ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04673981OCAPAUpdated Sep 2, 2025

Neurosensorial Disorder and Pain in Oral Cavity and Oropharynx Cancer Traited Patients (OCAPA)

An interventional study of diagnostic tes for neuropathic pain in Head Cancer, Neck Cancer and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-02.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2020; still recruiting 6 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Following preliminary studies carried out in our department on these subject and subjective findings during clinical examinations, it has been shown that pain is a symptom that is rarely reported following treatment. Instead, neurosensory disorders such as hypoesthesia and paresthesia are found.

The objective of the study is to map and qualitatively evaluate neurosensory disorders in patients treated for cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

Read the detailed description

The protocol, which is done during the usual follow-up consultation of the patient by the maxillo-facial surgeon, is divided into 3 parts:

PART 1: Collection of Data and Consent

  • Patient Data:

    • Date of visit and inclusion in the study
    • Patient initials
    • Age
    • Gender (male or female)
    • The weight
    • The size
  • Verification of inclusion and non-inclusion criteria:
  • General patient history:

    • Patient history
    • Ongoing Treatments
    • Professional activity
  • Tumor:

    • Features
    • Location
    • TNM
    • Histological type
  • Search for risk factors for peripheral neuropathy
  • Check for symptoms of peripheral neuropathy.

PART 2: Collecting Treatment Data

  • Operating data:

    • Operation date
    • Type of surgery
    • Duration of surgery
    • Severed sensory nerves
    • Perioperative complications
  • On the way out:

    • Adjuvant treatment including radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
    • Exit analgesic treatment
    • EN (Numerical Scale)

PART 3: Collection of data related to neurosensory disorders and pain

  • Analgesics consumed
  • Questionnaire DN4 for each operated area separated according to the curage, lumpectomy and reconstruction if they take place.
  • If DN4 positive, completion of the QCD and QEDN questionnaires.
  • Clinical examination for sensory disturbances reported on a chart.
  • Generic quality of life questionnaire adapted to cancer pathology EORTC QLQC30 and its specific Head and Neck35 add-on module adapted to head and neck cancers.
  • Thermotest and hot water, cold water (for the oral cavity)
  • HADS Questionnaire
  • Catastrophe Questionnaire
  • Quantitative sensory testing (QST) for neuropathic patients :

Mechanical neurosensory disorders will be tested with the Von frey filament and the brush.

  • Hypoesthesia or mechanical anaesthesia will be sought with the Von Frey filament and the brush.
  • Mechanical hypersensitivity, a painful sensation exacerbated by a sharp, non-traumatic object, will be sought with a large calibre Von Frey filament.
  • Static Allodynia, felt painful on contact, will be sought at Von Frey's filament.
  • Dynamic Allodynia, felt painful when rubbed, will be sought with a wide brush (8 mm) over a distance of several centimetres.

Thermal neurosensory disorders will be sought for the skin with the Thermotest and at the level of the oral cavity with the application of standardised test tubes containing water at 4°C stored in the fridge or hot water at 63°C (the protocol consists of heating water at 4°C in the microwave for 30 seconds to obtain the temperature of 63°C); these examinations will allow the evaluation of thermal allodynia and hypoesthesia.

The examination will cover the entire face, the oral cavity, the cervical region and the area where the reconstruction flaps are taken. The pathological areas identified will be delimited on diagrams previously made with a coding according to the sensations collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head Cancer
  • Neck Cancer
  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • Hypoesthesia
  • Allodynia
  • Orofacial
  • Neuropathic pain
  • cancer
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 594 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 46 across 2,032 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 859 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient treated for an oral cavity and oropharynx tumor from at least one year and maximum five years.
  • Women or men upper 18 years old)
  • Patient with full consent, aware and signed
  • Patient cover by the French social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with mental disorder, psychologic, with a defect of comprehension to agree fully the protocol
  • Pregnant women or nursing
  • Patients who can't comply with the protocol
  • Participation refusal
  • Inable full age patient or under judicial protection
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    patient treated for a oral cavity and oropharynx cancer

    questionnaire and tests to evaluate neuropathic pain

    Diagnostic Test: diagnostic tes for neuropathic pain

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testdiagnostic tes for neuropathic pain

    Thermotest and hot water, cold water (for the oral cavity), Von frey filament and the brush

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. hypoesthesia on surgical site using a brush and Von Frey Filament

    The measure is a binary measure (positive or negative)

    Time frame: day 0

  2. anaesthesia on surgical site using a brush and Von Frey Filament

    The measure is a binary measure (positive or negative)

    Time frame: day 0

  3. allodynia on surgical site

    The measure is a binary measure (positive or negative) by clinical examination

    Time frame: day 0

  4. Evaluation of the characteristics of the pain by questionnaire DN4

    One standard DN4 with four questions and ten pain characteristics which gave a score from zero to ten points. If DN4 equal or superior of four out of ten the patient seems possible to develop neuropathic pain.

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. hyperalgesia on surgical site using a brush and Von Frey Filament

    The measure is a binary measure (positive or negative)

    Time frame: Day 0

  6. Evaluation of the characteristics of the pain by questionnaire Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    Twelve questions with a score from zero to ten, zero stands for no pain and ten maximal pain scale. A score is given for burning pain (score out of ten), constriction pain (score out of ten), paroxystic pain (score out of ten), evoked pain (score out of ten), paresthesia (score out of ten) and a total score (out of one hundred)

    Time frame: Day 0

  7. Evaluation of the characteristics of the pain by questionnaire Brief Pain Inventory

    Fifteen questions compose the questionnaire, the first one is a binary answer yes or no, the second one is a schema to localize the pain, thirteen following questions are scaled with a score from zero to ten, zero stands for no pain and ten maximal pain scale

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Questionnaire EORTC QLQC30 to assess Quality of life of cancer patients

    a score is given for each question, Thirty questions with for each question a score from one (not at all), two (a bit), three (enough) to four (a lot). Two last questions are scale from one (really bad) to seven (excellent)

    Time frame: day 0

  2. Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-H&N35 to assess Quality of life of head and neck cancer patient

    a score is given for 34 questions (with for each question a score from one (not at all), two (a bit), three (enough) to four (a lot)), for the last 5 questions there is a binary scale (1 for no answer and 2 for yes).

    Time frame: day 0

  3. Quality of life evaluate by the Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-H&N35

    a score is given for 34 questions (with for each question a score from one (not at all), two (a bit), three (enough) to four (a lot)), for the last 5 questions there is a binary scale (1 for no answer and 2 for yes)

    Time frame: Day 0

  4. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-CF) to assess the catastrophizing

    thirteen questions with for each question a score from zero (not at all), one (a bit), two (moderatly), three (a lot) to four (constantly). A score inferior than thirty mark a moderate risk to develop chronic pain. A score superior than thirty mark a high risk to develop chronic pain.

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. Anxious and depression disorder screening using questionnaire Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD)

    Fourteen items scaled from zero to three, seven questions refer to anxiety seven others to depressive dimension Both of them gathered to make a score of twenty-one for maximum

    Time frame: day 0

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 96 months after the start.

Of 437 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Head and Neck Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 96 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 455 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 70.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2020
First posted
Dec 17, 2020
StartActual
Jul 31, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 2028
Last update
Sep 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04673981
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2020
Start date
Jul 31, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2025

Study contacts

Lise LACLAUTRE
Contact
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
+33473754963
Nathalie PHAM DANG
principal investigator · University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion