ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05048394Updated Dec 18, 2024Results posted

Teleoperation Experimental Comparison With Able-bodied Subjects

An interventional study of Semi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm and Standard-of-care myoelectric control algorithm in Amputation; Traumatic, Arm, Upper, sponsored by Point Designs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-18.

Sponsored by Point Designs · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the use of the semi-autonomous control algorithm (condition 1) with the standard of care myoelectric system used with the TASKA prosthetic hand (condition 2). Able bodied subjects will enroll in a laboratory based experimental session at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Subjects will be fitted with a by-pass prosthesis which enables the able-bodied subject to control the prosthetic hand using the myoelectric signals on their able limb. A TASKA prosthetic hand will be sensorized using the Point Touch technology. In a randomized order, the subjects will perform functional tasks evaluating dexterity and assistance with prolonged gross motor movement using each experimental condition. Then, a direct comparison can be made across subjects for the semi-autonomous control algorithm and the standard of care myoelectric system used in the TASKA prosthetic hand.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amputation; Traumatic, Arm, Upper

Browse trials for

03

In context

Amputation, Traumatic

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Amputation, Traumatic; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 15 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Amputation, Traumatic.

Browse Amputation, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Point Designs is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able-bodied subject
  • Fluent in English
  • Age of 18 years or greater

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard-of-care then Semi-autonomous myoelectric control

    The standard of care myoelectric control algorithm will be implemented on a by-pass prosthetic socket with a sensorized TASKA prosthetic hand The semi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm will be implemented on a by-pass prosthetic socket with a sensorized TASKA prosthetic hand.

    Device: Semi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm · Device: Standard-of-care myoelectric control algorithm

  • Experimental
    Semi-autonomous then Standard-of-care myoelectric control

    The semi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm will be implemented on a by-pass prosthetic socket with a sensorized TASKA prosthetic hand. The standard of care myoelectric control algorithm will be implemented on a by-pass prosthetic socket with a sensorized TASKA prosthetic hand

    Device: Semi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm · Device: Standard-of-care myoelectric control algorithm

Interventions

  • DeviceSemi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm

    The semi-autonomous myoelectric control algorithm will be implemented on a by-pass prosthetic socket with a sensorized TASKA prosthetic hand.

  • DeviceStandard-of-care myoelectric control algorithm

    The standard of care myoelectric control algorithm will be implemented on a by-pass prosthetic socket with a sensorized TASKA prosthetic hand.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Transfer Success Rate in a Fragile Box and Blocks Task

    The participant is instructed to transfer a fragile, ball-like object that breaks at 8 Newtons of force over a 10-centimeter high barrier as many times as possible in a 2-minute period. A broken or dropped object is considered an unsuccessful transfer. The number of successful and attempted transfers is recorded. This task is modeled after the Box-and-Blocks Test and has been used to validate fine dexterity of myoelectric upper limb prostheses.

    Time frame: Day 1 (1 hour)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ball Drops in a Holding Task

    The participant is instructed to pick up a 2-inch Styrofoam ball and hold the object above the desk or table for 2 minutes. If the ball is dropped, the participant is instructed to pick it back up. The 2-minute timer does not restart. The number of times the ball was dropped is recorded. This task has been used to validate the ability of myoelectric prostheses to assist with gross, prolonged movements.

    Time frame: Day 1 (1 hour)

07

Results

Posted Dec 18, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric Control
Started74
Completed74
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTransfer Success Rate in a Fragile Box and Blocks Task

The participant is instructed to transfer a fragile, ball-like object that breaks at 8 Newtons of force over a 10-centimeter high barrier as many times as possible in a 2-minute period. A broken or dropped object is considered an unsuccessful transfer. The number of successful and attempted transfers is recorded. This task is modeled after the Box-and-Blocks Test and has been used to validate fine dexterity of myoelectric upper limb prostheses.

Time frame:
Day 1 (1 hour)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of attempted transfers
Transfer Success Rate in a Fragile Box and Blocks Task
percentage of attempted transfersStandard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric Control
Standard-of-care control67.50 ± 20.3572.75 ± 17.54
Semi-autonomous control93.46 ± 9.0295.06 ± 6.93
Statistical analysis
  • Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric Control vs Semi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric Control · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.001 (Threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.)
SecondaryBall Drops in a Holding Task

The participant is instructed to pick up a 2-inch Styrofoam ball and hold the object above the desk or table for 2 minutes. If the ball is dropped, the participant is instructed to pick it back up. The 2-minute timer does not restart. The number of times the ball was dropped is recorded. This task has been used to validate the ability of myoelectric prostheses to assist with gross, prolonged movements.

Time frame:
Day 1 (1 hour)
Reported as:
Median · ball drops
Ball Drops in a Holding Task
ball dropsStandard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric Control
Standard-of-care control0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 1)
Semi-autonomous control1 (0 to 2)0 (0 to 2)
Statistical analysis
  • Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric Control vs Semi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric Control · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.14 (Threshold for significance was p = 0.05.)

Adverse events

Collected over 9 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric Control0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)
Semi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric Control0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric ControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7411
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric ControlTotal
Mean30 ± 727 ± 129 ± 6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric ControlTotal
Female213
Male538
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric ControlTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric ControlTotal
United States7414
Handedness
Handedness(Participants)Standard-of-care Then Semi-autonomous Myoelectric ControlSemi-autonomous Then Standard-of-care Myoelectric ControlTotal
Right639
Left112
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Colorado Boulder
    Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05048394
Lead sponsor
Point Designs
Collaborators
University of Colorado, Boulder, National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2021
Start date
Mar 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2023
Completion
Jul 31, 2023
Results posted
Dec 18, 2024
Last update
Dec 18, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion