ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04970355CHERUB01Updated Jan 23, 2024

Efficacy of Erenumab in Chronic Cluster Headache

A Phase 2 interventional study of Erenumab and Placebo in Cluster Headache, Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias and Headache Disorders, Primary, sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany. Completed at 11 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-23.

Sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Sep 2023, 3 years 1 month ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of erenumab in participants with chronic cluster headache.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of erenumab in a loading dose of 280mg followed by 140mg after 4 weeks compared to placebo as a prophylactic treatment in patients with chronic cluster headache.

This study has a 10-week 2-arm, randomized, double-blind, parallel- group, placebo-controlled design. Data from this study will provide important information if the blockade of the CGRP receptor with erenumab is an efficacious principle for the treatment of chronic cluster headache

02

Conditions studied

  • Cluster Headache
  • Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias
  • Headache Disorders, Primary
  • Brain Disease

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Neurology
03

In context

Cluster Headache

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Cluster Headache; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 101 is above the median of 42 across 90 interventional studies indexed under Cluster Headache.

Browse Cluster Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany is the lead sponsor of 857 studies on the registry; 129 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (screening)

  • Adults ≥18 and \< 65 years of age
  • Documented history of chronic cluster headache for ≥12 months prior to screening according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3rd Edition (ICHD-3)
  • Participants are able to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headaches.
  • Insufficient efficacy OR tolerability OR of approved cluster headache prophylactic medications. Insufficient efficacy and tolerability as determined by the patient.
  • Sufficient acute attack treatment with triptans or oxygen based on the patient´s history
  • The patient is able to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headaches (i.e. tension-type headaches).

Inclusion Criteria (Baseline)

  • At least 9 cluster headache attacks as defined by the ICHD-3 in 7 days during the baseline epoch (SPII), confirmed by patient-reported eDiary entries.
  • Attacks must have occurred on more than 50% of days of the baseline epoch (SPII).
  • ≥ 90% patient-reported eDiary compliance during the Baseline epoch, compliance is measured as interacting with e-Diary at least once a day.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis or history of other primary headache diseases according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3), excluding episodic tension type headache and migraine as defined in criterion 2.
  • Headache freedom from the historic diagnosis of migraine has to be at least one year prior to study inclusion. If patients have on average \<=1 migraine attack per month within a year and can distinguish between migraine attacks and cluster attacks, they are allowed to participate.
  • Unable to differentiate cluster headache attacks from other headaches
  • Use of a prophylactic cluster headache medication within 5 half-lives prior to the start of the baseline phase
  • Parallel use of an SPG stimulator, deep brain stimulation or parallel use of a device for the acute/preventive treatment of chronic cluster headache
  • Administration of botulinum toxin type A or B in the head or neck area, within 4 months of baseline (SP II)
  • Concurrent use of other therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
  • Current use or any prior exposure to any calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibody, any antibody to the CGRP receptor
  • Use of other drugs within 5 half-lives of enrollment, or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline, whichever is longer
  • Evidence of drug, opioid or alcohol abuse or dependence within 12 months prior to screening, based on medical records or patient self-report
  • History of use of psilocybin (mushrooms), LSD, MDMA or 2- bromo-LSD within 2 months prior to baseline (SPII)
  • Have a positive urine drug screen (UDS) for any substances of abuse, except cannabis or cannabinoids, prior to randomization. A retest is applicable if, in judgment of the investigator, there is a reasonable explanation for the positive result. A negative result in the retest is obligatory for entering baseline (SPII)
  • Diagnosis or history of significant active or unstable psychiatric disease, such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, personality disorders, or other serious mood or anxiety disorders. Patients with anxiety disorder and/or major depressive disorder are permitted in the study if they are considered by the investigator to be stable and are taking no more than one medication per disorder. Patients must have been on a stable dose within the 3 months prior to the start of the baseline phase
  • Score "yes" on item 4 or item 5 of the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), if this ideation occurred in the past month, or "yes" on any item of the Suicidal Behavior section, except for the "Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior" (item also included in the Suicidal Behavior section), if this behavior occurred in the past 3 months. Patients who do not meet this criterion, but who are considered by the judgment of the investigator to be at significant risk for suicide, must be excluded
  • Active chronic pain syndromes (e.g., fibromyalgia or chronic pelvic pain) in which the pain has lost its guiding and warning function and has acquired an independent disease value.
  • History or current evidence of major psychiatric disorder (such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or type B personality disorder that might interfere with the ability to properly report clinical outcomes)
  • History or current severe coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, , unstable angina, or coronary artery bypass surgery or other revascularization procedures within 12 months prior to screening
  • History or current diagnosis of abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety for patients participating in the study- Known to multiple drugs, monoclonal antibodies or other therapeutic protein
  • History of of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ cervical cancer), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or
  • Hepatic disease by history or total ≥2× or or AST ≥3xULN as assessed by central laboratory at initial screening
  • History of severe constipation, defined as less than 3 bowel movements /week not adequately manageable by routine medical treatment, within 3 months prior to screening
  • Acute SARS-CoV2 Infection within 2 weeks prior to screening
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing
  • Known hypersensitivity to multiple drugs, monoclonal antibodies or other therapeutic proteins, or to erenumab or to any of the inactive ingredients
  • Unlikely to be able to complete all protocol required study visits or procedures, and/or to comply with all required study procedures (e.g., independent completion of electronic diary items) to the best of the patient's and investigator's knowledge
  • Prior known treatment with a CGRP receptor mAb (erenumab)
  • Prior treatment with a CGRP ligand antibody. Exceptions: Patients who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with CGRP ligand antibodies and were not unblinded (i.e., have no knowledge whether they received placebo or verum) can participate in the trial. Patients, who knowingly received a CGRP ligand antibody (i.e.galcanezumab or fremanezumab) can participate in the trial if the following criteria are met: a) Administered dose was not effective versus placebo in clinical trials i.e. galcanezumab (\<300 mg/month s.c.) or fremanezumab (≤675 mg loading dose followed by 225 mg s.c./month), b) Treatment duration of maximal 2 month or 2 injection cycles c) The last dose was administered at least 6 month prior to begin of screening epoche.
  • Patients who may be dependent on the sponsor or investigator
  • Patients who are in custody of an institution due to governmental authority decision or court order
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Erenumab

    Double-Blind Treatment Phase: Participants receive erenumab 280 mg subcutaneous (SC) injections (loading dose, week 0) followed by erenumab 140 mg s.c. in week 4.

    Biological: Erenumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Double-Blind Treatment Phase: Participants receive placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections in week 0 and week 4.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalErenumab

    Pre-filled syringe; s.c. injection

    Also known as: AMG 334

  • DrugPlacebo

    Pre-filled syring; s.c. injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of weekly cluster headache attack frequency from baseline over the last 2 weeks of the double-blind epoch (averaged for 7 days).

    Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval, Week 5+6.

    Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 5-6 (Days 29-42)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants with a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks averaged per 7 days over the last 2 weeks of the DB epoch.

    A 50% responder is any participant who has a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 7-day interval: Weeks 5+6

    Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 5-6 (Days 29-42)

  2. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at week 6.

    PGI-I requests participants to mark the box that best describes their cluster headache condition since they started taking the medicine. The options in the displayed boxes are represented on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

Other outcomes

  1. Reduction from baseline in the weekly number of CH attacks in each of the last 2 weeks of the double blind epoch.

    Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval, week 5 and week 6.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5; Week 6

  2. Reduction from baseline in the number of weekly CH attacks over the entire double-blind trial period (day 1-42).

    Number of cluster headache attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval; week 1-week 6

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1- 6

  3. Safety and tolerability of erenumab/placebo

    Number of AEs, TEAEs, SAEs, and number of patients discontinue study participation stratified for treatment and non-treatment related discontinuation.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 1-Week 10

  4. Discontinuation of the study due to intolerable attack frequency or severity during the double-blind epoch of the study.

    To compare erenumab with placebo in reduction of frequency and intensity of CH attacks assessed by the rate of patients discontinuing the study due to intolerable attack frequency or severity.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 1-Week 6

  5. Number of patients achieving at least a 30% reduction from baseline in weekly CH attacks averaged over the last 2 weeks (days 29-42) of the double-blind epoch

    A 30% responder is any participant who has a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 7-day interva in Weeks 5+6

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5-Week 6

  6. Number of patients achieving at least a 70 % reduction from baseline in weekly CH attacks averaged over the last 2 weeks (days 29-42) of the double-blind epoch.

    A 70% responder is any participant who has a ≥70% reduction from baseline in the weekly number of cluster headache attacks in a 7-day interval: Weeks 5+6

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5-Week 6

  7. Change from baseline in SF-12 quality of life at week 6 (day 42). Difference between erenumab and placebo scores at week 6

    This information will help keep track of how participants feel and how well they are able to do usual activities.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  8. Change from baseline in HIT-6 quality of life at week 6 (day 42). Difference between erenumab and placebo scores at week 6 and improvement of HIT-6 scores from baseline.

    This information will allow to assess the impact of attacks on headache related disability. The recall period for 3 questions is 4weeks \& the remaining questions do not have a specific recall period.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  9. Change from baseline in average duration in minutes of recorded CH attacks over the last 2 weeks (days 29-42) of the double-blind epoch.

    Duration of CH attacks was recorded daily by study participants in their ePRO Diary, Baseline and 6 weeks of daily data during double-blind treatment phase will be converted into 7-calendar day intervals: The baseline 7-10 day interval, Week 5+6.

    Time frame: Baseline: Weeks 5-6

  10. Change from baseline in frequency of acute medication per week averaged over week 5 and 6 (days 29-42).

    Baseline data and the mean change from baseline in the overall weekly average number of days with the use of cluster-specific acute headache medications (as liosted in the protocoll) during weeks 5-6 after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 5-6 data) is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline: Weeks 5-6

  11. Change from baseline in average intensity in average numerical pain rating scale value of recorded attacks over week 5 and 6 (days 29-42).

    Participants marked the level of CH-associated pain using the numerical pain ratiung scale.

    Time frame: Baseline: Weeks 5-6

  12. Discontinuation of treatment due to all-cause during the double-blind epoch of the study

    Rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to any cause during the double-blind treatment period.

    Time frame: Weeks 1-8

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • LMU Klinikum München
    München, Bayern 81377, Germany
  • Kopfschmerzzentrum Frankfurt
    Frankfurt, Hessen 65929, Germany
  • Vitos - Orthopädische Klinik gGmbH
    Kassel, Hessen 34131, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
    Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 17475, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Rostock
    Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 18147, Germany
  • Praxis für Neurologie, Nervenheilkunde, Psychosomatik
    Essen, Nordrhein Westfalen 45133, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
    Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 45147, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Halle
    Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt 06120, Germany
  • Universitätsklinik Dresden
    Dresden, Sachsen 01307, Germany
  • Schmerzklinik Kiel - Migräne- und Kopfschmerzzentrum
    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein 24149, Germany
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: Data are available 6 months after the primary publication.

Access criteria: A research proposal must be approved by Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04970355
Responsible party
Prof. Uwe Reuter (Neurologist, Charite University, Berlin, Germany) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2021
Start date
Dec 2, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 27, 2023
Completion
Sep 27, 2023
Last update
Jan 23, 2024

Study contacts

Uwe Reuter, MD
principal investigator · Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Erenumab

Start the discussion