ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06755281Updated Apr 10, 2025

Risk-stratified Testing for Safe Removal of Penicillin Allergy Labels

An interventional study of Direct Oral challenge and standard of care in Penicillin Allergy, Hypersensitivity, Immediate and Hypersensitivity, Delayed, sponsored by Deniz Göcebe. Recruiting at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-10.

Sponsored by Deniz Göcebe · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to analyze the negative predictive capacity and safety of risk-stratified direct drug provocation tests for patients with self-reported penicillin allergies. Patients reporting immediate or delayed penicillin allergies and defined as low-risk by the PEN-FAST score will receive drug provocation tests without prior skin testing.

Read the detailed description

The PEN-FAST clinical decision rule is an internationally validated scoring system (0-5 points) that identifies low-risk patients (= a score of 0-2 points) with self-reported penicillin allergies with a negative predictive value (NPV) of over 95%. Performing direct drug provocation tests without prior skin testing on these low-risk patients was shown to be non-inferior in terms of safety and prediction of immediate allergic reactions. However, several studies have questioned the negative predictive capacity of the PEN-FAST score. In these studies, misclassifications of the PEN-FAST score were mainly based on positive skin test findings that can show false-positive results.

This study aims to validate the NPV and safety of direct drug provocation tests using the PEN-FAST score.

Participants with a PEN-FAST score of 0-2 points will directly receive a two-dose challenge (50%-50%) or single challenge (100%) with the culprit penicillin and will be monitored for at least 4 hours. No skin tests will be performed prior to the drug provocation test. Patients will be instructed to contact the hospital after the drug provocation test to monitor any delayed allergic reactions.

The outcomes will be compared to those of patients with a PEN-FAST score of 0-2 points who do not wish to skip the skin tests and who will, in parallel, receive the standard-of-care testing.

Currently, this study is approved as a single-site study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Penicillin Allergy
  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Hypersensitivity, Delayed
  • Hypersensitivity Response

Keywords

  • PEN-FAST
  • penicillin allergy
  • allergy delabeling
03

In context

Hypersensitivity, Immediate

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity, Immediate; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 70 across 66 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity, Immediate.

Browse Hypersensitivity, Immediate studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Deniz Göcebe as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult outpatients or inpatients with a penicillin allergy label
  2. Willing and able to give consent.
  3. PEN-FAST score of 0-2 points

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \<18 years
  2. Concurrent therapy with 20 mg of prednisolone per day or equivalent
  3. Concurrent antihistamine therapy
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Significantly impaired general condition
  6. Unstable or therapeutically inadequately controlled bronchial asthma
  7. History of stem cell transplantation
  8. History of acute interstitial nephritis
  9. Chronic urticaria
  10. Mastocytosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Direct drug provocation test

    Other: Direct Oral challenge

  • Active comparator
    Standard of care

    Standard of care Skin testing and measurement of allergen-specific IgE, if negative, drug provocation test.

    Other: standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherDirect Oral challenge

    Patients will receive a 1-step or 2-step challenge with the suspected penicillin and will be monitored for any allergic reaction within the first four hours. Patients will be instructed to contact the hospital after the drug provocation test to inquire delayed allergic reactions.

  • Otherstandard of care

    The patient will receive skin prick test and patch test (if a delayed allergy is suspected). Allergen-specific IgE will be measured. If all negative, drug provocation tets will be performed identical to the experimental group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The difference in the proportion of patients with any positive finding in skin tests, allergen-specific IgE or drug provocation test between the two groups

    Percentage of subjects that retain their allergy label as they show at least one positive finding in skin tests, allergen-specific IgE or drug provocation test.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Negative predictive capacity of skin tests and allergen-specific IgE

    Negative predictive values of each test alone and combined

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Analysis of medical and allergic history

    (supposed) allergic symptoms

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Penicillin allergy label

    Identification of culprit penicillin

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Analysis of demographic data

    Age, sex

    Time frame: 1 day

  5. Analysis of adverse reactions

    Detailed analysis of any (supposed) allergic reactions following drug provocation test

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Analysis of medical and allergic history

    year of (supposed) allergic reaction

    Time frame: One day

  7. Analysis of medical and allergic history

    time between administration and (supposed) allergic reaction

    Time frame: One day

  8. Analysis of medical and allergic history

    treatment required for (supposed) allergic reaction

    Time frame: One day

  9. Analysis of medical and allergic history

    current medication

    Time frame: One day

  10. Analysis of internal hospital risk stratification system

    Measurement of score of internal hospital risk stratification system

    Time frame: One day

  11. Analysis of medical and allergic history

    (supposed) allergic symptoms

    Time frame: One day

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Copaescu AM, Vogrin S, James F, Chua KYL, Rose MT, De Luca J, Waldron J, Awad A, Godsell J, Mitri E, Lambros B, Douglas A, Youcef Khoudja R, Isabwe GAC, Genest G, Fein M, Radojicic C, Collier A, Lugar P, Stone C, Ben-Shoshan M, Turner NA, Holmes NE, Phillips EJ, Trubiano JA. Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):944-952. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2986. PubMed 37459086 ↗
  • Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, Bourke J, Yun J, Douglas A, Stone CA, Yu R, Groenendijk L, Holmes NE, Phillips EJ. Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):745-752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403. PubMed 32176248 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article that is planned to be published, after deidentification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Access criteria: Researchers who offer a well-structured and scientifically sound approach to realizing the objectives detailed in the approved proposal.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 23 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 22, 2024
First posted
Jan 1, 2025
StartActual
Jan 8, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 2027
Last update
Apr 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06755281
Lead sponsor
Deniz Göcebe
Responsible party
Deniz Göcebe (Dr. med. Deniz Göcebe, University Hospital Heidelberg) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 1, 2025
Start date
Jan 8, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 10, 2025

Study contacts

Deniz Göcebe, MD
Contact
Deniz.Goecebe@med.uni-heidelberg.de
+4962215639539
Knut Schäkel, MD
Contact
Knut.Schaekel@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion