CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04891887Updated May 19, 2021

Diabetes Mellitus and microRNA as Risk Factors for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Impact of Life Style Modification

An interventional study of Health education program in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by National Research Centre, Egypt. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-19.

Sponsored by National Research Centre, Egypt · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2016, registered Apr 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
163
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 2-step study; 1st step was a cross sectional study carried out on 163 consecutive Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients employee attending outpatient clinics of the National Research Center (NRC), Egypt. A face-to-face interview was carried out to collect data about demographic data and medical history. Cognitive function assessment was carried out using Adenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE III) test and the Trail Making Test (TMT) which consists of two parts (A and B). Quality of life and depression were also assessed using Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRDS) questionnaires respectively. The second step was an interventional study for health education and life style modification. The main outcome measures were Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), HbA1c, total blood cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, oxidant and antioxidant (Malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR)) which were assessed at baseline and reassessed after the intervention.

Read the detailed description

The current study was carried out during the period from February 2016 to June 2019 on two steps.

  1. First step (baseline assessment): It was a cross sectional study carried out on 163 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients attending outpatient clinics at NRC. Patients were 65 males and 98 females; aged from 40 to 65 years. All patients were literate and were able to complete the tests of cognitive function. The exclusion criteria were T2DM patients with history of head trauma, stroke, transient ischemic attack, brain tumor, epilepsy, psychiatric disease, cardiac or liver failure and visual or hearing disabilities. Approval of NRC ethical committee was obtained with registration number 15131. Participants signed a written informed consent before being included in the study.

1.1 A face to face interview was carried out with all participants to collect data about demographics, medical history and cognitive function. Data included age, gender, level of education, and tobacco smoking. Detailed medical history of diabetes was taken from patients including age of diagnosis of diabetes, frequency of hypoglycemic attacks, type of treatment (insulin or oral hypoglycemic drug), history of hypertension, dyslipidemia or other diseases and medications taken. Any complaint suggestive for presence of sensory peripheral neuropathy such as tingling, burning pain or numbness in hands and feet was recorded. All studied participants were subjected to thorough clinical examination, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and anthropometric assessment (weight and height measurements).

1.2 Assessment of cognitive function with its domains was carried out using Adenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE III) test which assesses five cognitive domains: attention, memory, verbal fluency, language and visuospatial abilities. It is the most reliable and validated Arabic form cognitive scale and freely available to be applied. Objective mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was considered if ACE III score is less than 88. The Trail Making Test (TMT) was also used. TMT is one of the most widely used instruments in neuropsychological assessment as an indicator of speed of cognitive processing and executive functioning. It assesses attention, concentration, psychomotor speed, cognitive shifting and complex sequencing function by measuring the time required to connect a series of sequentially numbered and lettered circles. The test consists of two parts (A and B). The direct score of each part is represented by the time of completion of the tasks. Shorter time indicates better cognitive function.

1.3 Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) was used, it is one of the most widely used scales that objectively rate depression severity. The scale includes 17 items, each one is scored on a 3 or 5 points scale, with the final score indicative of the severity of the patient's depression. The classification of depression level was carried out depending on the National Institute for Health \& Clinical Excellence of the United Kingdom (UK) (0-7 = Normal, 8-13 = Mild depression, 14-18 = Moderate depression, 19-22 = Severe depression and ≥ 23 = Very severe depression).

1.4 Assessment of health related quality of life (HRQOL) was carried out using Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The questionnaire contains 36 items comprising eight domains of health status which are physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perception GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). Scoring of each domain is from 0 to 100, with a score of '100' as the best rating of health. The Arabic version of the questionnaire was used.

1.5 Assessment of T2DM patients' life style. Patients were given a designed questionnaire to assess their life style regarding nutritional habits, physical, social and mental activities and the opinion about the best way to motivate them for changing their lifestyle.

1.6 Baseline Laboratory analysis. Five ml blood sample was withdrawn under complete aseptic technique from each participant, after fasting for at least 10 hours at the beginning of the study. It was divided into dry plain and lavender ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) vacutainer tubes. Level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and total blood cholesterol were assessed using Olympus-au-400 chemistry auto-analyzer. Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations in serum was determined using ELISA kit based on the competitive binding enzyme immunoassay technique. Erythrocytes were examined for the enzymatic antioxidant activity of catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and glutathione reductase (GR).

1.7 For miRNAs expression analysis: Blood was drawn into special RNA preservation tubes; inverted 8-10 times, and then stored frozen at -80°C for further RNA extraction. RNA isolation and estimation of RNA quality was employed prior to initiating the characterization of miRNA expression. Only 1-10 nano grams of purified total RNA or equivalent was enough to reliably quantify the miRNAs of interest. The concentrations of miRNAs selected in this study was determined by the single target TaqMan miRNA quantitative Real Time (qRT) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay (Applied Biosystems) in the plasma samples according to the manufacturer's instructions. A two-step protocol were applied which requires only reverse transcription with a miRNA-specific primer, followed by real-time PCR with TaqMan probes. The TaqMan MicroRNA Assays is a target-specific stem-loop structure reverse-transcription primer. The stem-loop accomplishes two goals: 1) specificity for only the mature miRNA target, and 2) formation of a Reverse Transcriptase (RT) primer/mature miRNA-chimera, extending the 5' end of the miRNA. RT reactions containing RNA samples, looped- primers, 1 X buffer, reverse transcriptase, and RNase inhibitor will be incubated for 30 min each, at 16°C and at 42°C. The resulting longer RT amplicon presents a template amenable to standard real-time PCR, using TaqMan assays. Then Real-time PCR was performed on Quant Studio 12 K Flex Real-Time PCR Instrument.

Second step (interventional trial): This step was an interventional study for health education and life style modification. It was carried out to Implementing the life style modification program on T2DM patients.

2.1 Designing two health educational booklets After identifying the T2DM participants' needs, the research team designed two health education booklets. The first booklet titled "Diabetes mellitus and how to control its complications". The booklet includes information about T2DM disease and, how it affects different body systems leading to Diabetes Mellitus (DM) complications. It includes also information on normal and abnormal level of fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). It demonstrates how to control and prevent DM complications, stressing on healthy nutrition and carbohydrate counting, physical activities, strict adherence to medical regimen and avoiding stress. The second booklet titled "Mild cognitive impairment and how to prevent" it includes information about definition of cognitive function, MCI and Alzheimer and its relation with T2DM and risk factors for cognitive impairment and how to control and improve cognitive function.

2.2 Patient education program implementation: Only 144 participants accepted the invitation to attend the health education (HE) sessions. The actual number who attended were only 121. The reasons for non-participation include: lack of interest and they refused commitment to the life style program.

2.2.1 Face to face and group discussion HE sessions to encourage life style modification: All the studied patients were invited to attend the HE sessions. Seven sessions were held at NRC over a period of nearly 2 months explaining the two designed booklets. HE lectures were presented by the public health team and a diabetic expert who shared in the group discussion to explain and answer the questions related to management of T2DM. HE program was provided for controlling DM, information about foods important to brain health and different intellectual games to improve their cognition.

2.2.2 Dissemination of Educational Materials The prepared booklets were distributed to all attendants. Participants were informed about the importance of these two booklets in improving their scientific information on T2DM and MCI.

2.2.3 Reassessment of laboratory analysis. Three ml of blood sample was withdrawn under complete aseptic technique from each participant, after fasting for at least 10 hours at the time of health education. It aimed to assess FBG, HbA1c and total blood cholesterol just before the intervention and were reassessed three months during the intervention to be an incentive for the patients as a monitoring the progress they attained due to life style modification. Each participant was asked to receive his laboratory results personally from the research team. This allowed to discuss the interpretation of his results and thus re-encourage or give him any needed advice to maintain his adherence to the lifestyle modification program.

2.2.4 Clinical follow-up and management were carried out by specialist in endocrinology and neurology depending on laboratory results and patient compliance.

2.2.5 Individualized Medical Nutrition program: Each participant was asked to complete a 3-day food diary. These were discussed with each participant individually through a face-to-face interview in order to advise and convince them to change their dietary habits . Every patient was taught how he can regulate his diet depending on the result of laboratory analysis and carbohydrate count.

2.2.6 Individualized biweekly follow-up scheme was also distributed as a guide for the targeted healthy behaviors needed to be changed which allowed self-monitoring of their achieved progress. Over a period of 6 months, the participants were followed up through mobile phone, using designed sheet, to assess patients' compliance and adherence to the life style modification program.

2.2.7 WhatsApp phone application group: The participants were welcomed to contact the research team whenever they had any inquiry concerning life style or treatment modifications. Through this group, 12 audio messages were recorded and distributed. These messages summarized the content of the booklet, to be an easily accessible way for the patients to help them follow the health education. Tips for healthy habits as well as exercises for mental activities were also uploaded to this group.

2.3.8 Final reassessment of clinical status and laboratory profile. Six months after recruitment, a face-to-face interview was carried out with the 98 participants who continued till the end of the study. They fulfilled a final sheet to assess their compliance to the program. ACE III test and TMT with its two parts A and B tests were reassessed with clinical, weight and blood pressure reassessment to evaluate the impact of the lifestyle modification program on cognitive function. Quality of life and depression were reassessed using SF-36 and HRDS questionnaires respectively. Laboratory analysis for the level of HbA1c, lipid profile, oxidant and antioxidant were reassessed after the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Health education
  • Depression
  • Quality of life
  • Healthy life style
  • Cognitive function
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 163 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

National Research Centre, Egypt is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

T2DM patients attending outpatient clinics of Medical Services Unit of the National Research Center (NRC).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

T2DM patients with history of head trauma, stroke, transient ischemic attack, brain tumor, epilepsy, psychiatric disease, cardiac or liver failure and visual or hearing disabilities

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
163 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Health education program

    Behavioral: Health education program

Interventions

  • BehavioralHealth education program

    Seven face to face sessions and group discussion health education sessions. Two prepared booklets were distributed to all attendants titled "Diabetes mellitus and how to control its complications" and "Mild cognitive impairment and how to prevent it". Lab results were discussed individually with each participant to discuss his adherence to the lifestyle modification program. Clinical follow-up and management with endocrinology and neurology specialists. Individualized Medical Nutrition. Participants were then counselled on healthy eating habits. Individualized biweekly follow-up scheme through mobile phone. A WhatsApp group was created for all participants to contact the research team whenever they have any inquiry concerning life style modifications. Through this group, 12 HE audio electronic messages were shared with participants. Final reassessment of clinical status and laboratory profile was carried out with participants who continued till the end of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1c

    HbA1c

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Cognitive function

    Total score of Adenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III. Minimum value= 0, maximum value= 100 and higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Depression

    Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score. Minimum value= 0, maximum value= 53 and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Health related quality of life

    Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire score. Minimum value= 0, maximum value= 100 and higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Malondialdehyde

    Serum Malondialdehyde level

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Glutathione Reductase

    Erythrocyte Glutathione Reductase activity

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Glutathione Peroxidase

    Erythrocyte Glutathione Peroxidase activity

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Total serum cholesterol

    Total serum cholesterol level

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. LDL

    serum LDL level

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. HDL

    Serum HDL level

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Triglycerides

    Serum triglycerides level

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Fasting blood glucose

    Serum fasting blood glucose level

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Healthy dietary intake

    Questionnaire with the following items: 1. Intake of fresh vegetables 2. Intake of Dark green vegetable 3. Intake of oats 4. Healthy snacks 5. Water intake 6. Sugar intake 7. Intake of yellow cheese 8. Intake of Fried food 9. Intake of margarine 10. Intake of carbohydrate 11. Intake of soft drinks 12. Intake of sweets and deserts Minimum value= never or less than once/ month, maximum value= 2-3 time/ day For food items from 1-5, higher scores mean a better outcome and for food items from 6- 12, higher score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Physical activities

    Physical activity questionnaire to assess the following: Light activities as walking Moderate activities Heavy activities Minimum value= 0, maximum value= 300 minutes/ week and higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Social activity

    Social activity questionnaire to assess the following: Going to restaurants and cafes Going to the club Participate in seminars in the mosque or church, social circles, and groups for entertainment Visiting relatives Going to museums, art galleries, theaters, cinemas, and concerts Minimum value= never or less than once/ month, maximum value= daily and higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. Mental activity

    Mental activity questionnaire to assess daily practice of the following activities: Reading Listening to radio Playing Intellectual games Internet usage Minimum value= never or less than once/ month, maximum value= 4 hours/ day and higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  13. Trail Making Test

    Trail Making Test

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Medication compliance

    Medication compliance was assessed by questionnaire include regularity of medication intake 0=No 1=to some extent 2=sometimes 3=often 4=Always Higher score means a better outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

  15. Hypoglycemic attacks

    The number of patients who complained of hypoglycaemic attacks

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Body weight

    Body weight

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Research Centre
    Giza, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04891887
Lead sponsor
National Research Centre, Egypt
Collaborators
Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2021
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2019
Completion
Jun 2019
Last update
May 19, 2021

Study contacts

Iman I Salama, MD
principal investigator · National Research Centre, Egypt

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion