ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07913152Heart@HomeUpdated Nov 3, 2026

Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients

An interventional study of Remote cardiovascular monitoring at home in Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute and Pericarditis, sponsored by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hospital-at-Home (H@H) programs provide hospital-level acute care in the patient's home and may reduce healthcare utilization while improving patient experience. Although H@H models have been evaluated in several acute medical populations, evidence regarding their safety and efficacy in a broad population of patients with acute cardiovascular conditions remains limited.

HeaRt@Home is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of H@H compared with standard in-hospital care in clinically stable cardiac patients admitted to Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. The study will enroll 150 adults hospitalized for selected cardiovascular conditions, including acute myocardial infarction following uncomplicated percutaneous coronary intervention, pericarditis or myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, post transcatheter valvular intervention, acute or worsening heart failure, or following Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.

Eligible patients will be assessed within the first 12-24 hours following clinical intervention and randomized to either continued standard hospitalization or H@H care. Patients assigned to H@H will receive hospital-level care at home, including continuous remote monitoring of vital signs and cardiac rhythm, 24/7 access to the hospital monitoring center, at least one daily home visit by a nurse, and at least one daily virtual assessment by a cardiologist. Laboratory testing, imaging, oral and intravenous medications, oxygen therapy, and additional specialist consultations will be provided at home as clinically indicated. A predefined emergency pathway will enable rapid transfer back to the hospital when required.

The study will assess safety outcomes including all-cause mortality, hospital-acquired infections, hemodynamic deterioration, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, medication errors, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. Patient experience will be evaluated using the 15-item Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, healthcare resource utilization, mobility and physical activity, sleep, arrhythmias, need for escalation to hospital care, and psychological outcomes.

The study aims to determine whether a structured, technology-supported H@H model can provide safe and effective hospital-level care for appropriately selected cardiovascular patients while potentially improving patient experience and optimizing healthcare resource utilization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Myocarditis Acute
  • Pericarditis
  • Pulmonary Embolism Acute
  • Heart Failure Acute
  • Transcatheter Valve Replacement
  • Defibrillators, Implantable

Keywords

  • CARDIOLOGY
  • HOSPITAL AT HOME
  • REMOTE MONITORING
  • H@H
  • Heart@Home
  • Hospital-at-Home
  • cardiovascular
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,270 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 371 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is close to the median of 150 across 1,314 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 554 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Residence in the Tel Aviv area, allowing accessibility of the treating team and a rapid response when required.
  • Mental capacity to provide and the ability to understand and follow medical recommendations.
  • Availability of a family member or caregiver who agrees to remain with the patient during the first 24 hours of Hospital-at-Home care and to be available for periodic assessments as needed. This requirement may be waived at the discretion of the patient and treating physician for highly independent patients.
  • Suitable home environment with Wi-Fi connectivity to support remote monitoring.
  • Adequate technological literacy of the patient or caregiver to use the required technology.
  • Clinically stable and at low risk of rapid deterioration, based on vital signs and initial assessments as determined by the treating physician.
  • The primary indication for hospitalization is one of the following: acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, pericarditis/myocarditis, heart failure, following transcatheter valve replacement or repair, following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation,.

Disease-Specific Inclusion Criteria

In addition to the general inclusion criteria, patients must meet the relevant disease-specific criteria:

  1. Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Acute myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation (STEMI or NSTEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The intervention must have been performed in a coronary artery other than the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery or left main coronary artery, with TIMI grade III flow at the end of the procedure, no additional critical coronary artery stenoses, an uncomplicated PCI without periprocedural complications, and preserved left ventricular systolic function ( >45%).

  2. Pericarditis/Myocarditis

    Initial diagnosis of pericarditis or myocarditis, with no more than a mild pericardial effusion and preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF ≥50%).

  3. Pulmonary Embolism

    Low-intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism following echocardiographic and CT angiographic (CTA) assessment and treatment with oral or subcutaneous anticoagulation; or intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism following successful mechanical thrombectomy, with subsequent improvement in hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters.

  4. Following Transcatheter Valve Replacement or Repair

    Patients following uncomplicated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral or tricuspid valve, with no clear indication for pacemaker implantation.

  5. Heart Failure

    Newly diagnosed (de novo) heart failure or worsening of pre-existing heart failure, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), with symptomatic functional class II-IV heart failure requiring hospitalization.

  6. Following Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Inability to provide .
  • Clinically unstable medical condition or significant risk of developing hemodynamic or cardiovascular instability.
  • Requirement for continuous intravenous infusion of fluids or medications.
  • Uncontrolled pain.
  • Active significant non-cardiovascular comorbid condition, including acute ischemic stroke, active bleeding, severe exacerbation of pulmonary disease, or sepsis.
  • \<8 g/dL.
  • Estimated (eGFR) \<20 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • History of non-adherence to medical treatment or failure to attend follow-up visits.
  • Residence in a facility that provides on-site medical care, such as a nursing facility.
  • Significant cognitive impairment interfering with the patient's ability to adhere to treatment or participate in education and self-care.
  • Inability to obtain peripheral intravenous access, including vascular access requiring ultrasound guidance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Home monitoring

    Patients assigned to H@H will receive hospital-level care at home, including continuous remote monitoring of vital signs and cardiac rhythm, 24/7 access to the hospital monitoring center, at least one daily home visit by a nurse, and at least one daily virtual assessment by a cardiologist. Laboratory testing, imaging, oral and intravenous medications, oxygen therapy,and additional specialist consultations will be provided at home as clinically indicated. A predefined emergency pathway will enable rapid transfer back to the hospital when required.

    Other: Remote cardiovascular monitoring at home

  • No intervention
    Standard hospital care

    Patients assigned to this arm will be monitored with the same continuous remote monitoring device and treated with the standard routine hospital care

Interventions

  • OtherRemote cardiovascular monitoring at home

    Patients assigned to H@H will receive hospital-level care at home, including continuous remote monitoring of vital signs and cardiac rhythm, 24/7 access to the hospital monitoring center, at least one daily home visit by a nurse, and at least one daily virtual assessment by a cardiologist. Laboratory testing, imaging, oral and intravenous medications, oxygen therapy, and additional specialist consultations will be provided at home as clinically indicated. A predefined emergency pathway will enable rapid transfer back to the hospital when required.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Primary Safety Outcomes number of Events

    The total number of events - Each of the following events will be contented is 1 unit: including all-cause mortality during hospitalization; Hospital-acquired infections; Hemodynamic deterioration requiring inotropic treatment and/or mechanical ventilation; Acute kidney injury according to KDIGO criteria; Deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism; Medication administration errors; Hospital readmission within 30 days; and All-cause mortality within 30 days.

    Time frame: 1. Through hospitalization completion, an expected average of 3-5 days 2. Re-hospitalization and all-cause mortality at 30 days following discharge

  2. Patient Experience Questionnaire

    The total score of the 15-item Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire.

    Time frame: Questionnaire filled at the day of discharge from admission, an average of 3-5 days, and refers to the hospitalization duration.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite Secondary Endpoints number of Events

    Duration of hospitalization; Number of diagnostic tests performed during hospitalization, including laboratory tests, imaging examinations, Holter monitoring, and specialist consultations; Number and duration of intravenous treatments; Number of hours of oxygen treatment per day; Episodes of peripheral intravenous-line phlebitis; Episodes of venous thromboembolism; Episodes of acute kidney injury; Requirement for urinary catheterization; Medication administration errors; Falls; Mobility and number of active hours per day measured by continuous monitoring; Daily step count; Hours of sleep per day; Cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia, and second-degree or higher atrioventricular conduction abnormalities; Requirement for transfer from H@H to conventional hospital care; Number of daily nursing visits; Number of daily cardiologist assessments; Cardiac and all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days; All-cause mortality at 30 days;

    Time frame: 1. Through hospitalization completion, an expected average of 3-5 days 2. Re-hospitalization and all-cause mortality at 30 days following discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Achanta A, Wasfy JH, Moss CT, Cherukara A, Ho D, Boxer R, Schmieding M, Phadke NA, Thompson R, Levine DM, Weiner RB. Home Hospital Outcomes for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Factors Associated With Escalation of Care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jan;17(1):e010031. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010031. Epub 2023 Dec 6. PubMed 38054286 ↗
  • Levine DM, Souza J, Schnipper JL, Tsai TC, Leff B, Landon BE. Acute Hospital Care at Home in the United States: The Early National Experience. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):109-110. doi: 10.7326/M23-2264. Epub 2024 Jan 9. No abstract available. PubMed 38190713 ↗
  • Levine DM, Ouchi K, Blanchfield B, Saenz A, Burke K, Paz M, Diamond K, Pu CT, Schnipper JL. Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 21;172(2):77-85. doi: 10.7326/M19-0600. Epub 2019 Dec 17. PubMed 31842232 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 17 months after the start.

Of 321 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myocardial Infarction, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 58. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 354 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
StartActual
Jun 17, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07913152
Collaborators
SABAR HEALTH, SHL Telemedicine Ltd.
Responsible party
Shmuel Kivity, MD (IRB Chairman, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 17, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Michal Laufer Perl, MD, MHA
Contact
michallp@tlvmc.gov.il
97236974388
Shmuel Banai, MD
Contact
shmuelb@tlvmc.gov.il
Shmuel Banai, MD
study director · Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion