CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04527627Updated Oct 14, 2021

Nursing Intervention in the Patient Being Discharged From the Intensive Care Unit

An interventional study of Nursing Empowerment Intervention in Anxiety and Depression, sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Completed at 3 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-14.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2019, registered Aug 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
178
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are common among critical disease survivors. Interventions aimed to decrease ICU impact on patient mental well-being are needed.

Methods/Design: The study will evaluate an educational nursing intervention addressed to ease the transition during ICU discharge by empowering the patient. A quantitative design will be used to measure the effectiveness of the nursing intervention through an experimental pre-test/post-test with control group design.

Participants will consist of patients from three critical care units from three different hospitals.

Data will be obtained from Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data will be analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics.

Discussion: This study will help to develop and implement an intervention to help patients lessen anxiety and depression associated to their transition from ICU to the general ward.

Read the detailed description

Method An experimental pre-test-post-test design will be used. Setting and participants The study will be carried out in the ICU of three university hospitals which have 151 level 3 ICU beds and where the nurse/patient ratio is 1:2. The three ICUs admit approximately 2000 patients per year. Participants who meet the following inclusion criteria will be included: age > 18 years; ICU stay > 48h; speaker of one of the two official languages of the region and carrying out a personal interview, Glasgow Coma Score of 15, Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) negative, and provision of signed informed consent. Patients with a pre-admission diagnosis of mental illness will be excluded.

Patients will be selected by simple random probabilistic sampling. Patients will be recruited through the ICU admission list and randomly assigned to the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG). To calculate the sample number needed, on the basis of a statistical power of 80% and a level of confidence of 95% in a unilateral analysis, and estimating the percentage of patients who have high anxiety at ICU discharge at 50% (between 30% and 75% according to reports), a sample of 86 patients per group will be needed (assuming 15% losses per group) to detect a difference of >20% as statistically significant (expected to be 0.5 for the CG and 0.28 for the EG).

Nursing empowerment intervention The intervention will be carried out during the ICU discharge planning. A "Patient Information Guide for Intensive Care Unit patients" will be developed.

The guide will be based on the findings obtained in a previous qualitative study and on previous studies on patient empowerment and education. The guide structure will take into account the dimensions of empowerment: bio-physiological, functional, social, experience, ethics and the financial aspect. The guide will be reviewed by experts in the development of information guides for patients and family members and will be evaluated by the participating ICUs before use.

EG patients will receive the intervention verbally and in booklet format from the study nurses at each ICU. CG patients will receive the usual nursing treatment provided during ICU discharge, which usually consists of verbal information about the time and place of destination.

Variables:

  1. Independent variable: Nursing empowerment intervention administered to the patient during ICU discharge.
  2. Dependent variable: Level of anxiety and depression (HADS scale) pre-post ICU discharge.
  3. Sociodemographic variables: sex (male/female), age (in years), educational level (none, primary, secondary, higher), profession, family situation (lives alone, with family or friends) and marital status (single, married or cohabiting, widower, divorced).
  4. Clinical variables: severity level (APACHE II), reason for ICU admission and days of stay in the ICU.

Data will be collected using a first contact with the patient in the ICU, and the study objectives and informed consent will be explained.

The researcher will administer the HADS scale to the EG and CG groups before ICU discharge and after ICU discharge (in the destination ward).

Instruments:

  1. Glasgow Coma Score: The Glasgow scale is designed to assess the level of consciousness, and includes the assessment of the ocular, verbal and motor response. It is simple, objective and easily reproducible.
  2. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) adapted and translated to Spanish by Tobar et al. (2010), which is recommended and validated in the detection of delirium. The four criteria that characterize delirium are evaluated using four questions for each area (change in mental status, inattention, altered consciousness and disorganized thinking).
  3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Adapted and validated in Spanish by Tejero, Guimera, Farré and Peri (1986) it comprises two subscales of 7 items each, one for anxiety and one for depression. The intensity/frequency of symptoms is evaluated on a four-point Likert scale. For each subscale, the score ranges from 0 to 21, with the following cut-off points: 0-7 Normal; 8-10 Doubtful/possible clinical problem; >10 Likely clinical problem. The HADs measures the current status during the last week. Designed to be administered to subjects with organic diseases, the physical aspects that may accompany anxiety or depression have been eliminated, leaving the emotional aspects ones. In addition to the quantitative evaluation, it may be stratified into non-anxious or non-depressed if the HADS scores are \< 8; possible or doubtful between 8 and 10, and likely or affirmative if they are ≥ 11. The authors consider that, for research purposes, if a low proportion of false positives are to be obtained, the upper limit with values of 10 or 11 should be used, while values of 8 or 9 would prevent false negatives. For this study, a value of 10 was decided on as a cut-off point between the presence or absence of anxiety and depression.
  4. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II: To measure and evaluate the severity of the critically ill, Knaus produced in 1981 the first version, comprising 34 items, which were reduced reducing to 14 in the second version in 1985. APACHE II classifies disease severity using 12 usual physiological measures, the previous health status and age, with a score ranging from 0 to 71 points.

Data analysis The data will be analysed using the SPSS v23 statistical package. A descriptive analysis of the study variables will be made (means and standard deviation and medians and 25-75 percentiles (IQR) for quantitative variables according to the normality of distribution, and frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables). The possible relationship between sociodemographic and clinical variables and the level of anxiety and depression will be analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Student's t test and ANOVA or their nonparametric equivalents based on the type of variable and its distribution and the number of subgroups compared. The chi square test will be used to compare the variation in categorical variables between the EG and CG. The Mann-Whitney test or the Wilcoxon test will be used to compare the mean anxiety scale score between EG and CG. Statistical significance will be established as p ≤ 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety
  • Depression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • empowerment patient
  • patient education
  • icu discharge
  • nursing interventions
  • anxiety
  • depression
  • post-traumatic stress disorder
  • post icu syndrome
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 178 is above the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona is the lead sponsor of 319 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • ICU stay > 48h
  • Speaker of one of the two official languages of the region Catalan or Spanish and carrying out a personal interview
  • Glasgow Coma Score of 15
  • Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) negative
  • Provision of signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre ICU admission diagnosis of mental illness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
178 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group (EG)

    The nursing empowerment intervention will be administered in the experimental group

    Behavioral: Nursing Empowerment Intervention

  • No intervention
    Control Group (CG)

    The nursing empowerment intervention will not be administered in the control group

Interventions

  • BehavioralNursing Empowerment Intervention

    Nursing empowerment intervention The intervention will be carried out during the ICU discharge planning. A "Patient Information Guide for Intensive Care Unit patients" will be developed. The guide will be based on the findings obtained in a previous qualitative study and on previous studies on patient empowerment and education. Its structure will take into account the dimensions of empowerment: bio-physiological, functional, social, experience, ethics and the financial aspect. The guide will be reviewed by experts in the development of information guides for patients and family members and will be evaluated by the participating ICUs before use. EG patients will receive the intervention verbally and in booklet format from the study nurses at each ICU.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Level of anxiety and depression assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

    The outcome 1 will be mesured with the anxiety and depression scale (HADS) after ICU discharge. The HADS measures the current status during the last week. A value of 10 is the cut-off point between the presence or absence of anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Level of anxiety and depression at ICU discharge assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The outcome 2 will be mesured with the anxiety and depression scale (HADS) during ICU discharge. The HADS measures the current status during the last week. A value of 10 is the cut-off point between the presence or absence of anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: Up to 2 days

  2. Level of anxiety and depression at the general ward stay assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The outcome 3 will be mesured with the anxiety and depression scale (HADS) at the general ward. The HADS measures the current status during the last week. A value of 10 is the cut-off point between the presence or absence of anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: After 2 days

  3. Severity level at ICU admission assessed by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II

    APACHE II is a clinical variable. It will be used to measure and evaluate the severity of the critically ill. It classifies disease severity using 12 usual physiological measures, the previous health status and age, with a score ranging from 0 to 71 points.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Duration of ICU stay

    Duration of ICU stay is a clinical variable. This variable indicates how many days the patients needs to recovery from critically ill.

    Time frame: Up to 60 days

  5. Sex: male or female

    Sex is a sociodemographic variable. Acording to the literature, female sex presents more ansiety and depression than male sex.

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Age in years

    Sociodemographic variable

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Educational level: none, primary, secondary or higher

    Sociodemographic variable

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Family situation: lives alone, with family or friends

    Sociodemographic variable

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Marital status: single, married, cohabiting, widower or divorced

    Sociodemographic variable

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Hospital de Bellvitge
    Barcelona, Hospitalet De Llobregat, Spain
  • Hospital Clínic of Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75. PubMed 21946660 ↗
  • Desai SV, Law TJ, Needham DM. Long-term complications of critical care. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):371-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fd66e5. PubMed 20959786 ↗
  • Svenningsen H, Langhorn L, Agard AS, Dreyer P. Post-ICU symptoms, consequences, and follow-up: an integrative review. Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Jul;22(4):212-220. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12165. Epub 2015 Feb 17. PubMed 25688675 ↗
  • Fumis RR, Ranzani OT, Martins PS, Schettino G. Emotional disorders in pairs of patients and their family members during and after ICU stay. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0115332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115332. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25616059 ↗
  • Milton A, Bruck E, Schandl A, Bottai M, Sackey P. Early psychological screening of intensive care unit survivors: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2017 Nov 9;21(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1813-z. PubMed 29121983 ↗
  • Ferrand N, Zaouter C, Chastel B, Faye K, Fleureau C, Roze H, Dewitte A, Ouattara A. Health related quality of life and predictive factors six months after intensive care unit discharge. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Apr;38(2):137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 1. PubMed 29864552 ↗
  • Thomas S, Mehrholz J. Health-related quality of life, participation, and physical and cognitive function of patients with intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness 1 year after rehabilitation in Germany: the GymNAST cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 13;8(7):e020163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020163. PubMed 30007926 ↗
  • de Grood C, Leigh JP, Bagshaw SM, Dodek PM, Fowler RA, Forster AJ, Boyd JM, Stelfox HT. Patient, family and provider experiences with transfers from intensive care unit to hospital ward: a multicentre qualitative study. CMAJ. 2018 Jun 4;190(22):E669-E676. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170588. PubMed 29866892 ↗
  • Stelfox HT, Lane D, Boyd JM, Taylor S, Perrier L, Straus S, Zygun D, Zuege DJ. A scoping review of patient discharge from intensive care: opportunities and tools to improve care. Chest. 2015 Feb;147(2):317-327. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2965. PubMed 25210942 ↗
  • Won MH, Son YJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Relocation Stress Syndrome Scale-Short Form for patients transferred from adult intensive care units to general wards. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Jun;58:102800. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102800. Epub 2020 Jan 18. PubMed 31964557 ↗
  • Nikayin S, Rabiee A, Hashem MD, Huang M, Bienvenu OJ, Turnbull AE, Needham DM. Anxiety symptoms in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Nov-Dec;43:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 28. PubMed 27796253 ↗
  • Hatch R, Young D, Barber V, Griffiths J, Harrison DA, Watkinson P. Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: a UK-wide prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2018 Nov 23;22(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2223-6. PubMed 30466485 ↗
  • Cuzco C, Castro P, Marin Perez R, Ruiz Garcia S, Nunez Delgado AI, Romero Garcia M, Martinez Momblan MA, Benito Aracil L, Carmona Delgado I, Canalias Reverter M, Nicolas JM, Martinez Estalella G, Delgado-Hito P. Impact of a Nurse-Driven Patient Empowerment Intervention on the Reduction in Patients' Anxiety and Depression During ICU Discharge: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;50(12):1757-1767. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005676. Epub 2022 Sep 30. PubMed 36178294 ↗
  • Cuzco C, Castro Rebollo P, Marin Perez R, Nunez Delgado AI, Romero Garcia M, Martinez Momblan MA, Estrada Reventos D, Martinez Estalella G, Delgado-Hito P. Mixed-method research protocol: Development and evaluation of a nursing intervention in patients discharged from the intensive care unit. Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3666-3676. doi: 10.1002/nop2.894. Epub 2021 May 6. PubMed 33955196 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04527627
Lead sponsor
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 26, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2021
Completion
Aug 31, 2021
Last update
Oct 14, 2021

Study contacts

Cecilia Cuzco, RN
principal investigator · Hospital Clínic of Barcelona
Pedro Castro, MD
study director · Hospital Clínic of Barcelona
Pilar Delgado-Hito, RN
study director · University of Barcelona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion