ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07558291Updated Sep 18, 2026

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Women With Gestational Diabetes

An interventional study of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (FreeStyle Libre 2) and Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (Capillary Glucose Meter) in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 15 studies in Diabetes, Gestational with a site in Spain — 6 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Diabetes, Gestational · Spain.

Planned enrollment
8th of 11
100 · median 120
Started
2026
with 2 others
No phase
10 of 15
5 open now
Registered
13th of 15
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 15
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Among the 15 studies in Diabetes, Gestational with a site in Spain, this one is the 8th largest by planned enrollment of the 11 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2026, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 13th registered.

Diabetes, Gestational

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes, Gestational; 203 are open to participants now.

Browse Diabetes, Gestational studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 15 studies in Diabetes, Gestational with a site in Spain are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 6 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Spain have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Spain →

Who these studies take

Of the 139 Diabetes, Gestational studies recruiting now, 63 (45%) set no upper age limit and 74 (53%) stop at 75 or younger; 14 take children under 18; 63 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 15 studies in Diabetes, Gestational with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a type of diabetes that is first diagnosed during pregnancy. It causes high blood sugar levels and can increase the risk of health problems for both the mother and the baby. Babies may grow larger than expected (macrosomia), which can make delivery more difficult and increase the risk of birth complications. Mothers with GDM are also more likely to need insulin treatment and may have a higher risk of high blood pressure during pregnancy. Good blood sugar control is important to reduce these risks.

The usual way to monitor blood sugar in women with GDM is by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This involves pricking the finger several times a day to measure blood sugar levels. Although this method provides useful information, it only shows glucose levels at specific moments and may miss changes that happen during the night or between measurements.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a newer method that uses a small sensor placed under the skin to measure glucose levels throughout the day and night. It provides more detailed information about blood sugar patterns and does not require frequent finger pricks. CGM has been shown to improve blood sugar control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, but its benefits in women with gestational diabetes are not yet fully known.

The purpose of this study is to compare continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with standard finger-prick monitoring (SMBG) in pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. The study will evaluate whether CGM is practical to use, whether women are satisfied with it, and whether it may help improve blood sugar control and pregnancy outcomes.

A total of 100 pregnant women with gestational diabetes will take part in this study. Participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups:

One group will use a continuous glucose monitoring device.

The other group will continue with standard finger-prick blood glucose monitoring.

Both groups will receive the same medical care, including dietary advice, physical activity recommendations, and insulin treatment if needed. Participants will attend regular pregnancy visits every 2 to 3 weeks until delivery, as part of usual care. No extra hospital visits are required because of the study. Women using CGM will receive training on how to use the device.

The researchers will compare blood sugar control, the need for insulin, pregnancy complications, and newborn outcomes such as birth weight and episodes of low blood sugar after birth. The study will also assess how satisfied women are with their glucose monitoring method and how it affects their quality of life.

This is a pilot study, which means its main goal is to determine whether a larger study should be carried out in the future. The results will help researchers understand whether continuous glucose monitoring could improve the care of women with gestational diabetes and their babies.

Read the detailed description

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition in which high blood glucose levels are first detected during pregnancy. It usually develops in the second or third trimester and affects a significant proportion of pregnant women worldwide. Although blood glucose levels often return to normal after delivery, GDM is associated with important short-term and long-term health risks for both the mother and the child.

In the short term, poorly controlled blood glucose levels during pregnancy increase the risk of excessive fetal growth (macrosomia or large for gestational age), shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory complications, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). For the mother, GDM increases the likelihood of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and postpartum complications. In the long term, women with GDM have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and their children are at increased risk of obesity and metabolic disorders later in life.

Achieving and maintaining optimal glycemic control is therefore a central goal in the management of GDM. Standard treatment includes dietary counseling, physical activity recommendations, and regular monitoring of blood glucose levels. If lifestyle measures are not sufficient to reach glycemic targets, insulin therapy is initiated.

Currently, the standard method for glucose monitoring in women with GDM is self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This involves capillary finger-prick measurements typically performed four to six times per day (fasting and postprandial values). While SMBG provides important information, it has several limitations. It captures glucose levels only at specific time points and may miss significant fluctuations, including nocturnal hyperglycemia and postprandial excursions. It also relies heavily on patient adherence and accurate recording of results. Incomplete monitoring or reporting errors may affect clinical decision-making. Additionally, frequent finger pricks can be uncomfortable and burdensome.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers an alternative approach. CGM systems use a small sensor inserted under the skin to measure interstitial glucose levels continuously throughout the day and night. The device provides real-time glucose readings, trend information, and metrics such as time in range, time above range, time below range, and glucose variability. These metrics offer a more comprehensive view of glycemic control than isolated capillary measurements.

In individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, CGM has been shown to improve glycemic control, increase time in target range, reduce hypoglycemia, and enhance patient satisfaction. In pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that CGM use can improve neonatal outcomes. However, evidence supporting the use of CGM in women with gestational diabetes remains limited and inconclusive. Observational studies suggest that CGM may detect glycemic abnormalities not captured by SMBG and may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes, but well-designed randomized controlled trials in this population are lacking.

This study aims to address this evidence gap.

Study Design

This is a single-center, parallel-group, pilot randomized controlled trial conducted at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. The study will include pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation.

A total of 100 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups:

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Group

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Group

Randomization will be computer-generated and implemented through a secure electronic system to ensure allocation concealment. Due to the nature of the intervention, participants cannot be blinded to group assignment; however, outcome assessors will be blinded when feasible.

Intervention

Participants in the CGM group will receive a CE-marked continuous glucose monitoring device (FreeStyle Libre 2). The device will be used according to the manufacturer's approved indications. Women will receive standardized training on sensor placement, device use, interpretation of glucose trends, and troubleshooting. A capillary glucose meter will also be provided for confirmation of values if necessary.

Participants in the SMBG group will continue with standard capillary glucose monitoring according to usual clinical practice, typically including fasting and postprandial measurements. They will receive standardized education on proper technique and documentation.

Both groups will receive identical clinical management, including dietary advice, physical activity recommendations, and insulin therapy initiation if glycemic targets are not achieved. Clinical decisions will follow established local protocols for gestational diabetes management. Follow-up visits will occur every 2 to 3 weeks until delivery, consistent with routine care.

No additional clinical visits beyond standard GDM management are required. Questionnaires assessing patient satisfaction and quality of life will be administered after two weeks of device use and again at delivery.

Objectives

The primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate feasibility, including recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence to the assigned monitoring strategy, and completeness of collected data. In addition, preliminary efficacy data will be generated to estimate potential clinical benefits and inform the design of a future larger-scale randomized trial.

Secondary objectives include comparison between groups in:

Neonatal outcomes (birth weight, large for gestational age, neonatal hypoglycemia, NICU admission, obstetric trauma, Apgar scores, umbilical artery pH)

Maternal outcomes (need for insulin therapy, gestational age at insulin initiation, HbA1c levels, gestational weight gain, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, postpartum hemorrhage, infections, and mode of delivery)

Glycemic control parameters (including CGM-derived metrics such as time in range and glucose variability)

Patient-reported outcomes, including treatment satisfaction, usability, and diabetes-related quality of life

Exploratory analyses will examine associations between CGM metrics and neonatal outcomes, as well as patient engagement with remote monitoring platforms.

Statistical Considerations

As a pilot trial, the sample size of 100 participants is designed to assess feasibility and generate preliminary estimates of effect size rather than to definitively demonstrate superiority. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Continuous and categorical outcomes will be compared using appropriate statistical tests, and multivariable regression models will be used to adjust for potential confounders. Effect sizes and confidence intervals will be emphasized to inform future research planning.

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable European and Spanish regulations governing biomedical research and medical devices. The protocol and informed consent documents will be reviewed and approved by an independent Research Ethics Committee prior to study initiation.

Participation is voluntary. Written informed consent will be obtained before any study-specific procedures. Data will be coded and stored securely in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). No biological samples will be collected as part of this study.

Significance

This pilot randomized clinical trial seeks to determine whether continuous glucose monitoring is feasible, acceptable, and potentially beneficial for women with gestational diabetes. By collecting comprehensive maternal, fetal, neonatal, and patient-reported data from diagnosis through delivery, the study will provide important preliminary evidence regarding the role of CGM in this population.

If results suggest clinical benefit and operational feasibility, the findings will support the development of a larger, adequately powered randomized controlled trial. Ultimately, this research aims to improve glycemic management strategies during pregnancy and enhance health outcomes for both mothers and their babies.

03

Conditions studied

  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring
  • Glycemic Control
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women aged ≥18 years
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to local two-step protocol (abnormal 50 g glucose challenge test followed by abnormal 100 g oral glucose tolerance test with at least 2 abnormal values)
  • Gestational age between 24 and 28 weeks at time of GDM diagnosis
  • Access to a compatible smartphone or digital device with internet connection to allow synchronization and remote upload of glucose data (CGM or SMBG)
  • Ability and willingness to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preexisting type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • History of bariatric surgery
  • Treatment with metformin during pregnancy
  • Chronic systemic therapy
  • Known to use of a CGM sensor (e.g., severe dermatologic conditions at insertion site)
  • Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

    Participants randomized to this arm will use a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (FreeStyle Libre 2) from randomization (24-28 weeks of gestation) until delivery. The sensor will be placed by trained staff, and participants will receive standardized training on device use and interpretation of glucose trends. Clinical decisions, including dietary adjustments and initiation or titration of insulin therapy, will be based on CGM data according to local gestational diabetes protocols. A capillary glucose meter will be provided for confirmatory measurements if needed. All other aspects of care will follow standard practice.

    Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (FreeStyle Libre 2)

  • Active comparator
    Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG)

    Participants randomized to this arm will perform standard self-monitoring of blood glucose using capillary finger-prick measurements (typically fasting and postprandial values, 4-6 times daily) from randomization until delivery. Participants will receive standardized education on measurement technique and recording. Clinical decisions, including dietary adjustments and insulin initiation or titration, will be based on SMBG values according to local gestational diabetes protocols. All other aspects of care, including obstetric follow-up, will follow standard clinical practice.

    Device: Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (Capillary Glucose Meter)

Interventions

  • DeviceContinuous Glucose Monitoring (FreeStyle Libre 2)

    Use of a CE-marked continuous glucose monitoring system (FreeStyle Libre 2) from randomization (24-28 weeks of gestation) until delivery. The sensor measures interstitial glucose continuously and provides real-time glucose values and trend information. Data are reviewed during routine visits or remotely and used to guide clinical management of gestational diabetes, including lifestyle adjustments and insulin initiation or titration when required. A capillary glucose meter may be used to confirm discordant readings.

  • DeviceSelf-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (Capillary Glucose Meter)

    Standard capillary self-monitoring of blood glucose using a CE-marked glucose meter from randomization until delivery. Participants perform fasting and postprandial finger-prick measurements (typically 4-6 times daily). Glucose values are reviewed during routine visits or remotely and used to guide clinical management of gestational diabetes, including dietary adjustments and insulin initiation or titration according to local protocols.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared With Standard Self-Monitoring - Recruitment rate

    Number of enrolled participants over number of eligible participants

    Time frame: From randomization (24-28 weeks of gestation) until delivery

  2. Feasibility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared With Standard Self-Monitoring - Retention rate

    Number of participants completing the study over number of randomized participants

    Time frame: From randomization (24-28 weeks of gestation) until delivery

  3. Feasibility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared With Standard Self-Monitoring - Adherence to assigned monitoring strategy

    Proportion of expected glucose readings completed; ≥80% considered high adherence

    Time frame: From randomization (24-28 weeks of gestation) until delivery

  4. Feasibility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared With Standard Self-Monitoring - Data completeness

    Percentage of missing key variables

    Time frame: From randomization (24-28 weeks of gestation) until delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neonatal Outcomes - Birth weight

    Birth weight, measured in grams

    Time frame: At delivery

  2. Neonatal Outcomes - Large for gestational age

    Birth weight over the 90th centile for gestational age

    Time frame: At delivery

  3. Neonatal Outcomes - Neonatal hypoglycemia

    Episodes of hypoglycemia requiring treatment

    Time frame: From delivery up to hospital discharge

  4. Neonatal Outcomes - Admission to neonatal intensive care unit

    Admission to neonatal intensive care unit

    Time frame: From delivery up to hospital discharge

  5. Neonatal Outcomes - Obstetric trauma

    Presence of any neonatal lesion secondary to delivery (e.g., shoulder dystocia, birth injury)

    Time frame: From delivery up to hospital discharge

  6. Neonatal Outcomes - Apgar score

    Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes

    Time frame: At delivery

  7. Neonatal Outcomes - Umbilical artery pH

    Umbilical artery pH

    Time frame: At delivery

  8. Maternal Glycemic Control

    HbA1c levels

    Time frame: At diagnosis, third trimester, before delivery, postpartum

  9. Maternal Glycemic Control

    Time in range (63-140 mg/dL) - CGM group

    Time frame: At diagnosis, every two weeks, before delivery and at delivery

  10. Maternal Glycemic Control

    Time above range (\>140 mg/dL) - CGM group

    Time frame: At diagnosis, every two weeks, before delivery and at delivery

  11. Maternal Glycemic Control

    Time below range (\<63 mg/dL) - CGM group

    Time frame: At diagnosis, every two weeks, before delivery and at delivery

  12. Maternal Glycemic Control

    Number of abnormal capillary readings - SMBG group

    Time frame: At diagnosis, every two weeks, before delivery and at delivery

  13. Maternal Glycemic Control

    Mean fasting and postprandial glucose values

    Time frame: At diagnosis, every two weeks, before delivery and at delivery

  14. Maternal Glycemic Control

    Gestational age at first abnormal glucose reading

    Time frame: Third trimester of pregnancy

  15. Insulin Therapy

    Need of insulin initiation

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery

  16. Insulin Therapy

    Gestational age at insulin initiation

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery

  17. Insulin Therapy

    Initial and final insulin dose before delivery

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery

  18. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Weight before pregnancy, in kilograms

    Time frame: At beginning of pregnancy

  19. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Weight before delivery, in kilograms

    Time frame: Last visit before delivery

  20. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Height, in centimeters

    Time frame: Last visit before delivery

  21. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Mode of delivery (vaginal, instrumental, cesarean)

    Time frame: At delivery

  22. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome)

    Time frame: From randomization until postpartum hospitalization

  23. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Postpartum hemorrhage

    Time frame: At delivery and postpartum hospitalization

  24. Maternal Clinical Outcomes

    Peripartum infection requiring antibiotics

    Time frame: At delivery and postpartum hospitalization

  25. Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, DTSQ)

    Time frame: 2 weeks after device initiation and at delivery

  26. Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Device usability and acceptance (Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey, GMSS)

    Time frame: 2 weeks after device initiation and at delivery

  27. Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Quality of life (GDMQ-36 questionnaire)

    Time frame: 2 weeks after device initiation and at delivery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
    Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain
    • Federico Migliorelli, MD, PhD · Contactfmiguore@clinic.cat · (+34)932275400
    • Federico Migliorelli, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Clara Murillo, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Irene Vinagre, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Daria Roca · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared due to the sensitive maternal-neonatal data collected and the small sample size, which may pose a risk of re-identification. Data will be handled in compliance with GDPR.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.

Of 307 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes, Gestational, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 310 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 23, 2026
First posted
Apr 30, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07558291
Collaborators
Fundación Sociedad Española de Diabetes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 30, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Federico Migliorelli, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion