An interventional study of Global postural reeducation in Hallux Valgus, Hallux Deformity and Foot Deformities, sponsored by University of Jaén. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-13.
Sponsored by University of Jaén · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Manual approach of Hallux Valgus with global postural reeducation.
Hallux Abducto Valgus is a frequent pathology with a prevalence of 30% in women and 13% in men. The tendency is to increase with age.
Usually, the elected treatment is surgery, as the conservative orthopedic methods are used at the early stages of the pathology. Global Postural Re-Education is a manual therapy treatment method through which we can treat lots of pathologies. Some investigations demonstrate Postural Re-Education is effective for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders, urinary incontinence, and spine disorders, but there is no scientific evidence that defends the improvement of the symptoms and correction of the angle of the Hallux Abducto Valgus using Postural Re-Education.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients completed 3 sessions of global postural reeducation for 3 weeks.
Other: Global postural reeducation
Patients allocated to the control group did not receive any treatment.
It consisted of Global Postural Re-Education sessions divided into 3 sessions and performed with a frequency of 1 per week for 3 weeks. The sessions were performed individually, with an approximate duration of 40 minutes and all of them were assessed by the same physiotherapist.
Postural control
Postural control was evaluated by means of a stabilometric platform of resistive pressure sensors (Sensor Medica, Rome, Italy). There will be performed two tests: open eyes Romberg and closed eyes Romberg.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Dynamic balance
Dynamic balance has been measured by a simplified version of the Star Excursion Balance Test where the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral reach directions were collected for statistical analysis.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Ankle range of motion
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion was assessed by the weight-bearing lunge test. The patient is positioned in a standing position facing a wall with the involved foot parallel with a tape measure which has been attached to the floor and the opposite leg placed behind in a tandem stance. A forward lunge is performed until the anterior knee tries to make contact with the wall with the heel firmly planted on the ground.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Self-reported instability
To determine the severity of ankle instability the Cumberland ankle instability tool was used. The total score of the nine items ranges from 0 (severe instability) to 30 (normal stability).
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Assessment of the grade of hallux valgus
With the Manchester Scale the examiners grade the feet of the participants in: A: no hallux valgus; B: mild hallux valgus; C: moderate hallux valgus; D: severe hallux valgus.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Foot posture
it will be performed the Foot Posture Index 6-items for evaluating the general foot position. It is graded as pronated, neutral or supinated depending on the punctuation
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Passive and active dorsiflexion range of motion of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint
it will be assessed by the Jack test, in which the phalangeal bone is passively dorsiflexed and the plantar arch is observed. The aim is classified the Windlass Mechanism in: intact; limited; absent. The active range of motion will be assessed by kinovea software.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Gait parameters
Gait parameters after treatment with optogait system including gait cycle, contact time, flight time, and pre-swing phase during walking and running.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
Functional status
Function in daily living and sport activities were assessed by the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. This questionnaire Is divided by two subscales of 21 items (daily living subscale) and 8 items (sports subscale). The obtained score is expressed as a percentage calculated by dividing the patient's score by max score and the lower percentage is related to the lower level of function.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 weeks and 8 weeks.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Jaén