ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04749810Updated Aug 4, 2022

Observational Study of Elizaria® in aHUS Patients

An observational study in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome and aHUS, sponsored by AO GENERIUM. Completed at 8 sites in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 2 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-04.

Sponsored by AO GENERIUM · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
2 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is a multicenter observational non-comparative study of the efficacy and safety of long-term pathogenetic Elizaria® therapy in patients with atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Read the detailed description

After screening, patients meeting all of the inclusion / non-inclusion criteria and vaccinated against meningococcal infections were treated by Elizaria®.

The study is planned to include at least 50 patients receiving Elizaria® for the aHUS treatment.

The study will consist of a screening period of up to 4 weeks, including, if necessary, immunization with meningococcal vaccine, a treatment period of 52 weeks.

Medication will be prescribed in accordance with routine medical practice. Accordingly to minimize the risks and subjectivity of assessments the methods adopted in the routine practice of treating patients with aHUS will be used.

Investigators enroll patients with aHUS diagnosis who have indications for pathogenetic therapy and who are receiving Elizaria® under the government program. Patients will receive medication in accordance with the established requirements of national standards and protocols for the treatment of patients with aHUS. The registration of the amount of the drug used will be carried out on the basis of information in the Patient Diaries, as well as primary documentation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
  • aHUS

Keywords

  • Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
  • Azotemia
  • Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome
  • Hemolysis
  • Syndrome
  • Disease
  • Pathologic Processes
  • Uremia
  • Kidney Diseases
  • Urologic Diseases
  • Anemia, Hemolytic
  • Anemia
  • Hematologic Diseases
  • Thrombotic Microangiopathies
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Blood Platelet Disorders
03

In context

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 80 across 15 observational studies indexed under Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome.

Browse Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

AO GENERIUM is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

At least 50 adult and pediatric patients (from 2 months), with a confirmed diagnosis of aHUS, who meet the enrollment criteria.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Written to study participation.
  2. Male and female patients aged 2 months and older with documented atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS)diagnosis.
  3. By the time of inclusion in the study, Elizaria® should be prescribed as a pathogenetic therapy for aHUS; Exclusion Criteria
  1. Intolerance to eculizumab, or other components of the drug.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Elizaria®

    Eculizumab

    Drug: Elizaria®

Interventions

  • Induction cycle: 900 mg (3 vials of 30 mL, 10 mg/mL) intravenous infusion for 30 minutes once a week for 4 weeks. Maintenance therapy: 1200 mg (4 vials of 30 mL, 10 mg/mL) intravenous infusion for 30 minutes in Week 5, followed by 1200 mg every 14 days.

    Also known as: Eculizumab

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in platelet count compared to the screening level

    Change in platelet count at 52 week after treatment with study drug compared to baseline at screening

    Time frame: 52 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels from baseline at screening

    Change in LDH levels at 52 week after starting study drug treatment from baseline at screening

    Time frame: 52 week

  2. Proportion of patients with normalized platelet levels

    Proportion of patients with normal platelet count at 52 week after initiation of study drug treatment

    Time frame: 52 week

  3. Proportion of patients with no thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) events

    The absence of TMA-related events is defined as the absence, for at least 12 weeks, of: 1) a decrease in platelet counts greater than 25% from baseline at screening; 2) plasma therapy; 3) hemodialysis.

    Time frame: 52 week

  4. Proportion of TMA-related interventions

    The proportion of TMA-related interventions is defined as (number of plasma therapy sessions + number of hemodialysis sessions) / number of patient days.

    Time frame: 52 week

  5. Proportion of patients with complete TMA response

    Complete TMA response is defined as the absence of abnormalities in LDH and platelet levels + improvement in renal function (decrease in creatinine levels by 25% or more compared to the baseline value on screening) when performed at least two consecutive tests within 8 weeks

    Time frame: 52 week

  6. Change in eGFR (ml / min. / 1.73m2) compared with the baseline level at screening;

    Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) at 52 week after initiation of study drug treatment from baseline at screening

    Time frame: 52 week

  7. Proportion of patients with an improvement in glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 ml / min / 1.73m2 or more compared to the baseline level at screening.

    Proportion of patients with improvement in eGFR of 15 ml/min/1.73m2 or more at 52 week after treatment with study drug compared to baseline at screening

    Time frame: 52 week

  8. Proportion of patients with more then 1 stage-improvement in chronic kidney desease (CKD) compared to baseline at screening.

    Proportion of patients with \>=1 stage improvement in CKD at 52 week after initiation of study drug treatment compared with baseline at screening

    Time frame: 52 week

  9. Proportion of patients with an increase in hemoglobin level of more than 20 g / l compared to the baseline level at screening.

    Proportion of patients with an increase in hemoglobin level of more than 20 g/l at 52 week after the start of study drug treatment compared with baseline at screening

    Time frame: 52 week

  10. Dynamics of membrane attack complex (MAC) level compared to baseline at Visit 2

    Changes in MAC levels at 52 week compared to baseline

    Time frame: 52 week

  11. The frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs)

    Frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs associated with study drug use

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  12. Proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies

    Proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies; titer of antidrug antibodies and their neutralizing activity

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
    Kazan, 420012, Russian Federation
  • Regional State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Krasnoyarsk' Regional Clinical Center for Maternity and Childhood Protection"
    Krasnoyarsk, 660074, Russian Federation
  • State budgetary healthcare institution of the city of Moscow "Children's City Clinical Hospital of St. Vladimir of the Healthcare Department of the City of Moscow"
    Moscow, 107014, Russian Federation
  • Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
    Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
  • State budgetary healthcare institution of the City of Moscow "City clinical hospital #52 of the Moscow City Healthcare Department"
    Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation
  • State budgetary healthcare institution of the city of Moscow "City Clinical Hospital n.a. A.K. Eramishantsev of the Moscow City Healthcare Department"
    Moscow, 129327, Russian Federation
  • St. Petersburg's State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "City Mariinsky Hospital"
    Saint-Petersburg, 191104, Russian Federation
  • St. Petersburg's State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Children's City Multidisciplinary Clinical Specialized Center of High Medical Technologies"
    Saint-Petersburg, 198205, Russian Federation
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04749810
Lead sponsor
AO GENERIUM
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2021
Start date
Dec 19, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2022
Completion
Apr 30, 2022
Last update
Aug 4, 2022

Study contacts

Oksana A. Markova, MD
study chair · AO GENERIUM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion