ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04454229PALACEUpdated Mar 6, 2023

The Use of Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge

An interventional study of Direct oral penicillin challenge and Standard of care in Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity, Delayed and Hypersensitivity Response, sponsored by Austin Health. Completed at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-06.

Sponsored by Austin Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
382
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Whilst validated tools exist to enable inpatient penicillin assessment and de-labelling, limited evidence is available regarding the safety and efficacy in the outpatient clinic. The ability to deliver point-of-care penicillin allergy testing for a large cohort of patients, without skin testing, will improve patient access to testing and utilization of preferred penicillin antibiotics.

Read the detailed description

Patient-reported penicillin allergies result in poor health outcomes for patients and drive inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, antimicrobial resistance and healthcare costs. Our group has internally and externally validated a novel penicillin allergy clinician decision rule (PEN-FAST) that is able to identify low risk penicillin allergies with a negative predictive value of 96% (95%; 94-98%). Therefore, whilst validated tools exist to enable inpatient penicillin assessment and de-labelling, limited evidence is available regarding the safety and efficacy in the outpatient clinic. The ability to deliver point-of-care penicillin allergy testing for a large cohort of patients, without skin testing, will improve patient access to testing and utilization of preferred penicillin antibiotics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Hypersensitivity, Delayed
  • Hypersensitivity Response

Keywords

  • penicillin
  • Low Risk allergy
  • direct oral challenge
  • standard of care
  • outpatient clinic
03

In context

Hypersensitivity, Immediate

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity, Immediate; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 382 is above the median of 70 across 66 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity, Immediate.

Browse Hypersensitivity, Immediate studies →

Lead sponsor

Austin Health is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients referred to the outpatient allergy clinic for a penicillin allergy history;
  2. Willing and able to give consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient age is \< 18 years;
  2. Patients with a PEN-FAST score less than 3
  3. Pregnancy;
  4. Any other illness that, in the investigator's judgement, will substantially increase the risk associated with subject's participation in this study;
  5. Patients with history of type A adverse drug reaction, drug-associated anaphylaxis, idiopathic urticaria/anaphylaxis, mastocytosis, serum sickness, blistering skin eruption or acute interstitial nephritis;
  6. Patients where the allergy history was not able to be confirmed with patient;
  7. Patients on concurrent antihistamine therapy;
  8. Patients receiving more than stress dose (i.e. > 50mg QID hydrocortisone [or steroid equivalent]).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
382 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Direct oral antibiotic challenge

    Direct oral antibiotic (penicillin) challenge in patients with PEN-Fast less than 3.

    Other: Direct oral penicillin challenge

  • Active comparator
    Standard of care

    Standard of care: skin testing and, if negative, oral challenge.

    Other: Standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherDirect oral penicillin challenge

    The patient will receive a single dose of oral penicillin, following baseline vital signs.

  • OtherStandard of care

    Routine management as per the treating clinicians that include skin prick and intradermal beta-lactam testing, followed by oral penicillin challenge in the setting of negative skin testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The difference in the proportion of positive oral challenges (i.e. immune-mediated reaction)

    Time frame: up to 48H after oral challenge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients referred to the outpatient allergy clinic that are eligible for intervention (i.e randomization) as per protocol [Eligibility to screened ratio]

    Time frame: Before randomization

  2. Feasibility of recruitment defined as the proportion of patients consenting to participate in the study as per protocol from eligible patients. [Recruitment to eligibility ratio].

    Time frame: Before randomization

  3. Feasibility of intervention delivery defined as the proportion of patients randomized to the intervention arm who had the intervention delivered as per protocol. [Intervention to recruitment ratio]

    Time frame: Before randomization

  4. The proportion of patients with a penicillin allergy who experience an antibiotic associated immune mediated adverse event OR severe adverse drug reaction as per protocol definitions.

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  5. The proportion of patients with a penicillin allergy who experience an antibiotic associated non-immune mediated adverse event.

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  6. The proportion of patients that will respect the protocol (protocol compliance)

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  7. Proportion of patient with positive Penicillin Skin Testing

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  8. Proportion of patients with non-immune mediated positive oral provocation

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  9. Proportion of patients with severe adverse reaction - anaphylaxis/death

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  10. Time from randomization to delabelling

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  11. Number of appointments required for Penicillin delabelling

    Time frame: Up to 48h after the drug challenge

  12. Assessment with the Pre-Questionnaire and the 6 months follow-up Questionnaire

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after the drug challenge

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Austin Health
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Center
    Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
  • McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
    Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, Bourke J, Yun J, Douglas A, Stone CA, Yu R, Groenendijk L, Holmes NE, Phillips EJ. Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):745-752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403. PubMed 32176248 ↗
  • Devchand M, Urbancic KF, Khumra S, Douglas AP, Smibert O, Cohen E, Sutherland M, Phillips EJ, Trubiano JA. Pathways to improved antibiotic allergy and antimicrobial stewardship practice: The validation of a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy assessment tool. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):1063-1065.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.07.048. Epub 2018 Aug 29. PubMed 30172019 ↗
  • Trubiano JA, Smibert O, Douglas A, Devchand M, Lambros B, Holmes NE, Chua KY, Phillips EJ, Slavin MA. The Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Challenge Program in Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Pilot Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 17;5(12):ofy306. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy306. eCollection 2018 Dec. PubMed 30547046 ↗
  • Copaescu AM, James F, Vogrin S, Rose M, Chua K, Holmes NE, Turner NA, Stone C, Phillips E, Trubiano J. Use of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule to enable direct oral penicillin provocation: an international multicentre randomised control trial in an adult population (PALACE): study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):e063784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063784. PubMed 35940831 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 17 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 25, 2020
First posted
Jul 1, 2020
StartActual
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 2, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 2, 2022
Last update
Mar 6, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04454229
Lead sponsor
Austin Health
Responsible party
Ana Copaescu (Physician-Scientist Immunology and Allergy, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2022
Completion
Dec 2, 2022
Last update
Mar 6, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion