ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05056051Updated Apr 24, 2024

Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling in Endoscopic Eradication Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus

An interventional study of WATS-3D tissue sampling prior to forceps biopsies and WATS-3D tissue sampling following forceps biopsies in Barrett Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer, sponsored by Northwestern University. Status unknown at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-24.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2024), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2020, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Esophageal cancer is a deadly disease that is becoming increasingly common in the United States. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a pre-cancerous state that can develop into esophageal cancer, but is highly treatable. Progression of BE to esophageal cancer is still common due to missed diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus recurrence following treatment. Wide-Area Trans-Epithelial Sampling (WATS-3D) is a new technology that uses brush sampling to examine larger areas of the esophagus as compared to conventional biopsies. Preliminary studies show improved detection of cancerous changes in Barrett's esophagus surveillance. The investigators hope to see if the addition of WATS-3D increases the rate of detection of recurrent BE following treatment, which is of the utmost importance since it would allow for earlier re-treatment of disease and ultimately allow for prevention of progression to esophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Barrett's esophagus (BE) affects 5-15% of all patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and approximately 1-2% of the entire population. The stepwise progression of BE from intestinal metaplasia (IM) to dysplasia can ultimately lead to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There are over 15,000 cases of EAC diagnosed in the United States each year. Regardless of stage of disease at time of diagnosis, the 5-year survival for EAC is an abysmal 19%. Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) has been shown to be very effective in preventing progression of dysplastic BE to EAC with rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) > 90%. This is of paramount importance given the poor outcomes associated with the development of EAC.

Despite high success rates in achieving CE-IM, recent studies show that the recurrence of IM following CE-IM occurs with annual incidence of 8-10% and a 2-3% dysplasia rate per patient year of follow-up. The current paradigm of endoscopic surveillance following CE-IM focuses on random biopsies, which has raised concerns about sampling error and missed recurrence of IM and dysplasia leading to increased risk of interval development of EAC. New technologies, such as Wide-Area Trans-Epithelial Sampling (WATS-3D; CDx Diagnostics, Suffern, NY) have been studied to improve detection of dysplasia in BE. WATS-3D involves abrasive brush sampling of the esophagus that is then processed by a validated computer imaging system and subsequently reviewed by pathologist. Prior studies have shown increased dysplasia detection in routine BE surveillance with WATS-3D over standard biopsies, however there are no published data as to the additive value of WATS-3D for detection of recurrence of disease after endoscopic therapy.

Problem Statement:

Despite high success rates of successful eradication of BE with EET, recurrence rates are still high. Current Seattle Protocol biopsies for Post-EET surveillance is time-consuming, difficult to reproduce, and often misses IM recurrence putting patients at increased risk of developing EAC.

Hypothesis and Specific Aims:

The investigators hypothesize that the addition of WATS-3D to standard four-quadrant biopsies driven by HD-WLE and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) will increase the rate of detection of recurrence of IM and dysplasia in patients who have undergone EET. To that end, increased recurrent IM detection will allow for proper choice of repeat EET and decreased progression to EAC. The specific aims:

  1. To assess the additive diagnostic yield of WATS-3D sampling beyond that of standard biopsies for detection of IM or dysplasia (recurrence) in patients who have undergone EET for BE-related neoplasia.
  2. To assess the difference in additive diagnostic yield of WATS-3D sampling beyond that of standard biopsies between CE-IM as defined by a single exam without IM vs. >1 exam
  3. To assess the impact of order of tissue acquisition techniques on detection of recurrent IM or dysplasia (via randomization)

The proposed study will be a prospective multi-center design over 24 months. The participating centers will include Northwestern University, Washington University in St. Louis, University of Colorado and University of California, Los Angeles.

  • A total of 200 patients will be in enrolled in this prospective study. All patients who have completed EET with at least one endoscopy with biopsies demonstrating no evidence of IM will be eligible for enrollment in the study. Enrollment will occur in the setting of outpatient clinic visit or in the endoscopy lab. The PI or study coordinator will meet with the patient and discuss the study, its objectives, and expectations and informed consent will be obtained.
  • Enrolled subjects will have completed EET as per clinical standard of care within the framework of the following study design. Standard EET will be defined as resection of visible lesions and ablative therapy (either radio frequency ablation or cryo-therapy). Once complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) is achieved as defined as no recurrence of BE endoscopically or on forceps biopsies for at least a single EGD, patients will then undergo post-EET surveillance.
  • While adhering to standard post-EET surveillance endoscopy intervals, on a prospective basis, the investigators will add WATS-3D to the surveillance protocol. Each patient will be randomized to one of two groups. The first group will undergo biopsies with standard forceps first, followed by tissue sampling with WATS-3D. The second group will undergo tissue sampling with WATS-3D first, followed by biopsies with standard forceps. The forceps biopsies will then be examined by expert pathologists at each respective institution, while the WATS-3D samples will be evaluated at a central laboratory. Each surveillance endoscopy will follow current standard inspection with HD-WLE and NBI. Forceps biopsies will be obtained from: a) the gastric cardia, b) the new squamocolumnar junction, and c) targeted/neosquamous sampling of the original BE segment. WATS-3D brushing will be performed of the: a) squamocolumnar junction to include and visible islands and b) the neosquamous zone representative of the original BE segment. WATS-3D brushings will be taken in 5 cm esophageal segments of the neo-squamous mucosa.
  • All physicians will participate in a training session (virtual) which will discuss the use of WATS-3D and ensure all sampling is standardized.
  • Once a patient is randomized, all subsequent surveillance endoscopies will follow the same tissue sampling order. For instance, if a patient is assigned to the group that will undergo tissue sampling with WATS-3D first, followed by biopsies with standard forceps second, all surveillance endoscopies will follow sampling in this order. Patients will continue in the study for 2 consecutive endoscopies using this sampling protocol. All patients will be followed longitudinally for the duration of their endoscopy surveillance.
  • The investigators will then compare the detection of IM and dysplastic cells obtained via Seattle Protocol biopsies to WATS-3D obtained samples.
02

Conditions studied

  • Barrett Esophagus
  • Esophageal Cancer
03

In context

Barrett Esophagus

316 studies on the registry are indexed under Barrett Esophagus; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 61 across 190 interventional studies indexed under Barrett Esophagus.

Browse Barrett Esophagus studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,420 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 103 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 75 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients aged 18+ diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus with confirmed histologic dysplasia or intra-mucosal cancer undergoing surveillance after EET
  • Patients who have achieved CE-IM on at least one surveillance endoscopy following EET
  • All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients who are unable or unwilling to give consent will not be included in the study
  • All patients deemed to have refractory BE despite EET
  • Patients who are pregnant, vulnerable populations such as prisoners, life expectancy \< 1 year based on concurrent comorbidities, coagulopathy with INR > 1.5 that cannot be reversed, thrombocytopenia with platelets \< 125,000 that cannot be corrected with blood products, unable to safely undergo elective endoscopy due to current comorbidities, and inability to pass standard endoscope will not be included in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Post-EET Surveillance Group: WATS-3D samples followed by Forceps biopsies

    Sampling will occur with WATS-3D followed by forceps biopsies. For each patient, resection samples will be identified by the endoscopy method used to locate the sample as either HD-WLE/NBI or WATS-3D. For each method of detection, the highest grade of histology for each patient will be assigned based on the identified samples. Dysplasia detected on random biopsies will be attributed HD-WLE/NBI given it is part of the standard of care.

    Device: WATS-3D tissue sampling prior to forceps biopsies

  • Active comparator
    Post-EET Surveillance Group: Forceps biopsies followed by WATS-3D samples

    Sampling will occur with forceps biopsies followed by WATS-3D. For each patient, resection samples will be identified by the endoscopy method used to locate the sample as either HD-WLE/NBI or WATS-3D. For each method of detection, the highest grade of histology for each patient will be assigned based on the identified samples. Dysplasia detected on random biopsies will be attributed HD-WLE/NBI given it is part of the standard of care.

    Device: WATS-3D tissue sampling following forceps biopsies

Interventions

  • DeviceWATS-3D tissue sampling prior to forceps biopsies

    WATS-3D is a brush-based tissue sampling technique. Abrasive brush sampling of large areas of the esophagus pick up cells to obtain trans-epithelial specimens. This technique samples much larger tissue areas than standard forceps biopsies. Analysis is then done by proprietary neural-network based computer scanning and molecular diagnostics to identify abnormal cells.

  • DeviceWATS-3D tissue sampling following forceps biopsies

    WATS-3D is a brush-based tissue sampling technique. Abrasive brush sampling of large areas of the esophagus pick up cells to obtain trans-epithelial specimens. This technique samples much larger tissue areas than standard forceps biopsies. Analysis is then done by proprietary neural-network based computer scanning and molecular diagnostics to identify abnormal cells. This will be done after forceps biopsies in this arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the additive diagnostic yield as assessed by proportion of patients with recurrence be use of WATS-3D

    To assess the additive diagnostic yield of WATS-3D sampling beyond that of standard biopsies for detection of IM or dysplasia (recurrence) in patients who have undergone EET for BE-related neoplasia. The rates of recurrence as determined by the proportion of patients (percentage) deemed to have recurrence of BE on tissue sampling will be compared between samples obtained by WATS-3D vs forceps biopsies.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess if there is a difference in diagnostic yield of WATS-3D based on CE-IM definition between one and two or more endoscopies

    To assess the difference in additive diagnostic yield of WATS-3D sampling beyond that of standard biopsies between CE-IM, the proportion of patients with recurrence will be compared based if CE-IM was based on a single exam without IM vs. two or more successive exams without IM.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. To assess if the order by which tissue is sampled affects the diagnostic yield of WATS-3D by comparing the proportion of patients with recurrence between groups.

    It is unclear if there is any impact of order of tissue acquisition techniques on detection of recurrent IM or dysplasia. By randomizing patients to either WATS-3D first followed by forceps biopsies vs forceps biopsies followed by WATS-3D, the proportion of patients with recurrence will be compared to see if the order of sampling affects the proportion of patients found to have recurrent BE.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
  • University of California, LA
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    Not yet recruiting
  • University of Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
    Not yet recruiting
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
    Recruiting
  • Washington University in St. Louis, Barnes Jewish Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rastogi A, Puli S, El-Serag HB, Bansal A, Wani S, Sharma P. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.019. Epub 2007 Nov 28. PubMed 18045592 ↗
  • Runge TM, Abrams JA, Shaheen NJ. Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;44(2):203-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Apr 9. PubMed 26021191 ↗
  • ASGE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE COMMITTEE; Qumseya B, Sultan S, Bain P, Jamil L, Jacobson B, Anandasabapathy S, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Fishman DS, Gurudu SR, Jue TL, Kripalani S, Lee JK, Khashab MA, Naveed M, Thosani NC, Yang J, DeWitt J, Wani S; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):335-359.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.012. No abstract available. PubMed 31439127 ↗
  • Reed CC, Shaheen NJ. Natural History of the Post-ablation Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Aug;63(8):2136-2145. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5066-8. PubMed 29671157 ↗
  • Phoa KN, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FGI, Sondermeijer CMT, Ten Kate FJW, Visser M, Meijer SL, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Weusten BLAM, Schoon EJ, Mallant-Hent RC, Bergman JJGHM. Remission of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jul;145(1):96-104. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.03.046. Epub 2013 Mar 28. PubMed 23542068 ↗
  • Yousef F, Cardwell C, Cantwell MM, Galway K, Johnston BT, Murray L. The incidence of esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 1;168(3):237-49. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn121. Epub 2008 Jun 12. PubMed 18550563 ↗
  • Kia L, Komanduri S. Care of the Postablation Patient: Surveillance, Acid Suppression, and Treatment of Recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;27(3):515-529. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2017.02.008. PubMed 28577772 ↗
  • Anders M, Bahr C, El-Masry MA, Marx AH, Koch M, Seewald S, Schachschal G, Adler A, Soehendra N, Izbicki J, Neuhaus P, Pohl H, Rosch T. Long-term recurrence of neoplasia and Barrett's epithelium after complete endoscopic resection. Gut. 2014 Oct;63(10):1535-43. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305538. Epub 2014 Jan 3. PubMed 24389236 ↗
  • Desai M, Saligram S, Gupta N, Vennalaganti P, Bansal A, Choudhary A, Vennelaganti S, He J, Titi M, Maselli R, Qumseya B, Olyaee M, Waxman I, Repici A, Hassan C, Sharma P. Efficacy and safety outcomes of multimodal endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):482-495.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.022. Epub 2016 Sep 23. PubMed 27670227 ↗
  • Fujii-Lau LL, Cinnor B, Shaheen N, Gaddam S, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Das A, Wilson R, Simon VC, Kushnir V, Mullady D, Edmundowicz SA, Early DS, Wani S. Recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and early neoplasia after endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Jun;5(6):E430-E449. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-106578. Epub 2017 May 31. PubMed 28573176 ↗
  • Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Shaheen NJ, Yadlapati R, Wilson R, Abrams JA, Bergman J, Chak A, Chang K, Das A, Dumot J, Edmundowicz SA, Eisen G, Falk GW, Fennerty MB, Gerson L, Ginsberg GG, Grande D, Hall M, Harnke B, Inadomi J, Jankowski J, Lightdale CJ, Makker J, Odze RD, Pech O, Sampliner RE, Spechler S, Triadafilopoulos G, Wallace MB, Wang K, Waxman I, Komanduri S. Development of quality indicators for endoscopic eradication therapies in Barrett's esophagus: the TREAT-BE (Treatment with Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett's Esophagus) Consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):1-17.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 May 30. No abstract available. PubMed 28576294 ↗
  • Cotton CC, Haidry R, Thrift AP, Lovat L, Shaheen NJ. Development of Evidence-Based Surveillance Intervals After Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):316-326.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 13. PubMed 29655833 ↗
  • Cotton CC, Wolf WA, Overholt BF, Li N, Lightdale CJ, Wolfsen HC, Pasricha S, Wang KK, Shaheen NJ; AIM Dysplasia Trial Group. Late Recurrence of Barrett's Esophagus After Complete Eradication of Intestinal Metaplasia is Rare: Final Report From Ablation in Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia Trial. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):681-688.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 Jun 1. PubMed 28579538 ↗
  • Smith MS, Ikonomi E, Bhuta R, Iorio N, Kataria RD, Kaul V, Gross SA; US Collaborative WATS Study Group. Wide-area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted 3-dimensional analysis (WATS) markedly improves detection of esophageal dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus: analysis from a prospective multicenter community-based study. Dis Esophagus. 2019 Mar 1;32(3):doy099. doi: 10.1093/dote/doy099. PubMed 30541019 ↗
  • Vennalaganti PR, Kaul V, Wang KK, Falk GW, Shaheen NJ, Infantolino A, Johnson DA, Eisen G, Gerson LB, Smith MS, Iyer PG, Lightdale CJ, Schnoll-Sussman F, Gupta N, Gross SA, Abrams J, Haber GB, Chuttani R, Pleskow DK, Kothari S, Goldblum JR, Zhang Y, Sharma P. Increased detection of Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia using wide-area trans-epithelial sampling: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.039. Epub 2017 Jul 27. PubMed 28757316 ↗
  • Vennalaganti PR, Naag Kanakadandi V, Gross SA, Parasa S, Wang KK, Gupta N, Sharma P. Inter-Observer Agreement among Pathologists Using Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling With Computer-Assisted Analysis in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1257-60. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.116. Epub 2015 Apr 28. PubMed 25916227 ↗
  • Gupta M, Iyer PG, Lutzke L, Gorospe EC, Abrams JA, Falk GW, Ginsberg GG, Rustgi AK, Lightdale CJ, Wang TC, Fudman DI, Poneros JM, Wang KK. Recurrence of esophageal intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus: results from a US Multicenter Consortium. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jul;145(1):79-86.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 Mar 15. PubMed 23499759 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 56 months after the start.

Of 66 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Barrett Esophagus, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 108. This study's planned 56 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 77 studies reached it within 52 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 102.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2021
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
StartActual
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Apr 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05056051
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2021
Start date
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2024

Study contacts

Srinadh Komanduri, MD, MS
Contact
skomandu@nm.org
3126950484
Domenico AJ Farina, MD
Contact
domenico.farina@northwestern.edu
3129144602
Srinadh Komanduri
principal investigator · Feinberg School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion