ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06687603Updated Sep 15, 2026

Multi-Site Detection of Barrett's Esophagus in Patients Without Chronic GERD Symptoms

An interventional study of EsoCheck and EsoGuard in Barrett Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Reflux and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop a method to detect Barrett's esophagus in individuals with a new office based diagnostic test. Barrett's esophagus is a condition in which the flat pink lining of the swallowing tube that connects the mouth to the stomach (the esophagus) becomes damaged by acid reflux. The main question it aims to answer is: Can this approach demonstrate efficacy for screening of Barrett's esophagus?

Participants will:

  • Participate in a questionnaire.
  • Undergo a capsule balloon test, called EsoCheck.
  • Have their EsoCheck sample sent to the laboratory for an EsoGuard test, which is used to detect Barrett's esophagus.
  • Participants will undergo upper endoscopy as part of standard of care.
Read the detailed description

The overall goal of this clinical trial is to eliminate deaths from Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) by demonstrating the efficacy of a non-endoscopic method for efficient population screening to detect all Barrett's esophagus (BE), the precursor lesion of EAC. EAC is a highly lethal malignancy with less than 20% 5-year survival, and an annual U.S. incidence > 14,000 that has increased more than 6-fold in the past three decades. Barrett's esophagus, a pre-malignant metaplasia/neoplasia, is the precursor lesion of EAC, but is currently detectable only when patients undergo upper endoscopy (EGD). Despite Guideline recommendations for EGD in chronic GERD (gastrointestinal reflux disease) patients, barriers to EGD that include cost, sedation, and lack of acceptance, have so severely limited screening that antecedent BE remains undetected in over 95% of EAC cases. A major advance in EAC prevention was made by developing a non- endoscopic biomarker based method for detecting BE. The technology consists of an encapsulated swallowable balloon (EsoCheck) enabling a 5 minute non-endoscopic sampling of the esophagus, combined with a methylated DNA panel that detects esophageal neoplasia (EsoGuard). The research team validated the > 90% sensitivity and specificity of EC+EG testing in the population of individuals who have symptomatic GERD, and who account for 60% of EAC cases. In this new proposal, the research team plans to double the impact of this technology to detect nearly all individuals harboring BE, by proving the EC+EG technology is so robust that it further enables screening a population of high risk, but asymptomatic, non-GERD individuals who account for the remaining 40% of EAC cases, but who fall totally outside of all current screening guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Barrett Esophagus
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux
  • Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

  • Esophagus
  • Non-endoscopic
03

In context

Barrett Esophagus

312 studies on the registry are indexed under Barrett Esophagus; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 62 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Barrett Esophagus.

Browse Barrett Esophagus studies →

Lead sponsor

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 494 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 46 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy are an accessible cohort for BE screening and are also a reasonable representation of the general population. Permission will be obtained from colonoscopy physicians for researchers to contact and recruit patients for this study. Patients without GERD, who are at risk for BE, and who have not had a prior EGD, will be recruited prior to or at the time of scheduled colonoscopy.(9) Those eligible will be:

  • Adults who have not had prior EGD within past ten years, and are able to provide , and who have:
  • No known coagulopathy, no known esophageal varices, not on chronic anticoagulation therapy, and have:
  • No significant dysphagia or odynophagia; but who do have:
  • Absence of GERD (absence of weekly heartburn or regurgitation, not on medications for GERD), and are:
  • Adults > age 50, who also have two or more added risk factors for BE from the set of: central obesity (waist size > 35 inches for women and > 40 inches for men), current smoker or smoking history > 10 pack years, white race, male sex, confirmed history of BE/EAC in at least two family members, with one a first degree relative. While BE is most highly prevalent in white males, a black female over age 50 with obesity and a positive smoking history would also be at increased BE risk and would equally meet eligibility criteria.
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior EGD procedure in past ten years
  • Inability to provide written
  • History of weekly of more frequent heartburn or regurgitation for five or more years
  • On anti-coagulant drug(s) that cannot be temporarily discontinued or coagulopathy with > 1.5
  • Known history of esophageal varices or esophageal stricture
  • Any , as deemed in Investigator's medical judgment, to undergoing the EsoCheck procedure, undergoing the EGD procedure, and/or having taken, including but not limited to due to comorbidities such as coagulopathy or a known history of esophageal diverticula, esophageal fistula and/or esophageal ulceration
  • History of difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) or painful swallowing (odynophagia), including swallowing pills
  • Oropharyngeal tumor
  • History of esophageal or gastric surgery, with exception of uncomplicated surgical fundoplication procedure
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EsoCheck + EsoGuard

    Participants will undergo an EsoCheck test. The sample produced by the EsoCheck will be sent to LucidDx where the EsoGuard assay will be performed.

    Device: EsoCheck · Diagnostic Test: EsoGuard

Interventions

  • DeviceEsoCheck

    FDA-approved, non-endoscopic, encapsulated swallowable balloon. EsoCheck will produce a sample which will subsequently be tested with EsoGuard assay. The EsoCheck is performed and completed in approximately 5 minutes.

  • Diagnostic testEsoGuard

    Approved laboratory, methylated DNA panel that detects esophageal neoplasia. The EsoGuard assay tests the EsoCheck samples to detect BE in GERD participants.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive predictive value for Barret's Esophagus in EsoCheck/EsoGuard positive participants

    The primary goal of this study is to develop a non-endoscopic screening test for the non-GERD population that provides a PPV \>20%, i.e. at least 2-fold greater than the 10% PPV of society recommended EGD screening of chronic GERD patients with any additional risk factors.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  2. Barrett's Esophagus prevalence in EsoCheck/EsoGuard test negative subjects from a high-risk GERD negative population

    This study will also perform endoscopy in a sample of EC/EG negative subjects to confirm that BE is enriched in the test positive versus test negative population. This will be measured by the prevalence of BE in a high-risk GERD negative population.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  3. Tissue origins of true positive versus false positive EsoCheck/EsoGuard tests in non-GERD screening population

    In BE positive cases, biopsies will be taken every 2-cm across the BE segment to map the extent of the field of methylated Vimentin (mVim) and methylated CCNA1 (mCCNA1) DNA detected by EsoGuard.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • University of Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
    Recruiting
    • Sachin Wani, MD · Contact
    • Sachin Wani, MD · Principal investigator
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    Recruiting
    • Marcia Canto, MD · Contact
    • Marcia Canto, MD · Principal investigator
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 027599, United States
    Recruiting
    • Nicholas Shaheen, MD · Contact
    • Nicholas Shaheen, MD · Principal investigator
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44016, United States
    Recruiting
    • Amitabh Chak, MD · Contact
    • Amitabh.Chak@UHHospitals.org · Contact
    • Amitabh Chak, MD · Principal investigator
  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    Recruiting
    • Prashanti Thota, MD · Contact
    • Prashanti Thota, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 42 months after the start.

Of 65 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Barrett Esophagus, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 108. This study's planned 42 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 76 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 108.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 12, 2024
First posted
Nov 13, 2024
StartActual
Mar 10, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 27, 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 27, 2029
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06687603
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2024
Start date
Mar 10, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 27, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 27, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Wendy Brock
Contact
Wendy.brock@uhhospitals.org
216-844-3853
Amitabh Chak, MD
principal investigator · University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion