A Phase 2 interventional study of Erenumab and Placebo in Cluster Headache, Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias and Headache Disorders, Primary, sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany. Completed at 11 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-23.
Sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of erenumab in participants with chronic cluster headache.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of erenumab in a loading dose of 280mg followed by 140mg after 4 weeks compared to placebo as a prophylactic treatment in patients with chronic cluster headache.
This study has a 10-week 2-arm, randomized, double-blind, parallel- group, placebo-controlled design. Data from this study will provide important information if the blockade of the CGRP receptor with erenumab is an efficacious principle for the treatment of chronic cluster headache
123 studies on the registry are indexed under Cluster Headache; 26 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 101 is above the median of 42 across 90 interventional studies indexed under Cluster Headache.
Browse Cluster Headache studies →Charite University, Berlin, Germany is the lead sponsor of 857 studies on the registry; 129 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria (screening)
Inclusion Criteria (Baseline)
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.
Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
TIA (transient ischaemic attack)
A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.
Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Double-Blind Treatment Phase: Participants receive erenumab 280 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections (loading dose, week 0) followed by erenumab 140 mg s.c. in week 4.
Biological: Erenumab
Double-Blind Treatment Phase: Participants receive placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections in week 0 and week 4.
Drug: Placebo
Pre-filled syringe; s.c. injection
Also known as: AMG 334
Pre-filled syring; s.c. injection
Reduction of weekly cluster headache attack frequency from baseline over the last 2 weeks of the double-blind epoch (averaged for 7 days).
Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval, Week 5+6.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 5-6 (Days 29-42)
Percentage of participants with a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks averaged per 7 days over the last 2 weeks of the DB epoch.
A 50% responder is any participant who has a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 7-day interval: Weeks 5+6
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 5-6 (Days 29-42)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at week 6.
PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Reduction from baseline in the weekly number of CH attacks in each of the last 2 weeks of the double blind epoch.
Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval, week 5 and week 6.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5; Week 6
Reduction from baseline in the number of weekly CH attacks over the entire double-blind trial period (day 1-42).
Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval; week 1-week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1- 6
Safety and tolerability of erenumab/placebo
Number of AEs, TEAEs, SAEs, and number of patients discontinue study participation stratified for treatment and non-treatment related discontinuation.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1-Week 10
Discontinuation of the study due to intolerable attack frequency or severity during the double-blind epoch of the study.
To compare erenumab with placebo in reduction of frequency and intensity of CH attacks assessed by the rate of patients discontinuing the study due to intolerable attack frequency or severity.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1-Week 6
Number of patients achieving at least a 30% reduction from baseline in weekly CH attacks averaged over the last 2 weeks (days 29-42) of the double-blind epoch
A 30% responder is any participant who has a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 7-day interva in Weeks 5+6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5-Week 6
Number of patients achieving at least a 70 % reduction from baseline in weekly CH attacks averaged over the last 2 weeks (days 29-42) of the double-blind epoch.
A 70% responder is any participant who has a ≥70% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 7-day interval: Weeks 5+6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5-Week 6
Change from baseline in SF-12 quality of life at week 6 (day 42). Difference between erenumab and placebo scores at week 6
This information will help keep track of how participants feel and how well they are able to do usual activities.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Change from baseline in HIT-6 quality of life at week 6 (day 42). Difference between erenumab and placebo scores at week 6 and improvement of HIT-6 scores from baseline.
This information will allow to assess the impact of attacks on headache related disability. The recall period for 3 questions is 4weeks \& the remaining questions do not have a specific recall period.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Change from baseline in average duration in minutes of recorded CH attacks over the last 2 weeks (days 29-42) of the double-blind epoch.
Duration of CH attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval, Week 5+6.
Time frame: Baseline: Weeks 5-6
Change from baseline in frequency of acute medication per week averaged over week 5 and 6 (days 29-42).
Baseline data and the mean change from baseline in the overall weekly average number of days with the use of cluster-specific acute headache medications (as liosted in the protocoll) during weeks 5-6 after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 5-6 data) is reported.
Time frame: Baseline: Weeks 5-6
Change from baseline in average intensity in average numerical pain rating scale value of recorded attacks over week 5 and 6 (days 29-42).
Participants marked the level of CH-associated pain using the numerical pain ratiung scale.
Time frame: Baseline: Weeks 5-6
Discontinuation of treatment due to all-cause during the double-blind epoch of the study
Rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to any cause during the double-blind treatment period.
Time frame: Weeks 1-8
Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Supporting information: Clinical study report
Time frame: Data are available 6 months after the primary publication.
Access criteria: A research proposal must be approved by Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Erenumab
Charite University, Berlin, Germany →