CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT04878978PROMPTUpdated Aug 18, 2021

Premature Rupture Membranes and tPTL: a Personalised Approach (PROMPT)

An interventional study of Amniocentesis and Routine care without amniocentesis in Preterm Rupture of Membranes and Threatened Preterm Labor, sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-18.

Sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
276
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) affect approximately 8% of babies in the UK and is the worldwide leading cause of death in children under the age of 5. Subclinical infection affects approximately 50% of women giving birth before 32 weeks. Infection contributes to significant neonatal morbidity and mortality. Antibiotics such as erythromycin is currently used to treat women who present with preterm rupture of membranes. While this has shown short-term improvement in neonatal morbidity, it has not had any impact in reducing the perinatal mortality and also little effect on the health of the children at age seven. Some antibiotics such as co-amoxiclav has not shown to be effective in delaying delivery and some studies have shown that antibiotics increases rather than reduces the risk of cerebral palsy. Many women do not display signs of infection and the underlying bacteria is multifactorial (bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, gonorrhoea, Chlamydia, ureaplasma, Group B streptococcal and E. Coli) and remains a diagnostic challenge. The only available clinical approach is to test the sample of amniotic fluid for bacteria and small case series have shown prolongation of pregnancy when accurately targeted antibiotic treatment is used.

This research aims to prove that targeted antibiotic therapy results in a greater prolongation of pregnancy than standard management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) and/or threatened preterm labour (tPTL).

Women will be randomised to standard care versus BioFire directed antibiotic treatment in addition to standard care. Investigators will use the BioFire point of care testing to identify the presence of infection and identify with anti-microbial resistance genes the bacteria possess to guide the antibiotic treatment. To be certain that the presence of infection is detected the investigators will use PCR to test the amniotic fluid for IL-6 and white cell count.

Read the detailed description

Overall 10-15% of women delivering before 37 weeks have intraamniotic infection and of those delivering before 32 weeks have 50% chance. Consequently, since infection is one of the most important causes of spontaneous PTL it is possible that antibiotic treatment may delay delivery and reduce the risk of fetal damage and consequently long-term disability. However, most cases do not display typical symptoms or signs of infection, the only way to make the diagnosis reliably is through performing an amniocentesis. The risk of this procedure is low in the 3rd trimester and should be considered particularly in those in PTL at less than 32 weeks, when the risk of infection is high. Studies in non-human primate models of intra-amniotic infection support for this approach, showing that specific antibiotic therapy can prevent infection-induced PTL and prolong pregnancy with improved neonatal outcomes.

Human studies have been less positive, with antibiotics failing to prolong pregnancy in PTL or eradicate infection in PPROM. The Oracle trial assessed the ability of two antibiotics, erythromycin and co-amoxiclav, to reduce the risk of PTD in women with PPROM using a composite primary outcome of neonatal death, chronic lung disease, or major cerebral abnormality on ultrasonography before discharge from hospital. Erythromycin, but not co-amoxiclav, reduced the risk of the primary outcome.

Two recent papers have challenged this negative view of the use of antibiotics for intraamniotic infection. In the first, amniocentesis was performed to identify infection or inflammation and broad-spectrum antibiotics administered to women with a singleton pregnancy presenting with tPTL at between 20 and 34 weeks. Infection was thought to be present in at least 60% of cases as judged by the presence of a raised WCC, although only 20% had positive cultures using standard microbiological approaches. 100% had an elevated IL-6 level confirming inflammation. Repeat amniocentesis confirmed resolution of inflammation in all cases and overall average prolongation was 11.4 days. In a control group not given antibiotics average prolongation was 3 days. In 3 cases infection was shown to be cleared by antibiotic treatment. In the second report, women undergoing rescue cerclage had an amniocentesis and those found to have evidence of infection or inflammation treated with broad spectrum antibiotics. A repeat amniocentesis demonstrated resolution of infection/inflammation with antibiotic treatment.

Investigators plan to recruit women to a multicenter randomised trial of standard management vs. amniocentesis with the use of BioFire filmArray point of care testing to identify the presence of bacteria and identify common anti-microbial resistance genes the bacteria possess to guide the selection of an additional antibiotic agent.

The BioFire filmArray clinical application is currently being studied in patients with pneumonia in the INHALE study. Investigators plan to use the BioFire filmArray in a maternity setting and will use the information generated by the BioFire filmArray platform to give targeted antibiotics in the amniocentesis arm in addition to routine erythromycin with the aim of prolonging latency to delivery and of improving neonatal outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Rupture of Membranes
  • Threatened Preterm Labor
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 276 is above the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Pregnant women between 23+0 weeks and 34 weeks gestation.
  2. Admitted with signs and symptoms of threatened PTL with positive fetal fibronectin of 200ng/mL or clinical confirmation of preterm rupture of membranes
  3. Singleton pregnancy
  4. The ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, prior to participation in any screening procedures and must be willing to comply with all study requirements.
  5. Women must be aged 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chorioamnionitis: Defined as maternal temperature was elevated to 37.8°C and two or more of the following criteria were present: uterine tenderness, malodorous vaginal discharge, maternal leucocytosis (>15 000 cells/mm3), maternal tachycardia (>100 beats/min) and fetal tachycardia (>160 beats/min).
  2. Multiple pregnancy
  3. Uterine contractions >2:10 and evidence on tocogram
  4. Maternal infections such as HIV and hepatitis
  5. Clinical suspicion of placental abruption
  6. Evidence of meconium stained liquor
  7. Fetal abnormality or growth restriction
  8. Abnormal fetal heart rate pattern
  9. Maternal pathologies in which preterm termination of pregnancy is required.

    -

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
276 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Routine care

    Women who present with PPROM or threatened PTL and have routine care

    Other: Routine care without amniocentesis

  • Experimental
    Amniocentesis and biofire directed antibiotic use

    Women who present with PPROM or threatened PTL and randomised to amniocentesis and biofire directed antibiotic treatment

    Diagnostic Test: Amniocentesis

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testAmniocentesis

    Amniocentesis will be used to sample the amniotic fluid for Biofire detection of microorganism and to direct antibiotic treatment

  • OtherRoutine care without amniocentesis

    Routine clinical care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The length of latency of women receiving amniocentesis with BioFire filmArray POC test guided antibiotic selection compared to those receiving standard treatment.

    Days

    Time frame: 4 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maternal outcome

    The number of women with (i) clinical diagnosis of infection including: chorioamnionitis (one or more of pyrexia, abdominal pain/tenderness, tachycardia, vaginal discharge) or (ii) postpartum endometritis with laboratory diagnosis (raised peripheral blood CRP and/or WCC, positive blood, vaginal or urine cultures)

    Time frame: 4 years

  2. Neonatal outcome

    We will use a composite severe neonatal outcome of neonatal death, major adverse outcome ie, chronic lung disease (defined as the need for supplementary oxygen at 36 weeks post conception) major cerebral abnormality on ultrasonography identified prior to discharge or necrotising enterocolitis.

    Time frame: 4 years

  3. Microbiota and inflammatory marker endpoints

    Maternal (vaginal, rectal, amniotic fluid) and neonatal (faecal) (measured using BioFire PCR, 16srRNA sequencing, multiplex ELISA, and associated clinical tests). Residual sample stored for future peptide/proteomics testing (e.g. MALDI-TOF multiplex). Incidence of antibiotic resistance (neonatal and maternal).

    Time frame: 4 years

  4. Patient based endpoints

    Acceptability of having an amniocentesis; how risks communicated and understood; how test presented; how was the situation understood by the researchers/care givers and how did that impact on the subject's ability to understand what was being proposed? Partner perceptions and sense of inclusion/involvement. • Clinical data including previous obstetric history, demographic and socio-economic data and neonatal health data, the gestational age and cervical dilatation at randomisation, other drugs prescribed (corticosteroids, indomethacin, nifedipine, magnesium sulphate) will be collected.

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Timing of birth

    Number of women who deliver within 2 days

    Time frame: 4 years

  6. Mode of delivery

    Vaginal, caesarean or assisted birth

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Length of hospitalisation

    Number of days of maternal hospitalisation

    Time frame: 4 years

  8. Gestational age at delivery

    Weeks

    Time frame: 4 years

  9. Outcomes for neonates admitted to NICU

    Number of neonates (i) admitted to NICU, (ii) ventilated, (iii) needing oxygen (iv) respiratory distress syndrome; (v) treatment with exogenous surfactant and (vi) with infection

    Time frame: 4 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04878978
Lead sponsor
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion