An interventional study of Inquiry Based Stress Reduction (IBSR) workshop in Stuttering, sponsored by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-09.
Sponsored by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Stuttering is a speech disorder that can cause disturbances in the timing and flow of speech. It is often accompanied not only by verbal difficulties but also by negative impact on several psycho-social aspects in the life of the people who stutter.
Recently, clinical evidences have shown the effectiveness of Inquiry Based Stress Reduction (IBSR) technique to improve psychosocial symptoms and enhance well-being in clinical and non-clinical samples. IBSR, the clinical application of Byron Katie's "The Work", enables individuals to mindfully spot and investigate in a systematic and comprehensive manner thoughts that lead to stress and suffering by a series of questions and turnarounds. IBSR was found to have significantly positive influence on the quality of life, mental well-being and stress management in a variety of populations which suffer from elevated levels of stress, suffering, tension and anxiety, and to enhance resilience of non-clinical general population.
In our research we hypothesized that:
74 studies on the registry are indexed under Stuttering; 23 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 56 is above the median of 44 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Stuttering.
Browse Stuttering studies →Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 554 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants of this group received an IBSR intervention workshop.
Behavioral: Inquiry Based Stress Reduction (IBSR) workshop
Participants of this group did not take a part in the workshop.
The IBSR intervention workshop included weekly group meetings (3.5 hours/meeting) for 12 weeks. During the workshop, participants were encouraged to identify and inquire their stressful thoughts. Using self-inquiry practices participants were taught to increase awareness of their thoughts and feelings, to observe their emotional and physical responses during situations perceived by them as stressful, and allow their mind to return to its true, peaceful, creative nature. Through the process of self-inquiry, participants took an active role in investigating their stressful thoughts, and by this regulated their stress and managed symptoms and emotions, thus enabled them to cope better with the psycho-social consequences of the stuttering.
Also known as: "The Work" meditation (Byron Katie)
Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for Adults (OASES-A)
The purpose of OASES-A questionnaire is to assess the overall stuttering experience of adults who stutter. It quantifies the quality of life, satisfaction and overall personal experience of the adult in his daily coping with stuttering. The items in the questionnaire are divided into four main sections: 1. General information on stuttering awareness and perception. 2. Reactions to stuttering. 3. Communication in daily situations. 4. Quality of life. The OASES-A total score is obtained by summing the scores of the four different sections. In this trial we used the Hebrew version of this questionnaire. OASES-A total score and the score for each of the sections (in the Hebrew version) is ranging from 1.0 to 5.0. The score rates the severity of the stuttering experience, where 1.0 indicates a mild impact rating and 5.0 a severe impact rating (higher scores indicate a more negative impact of stuttering) (Freud et al., 2017; Yaruss \& Quesal, 2006).
Time frame: 1) Baseline (Before the workshop (T1)). 2) Immediately after the workshop (T2). 3) One month after the workshop (T3).
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
The STAI questionnaire assess the tendency of adults to experience anxiety and to inspect their sensitivity to anxiety-provoking situations. The questionnaire distinguishes between two scales of anxiety: anxiety as a state and anxiety as a trait. State anxiety is a person's tendency to experience anxiety in certain situations and times, depending on their context. Trait anxiety is a person's constant and stable tendency to experience anxiety frequently. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale. After completing the questionnaire, items scores are added to obtain total scores. Responders receives 2 separate total scores, one for each of the scales. The maximum score for each scale is 80 and the minimum score is 20. In both scales, scores between 20 to 40 is considered normal in the general adult population. The higher the score, the higher the anxiety level (Spielberger et al., 1970; Taychman \& Malinek, 1984).
Time frame: 1) Baseline (Before the workshop (T1)). 2) Immediately after the workshop (T2). 3) One month after the workshop (T3).
Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire (PFQ)
The aim of PFQ questionnaire is to measure the psychological flexibility of the test responder. Psychological flexibility describes a person's ability to be open, to perceive change as positive, to focus on the present and to change or persist in behavior according to changes of internal and external circumstances. The questionnaire consists of 20 items rated on a 6-point Likert scale. Each item is associated with one of 5 factors that refers to a significant domain in psychological flexibility. The 5 factors are: 1. Positive perception of change. 2. Characterization of the self as flexible. 3. Self-characterizing as open and innovative. 4. A perception of reality as dynamic and changing. 5. A perception of reality as "multifaceted". The score of the questionnaire is calculated based on the mean of the 20 items. Higher score indicates high level of psychological flexibility (Ben-Itzhak et al., 2014).
Time frame: 1) Baseline (Before the workshop (T1)). 2) Immediately after the workshop (T2). 3) One month after the workshop (T3).
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
The SWLS questionnaire evaluates the person's overall satisfaction with life, based on personal criteria that he defined for himself and based on his perception of life. In the questionnaire, there is 5 items that the subjects are required to rate using a 7-point Likert scale. The five items are summed to create a total score that ranged from 5 to 35, with a higher score indicates greater satisfaction with the subject's life. A final grade in the range of 30-35 is a very high score, indicating a person with great satisfaction and very satisfied with his life (Diener, 1994; Diener et al., 1985).
Time frame: 1) Baseline (Before the workshop (T1)). 2) Immediately after the workshop (T2). 3) One month after the workshop (T3).
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 9 months.
Of 37 interventional studies with no phase under Stuttering, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38. This study's 9 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center →