ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04996186STAR-QUpdated Aug 27, 2021

Symptoms and Treatment Assessment of Ano-Rectal Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis Patients : STAR-Q

An observational study in Multiple Sclerosis, Constipation and Fecal Incontinence, sponsored by Pierre and Marie Curie University. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-27.

Sponsored by Pierre and Marie Curie University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 376 studies in Multiple Sclerosis with a site in France — 64 open to participants now, 93 under way, 18 of them phase 3. Multiple Sclerosis · France.

Enrollment
57th of 132
200 · median 174
Started
2019
with 28 others
Observational
132 of 376
22 open now
Registered
278th of 376
by date

Among the 376 studies in Multiple Sclerosis with a site in France, this one is the 57th largest by enrollment of the 132 observational ones that give a count, is one of 29 that started in 2019, is one of 132 observational ones, and was the 278th registered.

Multiple Sclerosis

3,267 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 662 are open to participants now.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Open to participants now

64 of the 376 studies in Multiple Sclerosis with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

59 more — sign in →

All 64 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 430 Multiple Sclerosis studies recruiting now, 163 (38%) set no upper age limit and 211 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 40 take children under 18; 96 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 376 studies in Multiple Sclerosis with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is known to cause urinary disorders, sexual and bowel dysfunction. Urinary symptoms due to MS are well known and profit of multiple questionnaire or tool developed in MS patients.

Prevalence of bowel disorders in MS is difficult to assess. Some studies up to 70% bowel disorders in MS patients. Constipation and fecal incontinence are the two main symptoms in neurogenic bowel dysfunction and frequently coexist in this population, generally in association with urinary disorders.

Because of the high prevalence of bowel disorders their and the major impact on the quality of life of patients with Multiple sclerosis (PwMS) , and the cross-talk bladder-rectum (persistence of anorectal dysfunction leading to poor neurogenic bladder control) assessment of bowel disorders in MS is necessary. But this evaluation is difficult as no specific score exist. The neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score (NBD) is often used. The NBD was developed and validated for spinal cord injury (SCI) population but not for PwMS MS. Yet NBD is often used in research for all neurologic patients despite its lack of sensibility in various neurogenic population other than spinal cord injury patient. As recommended in a Cochrane revue in 2014, there is a need of a specific evaluation for bowel symptoms in neurogenic population, especially for PwMS.

The aim of the study was to create and validate a new multidimensional questionnaire to assess bowel dysfunction and impact on quality of life in patients with MS.

The investigators conducted a prospective multicenter study (8 centers) between June 2019 to April 2021. This study was developed in 3 steps. First step was literature review and qualitative interview. Then the second step was the feasibility study to evaluate comprehension, acceptability of the different items. The last part of the study was the validation study of the questionnaire. This part of the study was performed between June2020 and April 2021. Validation study allowed to determine the psychometric properties of the new tool.

Patients aged over 18 years with multiple sclerosis diagnosed on the 2017 revised McDonald's criteria were included. Patients not able to read or understand the objectives and procedures for conducting the protocol and patient who had a recent relapse of MS were excluded.

Read the detailed description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorder characterized by demyelinisation and central neurologic damage. MS is the first cause of disability in young adults and affects 2.8 million people in the world.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is known to cause urinary disorders, sexual and bowel dysfunction. Urinary symptoms due to MS are well known and profit of multiple questionnaire or tool developed in MS patients.

Prevalence of bowel disorders in MS is difficult to assess. Some studies up to 70% bowel disorders in MS patients. Constipation and fecal incontinence are the two main symptoms in neurogenic bowel dysfunction and frequently coexist in this population, generally in association with urinary disorders. Chronic constipation and fecal incontinence were defined by Rome IV criteria. According to these criteria, constipation is a bowel disorder in which symptoms of difficult, infrequent, or incomplete defecation predominate for at least 3 months and fecal incontinence is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material for at least 3 months.

Moreover, neurogenic bowel dysfunction has a real impact on quality of life and can cause social isolation.

Because of the high prevalence of bowel disorders their and the major impact on the quality of life of patients with Multiple sclerosis (PwMS) , and the cross-talk bladder-rectum (persistence of anorectal dysfunction leading to poor neurogenic bladder control) assessment of bowel disorders in MS is necessary. But this evaluation is difficult as no specific score exist. The neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score (NBD) is often used. The NBD was developed and validated for spinal cord injury (SCI) population but not for PwMS MS. Yet NBD is often used in research for all neurologic patients despite its lack of sensibility in various neurogenic population other than spinal cord injury patient. As recommended in a Cochrane revue in 2014, there is a need of a specific evaluation for bowel symptoms in neurogenic population, especially for PwMS.

The aim of the study was to create and validate a new multidimensional questionnaire to assess bowel dysfunction and impact on quality of life in patients with MS.

The investigators conducted a prospective multicenter study (8 centers) between June 2019 to April 2021. This study was developed in 3 steps. First step was literature review and qualitative interview. Then the second step was the feasibility study to evaluate comprehension, acceptability of the different items. The last part of the study was the validation study of the questionnaire. All these phases allowed a full psychometric validation of the questionnaire.

Patients aged over 18 years with multiple sclerosis diagnosed on the 2017 revised McDonald's criteria were included. Patients not able to read or understand the objectives and procedures for conducting the protocol and patient who had a recent relapse of MS were excluded.

Step 1: literature review and qualitative interview. The investigators conducted a review of literature on Pubmed to know all the existing questionnaires or tools developed and validated to assess neurogenic bowel dysfunction in MS. All articles published until April 2020 were included. The following keywords were used: "neurogenic bowel dysfunction", "constipation", "fecal incontinence", "anorectal disorders", "multiple sclerosis".

In addition a single trained nurse performed qualitative interviews with patients suffering from ano rectal disorders secondary to MS. These interviews were lead in two phases. First part allowed to determine the wording of the different symptoms and mode of response for each item. The second part of the face-to-face was free and patients could express themselves if there was a gap in our list of symptoms.

During this first phase of the study a panel of 8 experts was selected, composed of neuro urologists and gastro enterologists.

The first version of the questionnaire was made based on the patients' qualitative interviews, on the reactions and comments of the expert team and on the literature review.

Step 2: Feasibility study The feasibility study was conducted between April 2020 and June 2020. This pilot study included 30 patients and was performed to assess comprehension, acceptability and pertinence of the items the investigators have created to build the questionnaire. More of response was also evaluate by patients.

Step 3: Validation study. This part of the study was performed between June2020 and April 2021. Validation study allowed to determine the psychometric properties of the new tool. All items were discussed for ceil or floor effect by the expert team. Each item with more than 50% of patients having the same response were discussed by panel experts to decide if they were excluded or not of the final version.

To obtain good psychometric properties, the investigators included 10 patients for each items of the questionnaire in the final version. This number of subjects was calculated to allow univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Internal consistency reliability was calculated using the alpha coefficient of Cronbach. Each response has been transformed in a numeric value to perform this test. Alpha coefficient of Cronbach was considered as very good if > 0.7.

Test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) which was significant over 0.7. The first questionnaire was filled at the end of the first consultation and patients had to mail a second questionnaire (filled at home) 7 to 14 days after the first consultation.

Statistical analyses: Final version of STAR-Q (Symptoms and Treatment Assessment of Ano-Rectal disorders in multiple sclerosis patients Questionnaire) was composed by 3 sub domains. First one was symptoms, second one was treatment, and a third sub domain was quality of life.

For each sub domains, the investigators calculated an alpha coefficient of Cronbach and a ICC. the investigators also assessed these properties for total score.

Total score was compared to NBD total score which represents gold standard in ano rectal disorders and thus constitutes the reference testing external consistency. Finally, PGI (Patient Global Improvment) severity scores were used to determine category of severity for STAR-Q scores.

All statistical analyzes were performed with the R-studio version 3.3.1 and Statviews (SAS institute V 5.0).

03

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Constipation
  • Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

  • multiple sclerosis
  • constipation
  • fecal incontinence
  • questionnaire
  • evaluation
  • quality of life
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients consulting or hospitalized in a rehabilitation center or in a neuro-urology center

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with multiple sclerosis diagnosed on the 2017 revised McDonald's criteria
  • over 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to read and to understand the questions
  • recent relapse of multiple sclerosis
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients enrolled

    Patients with Multiple sclerosis, with an age older than 18 years old and symptoms of fecal incontinence or chronic constipation

    Other: Clinical interviews

Interventions

  • OtherClinical interviews

    Semi-qualitative interviews and questionnaire STAR-Q

    Also known as: Semi-qualitative interviews and questionnaire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reproductibility of STAR-Q

    Patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire with a second evaluation at 14 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to determine if these evaluations could lead to similar results for each question. An ICC \> 0.70 was necessary to define reproducibility.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Acceptability and comprehension of STAR-Q

    Each patient was asked to rate each version of the 22 questions with a four-point Likert scale (A: perfect, B: good, C: average, D: bad) regarding acceptance and comprehension of the questions.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Neuro- Urology, Hôpital Tenon
    Paris, 75020, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2020, 13 months.

Of 335 non-industry observational studies under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 81. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 426 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 75.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 30, 2021
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
StartActual
Jun 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
Aug 27, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04996186
Lead sponsor
Pierre and Marie Curie University
Responsible party
Gérard Amarenco (Clinical Professor, Head of neurourology department, APHP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France, Pierre and Marie Curie University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
Start date
Jun 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2020
Completion
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
Aug 27, 2021

Study contacts

Gérard Amarenco, PHD
principal investigator · Sorbonne Université, GRC 001, GREEN, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, F-75020, Paris, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion