ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07124390EAOABUpdated Aug 28, 2026

Electroacupuncture as a Treatment for Refractory Overactive Bladder

An interventional study of Name: Electroacupuncture (EA) Type: Device-based acupuncture therapy and Neuromodulation therapy in Over Active Bladder, Urinary Incontinence (UI) and Nocturia, sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-28.

Sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is a single-site feasibility randomised controlled trial evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of electroacupuncture (EA), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), in women with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) who have not achieved satisfactory improvement following standard pelvic health physiotherapy.

The primary aim is to determine whether a larger definitive trial is feasible by assessing recruitment, consent, retention, treatment adherence, data completeness, intervention delivery, safety, and participant acceptability.

Twenty-four participants will be randomly allocated to receive electroacupuncture or PTNS, over a 12-week treatment period. Outcome assessments will be completed at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.

The findings will inform the design of a future definitive randomised controlled trial and contribute to the evidence base for non-pharmacological treatment options for overactive bladder.

Read the detailed description

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common and distressing condition characterised by urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia, and, in some cases, urgency urinary incontinence. OAB can substantially affect quality of life, psychological wellbeing, social participation, and healthcare utilisation. Although first-line management includes behavioural interventions and pelvic floor physiotherapy, a proportion of women continue to experience bothersome symptoms despite these treatments and require additional therapeutic options.

Electroacupuncture (EA) has emerged as a potential treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder. Previous studies suggest that EA may improve urinary symptoms through neuromodulatory mechanisms; however, the quality, consistency, and applicability of the evidence remain uncertain. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an established neuromodulation treatment used within clinical practice and is recommended for selected patients with refractory OAB. To date, there is limited evidence directly comparing EA with PTNS, and uncertainty remains regarding the feasibility of conducting a definitive comparative trial.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a two-arm randomised controlled trial comparing electroacupuncture and PTNS in women with refractory OAB.

This is a single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial conducted within a pelvic health physiotherapy service. Twent-four women with refractory OAB will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive:

  1. Electroacupuncture (EA)
  2. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)

Participants will receive weekly treatment sessions for 12 weeks and will be followed up at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.

The primary outcomes are feasibility outcomes, including:

  • Recruitment rate
  • Consent rate
  • Retention rate
  • Treatment adherence
  • Data completeness
  • Intervention delivery and fidelity
  • Safety and adverse events
  • Participant acceptability

Exploratory clinical outcomes include:

  • International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-OAB)
  • International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire 3 day bladder diary (ICIQ BD) Short health economics questioner

The study is not powered to detect treatment effectiveness. Findings will be used to estimate key feasibility parameters and inform the design, conduct, and sample size calculation of a future definitive randomised controlled trial.

The study has received favourable ethical approval from a UK Research Ethics Committee and NHS Research \& Development approval. The study is sponsored by Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and forms part of a PhD programme at Imperial College London.

02

Conditions studied

  • Over Active Bladder
  • Urinary Incontinence (UI)
  • Nocturia

Keywords

  • Electric-Acupuncture
  • Acupuncture
  • PTNS
  • Neuromodulation
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 66 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Female adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosed with overactive bladder syndrome (ICIQ-OAB score ≥10).
  • Symptoms present for at least three months and to treatments.
  • Willing to refrain from starting new bladder-related treatments during the study period.
  • Able and willing to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:

    • Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period.
    • Bleeding disorders.
    • Severe needle phobia.
    • Presence of a pacemaker.
    • Active cancer diagnosis.
    • Active urinary tract infections or other urological conditions requiring urgent intervention.
    • Participation in another clinical trial for bladder dysfunction within the past six months.
    • Neurological conditions affecting continence (e.g., diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease).
    • Life-threatening infections.
    • Severe cognitive deficits, unconsciousness, dementia (e.g., Alzheimer's or other neurodegenerative diseases).
    • History of incontinence surgery.
    • Previous acupuncture for OAB within the past two months.
    • History of thromboses.
    • Recovering from or suffering from a serious illness or major surgery.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: Electroacupuncture (EA) Group Experimental

    Arm 1: Electroacupuncture (EA) Group Arm Type: Experimental Description: Participants in this group will receive electroacupuncture treatment targeting sacral and lower abdominal acupuncture points traditionally used for overactive bladder (OAB). Sterile, single-use acupuncture needles will be inserted and connected to an electroacupuncture device that delivers a low-frequency electrical current. Duration: 12 weekly sessions over 12 weeks Setting: Delivered by trained pelvic health physiotherapists in an outpatient hospital setting. Intervention:

    Device: Name: Electroacupuncture (EA) Type: Device-based acupuncture therapy

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2: Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) Group

    Arm Type: Active Comparator Description: Participants in this group will receive percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, a standard treatment for OAB. A fine needle electrode is inserted near the ankle to stimulate the tibial nerve, transmitting signals to the sacral nerve plexus that controls bladder function. Duration: 12 weekly sessions over 12 weeks Setting: Delivered by trained clinicians in an outpatient setting.

    Device: Neuromodulation therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceName: Electroacupuncture (EA) Type: Device-based acupuncture therapy

    Description: Insertion of acupuncture needles at specific points with electrical stimulation (20 Hz) for 30 minutes per session.

  • DeviceNeuromodulation therapy

    Type: Neuromodulation therapy Description: Insertion of a needle electrode near the medial malleolus with low-voltage electrical stimulation (20 Hz) applied for 30 minutes per session.

    Also known as: Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events

    All adverse events related to EA or PTNS will be recorded and categorised by severity and causality. Monitoring will follow ICH Good Clinical Practice (E6\[R2\]) standards to ensure participant safety.

    Time frame: Baseline, during each treatment session, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and throughout study participation up to 12 weeks after randomisation.

  2. Recruitment Rate

    Recruitment feasibility will be assessed as the number and proportion of eligible patients who consent to participate in the study. The number of patients approached, assessed for eligibility, eligible, and recruited will be recorded. Reasons for declining participation will also be recorded where available.

    Time frame: At completion of recruitment (anticipated recruitment period: Sept 2026 to March 2027.

  3. Participant Retention and Follow-up Completion Rate.

    Retention will be assessed as the number and proportion of randomised participants who remain in the study and complete the scheduled follow-up assessments. Participant withdrawals and losses to follow-up will be recorded, including reasons where available.

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after randomisation.

  4. Treatment Compliance and Attendance Rates

    Participant adherence will be tracked through a treatment log. Missed sessions and reasons for non-attendance will be recorded to assess treatment feasibility and refine delivery strategies for future implementation.

    Time frame: During each treatment session and at 12 weeks after randomisation.

  5. Outcome Data Completeness

    Feasibility of outcome data collection will be assessed as the number and proportion of participants providing complete outcome measure data at each scheduled assessment. Missing questionnaires, questionnaire items, bladder diary data and other missing outcome data will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant Satisfaction and Treatment Acceptability

    Participants will complete a study-specific Likert-scale questionnaire at 12 weeks to assess satisfaction, perceived benefit, treatment burden, and overall acceptability of the intervention. The questionnaire will explore participants' experiences of treatment, including ease of participation, perceived symptom improvement, and willingness to recommend the intervention to others. Results will be used to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions and trial procedures.

    Time frame: At the end of 12 weeks post treatment

  2. Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms Measured by ICIQ-OAB

    change in overactive bladder symptoms as assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder Module (ICIQ-OAB). The questionnaire evaluates urinary frequency, urgency, nocturia, and urge urinary incontinence. Changes in total and individual symptom scores from baseline to the end of treatment will be compared between study groups, with lower scores indicating an improvement in symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months

  3. Change in Urinary Symptom-Related Quality of Life Measured by ICIQ-LUTSqol

    Participants will complete the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) questionnaire at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. The questionnaire assesses the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, including physical, social, emotional, and daily activities. Changes in questionnaire scores over time will be explored to assess the impact of treatment on symptom-related quality of life.

    Time frame: This questionnaire will be completed at Baseline 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  4. Change in Overactive Bladder Symptoms Measured Using a 3-Day Bladder Diary

    Participants will complete a 3-day bladder diary at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Diary measures will include daytime urinary frequency, nocturia, urgency episodes, urgency urinary incontinence episodes, voided volume, fluid intake and pad use. Changes in bladder diary outcomes over time will be explored within and between the treatment groups.

    Time frame: This questionnaire will be completed at Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided: It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 15 months after the start.

Of 301 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Incontinence, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 15 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 364 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2025
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
StartActual
Aug 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
Last update
Aug 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07124390
Lead sponsor
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Elmas (Pelvic Health Physiotherapist, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
Start date
Aug 15, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 28, 2026

Study contacts

Elmas Court
Contact
elmas.court@nhs.net
+447538355975
Leila Janani, PhD
study chair · Imperial College London-Advanced Research Fellow / Senior Clinical Trials Statistician Deputy Head of Trial Methodology
Deepa Dr Abichandani
study chair · Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy Employability Lead for School of Allied and Community Health London South Bank Universit
Mark Pro. Johnson
study chair · Senior Lecturer, Consultant in Obstetrics and Obstetric Medicine Charing Cross Hospital. And Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust Imperial College London Clinical Chair in Obstetrics Department of Metabolism, Digestion an
Rufus Mr. Cartwright
study director · Uro-gynaecologist consultant and Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Campus and Celsea and Westminster NHS Trust Gynaecology and Departm
Elmas X Court
principal investigator · Chelsea and Westminster Hospital and Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion