CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05025241PMS-001Updated Jun 3, 2025Results posted

An Open-Label Study of Oral NNZ-2591 in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS-001)

A Phase 2 interventional study of NNZ-2591 in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome, sponsored by Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-03.

Sponsored by Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2591 and measures of efficacy in children and adolescents with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome.

Read the detailed description

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of treatment with NNZ-2591 oral solution in children and adolescents with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome. The secondary purpose is to investigate measures of efficacy. Subjects will receive treatment with NNZ-2591 oral solution (50 mg/mL) doses for a total of 13 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Phelan-McDermid Syndrome

Keywords

  • Phelan-McDermid Syndrome
03

In context

Chromosome Disorders

54 studies on the registry are indexed under Chromosome Disorders; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 54 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Chromosome Disorders.

Browse Chromosome Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical diagnosis of PMS with a documented disease-causing genetic abnormality of SHANK3.
  2. Males or females aged 3-12 years.
  3. Body weight of 12 kg or higher at Screening.
  4. Subjects with a Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score of 4 or greater at the Screening visit.
  5. Not actively undergoing regression or loss of skills, defined as no persistent loss of previously acquired developmental skills for a period within 3 months of the Screening visit
  6. Each subject must be able to swallow the study medication provided as a liquid solution.
  7. Caregiver(s) must have sufficient English language skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Body weight \< 12kg at screening
  2. Clinically significant abnormalities in safety laboratory tests and vital signs at Screening.
  3. Abnormal QTcF interval or prolongation at Screening.
  4. Any other clinically significant finding on ECG at the Screening visit.
  5. Positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV- 2) and previous COVID 19 infection with last 12 months that required hospitalization
  6. Unstable or changes Psychotropic treatment 2 weeks prior to screening .
  7. Excluded concomitant treatments.
  8. Actively undergoing regression or loss of skills.
  9. Unstable seizure profile.
  10. Current clinically significant renal conditions and abnormalities
  11. Current clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, respiratory, endocrine disease, or clinically significant organ impairment.
  12. Current clinically significant hypo or hyperthyroidism, Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring insulin (whether well controlled or uncontrolled), or uncontrolled Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
  13. Has planned surgery during the study.
  14. History of, or current, cerebrovascular disease or brain trauma.
  15. History of, or current catatonia or catatonia-like symptoms.
  16. History of, or current, malignancy.
  17. Current major or persistent depressive disorder (including bipolar depression).
  18. Significant, uncorrected visual or uncorrected hearing impairment.
  19. Allergy to strawberry.
  20. Positive pregnancy test
  21. Subject is judged by the Investigator or Medical Monitor to be inappropriate for the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NNZ-2591

    NNZ-2591 oral solution (50mg/mL) to be administered twice daily dose for 13 weeks.

    Drug: NNZ-2591

Interventions

  • DrugNNZ-2591

    NNZ-2591 oral solution (50mg/mL) to be administered twice daily dose for 13 weeks.

    Also known as: Cyclo-L-Glycyl-L-2-Allylproline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety and Tolerability

    To examine the incidence, severity and frequency of adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment with NNZ-2591.

    Time frame: 13 weeks

  2. Pharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24

    Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.

  3. Pharmacokinetic - t1/2

    Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.

Secondary outcomes

  1. CGI-I

    Phelan-McDermid Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement Score on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

    Time frame: CGI-I was assessed at Weeks 6, 13/EOT & 15. Overall improvement scores relate to Week 13/EOT visit.

  2. CIC

    Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Measured on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

    Time frame: CIC was assessed at Week13/EOT

  3. CGI-S

    Phelan-McDermid syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) -Change from baseline on Overall Score. Based on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where a lower score is better.

    Time frame: Change in score assessed from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16 (week 13/EOT).

  4. Top 3 Concerns

    Caregiver Top 3 Concerns - Total Concerns Severity: Change from baseline. The range of scores was (0-30) for total concerns, with higher scores being worse

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall improvement score.

  5. MB-CDI

    MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI) - change from baseline. Range of scores was (0-792) with higher scores being better.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16).

  6. ORCA

    Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) - Change from baseline in Total Score. Range of Scores was (25.8-83.8) with higher scores being better

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in Total Score.

  7. ABC-2

    Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2) - Total score: Change from baseline. Range of scores was (0-174) with higher scores being worse

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total score.

  8. CSHQ

    Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) - Change from baseline in Total Score. Range of scores was (33-99) with higher scores being worse.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total score.

  9. GIHQ

    Gastrointestinal Health Questionnaire (GIHQ) - Total Frequency Score: Change from Baseline. Range of scores was (0-212) with higher scores being worse.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total frequency score.

  10. VABS-3

    Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3, Change from baseline in Composite Standard Score. Range of scores was (20-140) with higher scores being better.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in composite standard score.

  11. QL-Disability

    Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QL-Disability) Overall Score - change from baseline. Range of scores was (0-100) with higher scores being better.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall score score.

  12. ICND

    Impact of Childhood Neurological Disability (ICND) - Change from baseline in overall quality of life rating. Range of (1- 6) for quality of life rating, with higher scores indicating greater impact.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall quality of life rating score.

  13. PMS-DSRS

    PMS Clinician Domain Specific Rating Scale - Change from baseline in overall severity score. Range of Scores Was (0-20) With Higher Scores Being Worse.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall severity score.

  14. Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form

    Total Frequency Score - Change from Baseline. Range of scores was (0-4) for each of 30 behaviors, total range (0-120), with lower scores being better.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total frequency score.

07

Results

Posted May 30, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at 4 academic medical centers between August 2022 and June 2023. The first participant entered screening on 08 August 2022, and the last participant entered screening on 22 June 2023. Of 23 consented participants, 18 met eligibility criteria and were enrolled into the study. Enrolled participants received NNZ2591 12 mg/kg by liquid oral dose twice daily

Screening
Participant flow — Screening
MilestoneNNZ-2591
Started23
Completed18
Not completed5
Withdrew: Failed screening5
Treatment and Follow Up
Participant flow — Treatment and Follow Up
MilestoneNNZ-2591
Started18
Completed15
Not completed3
Withdrew: Adverse event3

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety and Tolerability

To examine the incidence, severity and frequency of adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment with NNZ-2591.

Time frame:
13 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety and Tolerability
ParticipantsNNZ-2591
Participants with any AE17
Participants with TEAE17
Participants with Serious TEAE1
Participants who discontinued due to TEAE3
Participants with mild TEAE11
Participants with moderate TEAE5
Participants with severe TEAE1
PrimaryPharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24

Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.
Reported as:
Mean · µg.h/mL
Pharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24
µg.h/mLPK Population
Pharmacokinetic - Mean AUC24411 ± 116
PrimaryPharmacokinetic - t1/2

Approximately nine sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected from each participant under steady-state conditions. These samples were taken at pre-dose, 1-3 hours post-dose, and/or 4-7 hours post-dose during Weeks 2, 6, and 13. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters for NNZ-2591, including half-life (t1/2) and area under the curve over 24 hours (AUC24), were derived using subject-level concentration-time profiles from the study population model.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1-3 h post-dose and/or 4-7 h post-dose at Weeks 2, 6 and 13.
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetic - t1/2
hoursPK Population
Pharmacokinetic - t1/28.02 ± 2.33
SecondaryCGI-I

Phelan-McDermid Syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I) - Overall Improvement Score on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

Time frame:
CGI-I was assessed at Weeks 6, 13/EOT & 15. Overall improvement scores relate to Week 13/EOT visit.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CGI-I
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
CGI-I2.4 ± 0.86
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = <0.0001
SecondaryCIC

Caregiver Impression of Improvement: Measured on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where lower scores are better.

Time frame:
CIC was assessed at Week13/EOT
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CIC
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
CIC2.7 ± 1.02
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0003
SecondaryCGI-S

Phelan-McDermid syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) -Change from baseline on Overall Score. Based on a 7 point Likert scale (1-7) where a lower score is better.

Time frame:
Change in score assessed from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 16 (week 13/EOT).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CGI-S
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
CGI-S-0.4 ± 0.5
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0156
SecondaryTop 3 Concerns

Caregiver Top 3 Concerns - Total Concerns Severity: Change from baseline. The range of scores was (0-30) for total concerns, with higher scores being worse

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall improvement score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Top 3 Concerns
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
Top 3 Concerns-5.9 ± 5.86
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0005
SecondaryMB-CDI

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI) - change from baseline. Range of scores was (0-792) with higher scores being better.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
MB-CDI
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
MB-CDI12.3 ± 35.19
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0647
SecondaryORCA

Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) - Change from baseline in Total Score. Range of Scores was (25.8-83.8) with higher scores being better

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in Total Score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
ORCA
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
ORCA1.9 ± 4.22
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0984
SecondaryABC-2

Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2 (ABC-2) - Total score: Change from baseline. Range of scores was (0-174) with higher scores being worse

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
ABC-2
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
ABC-2-17.2 ± 19.65
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0013
SecondaryCSHQ

Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) - Change from baseline in Total Score. Range of scores was (33-99) with higher scores being worse.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CSHQ
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
CSHQ-3.6 ± 5.68
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0191
SecondaryGIHQ

Gastrointestinal Health Questionnaire (GIHQ) - Total Frequency Score: Change from Baseline. Range of scores was (0-212) with higher scores being worse.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total frequency score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
GIHQ
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
GIHQ-9.6 ± 10.8
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0013
SecondaryVABS-3

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3, Change from baseline in Composite Standard Score. Range of scores was (20-140) with higher scores being better.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in composite standard score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
VABS-3
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
VABS-32.8 ± 7.82
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.1710
SecondaryQL-Disability

Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QL-Disability) Overall Score - change from baseline. Range of scores was (0-100) with higher scores being better.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall score score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
QL-Disability
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
QL-Disability6.1 ± 8.91
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0066
SecondaryICND

Impact of Childhood Neurological Disability (ICND) - Change from baseline in overall quality of life rating. Range of (1- 6) for quality of life rating, with higher scores indicating greater impact.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall quality of life rating score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
ICND
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
ICND0.3 ± 0.69
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.1094
SecondaryPMS-DSRS

PMS Clinician Domain Specific Rating Scale - Change from baseline in overall severity score. Range of Scores Was (0-20) With Higher Scores Being Worse.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in overall severity score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
PMS-DSRS
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
PMS-DSRS-0.9 ± 1.69
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0156
SecondaryBehavior Problems Inventory - Short Form

Total Frequency Score - Change from Baseline. Range of scores was (0-4) for each of 30 behaviors, total range (0-120), with lower scores being better.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (visit 3, week 0) to visit 13/EOT (week 16) in total frequency score.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form
score on a scaleNNZ-2591
Behavior Problems Inventory - Short Form-5.1 ± 9.41
Statistical analysis
  • NNZ-2591 · Wilcoxon Signed rank · p = 0.0326

Adverse events

Collected over 15 weeks for each participant starting on date of first dose. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
NNZ-25910/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)17/18 (94.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNNZ-2591
GastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders1/18
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventNNZ-2591
Psychomotor HyperactivityNervous system disorders4/18
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/18
Covid 19Infections and infestations3/18
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/18
SomnolenceNervous system disorders3/18
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/18
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/18
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/18
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/18
FatigueGeneral disorders2/18

Baseline characteristics

Intention to treat

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)NNZ-2591
Mean8.6 ± 2.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)NNZ-2591
Female6
Male12
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)NNZ-2591
Race : White16
Race : Black or African American1
Race : Asian0
Race : Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander0
Race : American Indian or Alaska Native0
Race : Multi Racial1
Race : Other0
Ethnicity : Hispanic or Latino3
Ethnicity : Not Hispanic or Latino15
Height (cm)
Height (cm)(cm)NNZ-2591
Mean130.6 ± 15.15
Weight (kg)
Weight (kg)(kg)NNZ-2591
Mean30.4 ± 10.75
BMI (kg/m^2)
BMI (kg/m^2)(kg/m^2)NNZ-2591
Mean17.4 ± 3.48
PMS Genotype
PMS Genotype(Participants)NNZ-2591
Terminal Deletion - Class I7
Terminal Deletion - Class II3
Ring 220
Unbalanced Translocation0
Interstitial Deletion1
SHANK 3 variant/mutation6
Other1
History of regression
History of regression(Participants)NNZ-2591
Yes11
No7

7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 30, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 6, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05025241
Lead sponsor
Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2021
Start date
Aug 8, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2023
Completion
Nov 17, 2023
Results posted
May 30, 2025
Last update
Jun 3, 2025

Study contacts

James Shaw
study director · Neuren Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion