ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05025332PTHS-001Updated Jun 18, 2025Results posted

An Open-Label Study of Oral NNZ-2591 in Pitt Hopkins Syndrome (PTHS-001)

A Phase 2 interventional study of NNZ-2591 in Pitt Hopkins Syndrome, sponsored by Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-18.

Sponsored by Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2591 and measures of efficacy in children and adolescents with Pitt Hopkins Syndrome.

Read the detailed description

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of treatment with NNZ-2591 oral solution in children and adolescents with Pitt Hopkins Syndrome. The secondary purpose is to investigate measures of efficacy. Subjects will receive treatment with NNZ-2591 oral solution (50 mg/mL) doses for a total of 13 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pitt Hopkins Syndrome

Keywords

  • Pitt Hopkins Syndrome
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical diagnosis of PTHS with a documented disease-causing genetic etiology for the disorder.
  2. Males or females aged 3-17 years.
  3. Body weight of 12kg or higher at screening
  4. Subjects with a Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S) score of 4 or greater at the Screening visit.
  5. Not actively undergoing regression or loss of skills, defined as no persistent loss of previously acquired developmental skills for a period within 3 months of the Screening visit
  6. Each subject must be able to swallow the study medication provided as a liquid solution.
  7. Caregiver(s) must have sufficient English language skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Body weight \<12kg at screening
  2. abnormalities in safety laboratory tests and vital signs at Screening.
  3. Abnormal interval or prolongation at Screening.
  4. Any other clinically significant finding on at the Screening visit.
  5. Positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) and previous COVID 19 infection with last 12 months that required hospitalization.
  6. Unstable or changes Psychotropic treatment 2 weeks prior to screening
  7. Excluded concomitant treatments.
  8. Actively undergoing regression or loss of skills.
  9. Unstable seizure profile.
  10. Current clinically significant renal conditions and abnormalities
  11. Current clinically significant cardiovascular, hepatic, gastrointestinal, respiratory, endocrine disease, or clinically significant organ impairment.
  12. Current clinically significant hypo- or hyperthyroidism, Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring insulin (whether well controlled or uncontrolled), or uncontrolled Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
  13. Has planned surgery during the study.
  14. History of, or current, cerebrovascular disease or brain trauma.
  15. History of, or current catatonia or catatonia-like symptoms.
  16. History of, or current, .
  17. Current major or persistent depressive disorder (including bipolar depression).
  18. Significant, uncorrected visual or uncorrected hearing impairment.
  19. Allergy to strawberry.
  20. Positive pregnancy test
  21. Subject is judged by the Investigator or Medical Monitor to be inappropriate for the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NNZ-2591

    NNZ-2591 oral solution (50mg/mL) to be administered twice daily dose for 13 weeks.

    Drug: NNZ-2591

Interventions

  • NNZ-2591 oral solution (50mg/mL) to be administered twice daily dose for 13 weeks.

    Also known as: Cyclo-L-Glycyl-L-2-Allylproline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety and Tolerability

    To examine the incidence, severity and frequency of adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment with NNZ-2591.

    Time frame: 13 weeks

  2. Pharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24

    Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.

  3. Pharmacokinetic - t1/2

    Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement

    Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement. Score on a Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

    Time frame: CGI-I was assessed at weeks 6, 13/EOT & 15. Overall improvement scores relate to week 13/EOT visit.

  2. Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Overall Score

    Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Overall Score. Measured on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

    Time frame: CIC was assessed at Week13/EOT

  3. Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) - Overall Score

    Pitt Hopkins syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) - Change from baselines on overall Score based on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

    Time frame: Change in score assessed from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16 (week 13/EOT).

  4. Caregiver Top 3 Concerns

    Caregiver Top 3 Concerns: Change from baseline in Average Concern Severity. The average concern severity defined as the average of the severity scores for the three concerns evaluated at a given visit, and was calculated as long as at least one concern was useable for analysis at the visit. Scores range from 0 - 10 with higher scores indicating greater concern severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in average concern severity.

  5. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI)

    MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI): Words Understood Domain. Scores ranges from 0-396, with higher scores indicating greater language ability. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13).

  6. Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA)

    Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA): Change from baseline in Modified t-score. The ORCA measures an individual's communication abilities based on observations made by caregivers, parents, or other relevant observers, and is based on 4 domains: Expressive Communication, Receptive Communication, Social Communication, and Pragmatic Language Skills. Scores range from 25.8 - 83.8, with higher scores indicating greater communication ability. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. A T-score standardizes the individual's performance relative to a normative sample. It typically has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. T score = 50 + 10 × (X-µ)/σ Where: X is the individual's raw score μ is the population mean σ is the standard deviation

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in Total Score.

  7. Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2)

    Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2): Change from baseline in Total Score. Range of scores is 0-174, with higher scores indicating more behavioral issues. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in total score.

  8. CSHQ

    Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ). Total Score. Change from baseline. Range of scores was (33-99) with higher scores being worse.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in total score.

  9. GIHQ

    Gastrointestinal Health Questionnaire (GIHQ). Change from baseline in total frequency score. Range of scores was (0-197) with higher scores being worse.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in total frequency score.

  10. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3, Interview Version

    Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3 (VABS-3), Interview version, Change from baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score. Scores range from 20 - 140 with higher scores indicating greater functional abilities. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in composite standard score.

  11. Modified Two-minute Walk Test

    Modified two-minute walk test. Change from baseline in distance travelled (m) on 2 minute walk test. The test was only administered for participants who were ambulatory and able to complete the assessment. A positive score on change from baseline indicates improvement in distance walked.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in distance travelled on two minute walk test.

  12. QI-Disability

    Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability). Overall Score change from baseline. Scores range from 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in overall score score.

  13. ICND

    Impact of Childhood Neurological Disability (ICND)-Overall quality of life rating, change from baseline. Score ranges from 1 - 6, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in overall quality of life rating score.

  14. Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form

    Change from baseline in Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form Total Frequency Score. Scores range from 0-120, with higher scores indicating greater frequency in behavior problems. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in Total Frequency score.

  15. Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-4): Non Verbal Development Quotient (NVDQ)

    Change from baseline in Non Verbal Development Quotient (NVDQ). Scores range from 40 - 160, with higher scores indicating greater development. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in NVDQ score.

07

Results

Posted May 18, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at 5 academic medical centers between August 2022 and December 2023

Screening
Participant flow — Screening
MilestoneNNZ-2591
Started28
Completed16
Not completed12
Withdrew: Screen failure12
Treatment & Follow Up
Participant flow — Treatment & Follow Up
MilestoneNNZ-2591
Started16
Completed11
Not completed5
Withdrew: Protocol violation1
Withdrew: Adverse event4

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety and Tolerability

To examine the incidence, severity and frequency of adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment with NNZ-2591.

Time frame:
13 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety and Tolerability
ParticipantsNNZ-2591
Participants with TEAE15
Participants with Serious TEAE0
Participants who discontinued due to TEAE4
Participants with mild TEAE as highest intensity12
Participants with moderate TEAE as highest intensity3
Participants with severe TEAE as highest intensity0
PrimaryPharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24

Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.
Reported as:
Mean · ug.h/mL
Pharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24
ug.h/mLNNZ-2591
Pharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24305 ± 56.1
PrimaryPharmacokinetic - t1/2

Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetic - t1/2
hoursNNZ-2591
Pharmacokinetic - t1/27.17 ± 1.64
SecondaryPitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement

Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement. Score on a Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

Time frame:
CGI-I was assessed at weeks 6, 13/EOT & 15. Overall improvement scores relate to week 13/EOT visit.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement2.6 ± 0.92
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = .0039null median = 4, not 0
SecondaryCaregiver Impression of Improvement: Overall Score

Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Overall Score. Measured on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

Time frame:
CIC was assessed at Week13/EOT
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Overall Score
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Overall Score3.0 ± 1.00
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0234null median = 4, not 0
SecondaryPitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) - Overall Score

Pitt Hopkins syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) - Change from baselines on overall Score based on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

Time frame:
Change in score assessed from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16 (week 13/EOT).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) - Overall Score
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Pitt Hopkins Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) - Overall Score-0.5 ± 0.52
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0313
SecondaryCaregiver Top 3 Concerns

Caregiver Top 3 Concerns: Change from baseline in Average Concern Severity. The average concern severity defined as the average of the severity scores for the three concerns evaluated at a given visit, and was calculated as long as at least one concern was useable for analysis at the visit. Scores range from 0 - 10 with higher scores indicating greater concern severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in average concern severity.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Caregiver Top 3 Concerns
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Caregiver Top 3 Concerns-1.606 ± 1.5385
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0039
SecondaryMacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI)

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI): Words Understood Domain. Scores ranges from 0-396, with higher scores indicating greater language ability. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI)
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI)15.9 ± 42.07
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.1934
SecondaryObserver-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA)

Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA): Change from baseline in Modified t-score. The ORCA measures an individual's communication abilities based on observations made by caregivers, parents, or other relevant observers, and is based on 4 domains: Expressive Communication, Receptive Communication, Social Communication, and Pragmatic Language Skills. Scores range from 25.8 - 83.8, with higher scores indicating greater communication ability. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. A T-score standardizes the individual's performance relative to a normative sample. It typically has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. T score = 50 + 10 × (X-µ)/σ Where: X is the individual's raw score μ is the population mean σ is the standard deviation

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in Total Score.
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA)
T-scoreModified Intention to Treat
Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA)1.97 ± 8.963
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.7480
SecondaryAberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2)

Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2): Change from baseline in Total Score. Range of scores is 0-174, with higher scores indicating more behavioral issues. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in total score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2)
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2)-4.8 ± 14.15
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.3203
SecondaryCSHQ

Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ). Total Score. Change from baseline. Range of scores was (33-99) with higher scores being worse.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in total score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CSHQ
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
CSHQ0.4 ± 1.79
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.3574
SecondaryGIHQ

Gastrointestinal Health Questionnaire (GIHQ). Change from baseline in total frequency score. Range of scores was (0-197) with higher scores being worse.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in total frequency score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
GIHQ
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
GIHQ-6.3 ± 21.83
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.4131
SecondaryVineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3, Interview Version

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3 (VABS-3), Interview version, Change from baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score. Scores range from 20 - 140 with higher scores indicating greater functional abilities. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in composite standard score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3, Interview Version
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3, Interview Version0.0 ± 2.36
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.9063
SecondaryModified Two-minute Walk Test

Modified two-minute walk test. Change from baseline in distance travelled (m) on 2 minute walk test. The test was only administered for participants who were ambulatory and able to complete the assessment. A positive score on change from baseline indicates improvement in distance walked.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in distance travelled on two minute walk test.
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Modified Two-minute Walk Test
metersModified Intention to Treat
Modified Two-minute Walk Test8.704 ± 25.7178
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 1.00
SecondaryQI-Disability

Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability). Overall Score change from baseline. Scores range from 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in overall score score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
QI-Disability
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
QI-Disability-1.672 ± 9.8493
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.7002
SecondaryICND

Impact of Childhood Neurological Disability (ICND)-Overall quality of life rating, change from baseline. Score ranges from 1 - 6, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in overall quality of life rating score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
ICND
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
ICND0.5 ± 1.44
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.3750
SecondaryBehavior Problems Inventory - Short Form

Change from baseline in Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form Total Frequency Score. Scores range from 0-120, with higher scores indicating greater frequency in behavior problems. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in Total Frequency score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form3.2 ± 15.45
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.7695
SecondaryBayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-4): Non Verbal Development Quotient (NVDQ)

Change from baseline in Non Verbal Development Quotient (NVDQ). Scores range from 40 - 160, with higher scores indicating greater development. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16/EOT (week 13) in NVDQ score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-4): Non Verbal Development Quotient (NVDQ)
score on a scaleModified Intention to Treat
Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-4): Non Verbal Development Quotient (NVDQ)0.444 ± 2.4685
Statistical analysis
  • Modified Intention to Treat · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.2402

Adverse events

Collected over 15 weeks for each participant starting on the day of first dosing. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
NNZ-25910/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)15/16 (93.8%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 37
Most frequent other events
EventNNZ-2591
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders4/16
FatigueGeneral disorders4/16
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders3/16
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/16
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/16
SomnolenceNervous system disorders2/16
IrritabilityPsychiatric disorders2/16
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/16
Gastroenteritis - viralInfections and infestations2/16
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)NNZ-2591
<=18 years16
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)NNZ-2591
Mean9.1 ± 4.63
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)NNZ-2591
Female8
Male8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)NNZ-2591
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino15
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)NNZ-2591
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian3
Black or African American1
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander0
White11
Other1
Multiple0
Unknown0
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)(units on a scale)NNZ-2591
Mean5.0 ± 0.69
Height (cm)
Height (cm)(centimetres)NNZ-2591
Mean127.26 ± 22.609
Weight (kg)
Weight (kg)(kilograms)NNZ-2591
Mean28.57 ± 12.291

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

5 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of California at San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • UT Southwestern
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in Feb 2024, 16 months.

Results were first posted in May 2025, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 24, 2021
First posted
Aug 27, 2021
StartActual
Oct 14, 2022
Primary completionActual
Feb 27, 2024
CompletionActual
May 3, 2024
Results first posted
May 18, 2025
Last update
Jun 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05025332
Lead sponsor
Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2021
Start date
Oct 14, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2024
Completion
May 3, 2024
Results posted
May 18, 2025
Last update
Jun 18, 2025

Study contacts

James Shaw
study director · Neuren Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ercanetide

Start the discussion