CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06916819CHOMPUpdated Apr 17, 2025

Food Challenge at Home or in Medical Practice - the FoodCHOMP Study

An interventional study of Home-Based Food Challenge and In-Clinic Food Challenge in Food Allergies, sponsored by Austin Health. Recruiting at 2 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-17.

Sponsored by Austin Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a pilot, multi-centre, randomised clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of a home-based oral food challenge in adults with low-risk food allergy labels. Eligible participants are aged 18 years or older and have a self-reported food allergy with negative skin prick testing to the implicated food. Participants will be randomised to either a home-based or standard in-clinic food challenge. The primary aim is to determine the safety of home challenges, measured by the rate of immune-mediated adverse events. Secondary aims include feasibility of recruitment and delivery, protocol adherence, quality of life, and food reintroduction outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Food allergies are highly prevalent and contribute to significant patient anxiety and healthcare utilisation. Many individuals carry food allergy labels without confirmation through diagnostic food challenge, resulting in unnecessary food avoidance. In-clinic food challenges are the current standard for confirming tolerance but are resource-intensive and often delayed. This study evaluates whether selected low-risk adults can safely complete a structured oral food challenge at home.

This is a pilot, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at two tertiary allergy centres in Victoria, Australia (Austin Health and Royal Melbourne Hospital). Adults referred with a reported food allergy will undergo clinical assessment and skin prick testing. Those with negative skin testing (\<3mm wheal) to the implicated food and meeting other eligibility criteria will be randomised 1:1 to either:

  • Intervention: Home-based oral food challenge over five days, beginning with a single supervised dose in-clinic and followed by four incremental doses at home with daily clinical follow-up.
  • Control: Standard in-clinic oral food challenge using a protocol derived from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines.

The primary outcome is the proportion of participants experiencing an immune-mediated adverse event during food challenge. Secondary outcomes include feasibility metrics (eligibility, recruitment, delivery), non-immune mediated adverse events, protocol adherence, quality of life (measured by FAQLQ-12), time to challenge, and real-world food reintroduction.

The study will enrol 120 participants (60 per arm). Outcomes will inform the design of a future non-inferiority trial and may support integration of home challenges into routine practice for selected patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Food Allergies

Keywords

  • Food allergy
  • Food allergy label
  • Food Challenge
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,916 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 57 across 1,384 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Austin Health is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Negative (\<3mm) fresh or extract skin testing to the food implicated within their allergy label
  2. Aged greater than 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of prior sensitisation to challenge food 0 Defined as previously positive skin testing or allergen specific IgEs if available
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with poorly controlled asthma - defined as an ACQ5 scores >1 at the time of enrolment
  • Patients with a history of food reactions that is not-consistent with an IgE mediated process; i.e. exclusively gastrointestinal symptoms, FPIES
  • Patients with a clear history of food-dependent exercise induced anaphylaxis
  • Patients on a concurrent medication which may influence the outcome of the challenge;
  • Antihistamine therapy; Patients receiving more than stress dose steroids (i.e. > 50mg QID hydrocortisone [or steroid equivalent]); Omalizumab
  • Any other illness that, in the investigator's judgement, will substantially increase the risk associated with subject's participation in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    In-Clinic Food Challenge (Control Arm)

    Participants randomised to the control arm will undergo a standard in-clinic oral food challenge conducted under direct medical supervision. The protocol used is derived from the PRACTALL consensus and ASCIA position statements and involves administration of increasing doses of the implicated food at 20-30 minute intervals over a 2-3 hour period. Observation continues for 1-2 hours post final dose. The challenge is performed in a hospital outpatient clinic equipped for anaphylaxis management. The food challenged is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

    Diagnostic Test: In-Clinic Food Challenge

  • Experimental
    Home-Based Food Challenge (Intervention Arm)

    Participants randomised to the intervention arm will undertake a structured home-based oral food challenge over five consecutive days. This begins with an initial supervised dose administered in clinic under medical observation (60-minute monitoring period). Participants will then self-administer increasing doses of the implicated food at home each subsequent day using a standardised protocol adapted from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines. Dose intervals are 24 hours to reduce risk of cumulative reactions. Participants are provided with written instructions, emergency action plans, and have daily phone follow-up with allergy nursing staff during the challenge. The challenge food is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

    Diagnostic Test: Home-Based Food Challenge

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testHome-Based Food Challenge

    Participants randomised to the intervention arm will undertake a structured home-based oral food challenge over five consecutive days. This begins with an initial supervised dose administered in clinic under medical observation (60-minute monitoring period). Participants will then self-administer increasing doses of the implicated food at home each subsequent day using a standardised protocol adapted from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines. Dose intervals are 24 hours to reduce risk of cumulative reactions. Participants are provided with written instructions, emergency action plans, and have daily phone follow-up with allergy nursing staff during the challenge. The challenge food is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

  • Diagnostic testIn-Clinic Food Challenge

    Standard of care - Participants randomised to the control arm will undergo a standard in-clinic oral food challenge conducted under direct medical supervision. The protocol used is derived from the PRACTALL consensus and ASCIA position statements and involves administration of increasing doses of the implicated food at 20-30 minute intervals over a 2-3 hour period. Observation continues for 1-2 hours post final dose. The challenge is performed in a hospital outpatient clinic equipped for anaphylaxis management. The food challenged is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants experiencing immune-mediated adverse events during food challenge

    Immune-mediated adverse events are defined as clinical symptoms consistent with IgE-mediated food allergy occurring during the food challenge, including but not limited to: urticaria, angioedema, vomiting, diarrhoea, or respiratory compromise (e.g., wheezing, cough, stridor). Events will be recorded according to a standardised adverse event form. For home challenges, participants will self-report symptoms daily and receive follow-up via nursing staff. In-clinic events will be recorded by supervising clinicians.

    Time frame: During the food challenge period (Days 1-5 post-randomisation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of screened patients who are eligible for randomisation (Eligibility-to-screened ratio)

    Feasibility metric defined as the proportion of patients referred to outpatient allergy clinic who meet the trial eligibility criteria (including negative skin prick testing to the implicated food and absence of exclusion criteria).

    Time frame: Baseline visit

  2. Proportion of eligible patients who consent to participate (Recruitment-to-eligibility ratio)

    Feasibility of recruitment measured as the proportion of eligible patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the trial.

    Time frame: At consent discussion (baseline visit)

  3. Proportion of randomised participants who receive the allocated intervention (Intervention-to-recruitment ratio)

    Defined as the proportion of randomised participants who complete their allocated food challenge (home or in-clinic) in accordance with protocol.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5 (intervention delivery period)

  4. Proportion of participants experiencing non-immune mediated adverse events

    Non-immune mediated events include those not consistent with IgE-mediated allergy and not meeting serious adverse event criteria. Examples: taste aversion, food refusal, procedural anxiety. Events will be recorded via self-report or in-clinic observation.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5 (challenge period)

  5. Proportion of participants with severe adverse reactions (anaphylaxis or death)

    Serious adverse events are defined per ICH-GCP and include anaphylaxis (as per ASCIA criteria) or death.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5 (challenge period)

  6. Difference in proportion of participants tolerant to challenge food

    Defined as the proportion of participants in each arm who successfully consume the full challenge dose without meeting stopping criteria or experiencing adverse events. Tolerance is determined according to protocol-defined thresholds.

    Time frame: At completion of challenge (Day 5)

  7. Change in Food Allergy Quality of Life (FAQLQ-12) score from baseline

    Measured using the FAQLQ-12, a validated 12-item quality of life tool for adults with food allergy. Change in score will be assessed as a continuous variable.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post-randomisation

  8. Proportion of participants consuming the challenge food post-trial

    Defined as the proportion of participants who report active inclusion of the challenge food in their diet at least once per week following a successful challenge.

    Time frame: At 6-month follow-up

  9. Time from clinic referral to challenge completion

    Measured in days to assess whether home-based challenge reduces diagnostic delay compared to in-clinic challenge. Data collected through clinic administrative records.

    Time frame: From the date of referral for food challenge to date of challenge completion or withdrawal from the study assessed up to 60 months.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Austin Health
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Recruiting
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06916819
Lead sponsor
Austin Health
Collaborators
Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia
Responsible party
Jack Godsell (Dr Jack Godsell, Clinical Immunologist and Allergist, Principal Investigator, Austin Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2025
Start date
Apr 16, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion