An interventional study of Point Powered partial hand prosthetic system in Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, sponsored by Point Designs. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-26.
Sponsored by Point Designs · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Point Powered system as compared to the patient's standard-of-care treatment. This study will be a single subject crossover design where one group of 10 adult partial hand amputees will be evaluated on several metrics on their existing prosthetic treatment (Treatment 1) and the Point Powered system (Treatment 2) over a period of three months using standard two-site myoelectric control. Metrics include: in-clinic functional measures, subjective assessments, bilateral hand use, and prosthesis wear time.
Point Designs is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Baseline outcome measurements will be performed with subject's existing partial hand prosthetic treatment, as deemed standard-of-care by the patient's prosthetist. Device types include, but are not limited to, no prosthesis, passive prosthesis, passive positional prosthesis, body-powered prosthesis, myoelectric prosthesis, or other assistive device.
Outcome measurements will be performed after the subject has been fit with the Point Powered at 3 different points in time: immediately post-fitting, \~30 days post-fitting, and \~60 days post-fitting.
Device: Point Powered partial hand prosthetic system
The Point Powered system includes 1-4 3-joint mechatronic digits, low-profile EMG electrodes, a low-profile controller, and flexible batteries. These components will be integrated into a waterproof and dustproof packaging
Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)
The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-fitting)
The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)
The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-fitting)
PROMIS Social Isolation
PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-fitting)
PROMIS Ability to Participate
PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-fitting)
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-fitting)
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-fitting)
Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)
The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.
Time frame: Immediately post-fitting
The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)
The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.
Time frame: Immediately post-fitting
PROMIS Social Isolation
PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Immediately post-fitting
PROMIS Ability to Participate
PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Immediately post-fitting
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Immediately post-fitting
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Immediately post-fitting
Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)
The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.
Time frame: 30 days post-fitting
The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)
The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.
Time frame: 30 days post-fitting
PROMIS Social Isolation
PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 30 days post-fitting
PROMIS Ability to Participate
PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 30 days post-fitting
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 30 days post-fitting
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 30 days post-fitting
Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)
The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.
Time frame: 60 days post-fitting
The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)
The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.
Time frame: 60 days post-fitting
PROMIS Social Isolation
PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 60 days post-fitting
PROMIS Ability to Participate
PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 60 days post-fitting
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity
PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 60 days post-fitting
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: 60 days post-fitting
Mean Prosthesis Wear Duration (MPWD)
We will measure the mean duration of daily prosthesis wear as a proxy for improved prosthesis acceptance. Prosthesis wear time is defined as the time from when participants don their prostheses to the time they doff their prostheses. The time points are both recorded by participants and through analysis of the activity monitors. We believe the mean prosthesis wear duration is an important metric as it is possible that participants who have higher levels of satisfaction with their prosthesis will wear their prosthesis for long periods of time. It is also possible that wear time may not necessarily be correlated with corresponding usage of the prosthetic limb. Measuring this variable will be important in its assessment in comparison with other variables.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Bilateral magnitude (BM)
Participants will be asked to wear accelerometers on each wrist throughout the study. From accelerometry data, we will calculate the bilateral magnitude (BM), which quantifies the intensity of activity across both arms for a given duration. A BM of 0 indicates that no activity occurs and increasing BMs indicate that more bilateral activity occurs.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Magnitude ratio (MR)
Participants will be asked to wear accelerometers on each wrist throughout the study. From accelerometry data, we will calculate magnitude ratio (MR), which is the ratio of acceleration between the two arms for a given duration. A MR of 0 indicates equivalent contribution of activity from both arms; positive values of MR indicate that more prosthesis-side activity occurs and negative values of MR indicate that more sound-side activity occurs.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Secondary activity duration variables
In addition to BM and MR, we will also calculate durations of non-injured UL activity, amputated UL activity, simultaneous UL activity, and total UL activity averaged across each day. Measurements of activity durations by UL side can provide additional insight into how much one side is used over another and with respect to bilateral use. This measure is complimentary to BM and MR measures and will help us determine if the Point Powered promotes more use of the prosthesis side relative to the standard-of-care.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Point Designs