ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07884331Updated Oct 23, 2026

Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap vs Buccal Advancement Flap for Acute Oro-Antral Communication Closure

An interventional study of Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap and Buccal Advancement Flap in Acute Oroantral Communication, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Eligibility revisedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will compare the Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap (BUPI) with the Buccal Advancement Flap (BAF) for the primary surgical closure of acute oro-antral communications (OAC) following tooth extraction in the posterior maxilla.

The primary objective is to determine whether the BUPI technique results in better preservation of keratinized gingival width compared with the BAF technique three months after surgery.

Secondary outcomes include successful closure rate of OACs, postoperative pain, swelling and bleeding, wound dehiscence or recurrence of the OAC, postoperative sinusitis or infection, reoperation rate, and operating time.

Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either BUPI or BAF. Clinical examinations and intraoral scans will be performed before surgery and at follow-up visits after 14 days, one month, and three months.

Read the detailed description

An OAC is a pathological communication between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus and occurs most commonly following extraction of posterior maxillary teeth. Surgical closure is indicated to reduce the risk of maxillary sinusitis.

The Buccal Advancement Flap (BAF) is an established technique for primary closure of acute OACs. However, advancement of the buccal soft tissue results often in a reduction of keratinized gingival width and flattening of the oral vestibule, which may negatively affect subsequent prosthetic or implant treatment.

The Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap (BUPI) is an alternative technique in which the periosteal layer of a buccal mucoperiosteal flap is separated from the overlying mucosa and inverted to cover the OAC. The overlying mucosa can therefore remain largely in its original position.

The study will prospectively compare both surgical techniques in adult participants presenting with an acute OAC following tooth extraction in the posterior maxilla.

After confirmation of eligibility and written informed consent, participants will undergo a baseline intraoral scan of the relevant quadrant and Periodontal Screening and Recording (PSR) of the relevant sextant. Participants will subsequently be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to BUPI or BAF using the Medical University of Graz randomization system.

The primary endpoint is the change in keratinized gingival width between baseline and three months after surgery. Keratinized gingival width will be measured between the mucogingival junction and the midpoint of the alveolar ridge using digital intraoral scans obtained with a 3Shape TRIOS 6 intraoral scanner. Measurements will be performed using 3D Slicer software.

Participants will document postoperative pain, swelling, and bleeding using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10 on the day of surgery and for the subsequent seven postoperative days.

Clinical follow-up examinations will be performed after 14 days, one month, and three months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Oroantral Communication

Keywords

  • Oro-antral communication
  • Oroantral communication
  • Oro-antral fistula
  • Maxillary sinus
  • Tooth extraction
  • Buccal advancement flap
  • Rehrmann flap
  • Buccal periosteal inversion flap
  • BUPI
  • Keratinized gingiva
  • Oral surgery
  • Maxillofacial surgery
  • Surgical closure
  • Oroantral fistula
  • OAC
  • BAF
  • Oro-antral communication closure
  • Posterior maxilla
  • Keratinized gingival width
  • Attached gingiva
  • Mucogingival junction
  • Soft tissue preservation
  • Intraoral scan
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 470 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Acute Oro-Antral Communication following extraction of posterior maxillary teeth (premolars and molars) within the last 24 hours
  • Good general health
  • Willingness to attend all scheduled follow-up examinations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Acute inflammation or maxillary sinusitis
  • Absence of nasal drainage during maxillary sinus irrigation
  • Previous surgeries in the study area resulting in scarring
  • Systemic diseases that could impair wound healing (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus)
  • Immunosuppression
  • Diagnosed or previously treated neoplasms
  • Bisphosphonate or antiresorptive therapy
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Allergy to dexibuprofen
  • Nicotine consumption ≥10 cigarettes/day
  • Inability to give informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap

    Participants assigned to this group will undergo surgical closure of the acute oro-antral communication using the Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap.

    Procedure: Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap

  • Active comparator
    Buccal Advancement Flap

    Participants assigned to this group will undergo surgical closure of the acute oro-antral communication using the Buccal Advancement Flap.

    Procedure: Buccal Advancement Flap

Interventions

  • ProcedureBuccal Periosteal Inversion Flap

    Following elevation of a trapezoidal buccal mucoperiosteal flap, the periosteum is dissected from the overlying buccal mucosa from apical to coronal. The mobilized periosteal layer is inverted over the oro-antral communication and sutured to the palatal soft tissue to achieve tension-free closure, while the overlying buccal mucosa is largely maintained in its original position.

    Also known as: BUPI, Inverted Periosteal Flap, Buccal Periosteal Flap

  • ProcedureBuccal Advancement Flap

    Following elevation of a trapezoidal buccal mucoperiosteal flap, the periosteum is incised to allow mobilization of the flap. The entire mucoperiosteal flap is advanced over the oro-antral communication to the palatal soft tissue to achieve tension-free primary closure.

    Also known as: BAF, Rehrmann Flap, Rehrmann Plastic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Width of Keratinized Gingiva

    Change in keratinized gingival width in millimeters between the preoperative baseline assessment and the three-month postoperative assessment. Keratinized gingival width will be measured between the mucogingival junction and the midpoint of the alveolar ridge using digital intraoral scans obtained with a 3Shape TRIOS 6 intraoral scanner and analyzed using 3D Slicer software.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful Closure of the Oro-Antral Communication

    Clinical success will be defined as complete closure of the oro-antral communication without persistent communication between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus. The proportion of successfully closed oro-antral communications will be calculated for each study group.

    Time frame: 14 days after surgery

  2. Postoperative Pain

    Participants will record their daily maximum postoperative pain once daily in the afternoon using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents very severe pain.

    Time frame: Day 0 through postoperative day 7

  3. Postoperative Swelling

    Participants will record their daily maximum postoperative swelling once daily in the afternoon using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no swelling and 10 represents very severe swelling.

    Time frame: Day 0 through postoperative day 7

  4. Postoperative bleeding

    Participants will record their daily maximum postoperative bleeding once daily in the afternoon using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no postoperative bleeding and 10 represents very severe postoperative bleeding.

    Time frame: Day 0 through postoperative day 7

  5. Number of Participants with Postoperative Wound dehiscence

    Presence or absence of postoperative separation of the sutured buccal and palatal soft tissues will be clinically assessed 14 days after surgery. Participants will be classified as having wound dehiscence if separation of the wound edges is observed. If wound dehiscence is present, its dimensions will additionally be quantified using the intraoral scan.

    Time frame: 14 days after surgery

  6. Dimensions of Postoperative Wound Dehiscence

    Among participants with postoperative wound dehiscence, the maximum dimensions of the separation of the sutured buccal and palatal soft tissues will be measured in milimeters using an intraoral scan 14 days after surgerx.

    Time frame: 14 days after surgery

  7. Number of Participants with Recurrent or Persistent Oro-Antral Communication

    Occurrence of a persistent or recurrent communication between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus during follow-up will be recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after surgery

  8. Number of Participants with Postoperative Sinusitis or Infection

    Occurrence of clinically diagnosed postoperative maxillary sinusitis or local infection at the follow-up examination after 14 days will be recorded. Clinical signs and symptoms may include facial pain, pressure sensation, purulent nasal discharge, intraoral purulent drainage, fever, or other clinically relevant signs of infection.

    Time frame: 14 days after surgery

  9. Reoperation rate

    Percentage of participants in each study group requiring surgical revision because of insufficient closure of the oro-antral communication.

    Time frame: 14 days after surgery

  10. Operative time

    Duration of the surgical procedure measured from the first surgical incision to completion of the final suture, recorded in minutes and seconds.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively on Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of Graz, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health
    Graz, Styria 8043, Austria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Reddy GA, Neelima C, Reddy GS, Charan DG, Samavedam SP. Buccal periosteal inversion flap technique after tooth extraction versus healing by secondary intention for preservation of keratinized gingiva and alveolar ridge: A comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. April 2025.
  • Raj G, Raj M, Loh JSP. Pathophysiology and clinical presentation of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Dentistry Review. June 2022;2(2):100044.
  • Cezairli B, Taskesen F, Yilmaz Altintas N. Causes and treatments of oroantral communications: Experience with 103 cases. Ann Med Res. 2021;28(1):204-209.
  • Rosenfeld EA. Inverted periosteal flap: an alternative to the buccal advancement flap for tension-free, watertight closure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;72(7):1244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 20. PubMed 24768423 ↗
  • Balicz A, Szurko A, Jedzierowska M, Kielbon A, Wojcik S, Adamczyk J, Starosta M, Fiegler-Rudol J, Morawiec T. Acute Oroantral Communication Closure: Resorbable Collagen Membrane vs. Buccal Advancement Flap Outcomes: A Clinical Trial. J Funct Biomater. 2026 Mar 18;17(3):150. doi: 10.3390/jfb17030150. PubMed 41893206 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Not applicable at this time.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2026
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2028
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Also revised
eligibility
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    Eligibility Criteria revised
    + 3 other changes: description, design details and secondary outcomes
  2. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07884331
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Barbara Kirnbauer, PD DDr.
Contact
barbara.kirnbauer@medunigraz.at
+43-316-385-30674
Norbert Jakse, Prof. DDr.
Contact
norbert.jakse@medunigraz.at
+43-316-385-30633
Barbara Kirnbauer, PD DDr.
principal investigator · Medical University of Graz
Norbert Jakse, Prof. DDr.
study chair · Medical University of Graz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion