ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04697563LiserUpdated May 13, 2025

Laser Therapy in Women With Lichenoid Disorders

An interventional study of Laser and Placebolaser in Lichen Sclerosus Et Atrophicus and Lichen Planus, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-13.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Primary aim of the trial is to compare improvement of lichen symptoms according to a composite VAS scale (burning, itching and pain) between women with vulvovaginal laser therapy vs. sham laser therapy at three months.

Read the detailed description

Background: Lichenoid Disorders (LD) include VLS (Vulvar lichen sclerosus) and LP (Lichen planus). VLS and LP are chronic skin diseases that usually affect the anogenital region. Both can cause vulvar itching, burning and pain and can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction. Current treatment options are unsatisfactory. Vulvovaginal laser therapy might be an effective treatment option.

Study aim: To study the effectiveness of non-ablative vulvovaginal laser therapy for women with lichenoid disorders.

Design: Randomized double-blinded placebo- controlled clinical study

Study Population: Women diagnosed with LD will be recruited from a specialized University outpatient clinic.

Study groups: Participants will be randomized (1:1). Intervention group: Laser therapy (2 treatments), plus ongoing therapy Control group: Sham laser therapy (2 treatments) plus ongoing therapy

Sample size Total 40 patients Primary study outcome: Visual analogue scale (VAS) composite score in regard to LD Secondary study outcomes: quality of life (QoL) (Skindex questionnaire); Treatment discomfort/ pain (VAS); Patient treatment satisfaction (Questionnaire to ask for treatment satifsaction: ZUF-8); Subjective improvement (Patient global impression of improvement- PGI-I), clinical LS score, histological appearance

02

Conditions studied

  • Lichen Sclerosus Et Atrophicus
  • Lichen Planus
03

In context

Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 45 across 20 interventional studies indexed under Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus.

Browse Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 471 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • women age >18 years
  • diagnosed with LD (VLS or LP proven)
  • Clinical LS score ≥ 4 based on the score of Günthert et al. [1]
  • Normal Pap-smear within 24 months
  • negative clinical and microscopic evaluation of vaginal fluid
  • Negative test for STD (sexually transmitted diseases) pathogens (chlamydia, gonorrhea, genital mycoplasma and trichomonas) if symptomic including abdominal pain or abnormal vaginal fluid
  • Good German language skills
  • written
  • preceding local corticoid therapy of at least 12 weeks according to the current guideline for LD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • women with for the use of laser on the skin
  • pregnancy
  • presence of vulvar pathology (other than lichen)
  • any vulvar/ vaginal infection
  • women
  • swollen lymph nodes
  • genital malignant disease
  • allergy to topical anaesthesia
  • connective tissue disease
  • keloid formation
  • Patients with a legal guardian
  • > 35 kg/m²
  • History of transvaginal mesh implant (excluding sling or sacrocolpopexy mesh)
  • Coagulopathy
  • patients using anticoagulants
  • patients with renal, hepatic or pulmonary-cardiovascular failure
  • patients who have undergone any kind of organ transplantation in the last three years.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Laser

    Before treatment the vulva will be carefully inspected to rule out signs of infection or recent trauma. A local anesthetic cream (Emla cream 5%) will be applied to the entire introitus vulvae and all areas intended for local laser treatment. Before laser treatment another cotton swab test will be performed to ensure sufficient local anesthesia. Vulvovaginal laser therapies will be performed with the non-ablative 2940 nm Er:YAG laser (Smooth XS, Fotona, Slovenia) in the Renova mode according to the manufacturer's guidelines and recommendations. The spot size (diameter of the laser beam) is 7 mm, with a pulse at a frequency of 1.6 Hz, and a fluence (laser energy delivered per unit area) of 5.0 to 10.0 J/cm2. The vulva will be treated using 1-3 repetitions.

    Device: Laser

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Laser

    Clinical examination and preparations will be identical to the intervention group. Sham laser treatments will be performed with the same laser and the same device. However, a specially designed placebo probe, which blocks the emission of radiation, will be used. Women will therefore receive no therapeutic laser treatment. Before treatment, a study assistant, who is aware of the study allocation, will prepare the laser with the placebo probe, which looks identically to the "normal" probe. The treating physician will not be aware of the study allocation and the type of probe in use.

    Device: Placebolaser

Interventions

  • DeviceLaser

    real laser beam administered

    Also known as: Fotona Smooth XS laser

  • DevicePlacebolaser

    no laser beam admitted

    Also known as: Fotona Smooth XS laser placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. subjective bother of lichenoid disorders (LD)

    A visual analogue scale (VAS) is used for assessment for the subjective bother of LD symptoms. Patients are asked to indicate the degree of each of the three following LD symptoms on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst possible symptoms): genital symptoms of itching, burning and vaginal pain resulting in a composite VAS score

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment discomfort / pain

    patients are asked to indicate the degree of discomfort or pain during laser therapy on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no discomfort/pain) to 10 (worst possible discomfort/pain)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. subjective symptoms of lichenoid disorders

    The Skindex questionnaire will be used to evaluate patients' subjective symptoms of lichenoid disorders

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Patient Global Impression of Improvement- PGI-I

    The PGI-I scales are robust and valid instruments to assess disease severity, bother and improvement after treatment in women and will be used to determine the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The PGI-I consists of a 7-likert-scale with 7 being the worst bother.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Patient Global Impression of Severity- PGI-S

    The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a global index that may be used to rate the severity of a specific condition (a single-state scale). The PGI scales are robust and valid instruments to assess disease severity, bother and improvement after treatment and will be used to determine the Patient Global Impression of Severity. The PGI scales are robust and valid instruments to assess disease severity, bother and improvement after treatment. The patient can choose from 4 answers including none, mild, moderate and severe.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. architectural changes

    The vulva will be inspected and structural changes due to LD will be recorded. The score is based on the publication from Günthert et al. The score records signs of erosions, hyperkeratosis, rhagades, synechia, stenosis, and atrophy of the vulva. The questionnaires is based on a 29-item version; the higher the score the more pronounced are the clinical signs.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Histological analysis of LD

    Lichenoid disorders show epidermic atrophy, sclerosis and a lymphocytic based dermal inflammation. Hyperkeratosis and dermal inflammation will be evaluated both from the histological probe before and after treatment. Each item will be scored from 1-3, mild, moderate and severe. A higher score indicates more severe expression of LD.

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Patient satisfaction with treatment/ inpatient management

    Patient satisfaction will be evaluated with the "Fragebogen zur Patientenzufriedenheit - ZUF8". The German version of the original "Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-CSQ8", is a validated tool for measuring global patient satisfaction at the end of inpatient treatment. he Zuf-8 is an 8-items questionnaire to assess satisfaction in patients undergoing inpatient treatment. At 3 months treatment satisfaction will be assessed using an adopted version of the questionnaire. The lower the score the higher is the patient satiscation.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Obstetrics, Medical University Graz
    Graz, 8045, Austria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2020 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 42 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 4, 2021
First posted
Jan 6, 2021
StartActual
Nov 17, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jun 13, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 13, 2024
Last update
May 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04697563
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2021
Start date
Nov 17, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 13, 2024
Completion
Jun 13, 2024
Last update
May 13, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion