ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05341726Updated Oct 23, 2026

BREATHE: An Efficacy-implementation Trial Among Black Adults With Uncontrolled Asthma

An interventional study of BREATHE Intervention and Control Intervention in Asthma, sponsored by Columbia University. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Updated Oct 23, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is an efficacy-implementation trial to:

  1. evaluate systematically the efficacy of BREATHE in 200 Black adults receiving care at urban federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) for uncontrolled asthma; and
  2. identify multi-level barriers and facilitators to the widespread adoption and implementation of BREATHE in FQHCs.
Read the detailed description

Black adults with asthma are an appropriate target for shared decision-making (SDM) interventions that support disease self-management as Black adults experience a higher asthma burden and worse clinical outcomes than non-Black adults and/or children with asthma of any racial-ethnic background. To date, the application of SDM and community-based interventions targeting Black adults have failed to address these disparities. Therefore, the investigator used patient input to develop BREATHE - BRief intervention to Evaluate Asthma THErapy - a 9-minute SDM intervention focused on reducing the impact of erroneous beliefs on asthma control - and established its efficacy in this health disparity population. This intervention is unique in that it is a one-time brief, tailored intervention integrated into office visits, using the patient's own provider as the interventionist (e.g. scalable). A previously conducted pilot trial demonstrated high fidelity to BREATHE delivery and improved asthma control and reduced symptoms among BREATHE participants compared to a dose-matched attention control condition.

We will conduct post-trial mixed-method interviews with patient participants, their loved ones, and PCPs using evaluation frameworks to determine satisfaction with, and acceptability of, the active and control interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Bronchial Diseases
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive
  • Lung Diseases
  • Respiratory Hypersensitivity
  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Immune System Diseases
03

In context

Asthma

4,841 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 78 across 3,341 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,136 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 148 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (participants):

Patients participants will

  1. be adults (> or = 18 years of age)
  2. self-report race as 'Black' race (African American, African, Caribbean, West Indian, multi-racial [Black AND one or more additional races]); identify their ethnicity as Hispanic OR non-Hispanic
  3. have clinician-diagnosed persistent asthma (defined as being prescribed inhaled in the last 48 months) or have had an asthma exacerbation (e.g., ER visit, course of Prednisone) regardless of controller medicine use
  4. receive asthma care at a partner FQHC and
  5. screen positive for uncontrolled asthma as measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire- 6 items (ACQ-6) and erroneous beliefs as measured by the Conventional and Alternative Management for Asthma (CAM-A) survey.

Exclusion Criteria (participants):

  1. non-English speaking
  2. serious mental health conditions that preclude completion of study procedures or confound analyses or
  3. participation in a listening session

Inclusion Criterion (clinicians):

1. those who manage a panel of adult asthma patients

Inclusion Criteria (loved ones):

  1. must be identified by patient participant as a loved one and
  2. loved one must be a family member or friend of the patient participant.

Exclusion Criteria (loved ones):

  1. non-English speaking or
  2. serious mental health conditions that preclude completion of study procedures or confound analyses
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BREATHE intervention

    The patient's primary care provider (PCP) will deliver a brief intervention using motivational interviewing and shared decision making, in a one time 9-minute intervention integrated into an office visit for asthma. PCPs will follow a 4-step script tailored to erroneous asthma and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) beliefs, as well as ACQ score, measured just prior to the office visit.

    Behavioral: BREATHE Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Control Intervention

    The patient's primary care provider (PCP) will deliver a 9-minute scripted intervention on credible nutrition and lifestyle information. The control intervention is designed to not be specific enough to change strategies related to asthma control.

    Behavioral: Control Intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralBREATHE Intervention

    BREATHE utilizes Primary Care Providers (PCPs) to deliver a 4-step script that was created by and tailored to Black adults' asthma and inhaled corticosteroid beliefs, as well as their Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, measured just prior to the medical visit. Step 1: Raise the subject (1½ minute). Step 2: Provide feedback (1½ minutes). Step 3: Enhance engagement (3 minutes). Step 4: Shared decision-making (3 minutes).

  • BehavioralControl Intervention

    The control intervention will be a 9-minute scripted discussion tailored to living a health lifestyle. Step 1: Review of BMI, current diet and exercise (3 minutes). Step 2: Diet/exercise counseling (3 minutes). Step 3: Plan for goal attainment (3 minutes).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Asthma Control Questionnaire Score

    Asthma control as measured by improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, a 6-item validated and widely used measure of asthma control. Each question is rated from 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates well controlled asthma and a score of 6 indicates extremely poorly controlled asthma. The overall ACQ score is the mean score of all 6 items. Lower mean scores indicate greater asthma control, higher mean scores indicate lesser asthma control.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 Months (post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Shared Decision Making-Questionnaire-9 Score

    The Shared Decision Making (SDM) Questionnaire-9, is a patient reported, 9-item validated instrument that consists of nine statements that measure the decisional process in medical visits from both patients' and physicians' perspectives. Each statement is rated on a six-point scale from "completely disagree" (0) to "completely agree" (5). The raw total score of all items range from 0-45. Lower scores indicate lower levels of shared decision making between provider and patient (in this study as it pertains to asthma treatment) and higher scores indicate higher levels of shared decision making.

    Time frame: Baseline (immediately post-intervention)

  2. Mean Medication Adherence Report Scale - Asthma Score

    Inhaled corticosteroid adherence as measured by the Medication Adherence Report Scale - Asthma (MARS-A). Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engage in each of the adherence-related behaviors on a five-point scale, where 5 = never, 4 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 2 = often and 1 = always. Scores for each item are summed to give a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of reported adherence.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 Months (post-intervention)

  3. Mean Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score

    Asthma quality of life improvements as measured by the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), a 32-item validated and widely-used measure consisting of 4 domains: symptoms (11 items), emotions (5 items), environment (4 items), and activities (12 items). Each item is measured on a 7-point Likert scale (7 = not impaired at all, 1 = severely impaired). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. Lower mean scores indicate lower quality of life due to asthma.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 Months (post-intervention)

  4. Mean Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire Score

    Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) is a 10-item valid and reliable survey that measures bot domains of control: symptom impairments and risk for uncontrolled asthma. AIRQ™ score ranges from 0-10, measured by total number of YES answers. Score tally of 0-1 indicates well controlled asthma, scores 2-4 indicate not well controlled asthma, and scores 5-10 indicate very poorly controlled asthma.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 Months (post-intervention)

Other outcomes

  1. Number of participants who completed post-trial interviews

    Qualitative post-trial interviews will be conducted with patient participants, their loved ones, and primary care providers to determine the satisfaction with, and acceptability of the intervention. The interviews will be analyzed using a directed content analysis to determine themes within the interviews.

    Time frame: up to 3 months (post-trial)

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Sun River Health
    Beacon, New York 12508, United States
    Recruiting
  • Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center
    Brooklyn, New York 11216, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2028, 61 months after the start.

Of 599 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Asthma, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 61 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 649 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 23, 2026: primary completion Jul 2026 → Feb 2028 and completion Jul 2026 → Feb 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 18, 2022
First posted
Apr 22, 2022
StartActual
Jan 19, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2028was Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 2028was Jul 2026
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Jul 2026→Feb 2028
Oct 23, 2026
Study completion
Jul 2026→Feb 2028
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    Primary completion Jul 2026→Feb 2028
    Study completion Jul 2026→Feb 2028
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05341726
Responsible party
Maureen George (Professor of Nursing at the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2022
Start date
Jan 19, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Maureen George, PhD
Contact
mg3656@cumc.columbia.edu
2123051175
Maureen George, PhD
principal investigator · Columbia University School of Nursing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion