ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT04758923Updated Sep 4, 2024

Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones.

An interventional study of Cholecystectomy in Calculus Biliary, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-04.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
16 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of concomitant gallstones and CBD stones patients. Two-stage endoscopic management using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common approach, although single-stage management by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with surgical exploration of the CBD is an alternative, with the single-stage approach more common in the open surgery era. Currently, it is unclear whether two-stage management is better than or at least equivalent to the single-stage surgical approach to choledocholithiasis. To address this, we undertook this study to compare these two approaches. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine the best technique for the management of patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones, by comparing the success rate, complication rates, and longer-term follow-up outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Single stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBDand the CBD will be opened longitudinally for adistance of approximately 1to1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the CBD stone(s) which will be removed by flushing sterile saline, passingastone basket, or electrohydraulic lithotrpsy as necessary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures, before completing the cholecystectomy. Cholangiography throuh T-tube be performed 14 14 days later and the T-tube will be removed immediately after Cholangiography if no residual CBD stones is identified. If residual stones are found then will be removed through the T-tube track using A choledoscope Two-stage approach The treatment process commenced with intial endoscopic treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy. The CBD stones will be removed using a basket or ballon, with lithotrpsy added if necessary. An endoscopic nasobiliary drainge will be inserted and kept in place until after laparoscopic cholecystectomy which perfermed 2 to 5 days later depending on the patients 's condition.. Surgery will be delsyed if urine amylase is elevated or significant abdominal pain is present. 2 to 5 days after the operation, Cholangiography will be performed via endoscopic nasobiliary drainge tube. And the endoscopic nasobiliary drainge tube wii be removed if no residual CBD stones are seen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calculus Biliary

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cholecystolithiasis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystolithiasis; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is below the median of 100 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Cholecystolithiasis.

Browse Cholecystolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 16 to 70 years; Clinical presentation with biliary colic with or without jaundice; Serum elevation of at least one of the following enzymes: , alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and total ; Radiological findings suggestive of gallstones and concomitant common bile duct stones, with abdominal ultrasound showing possible CBD stones or a dilated CBD >8 mm in diameter.

only patients with MRCP evidence of a CBD stone(s) were eligible after meeting all the previous criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

active acute pancreatitis, pregnancy, septic shock, intrahepatic gallstones, malignant pancreatic or biliary tumors, prior sphincterotomy, unfit for anesthesia and surgery, to MRCP and ERCP, liver cirrhosis, previous history of abdominal surgery (e.g., gastrectomy), and inability to give .

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Two-Stage

    Two-stage approach The treatment process commenced with an intial treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy

    Procedure: Cholecystectomy

  • Active comparator
    Single stage

    Single stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBD, and the CBD will be opened longitudinally for a distance of approximately 1 to 1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5 mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the cbd stone which will be removed by flushing with sterile saline, passing a stone basket or electrohydroulic lithotripsy as neccesary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures before completing the cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: Cholecystectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureCholecystectomy

    Under General anaesthesia cholecystectomy and CBD exploration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical successful rates

    The prospective clinical trial aims to determine the best technigue for the management of the patient with concomitant GB and CBD stones by comparing success rate and complication rates

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2024; primary completion for Sep 2026, 24 months later.

Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Cholecystolithiasis, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 96. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2020
First posted
Feb 17, 2021
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 4, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04758923
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Hossam Mahmoud Ibrahim (Resident, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion