845. doi: 10.1111/trf.14779. Epub 2018 Aug 30. PubMed 30160310 ↗
  • Hanna K, Bible L, Chehab M, Asmar S, Douglas M, Ditillo M, Castanon L, Tang A, Joseph B. Nationwide analysis of whole blood hemostatic resuscitation in civilian trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Aug;89(2):329-335. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002753. PubMed 32744830 ↗
  • Cotton BA, Podbielski J, Camp E, Welch T, del Junco D, Bai Y, Hobbs R, Scroggins J, Hartwell B, Kozar RA, Wade CE, Holcomb JB; Early Whole Blood Investigators. A randomized controlled pilot trial of modified whole blood versus component therapy in severely injured patients requiring large volume transfusions. Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):527-32; discussion 532-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4ffa0. PubMed 23979267 ↗
  • Strada AM, Suarez G, Luo-Owen X, Tabrizi MB, Rosenthal MG, Stevens WT, Lum SS, Mukherjee K. Pragmatic O-Positive Whole-blood RandoMizaTion in male trauma Patients (POWeR-MTP). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 16;51(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02848-0. PubMed 40237834 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 25, 2021
  • Study protocol · Jul 17, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05081063
Lead sponsor
Loma Linda University
Responsible party
Kaushik Mukherjee (Head of Surgery, Trauma Division, Loma Linda University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 18, 2021
Start date
Mar 5, 2022
Primary completion
May 15, 2023
Completion
May 15, 2023
Results posted
Aug 8, 2025
Last update
Aug 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion