CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04902378CIRCUITUpdated Jun 5, 2025

Closed-loop Insulin Delivery In Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancies (CIRCUIT)

An interventional study of Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Pregnancy Related and Glucose Metabolism Disorders, sponsored by University of Calgary. Completed at 14 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-05.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This trial will assess the efficacy of the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology compared with standard insulin delivery plus CGM in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

Read the detailed description

Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) require normal or near normal glucose in order to reduce the risks of birth defects, stillbirth, increased birthweight, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal death, preterm delivery and preeclampsia. Reducing maternal glucose is extremely difficult due to an increased risk of maternal hypoglycemia. Only 14% of T1D pregnancies achieve pregnancy guideline recommended glucose control, leading to complications related to high maternal glucose exposure in roughly half of newborns.

Maintaining recommended maternal glucose levels during pregnancy reduces the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes to those similar in pregnancies unaffected by T1D. Most insulin pumps in use today are open-loop systems, which means that the user must program the pump to deliver a pre-set amount of insulin. These insulin delivery methods (MDI and open-loop pumps) are usually inadequate to achieve the optimal glucose control necessary for T1D pregnancies and they impart a large time, effort and emotional burden.

Closed-loop systems have been found to be effective in improving glucose control outside of pregnancy when studied in children and adults. A new hybrid closed-loop system, the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology, recently became commercially available. Trials have demonstrated the efficacy of the Control IQ algorithm for non-pregnant adults and children. Pregnant women were not included in these trials.

The investigators propose the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology versus standard insulin delivery (MDI or pump) and CGM in pregnant women with T1D. In this trial, the investigators will assess the efficacy of the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology compared with standard insulin delivery plus CGM in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

We are grateful to Tandem Diabetes Care and Dexcom for in-kind donations to this investigator initiated study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Pregnancy Related
  • Glucose Metabolism Disorders
  • Metabolic Disease
  • Endocrine System Diseases

Keywords

  • Type 1 diabetes, pregnancy, closed-loop, clinical trial
03

In context

Pregnancy in Diabetics

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Pregnancy in Diabetics; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is close to the median of 90 across 88 interventional studies indexed under Pregnancy in Diabetics.

Browse Pregnancy in Diabetics studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Between 18 and 45 years of age (inclusive)
  • A diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, as defined by Diabetes Canada, for at least 12 months
  • A viable singleton pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, less than 14 weeks gestation
  • Currently on intensive insulin therapy (≥ 3 injections, or Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)
  • Willingness to use the study devices throughout the trial
  • A1c ≥ 6.2% and \<10% measured any time during pregnancy prior to enrollment
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Have access to email

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-type 1 diabetes
  • Current treatment with drugs known to interfere with glucose metabolism as judged by the investigator such as high dose systemic corticosteroids
  • Known or suspected allergy to insulin
  • Women with nephropathy (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] \<45), severe autonomic neuropathy, uncontrolled gastroparesis or severe proliferative retinopathy, as judged by the investigator, that is likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of study results
  • Total daily insulin dose \<8 or >250 units/day at screening
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment, as judged by the investigator to impact treatment compliance
  • Unable to communicate effectively in English or French as judged by the investigator
  • Current use of Tandem Control IQ, DIY looping system, 670G in Auto Mode, or alternate closed-loop system as judged by the investigator
  • Any reason judged by the investigator that would likely interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of study results
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology plus CGM

    Participants randomized to the intervention group will be fitted with the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology and Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor.

    Device: Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology

  • No intervention
    Standard insulin delivery (multiple daily injections (MDI) or pump) and CGM

    Participants randomized to the control group will be fitted with the Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitor. They will continue to use standard insulin delivery (MDI or pump) and CGM.

Interventions

  • DeviceTandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology

    The intervention group will be fitted with the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control IQ technology during pregnancy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Glycemic control as reflected by percent glucose time-in-range

    Time in range (3.5 to 7.8 mmol/L) per day assessed by CGM glucose measurement

    Time frame: 16 weeks until 34 weeks gestation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent time spent above target range per day (+/-SD)

    Glucose above target range defined as glucose \>7.8 mmol/L; Blood glucose will be assessed using CGM data

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  2. Percent time spent below target range per day (+/-SD)

    Glucose below target range defined as glucose \< 3.5 mmol/L; Blood glucose will be assessed using CGM data

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  3. Mean blood glucose measurement at 24 and 34 weeks (+/-SD)

    Blood glucose measured in mmol/L and assessed using CGM data

    Time frame: 24 and 34 weeks gestation

  4. Proportion of participants who experience maternal hypoglycemic events

    Maternal hypoglycemic events defined as ≥15 minutes with CGM glucose \<3.5 mmol/L \[level 1\] or \<2.8 mmol/L \[level 2\]; Blood glucose will be assessed using CGM data

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  5. Glycemic variability reflected by the coefficients of variation and standard deviations of CGM data

    Blood glucose measured in mmol/L and assessed using CGM data

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  6. Diabetes-related distress to the participant

    Diabetes-related distress will be assessed four times during the study using the Diabetes Distress Screening Scale (DDSS17)

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  7. Fear of hypoglycemia

    Fear of hypoglycemia will be assessed four times during the study using the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey Questionnaire II (HFSQ II)

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  8. Fear of hyperglycemia

    Fear of hyperglycemia will be assessed four times during the study using the g. Hyperglycemia Fear in Pregnancy Survey

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  9. Sleep quality

    Sleep quality will be assessed at four times during the study using the Modified Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  10. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed four times during the study using the Euro Quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  11. Work productivity

    Work productivity will be assessed four times during the study using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment survey

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  12. Diabetes-related distress to the partners

    Diabetes-related distress to the partners will be assessed four times during the study using the Partner Diabetes Distress Scale

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation, 24 weeks gestation, 34 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum

  13. Proportion of participants who experience preeclampsia events

    Preeclampsia is defined as pregnancy ≥20 wks gestation with SBP ≥140mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg on ≥2 occasions a minimum of 6 hrs apart and new-onset of proteinuria (defined as urinary excretion ≥0.3g protein on a 24-hr urine specimen, or ≥ 2+ by urinary dipstick, or ≥30mg protein/mmol of urinary creatinine by spot testing) OR ≥1 of the following adverse conditions: * Eclampsia (Seizures in pregnancy) * Elevated liver function tests (Increased AST and/or ALT \>70 IU/L) * Decreased platelet count \<100 x 109/L * Elevated serum creatinine (\>80 μmol/L) * Small for gestational age infant (birth weight \<10th percentile)

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  14. Proportion of participants who experience gestational hypertension events

    Gestational hypertension is defined as a woman ≥20 weeks gestation with a systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg on ≥2 occasions a minimum of 6 hours apart without proteinuria

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  15. Proportion of participants who experience worsening chronic hypertension events

    Chronic hypertension is defined as hypertension that is present at \<20 weeks gestation or pre-pregnancy

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  16. Proportion of participants who have caesarean deliveries

    Time frame: 16 weeks gestation until delivery of neonate

  17. Proportion of participants who experience preterm births

    Preterm birth defined as birth occurring \<37 weeks gestation

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate to 6 weeks postpartum

  18. Proportion of babies born large for gestational age (>90th percentile)

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate

  19. Proportion of babies born small for gestational age (<10th percentile)

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate

  20. Mean neonatal birthweight (+/-SD)

    Birthweight measured in kilograms

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate

  21. Comparison of birthweight z-score

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate

  22. Proportion of babies born with neonatal hypoglycemia

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate

  23. Proportion of neonates admitted to intensive care unit admission

    Admission to neonatal intensive care unit admission defined as admission of 24 hours or more

    Time frame: Delivery of neonate to 6 weeks postpartum

  24. Proportion of participants who experienced pregnancy loss or miscarriage (< 20 weeks, stillbirth ≥20 weeks, neonatal loss up to 28 days)

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks until delivery of neonate + up to 28 days

  25. Proportion of participants who experience episodes of severe hypoglycemia

    Severe hypoglycemia defined as a hypoglycemic episode requiring assistance from another person.

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation until delivery of neonate

  26. Proportion of participants who experience episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis

    Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is defined as an episode with elevated plasma ketones which can be categorized as possible DKA (mild/ self- treated \[plasma ketones 0.6 - 1.5mmol/L\], moderate/self-treated (plasma ketones \> 1.5mmol/L which resolves without hospital admission), or capillary blood ketones \>3.0 mol/L without an anion gap of \> 15 with admission to hospital for another reason \[i.e. prevention of DKA\]) or confirmed DKA (severe, with either plasma ketones \> 3.0mmol/L or positive serum ketones with an anion gap (Na -(CI+HC03) \> 15 and requiring hospital admission for IV fluids and IV insulin to correct the abnormal metabolic state).

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation until delivery of neonate

  27. Proportion of participants who experience device-related adverse events

    Device-related adverse events include skin reactions and insulin delivery failures.

    Time frame: 7-13 weeks + 6 days gestation until delivery of neonate

07

Study locations

14 sites
  • Campbelltown Hospital
    Campbelltown, 2560, Australia
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
    Camperdown, Australia
  • Canberra Hospital
    Garran, Australia
  • Royal Women's Hospital
    Parkville, Australia
  • Westmead Hospital
    Westmead, Australia
  • University of Calgary
    Calgary, Alberta T2T 5C7, Canada
  • BC Women's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • University of Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3P4, Canada
  • IWK Health Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3K 6R8, Canada
  • Lawson Health Research Institute
    London, Ontario N6C 2R5, Canada
  • Sunnybrook
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5T 3L9, Canada
  • University of Montreal - CHUM
    Montréal, Quebec H2X 3J4, Canada
  • Université Laval
    Quebec City, Quebec G1V 4G2, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Persson M, Norman M, Hanson U. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: A large, population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):2005-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0656. Epub 2009 Aug 12. PubMed 19675195 ↗
  • Feig DS, Hwee J, Shah BR, Booth GL, Bierman AS, Lipscombe LL. Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2010. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1590-6. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2717. Epub 2014 Apr 4. PubMed 24705609 ↗
  • Evers IM, de Valk HW, Visser GH. Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):915. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38043.583160.EE. Epub 2004 Apr 5. PubMed 15066886 ↗
  • Murphy HR, Roland JM, Skinner TC, Simmons D, Gurnell E, Morrish NJ, Soo SC, Kelly S, Lim B, Randall J, Thompsett S, Temple RC. Effectiveness of a regional prepregnancy care program in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: benefits beyond glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2514-20. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1113. PubMed 21115765 ↗
  • Maresh MJ, Holmes VA, Patterson CC, Young IS, Pearson DW, Walker JD, McCance DR; Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial Study Group. Glycemic targets in the second and third trimester of pregnancy for women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):34-42. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1755. Epub 2014 Nov 3. PubMed 25368104 ↗
  • Murphy HR, Bell R, Cartwright C, Curnow P, Maresh M, Morgan M, Sylvester C, Young B, Lewis-Barned N. Improved pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes but substantial clinic-to-clinic variations: a prospective nationwide study. Diabetologia. 2017 Sep;60(9):1668-1677. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4314-3. Epub 2017 Jun 8. PubMed 28597075 ↗
  • Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, Murphy KE, Amiel SA, Hunt KF, Asztalos E, Barrett JFR, Sanchez JJ, de Leiva A, Hod M, Jovanovic L, Keely E, McManus R, Hutton EK, Meek CL, Stewart ZA, Wysocki T, O'Brien R, Ruedy K, Kollman C, Tomlinson G, Murphy HR; CONCEPTT Collaborative Group. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2347-2359. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5. Epub 2017 Sep 15. PubMed 28923465 ↗
  • Tennant PW, Glinianaia SV, Bilous RW, Rankin J, Bell R. Pre-existing diabetes, maternal glycated haemoglobin, and the risks of fetal and infant death: a population-based study. Diabetologia. 2014 Feb;57(2):285-94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3108-5. Epub 2013 Nov 29. PubMed 24292565 ↗
  • Singh H, Murphy HR, Hendrieckx C, Ritterband L, Speight J. The challenges and future considerations regarding pregnancy-related outcomes in women with pre-existing diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Dec;13(6):869-76. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0417-5. PubMed 24013963 ↗
  • Singh H, Ingersoll K, Gonder-Frederick L, Ritterband L. "Diabetes Just Tends to Take Over Everything": Experiences of Support and Barriers to Diabetes Management for Pregnancy in Women With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2019 May;32(2):118-124. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0035. PubMed 31168282 ↗
  • Langer N, Langer O. Pre-existing diabetics: relationship between glycemic control and emotional status in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):257-63. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199811/12)7:63.0.CO;2-H. PubMed 9848689 ↗
  • Berg M. Pregnancy and diabetes: how women handle the challenges. J Perinat Educ. 2005 Summer;14(3):23-32. doi: 10.1624/105812405X57552. PubMed 17273439 ↗
  • Berg M, Honkasalo ML. Pregnancy and diabetes--a hermeneutic phenomenological study of women's experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Mar;21(1):39-48. doi: 10.3109/01674820009075607. PubMed 10907214 ↗
  • Gupton A, Heaman M, Cheung LW. Complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies: women's perception of risk. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;30(2):192-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01535.x. PubMed 11308109 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04902378
Lead sponsor
University of Calgary
Responsible party
Lois Donovan (MD, University of Calgary) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2021
Start date
Jun 15, 2021
Primary completion
May 23, 2025
Completion
May 23, 2025
Last update
Jun 5, 2025

Study contacts

Lois Donovan, MD
principal investigator · University of Calgary
Denice Feig, MD
principal investigator · MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion