ClinicalTrials.gg
SuspendedNCT04498585Updated Feb 10, 2023

Virtual Reality to Reduce Delirium

An interventional study of VR Stimulation in Delirium and Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Suspended at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-10.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was suspended
Decreased resources due to COVID-19
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
920
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Delirium has been long considered as a major contributor to cognitive impairments following a critical illness. Currently, both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic prevention and treatment strategies are used in the intensive care unit, despite these strategies remaining controversial. However, with previous studies showing the feasibility of using virtual reality (VR) within the critical care setting, the investigators propose to use this technology to investigate the effect of 360-degree immersive virtual reality stimulation on the incidence of delirium in the ICU.

Stimulation will be provided for 30 minutes, three times a day, evenly spaced between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, using a commercially available head-mounted display. The investigators hypothesize that by providing relaxing virtual environments to patients through a head-mounted display and headphones, the incidence of delirium will be lower compared to the control group receiving no VR stimulation. Secondary outcomes will include evaluating the movement patterns and intensity between the intervention and control group, and between patients with and without delirium, using inertial measurement units and an under mattress bed sensor. It is hypothesized that it will be possible to detect difference in movement patterns between groups and identify patterns indicating the presence or absence of delirium. Secondary objective also include the evaluation of the effect of VR on duration of delirium. Here it is hypothesized that the duration of delirium will be shorter in participants receiving the VR stimulation compared to those in the control group. Physiological parameters (e.g. heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, etc.) will also be recorded during the stimulation to further understand what, if any, effect VR has.

02

Conditions studied

  • Delirium
  • Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality
  • Delirium
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Critical Care
  • Movement Analysis
03

In context

Delirium

1,071 studies on the registry are indexed under Delirium; 239 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 920 is above the median of 119 across 608 interventional studies indexed under Delirium.

Browse Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 737 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written Informed Consent (by the patient, relatives, or authorized representative)
  • No severe visual or auditory impairments (strabismus, macular degeneration, retinopathy)
  • Estimated length of stay >24 hours
  • Can keep eyes open for at least 30 seconds
  • German or French speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known psychotic disorders associated with delusions (e.g. schizophrenia)
  • Recent history of major depression
  • Admission for drug overdose
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
920 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants who will be receiving standard ICU care and additionally the VR stimulation during their ICU stay.

    Other: VR Stimulation

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients in the ICU who will be receiving standard ICU care during their ICU stay. Participants in this arm will not be receiving VR stimulation.

Interventions

  • OtherVR Stimulation

    Participants in the intervention group will be provided with 30 minutes of relaxing, 360-degree virtual reality stimulation and corresponding sounds, three times a day (morning, midday, evening) everyday during their stay in the ICU, up to a maximum of 14 days.

    Also known as: Visuo-acoustic stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Delirium

    Delirium will be assessed 3 times a day using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. The screening will be conducted by trained critical care nurses. If a score greater than or equal to 4 is recorded, this will count as an incidence of delirium.

    Time frame: Number of incidences during stay in the intensive care unit (to a maximum of 14 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pattern of the movements before and during delirium

    Movement patterns, measured as acceleration and rotation, will be measured using inertial measurement units. The data will be used to determine if there is a change in pattern or intensity between periods before and during delirium.

    Time frame: Recorded during entire stay in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days)

  2. Intensity of the movements before and during delirium

    Movement patterns, measured as acceleration and rotation, will be measured using inertial measurement units. The data will be used to determine if there is a change in intensity between periods before and during delirium.

    Time frame: Recorded during entire stay in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days)

  3. Duration of Delirium

    The duration of delirium will be evaluated per 8 hour periods, or as needed, while patients are in the ICU. If the participant is assessed as delirious during any of the assessments during an 8 hour span, the entire period will count as delirious.

    Time frame: Recorded during entire stay in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days)

Other outcomes

  1. Cognitive Functioning

    Cognitive abilities will be measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

    Time frame: Compared between functioning at discharge to 6-months post-discharge.

  2. Health Related Quality of Life

    Quality of life is examined via the EQ-5D questionnaire (official name, not abbreviated). The five-level version (5L) will be used. The five levels of the scale, scored from 1 to 5 are: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to/extreme problems. The numbers for the five dimensions are subsequently combined to create a unique 5-digit code which represents the respondent's overall health state. This means an index of 11111 is the best possible health, and 55555 is the worst possible health.

    Time frame: Compared between quality pre-admission to 6-months post-discharge.

  3. Functional Independence

    Independence is examined using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

    Time frame: Compared between quality pre-admission to 6-months post-discharge.

  4. Heart Rate

    Changes in heart rate (beats per minute) recorded from the patient will be compared from the start of the stimulation to the end of the stimulation period.

    Time frame: Every stimulation period for the duration of the patient's time in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days).

  5. Blood Pressure

    Changes in blood pressure (mmHg) recorded from the patient will be compared from the start of the stimulation to the end of the stimulation period.

    Time frame: Every stimulation period for the duration of the patient's time in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days).

  6. Respiration Rate

    Changes in respiration rate (breaths per minute) recorded from the patient will be compared from the start of the stimulation to the end of the stimulation period.

    Time frame: Every stimulation period for the duration of the patient's time in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days).

  7. Oxygen Saturation

    Changes in oxygen saturation (%) recorded from the patient will be compared from the start of the stimulation to the end of the stimulation period.

    Time frame: Every stimulation period for the duration of the patient's time in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days).

  8. System Usability Scale

    The 10-item System Usability Scale is used to collect data on the user's (nurse providing VR stimulation) subjective usability assessments. There are five response options per question; from Strongly disagree (1) to Strongly agree (5). For each odd numbered question, subtract 1 from the score. For each even numbered question, subtract the score from 5. Add up the new values calculated and multiply this total by 2.5. This gives a final score from 0 - 100 (this is not a percentage, but values can be normalized to produce a percentile ranking). A score above 68 is considered above average, and below 68 is below average.

    Time frame: Once a day for the duration of the patient's time in the ICU (to a maximum of 14 days).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Inselspital
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chanques G, Ely EW, Garnier O, Perrigault F, Eloi A, Carr J, Rowan CM, Prades A, de Jong A, Moritz-Gasser S, Molinari N, Jaber S. The 2014 updated version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit compared to the 5th version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and other current methods used by intensivists. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Mar 1;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0377-7. PubMed 29492696 ↗
  • Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299. PubMed 30113379 ↗
  • Santos E, Cardoso D, Neves H, Cunha M, Rodrigues M, Apostolo J. Effectiveness of haloperidol prophylaxis in critically ill patients with a high risk of delirium: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 May;15(5):1440-1472. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003391. PubMed 28498176 ↗
  • Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Ely EW. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 9;370(2):185-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1313886. No abstract available. PubMed 24401069 ↗
  • Girard TD, Exline MC, Carson SS, Hough CL, Rock P, Gong MN, Douglas IS, Malhotra A, Owens RL, Feinstein DJ, Khan B, Pisani MA, Hyzy RC, Schmidt GA, Schweickert WD, Hite RD, Bowton DL, Masica AL, Thompson JL, Chandrasekhar R, Pun BT, Strength C, Boehm LM, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, Brummel NE, Hughes CG, Patel MB, Stollings JL, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW; MIND-USA Investigators. Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2506-2516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808217. Epub 2018 Oct 22. PubMed 30346242 ↗
  • Serafim RB, Bozza FA, Soares M, do Brasil PE, Tura BR, Ely EW, Salluh JI. Pharmacologic prevention and treatment of delirium in intensive care patients: A systematic review. J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 17. PubMed 25957498 ↗
  • Zayed Y, Barbarawi M, Kheiri B, Banifadel M, Haykal T, Chahine A, Rashdan L, Aburahma A, Bachuwa G, Seedahmed E. Haloperidol for the management of delirium in adult intensive care unit patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 12. PubMed 30665181 ↗
  • Gerber SM, Jeitziner MM, Knobel SEJ, Mosimann UP, Muri RM, Jakob SM, Nef T. Perception and Performance on a Virtual Reality Cognitive Stimulation for Use in the Intensive Care Unit: A Non-randomized Trial in Critically Ill Patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Dec 10;6:287. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00287. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31921867 ↗
  • Gerber SM, Jeitziner MM, Wyss P, Chesham A, Urwyler P, Muri RM, Jakob SM, Nef T. Visuo-acoustic stimulation that helps you to relax: A virtual reality setup for patients in the intensive care unit. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 16;7(1):13228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13153-1. PubMed 29038450 ↗
  • Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001 May;27(5):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s001340100909. PubMed 11430542 ↗
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. PubMed 15817019 ↗
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9. PubMed 21479777 ↗
  • Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32. PubMed 8311667 ↗
  • Naef AC, Jeitziner MM, Gerber SM, Jenni-Moser B, Muri RM, Jakob SM, Nef T, Hanggi M. Virtual reality stimulation to reduce the incidence of delirium in critically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05090-2. PubMed 33648572 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The investigators will ask patients to provide informed consent for sharing their anonymized data. Once the study results are published, the investigators will make the de-identified study dataset available for secondary analyses by sharing the dataset upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be shared once study results have been published.

Access criteria: To be determined.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04498585
Collaborators
University of Bern
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2020
Start date
Apr 14, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2023

Study contacts

Matthias Hänggi, Dr. med
principal investigator · Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern (Inelspital)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is suspended, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion