ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05003583Updated Jan 30, 2026

Effects of Emotional Processes on Speech Motor Control in Early Childhood Stuttering.

An interventional study of Speaking after viewing pictures with negative and neutral valence in Stuttering, Childhood, sponsored by Syracuse University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 10 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-30.

Sponsored by Syracuse University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare speech variability between preschool-age children who stutter and typically fluent, age-matched peers. Differences in emotional reactivity, regulation and speech motor control have been implicated in stuttering development in children. This study seeks to understand further how these processes interact. Children will repeat a simple phrase after viewing age-appropriate images of either negative or neutral valence to assess speech motor control.

Read the detailed description

Stuttering is a developmental disorder that emerges in the preschool years as children are undergoing rapid development of their speech, language, and emotional regulation processes. This study aims to understand how speech motor control and emotional processes interact in young children who do and do not stutter.

In Aim 1, the investigators will be observing how speech motor control and learning are affected by emotional (physiological) arousal. High arousal (e.g., stress) has been shown to disrupt highly skilled performances such as in sports and music performance (Yoshie et al., 2009). Parents of children who stutter often report that that exciting or stressful situations lead to increased stuttering in their children. There is little research, however, on how excitement or stress affects fluency in children.

In Aim 2, the investigators will observe how behavioral inhibition plays a role in speech motor control and motor learning in the context of emotional processes. Behavioral inhibition is one aspect of a child's temperament. Temperament refers to self-regulation as well as emotional, motor, and attentional reactivity that differs among individuals. Children with high behavioral inhibition (BI) are hyper-vigilant and more sensitive to new stimuli and negative emotional states. Therefore, the purpose of Aim 2 is to see if children with high BI are more susceptible to contextual emotional processes, therefore affecting speech motor control and learning.

Outcomes will be measured by calculating the variability in speech motor movements (STI). The two groups, children who stutter and age-matched peers who do not stutter, will be compared to see how speech motor control varies between groups and conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stuttering, Childhood

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stuttering
  • preschool
  • motor control
  • motor learning
  • emotional processes
  • behavioral inhibition
03

In context

Stuttering

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Stuttering; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is above the median of 44 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Stuttering.

Browse Stuttering studies →

Lead sponsor

Syracuse University is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. English as the primary language of communication.
  2. No history of neurological diseases or diagnosed speech-language disorders apart from stuttering.
  3. Parent report or direct observation of oral-facial structural abnormalities (such as cleft lip and/or cleft palate).
  4. Free of any medications that may affect neural functions (e.g., medications of seizures).
  5. Normal hearing acuity (must pass a hearing screening).
  6. Normal vision per parent report.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Failure to meet the inclusionary criteria listed above
  2. Parental report of neurodevelopmental disorders (such as autism spectrum disorders)
  3. Parental report of vision problems that are not corrected or corrected with glasses.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Condition

    Speaking while viewing images with negative and neutral valence

    Behavioral: Speaking after viewing pictures with negative and neutral valence

Interventions

  • BehavioralSpeaking after viewing pictures with negative and neutral valence

    Speaking Condition 1: 10 age-appropriate pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Lang, Bradley \& Cuthbert, 2005) will be shown to participants. These pictures are classified as high arousal, negative valence stimuli. Participants will be asked to repeat a simple phrase between picture presentations. Speaking Condition 2: A blank screen will be shown to participants in place of pictures. This condition is classified as low arousal, neutral valence. Participants will be asked to repeat a simple phrase between blank screen picture presentations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The spatiotemporal index (STI) of lip aperture during a negative valence condition on Day 1 (pretest).

    The spatiotemporal index (STI), a measure of speech coordination developed by Smith and colleagues (e.g., Smith, Goffman, Zelaznik, Ying \& McGillem, 1995). It will be employed to quantify speech motor control ability and speech motor learning effects. The STI reflects the degree to which repeated performance of a task produces movement trajectories that converge on a single pattern. Children produce less stable movement trajectories, as reflected in higher values of the STI (e.g. Smith \& Goffman, 1998), while adults produce more stable movement trajectories as reflected in lower STI values. The STI of lip aperture (a relative distance between upper and lower lips) will be calculated.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

  2. The spatiotemporal index (STI) of lip aperture during a neutral valence condition on Day 1 (pretest).

    The spatiotemporal index (STI), a measure of speech coordination developed by Smith and colleagues (e.g., Smith, Goffman, Zelaznik, Ying \& McGillem, 1995). It will be employed to quantify speech motor control ability and speech motor learning effects. The STI reflects the degree to which repeated performance of a task produces movement trajectories that converge on a single pattern. Children produce less stable movement trajectories, as reflected in higher values of the STI (e.g. Smith \& Goffman, 1998), while adults produce more stable movement trajectories as reflected in lower STI values. The STI of lip aperture (a relative distance between upper and lower lips) will be calculated.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

  3. The spatiotemporal index (STI) of lip aperture during a negative valence condition on Day 2 (retention).

    The spatiotemporal index (STI), a measure of speech coordination developed by Smith and colleagues (e.g., Smith, Goffman, Zelaznik, Ying \& McGillem, 1995). It will be employed to quantify speech motor control ability and speech motor learning effects. The STI reflects the degree to which repeated performance of a task produces movement trajectories that converge on a single pattern. Children produce less stable movement trajectories, as reflected in higher values of the STI (e.g. Smith \& Goffman, 1998), while adults produce more stable movement trajectories as reflected in lower STI values. The STI of lip aperture (a relative distance between upper and lower lips) will be calculated.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

  4. The spatiotemporal index (STI) of lip aperture during a neutral valence condition on Day 2 (retention).

    The spatiotemporal index (STI), a measure of speech coordination developed by Smith and colleagues (e.g., Smith, Goffman, Zelaznik, Ying \& McGillem, 1995). It will be employed to quantify speech motor control ability and speech motor learning effects. The STI reflects the degree to which repeated performance of a task produces movement trajectories that converge on a single pattern. Children produce less stable movement trajectories, as reflected in higher values of the STI (e.g. Smith \& Goffman, 1998), while adults produce more stable movement trajectories as reflected in lower STI values. The STI of lip aperture (a relative distance between upper and lower lips) will be calculated.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Skin conductance level (SCL)

    Skin conductance level (SCL) measures the activity of the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system. Higher SCL during experimental conditions as compared to the baseline is associated with higher sympathetic nervous system activity and provides physiologic validation of the emotional reactivity differences between the experimental conditions.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

  2. Number of phasic skin conductance responses elicited by picture presentations

    Phasic skin conductance responses (SCR) measures the activity of the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system. It is elicited by specific stimuli (in this study, by the pictures presented in the two experimental conditions).Greater number of SCRs elicited by picture presentations during experimental conditions is associated with higher sympathetic nervous system activity and provides physiologic validation of the emotional reactivity differences between the experimental conditions.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

  3. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)

    Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) (rhythmic fluctuations in heart rate associated with the respiratory cycle) measures the activity of the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system. Decreased RSA during the experimental conditions as compared to the baseline provides physiologic validation of the emotional reactivity differences between the experimental conditions.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

  4. Executive function (EF) composite score

    Executive function skills will be assessed through behavioral tasks using the NIH Toolbox Early Childhood Cognition Battery (Gershon et al., 2013; Zelazo et al., 2013). The tasks include the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test to examine inhibitory control, Picture Sequence Memory Test to examine episodic memory, and Dimensional Change Card Sort Test to examine mental flexibility and attention.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Syracuse University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders
    Syracuse, New York 13244, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 52 months.

Of 37 interventional studies with no phase under Stuttering, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38. This study's 52 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 22, 2021
First posted
Aug 12, 2021
StartActual
May 21, 2021
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2025
Last update
Jan 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05003583
Lead sponsor
Syracuse University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 12, 2021
Start date
May 21, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2025
Completion
Sep 30, 2025
Last update
Jan 30, 2026

Study contacts

Victoria Tumanova, PhD
principal investigator · Syracuse University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion