ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04580914NEwTON AFUpdated Jan 16, 2025Results posted

Clinical Evaluation of the StablePoint Catheter and Force Sensing System for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

An interventional study of Treatment with IntellaNav StablePoint Ablation Catheter in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation. Completed at 47 sites in 13 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-16.

Sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
321
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The NEwTON AF study is a multi-center, global, prospective, single arm study to establish the safety and effectiveness of the IntellaNav StablePoint Catheter and Force-Sensing System in subjects with symptomatic, drug refractory, recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • StablePoint
  • Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 321 is above the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation is the lead sponsor of 528 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Of its 64 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. History of recurrent symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF), defined as atrial fibrillation (AF) that terminates spontaneously or with intervention (either procedure or drug therapy) within seven days of onset. Minimum documentation includes the following:

    a physician's note indicating recurrent self-terminating atrial fibrillation (AF) which includes at least two symptomatic AF episodes in the patient's history within the last 6 months prior to enrollment, and any electrocardiographically documented AF episode within 12 months prior to enrollment.

  2. Subjects who are eligible for an ablation procedure for PAF according to 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation;
  3. Subjects or intolerant to at least one class I or class III antiarrhythmic medication or to any class I or class III medications;
  4. Subjects who are willing and capable of providing ;
  5. Subjects who are willing and capable of participating in all testing associated with this clinical investigation at an approved clinical center;
  6. Subjects whose age is 18 years or above, or who are of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure \< 180 days prior to enrollment
  2. Left atrial diameter > 5.0 cm or left atrial volume >50 ml/m² indexed based on the most recent echocardiography+
  3. \< 35% based on the most recent echocardiogram +
  4. Continuous AF lasting longer than seven (7) days
  5. Subjects who have undergone any previous left atrial cardiac ablation (RF, Cryo, surgical)
  6. Atrial fibrillation secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause
  7. Subjects who have undergone any cardiac ablation or any surgery within 30 days prior to enrollment
  8. Currently implanted with a pacemaker, ICD, CRT device, or an implanted arrhythmia loop recorder
  9. Active systemic infection
  10. Unstable angina or ongoing myocardial ischemia
  11. Myocardial Infarction (MI) within 90 days prior to enrollment
  12. Evidence of myxoma, left atrial thrombus or intracardiac mural thrombus++
  13. Previous cardiac surgery (i.e. ventriculotomy, atriotomy, CABG, PTCA, PCI, coronary stenting procedures) ≤ 90 days prior to enrollment.
  14. Severe valvular disease, including mechanical prosthetic mitral or tricuspid heart valves (patients with successful mitral valve repair allowed - annular ring constitutes repair);
  15. Any prior history of documented cerebral infarct, or systemic embolism [excluding a post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT)] \<180 days prior to enrollment
  16. Moderate or severe mitral stenosis (severity assessed on the most recent TTE ≤180 days prior to enrollment. Defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure >30 mmHg)
  17. Presence of left atrial appendage closure device
  18. Interatrial baffle, closure device, patch, or patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder
  19. Subjects who, in the judgment of the investigator, have a of less than two (2) years
  20. Women of who are, or plan to become, pregnant during the time of the study (method of assessment upon investigator's discretion)
  21. Amiodarone use within 60 days prior to enrollment
  22. Any carotid stenting or endarterectomy
  23. Stage 3B renal disease or higher (estimated , eGFR \<45 mL/min)
  24. Known coagulopathy disorder (e.g. von Willebrand's disease, hemophilia)
  25. Any known to an AF ablation
  26. Any known contraindication for anticoagulation (e.g. patients unable to receive heparin or an acceptable alternative to achieve adequate anticoagulation)
  27. Vena cava embolic protection filter devices and/or known femoral thrombus that prevents catheter insertion from the femoral approach
  28. Known sensitivity to contrast media (if needed during the procedure) that cannot be controlled with pre-medication
  29. Rheumatic Heart Disease
  30. Presence of intramural thrombus, tumor or other abnormality that precludes vascular access, or manipulation of the catheter
  31. Subjects unable or unwilling to complete follow-up visits and examinations for the duration of the clinical study
  32. Subjects who are currently enrolled in another study or registry that would directly interfere with the current study, except when the subject is participating in a mandatory governmental registry, or a purely observational registry with no associated treatments; each instance must be brought to the attention of the sponsor to determine eligibility.

    • LVEF and LA diameters obtained ≤180 days prior to enrollment will be acceptable, unless a cardiac event has occurred (e.g. MI) between the date of the exam and the enrollment date. In this case, a new echocardiogram (trans-thoracic or trans-esophageal, or intracardiac echo) must be performed to confirm eligibility prior to performing ablation. If no recent (≤180 days prior to enrollment) echocardiogram is available at the time of the enrollment, a new echocardiogram must be performed either prior to enrolling the patient into the study or post-consent to confirm patient's eligibility prior to performing the ablation. For TTE, LA anteroposterior diameter measured by M-mode from the parasternal long-axis view will be used. If both LA diameter and volume are available and at least one of them meets the exclusion criteria, the subject is considered ineligible for the study.

      • The absence of thrombus must be confirmed by means of a trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) within 48 hours prior to the procedure or Intracardiac Echography (ICE) during the procedure in subjects not adequately anticoagulated per Section 10.4.2. If a thrombus is observed, the subject no longer meets eligibility criteria and should be considered "Consent Ineligible".
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
321 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment with Ablation Catheter

    Patients who undergo treatment with the ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

    Device: Treatment with IntellaNav StablePoint Ablation Catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceTreatment with IntellaNav StablePoint Ablation Catheter

    Patients will be treated with an ablation catheter

    Also known as: IntellaNav StablePoint Catheter System

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Primary Safety Events at 1-Month Post-Procedure

    The primary safety endpoint at 30 days is defined as the safety event-free rate at 1-Month (30 days) post-procedure.

    Time frame: Up to 30 Days

  2. Rate of Primary Safety Events at 12-Months Post-Procedure

    The primary safety endpoint at 12 months is defined as the safety event-free rate at 12 months post-procedure.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  3. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Treatment Failure at 12-Months Post-Procedure

    The twelve-month effectiveness endpoint is defined as the event-free rate at twelve-month post-procedure.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  4. Number of Participants That Achieved Electrical Isolation of All Pulmonary Veins

    The primary effectiveness endpoint of acute procedural success is defined as the achievement of electrical isolation of all PVs using the IntellaNav StablePoint catheter only.

    Time frame: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of AEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure

    Secondary Safety Endpoint - AE Rates

    Time frame: 12 Months

  2. Number of Patients With New or Increased Dose of AAD

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint 1 - New or Increased Dose of AAD

    Time frame: 12 Months

  3. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Primary Effectiveness Failure Without a Repeat Procedure

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint 2 - Single Procedure Success defined as freedom from primary effectiveness failure without a repeat procedure

    Time frame: 12 Months

  4. Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Documented Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter and Atrial Tachycardia Recurrence

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint 3 - Symptomatic Recurrence: freedom from documented symptomatic AF/AT/AFL recurrence

    Time frame: 12 Months

  5. Rate of SAEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure

    Secondary Safety Endpoint - SAEs

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Results

Posted Jan 16, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Started299
Completed291
Not completed8
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2

Outcome measures

PrimaryRate of Primary Safety Events at 1-Month Post-Procedure

The primary safety endpoint at 30 days is defined as the safety event-free rate at 1-Month (30 days) post-procedure.

Time frame:
Up to 30 Days
Reported as:
Number · primary safety events
Rate of Primary Safety Events at 1-Month Post-Procedure
primary safety eventsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Rate of Primary Safety Events at 1-Month Post-Procedure13
PrimaryRate of Primary Safety Events at 12-Months Post-Procedure

The primary safety endpoint at 12 months is defined as the safety event-free rate at 12 months post-procedure.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Number · primary safety events
Rate of Primary Safety Events at 12-Months Post-Procedure
primary safety eventsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Rate of Primary Safety Events at 12-Months Post-Procedure13
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Treatment Failure at 12-Months Post-Procedure

The twelve-month effectiveness endpoint is defined as the event-free rate at twelve-month post-procedure.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Treatment Failure at 12-Months Post-Procedure
ParticipantsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Treatment Failure at 12-Months Post-Procedure181
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Achieved Electrical Isolation of All Pulmonary Veins

The primary effectiveness endpoint of acute procedural success is defined as the achievement of electrical isolation of all PVs using the IntellaNav StablePoint catheter only.

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Achieved Electrical Isolation of All Pulmonary Veins
ParticipantsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Number of Participants That Achieved Electrical Isolation of All Pulmonary Veins294
SecondaryRate of AEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure

Secondary Safety Endpoint - AE Rates

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Number · Events Reported
Rate of AEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure
Events ReportedTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Rate of AEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure156
SecondaryNumber of Patients With New or Increased Dose of AAD

Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint 1 - New or Increased Dose of AAD

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With New or Increased Dose of AAD
ParticipantsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Subjects with New or Increased Dose of AAD103
Subjects with No New or Increased Dose of AAD193
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Primary Effectiveness Failure Without a Repeat Procedure

Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint 2 - Single Procedure Success defined as freedom from primary effectiveness failure without a repeat procedure

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Primary Effectiveness Failure Without a Repeat Procedure
ParticipantsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Primary Effectiveness Failure Without a Repeat Procedure175
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Documented Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter and Atrial Tachycardia Recurrence

Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint 3 - Symptomatic Recurrence: freedom from documented symptomatic AF/AT/AFL recurrence

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Documented Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter and Atrial Tachycardia Recurrence
ParticipantsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Documented Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter and Atrial Tachycardia Recurrence211
SecondaryRate of SAEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure

Secondary Safety Endpoint - SAEs

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Number · Total number of reported SAEs
Rate of SAEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure
Total number of reported SAEsTreatment With Ablation Catheter
Rate of SAEs Through 12-Months Post-Procedure72

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment With Ablation Catheter0/299 (0%)47/299 (15.7%)64/299 (21.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment With Ablation Catheter
PericarditisSurgical and medical procedures6/299
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Cardiac disorders4/299
MusculoskeletalGeneral disorders4/299
PulmonaryGeneral disorders4/299
Pericardial EffusionSurgical and medical procedures3/299
GastrointestinalGeneral disorders3/299
Procedure related anesthesia/sedationSurgical and medical procedures2/299
Procedure related GastrointestinalSurgical and medical procedures2/299
Pulmonary EdemaSurgical and medical procedures2/299
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders2/299
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 38
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment With Ablation Catheter
PericarditisSurgical and medical procedures16/299
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Cardiac disorders7/299
Fever and/or virusGeneral disorders5/299
Procedure related Genitourinary/RenalSurgical and medical procedures4/299
Oozing/BleedingSurgical and medical procedures3/299
Pain (Non-cardiovascular)Surgical and medical procedures3/299
Pain cardiovascular (Non-ischemic)Surgical and medical procedures3/299
Post procedure infection/sepsisSurgical and medical procedures3/299
Procedure related Anesthesia/SedationSurgical and medical procedures3/299
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Surgical and medical procedures2/299

Baseline characteristics

Treatment Subjects

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Mean62 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Female118
Male181
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Hispanic or Latino5
Native American0
Asian48
Black3
Pacific Islander0
White244
Other1
Race Undisclosed5
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Hong Kong6
United States168
Japan6
United Kingdom13
Canada14
Austria14
Netherlands2
Belgium7
Monaco1
Taiwan33
Italy31
Germany4
Height
Height(cm)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Mean172 ± 11
Weight
Weight(kg)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Mean86 ± 21
BMI
BMI(percentage)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Mean29 ± 6
Pulse
Pulse(bpm)Treatment With Ablation Catheter
Mean69 ± 15

15 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

47 sites
  • Arrhythmia Research Group
    Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401, United States
  • AdventHealth Orlando
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • The Queen's Medical Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • St. Lukes Idaho Cardiology Associates
    Boise, Idaho 83712, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • St. John's Hospital
    Springfield, Illinois 62769, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Medical Center
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, United States
  • University of Kansas Hospital
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Baptist Health Lexington
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • University of Michigan Hospitals
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Regional Heart Center
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • Catholic Medical Center
    Manchester, New Hampshire 03102, United States
  • Northwell Health
    Bay Shore, New York 11706, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical University
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Wake Forest University School of Medicine
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1023, United States
  • Bethesda North Hospital
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Bryn Mawr Medical Specialists
    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19146, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8802, United States
  • St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Orion Medical
    Pasadena, Texas 77505, United States
  • Christus Trinity Mother Frances Health System
    Tyler, Texas 75702, United States
  • Chippenham and Johnston-Willis Hospital (CJW)
    Richmond, Virginia 23225, United States
  • A.o. Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus AKH
    Vienna, 1190, Austria
  • Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis
    Aalst, 9300, Belgium
  • Vancouver General Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L8, Canada
  • Hamilton General Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
  • Institut universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec
    Ste-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada
  • Hospital de la Pitie-Salpetriere
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Immanuel Klinikum Bernau Herzzentrum Brandenburg
    Bernau, 16321, Germany
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    Kowloon, Hong Kong
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Shatin, 999077, Hong Kong
  • Az. Osp. Lancisi
    Ancona, AN 60126, Italy
  • Fondazione Centro San Raffaele
    Milano, 20132, Italy
  • Kokura Memorial Hospital
    Fukuoka-ken, 802-8555, Japan
  • Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital
    Kanagawa, 238-8558, Japan
  • Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
    Monaco, 98000, Monaco
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
    Taichung, 40705, Taiwan
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
  • Papworth Hospital
    Cambridge, CB2 0AY, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
    Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom
  • Freeman Hospital
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No request for study data has been made at this time. However, Boston Scientific's policy on data sharing can be found at http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/data-sharing-requests.html

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04580914
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2020
Start date
Apr 12, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 21, 2023
Completion
Jun 21, 2023
Results posted
Jan 16, 2025
Last update
Jan 16, 2025

Study contacts

Gregory Michaud
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion