CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04453098RESOLVE+10Updated Jul 1, 2020

Results at 10 Years of the RESOLVE Study (RESOLVE+10)

An interventional study of 3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet, in Metabolic Syndrome, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-01.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

10-year effect of a lifestyle intervention program (exercise, sedentary lifestyle and dietary diet) on abdominal visceral adipose tissue (primary endpoint of the RESOLVE study 10 years ago): influence of kinetics abdominal visceral adipose tissue loss in the first year of follow-up on abdominal visceral adipose tissue at 10 years

Read the detailed description

The RESOLVE + 10 protocol was design to provide a 10-year effect of a lifestyle intervention program (exercise, sedentary lifestyle and dietary diet) on abdominal visceral adipose tissue.

In the present protocol, parameters are measured just once, during 3 hours, to compared the results with those of the protocol RESOLVE (5 measurement times over a year 10 years ago: before the thermal modification program of the lifestyle ( exercise, sedentary lifestyle and diet) of 3 weeks (D0), after the thermal program (D21), at the 3rd month (M3), 6th month (M6) and 12th month of follow-up (M12), to which was matched a healthy control group).

Statistical analysis will be performed using Stata software (version 13; Stata-Corp, College Station, Tex., USA). All statistical tests will be two-sided and p inferior to 0.05 will be considered significant. Qualitative variables will be described in terms of numbers and proportions. Quantitative variables will be described in terms of numbers, mean standard deviation or median according to statistical distribution (normality studied using Shapiro-Wilk test). Graphic representations will be complete presentations of results. Comparisons between patients and controls, concerning loss of abdominal visceral adipose tissue at 10 years, will be performed using Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test if the assumptions of anova are not met (normality and homoscedasticity analyzed using Fisher-Snedecor test). The results will be expressed as effect-size and 95 percent confidence intervals. The primary analysis should be completed by multivariable analysis (linear regression with logarithmic transformation of dependent outcome if necessary) considering an adjustment on covariates fixed according to univariate results and clinical relevance. The results will be expressed as regression coefficients and 95percent confidence intervals. Furthermore, the abdominal visceral adipose tissue loss kinetics in the first year of follow-up will be considered an independent variable and treated as a functional variable. The intra-group comparisons (for patients and for controls) will be performed using paired statistical tests: paired t-test or Wilcoxon test. The results will be expressed as effect-size and 95 percent confidence intervals. Comparisons between independent groups will be done similarly as presented previously for other quantitative outcomes (body composition, quality of life, skin conductance, etc.). Multivariable analyses will be applied similarly as described previously. The comparisons concerning categorical variables will be realized using Chi-squared or when appropriate Fischer-exact test. The relations between quantitative outcomes will be analyzed using correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman according to statistical distribution). Considering the several multiple comparisons, a correction of the type I error will be applied (Sidak's correction).

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • spa residential lifestyle program
  • prevention
03

In context

Metabolic Syndrome

1,964 studies on the registry are indexed under Metabolic Syndrome; 330 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 60 across 1,460 interventional studies indexed under Metabolic Syndrome.

Browse Metabolic Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 841 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • patients and healthy controls included in the RESOLVE study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal of participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Re group

    high-Resistance-moderate-endurance, participants performed 10 repetitions at 70% of one maximal repetition in resistance and 30% of VO2-peak for endurance training

    Behavioral: 3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet,

  • Experimental
    rE group

    moderate-resistance (30%) - high-Endurance (70%)

    Behavioral: 3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet,

  • Experimental
    re group

    moderate-resistance (30%) - moderate-endurance (30%).

    Behavioral: 3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet,

  • No intervention
    control group

    no intervention

Interventions

  • Behavioral3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet,

    3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet, exercise, education). The three weeks intervention was followed by a 1-year at-home follow-up. In the original protocol, participants were involved in a 3-week residential program based on a tryptic (diet, exercise, education).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Abdominal visceral adipose tissue loss, a primary cardiovascular risk (CVR) factor, highly related to morbidity and mortality

    to assess the ability of a lifestyle program in decreasing abdominal visceral fat, one of the major health-related factor It will be assessed from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

    Time frame: Year 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. weight

    measured in kilogramms

    Time frame: Year 10

  2. systolic blood pressure

    measured in millimeter of mercure

    Time frame: Year 10

  3. diastolic blood pressure

    measured in millimeter of mercure

    Time frame: Year 10

  4. Waist circumference

    measured in centimeter

    Time frame: Year 10

  5. heart rate

    measured in battment per minutes

    Time frame: Year 10

  6. Muscle mass

    measured using Impedancemeter, Densitometry x-ray absorption, Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and Quantitative ultrasounds (QUS)

    Time frame: Year 10

  7. fat mass

    measured using Impedancemeter, Densitometry x-ray absorption, Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and Quantitative ultrasounds (QUS)

    Time frame: Year 10

  8. bone structure

    measured using Impedancemeter, Densitometry x-ray absorption, Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and Quantitative ultrasounds (QUS)

    Time frame: Year 10

  9. Epicardial adipose tissue

    measures of epicardial adipose tissue using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiography

    Time frame: Year 10

  10. myocardial triglycerides

    measures of myocardial triglycerides using MRI

    Time frame: Year 10

  11. cardiac remodeling and function

    measures cardiac remodeling and function using MRI and echocardiography)

    Time frame: Year 10

  12. Depression

    Assessing depression using Hospital anxiety and depression scale- HAD. It's a 14-item questionnaire about frequency of perception about anxious (HAD-A: 7 items) and depressive (HAD-D: 7 items) symptoms. Items are made of a 4-point scale frequency of symptoms, varying from "never" to "always". Scores higher than 8 for HAD-A or HAD-D mean a possible symptomatology, and scores higher than 11 mean a clear and proper diagnostic of depressive or anxious disorder.

    Time frame: Year 10

  13. anxiety

    Assessing anxiety using State and trait anxiety inventory which consists of separate self-report scales measuring to distinct anxiety concepts: state anxiety and trait anxiety. Both state and trait anxiety are explored by a 20-item questionnaire made of a 4-point scale from "never" to "always".

    Time frame: Year 10

  14. General health

    Assessing general health using General Health Questionnaire with 36 items (SF-36)

    Time frame: Year 10

  15. Stress

    Assessing stress using visual analog scale of 100 mm, ranging from very low (0) to very high (100).

    Time frame: Year 10

  16. Fatigue

    Assessing fatigue using visual analog scale of 100 mm, ranging from very low (0) to very high (100).

    Time frame: Year 10

  17. Sleep

    Assessing sleep using visual analog scale of 100 mm, ranging from very low (0) to very high (100).

    Time frame: Year 10

  18. Burnout

    Assessing burnout using Maslach Burnout Inventory, composed of 22 items designed to assess the three components of the burn-out syndrome: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and reduced personal accomplishment (8 items). Items are made of a 7-point scale frequency of feelings, varying from "never" to "every day". The scores for each component of the burn-out syndrome are considered separately and are not combined into a single total score. If desired for participant feedback, each score can be coded as low, average, or high.

    Time frame: Year 10

  19. Mindfulness

    Assessing mindfulness using Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory a consistent and reliable scale evaluating several important aspects of mindfulness. Mindfulness has been described as a non-elaborative, non-judgmental present-centred awareness in which each thought, feeling or sensation that arises in the attention field is acknowledged and accepted as it is. Mindfulness appears as an attribute of consciousness long believed to promote well-being. Each self-descriptive statement of the FMI is evaluated using a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree)

    Time frame: Year 10

  20. Coping strategy

    Assessing coping using Brief COPE Questionnaire made to evaluate self-perceived reaction to a particular situation. The 28 items of the BCQ explore the 14 different theoretically identified coping responses (with two items for each of the measured coping strategies): self-distraction, active coping, denial, substance use, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, Behavioral disengagement, venting, positive reframing, planning, humor, acceptance, religion, and self-blame. Items of BCQ are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree.

    Time frame: Year 10

  21. Emotions

    Assessing emotions using Emotion Regulation Questionnaire a 10-item scale designed to measure respondents' tendency to regulate their emotions in two ways: 1) cognitive reappraisal and 2) expressive suppression. Respondents answer each item on a 7-point

    Time frame: Year 10

  22. Perception of work

    Assessing perception of work using Job Content Questionnaire of Karasek which assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures 9 items of job demands, 9 items of job control and 8 items of social support. Items are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, 5 negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24. We would ask the participants to fulfil the questionnaire from memories that they keep of their work.

    Time frame: Year 10

  23. Self-efficacy

    Assessing self-efficacy using Perceived self-efficacy scale created to assess a general sense of perceived self-efficacy with the aim in mind to predict coping with daily hassles as well as adaptation after experiencing all kinds of stressful life events. Responses are made on a 4-point scale for the 10 items (from "false" to "true"). The final composite score (ranged from 10 to 40) is obtained by summing up the responses to all 10 items. An example of item is "I am confident that I could deal efficiently with unexpected events".

    Time frame: Year 10

  24. Addiction

    Assessing addiction to work using Work Addiction Risk test (WART). The WART is a self-administered test with 25 statements for which the answers are scored 1-never true to 4-always true \[20,26\]. Respondents read the statements and mark their answers to describe their work habits \[19,27\]. The total score is the sum of the responses to the items-25 to 100-and the higher the score, the more one is considered addicted to work \[18,21\]. Scores from 25 to 56 were defined as "at low-risk of work addiction"; 57 to 66 as "at medium-risk of work addiction", and from 67 to 100 as "at high-risk of work addiction".

    Time frame: Year 10

  25. Alexithymia

    Assessing alexithymia using Toronto Alexithymia Scale For this scale, a three-factor structure was proposed: difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings and externally oriented thinking. Responses are made on a 5-point scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".

    Time frame: Year 10

  26. Illness perception

    Assessing illness perception using Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), adapted for stress at work). It's a self-questionnaire comprising an 11-point scale, including 8 items measuring cognitive and emotional illness perceptions (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, symptoms, coherence, illness concern and negative emotions). The total score is calculated by averaging all items (after reversed some items). A high score meant that diabetes was perceived as a threat.

    Time frame: Year 10

  27. Metacognition

    Assessing metacognition using MetaCognition Questionnaire. It is a 30-item questionnaire made of 5-point scales. The MCQ-30 is structured in five factors: cognitive confidence, positive beliefs about worry, cognitive self-consciousness, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thoughts and danger, and beliefs about need to control thoughts.

    Time frame: Year 10

  28. Time perception

    Assessing time perception using Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, a self-reported questionnaire comprising 56 items. Responses are made on a 5-point scale from "very uncharacteristic" to "very characteristic". It explores 3 temporalities and 5 dimensions.

    Time frame: Year 10

  29. Life style

    Assessing factors regarding lifestyle are related to smoking, alcohol, coffee, food intake (questionnaires), and physical activity (Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire)

    Time frame: Year 10

  30. Treatment perception

    Assessing factors regarding psychology and treatment are related to perception of treatment (Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), adherence to treatment (Visual analog scales from never to always), barriers to treatment (QUILAM) and treatment satisfaction (treatment SATisfaction with MEDicines Questionnaire).

    Time frame: Year 10

  31. questionnaires used 10 years ago

    Understanding and knowledge about the metabolic syndrome (4 items), comparative optimism (4 items), motivation to eat healthy (16 items) and motivation to practise physical activity (16 items).

    Time frame: Year 10

  32. Cholesterol

    Blood analyses on HDLc and LDL-cholesterol

    Time frame: Year 10

  33. HbA1c

    Blood analyses on HbA1c

    Time frame: Year 10

  34. Triglycerides (TG)

    Blood analyses on Triglycerides (TG)

    Time frame: Year 10

  35. Cortisol

    Blood analyses on Cortisol

    Time frame: Year 10

  36. DHEAS

    Blood analyses on DHEAS

    Time frame: Year 10

  37. Leptin

    Blood analyses on Leptin

    Time frame: Year 10

  38. BDnF

    Blood analyses on BDnF

    Time frame: Year 10

  39. Cytokines

    Blood analyses on Pro-inflammatory Cytokines: IL-1β, IL-6, IL-1, TNFα, NPY

    Time frame: Year 10

  40. Telomeres length

    Blood analyses on Telomeres length

    Time frame: Year 10

  41. Genetic polymorphisms related to stress

    Polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme and Polymorphism of the serotonin are measured by Blood cells

    Time frame: Year 10

  42. carotid intima-media thickness

    Assessing on carotid intima-media thickness by high-resolution B-mode ultrasound.

    Time frame: Year 10

  43. blood flow velocity

    Assessing on blood flow velocity by laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) and microvascular perfusion by laser-doppler flowmetry (LDF), flowmotion and Iontophoresis procedure.

    Time frame: Year 10

  44. microvascular perfusion

    Assessing microvascular perfusion by laser-doppler flowmetry (LDF).

    Time frame: Year 10

  45. flowmotion

    Assessing flowmotion

    Time frame: Year 10

  46. iontophoresis

    Assessing iontophoresis procedure

    Time frame: Year 10

  47. heart rate variability

    Assessing heart rate variability by Holter

    Time frame: Year 10

  48. skin conductance

    Assessing skin conductance by Wristband electrodes - Empatica 4.

    Time frame: Year 10

  49. Quantification of liver steatosis and fibrosis

    Liver steatosis by MRI, fibroscanner (ultrasonic attenuation) and Aixplorer (Lipersonic Imagine®).

    Time frame: Year 10

  50. Quantification of liver fibrosis

    Liver fibrosis by fibroscanner (liver stiffness) and fibrotest

    Time frame: Year 10

  51. Vo2max

    Assessing factors regarding fitness are related to Vo2max (maximal exercise test)

    Time frame: Year 10

  52. Fitness

    Assessing factors regarding fitness are related to 6-minutes walking test.

    Time frame: Year 10

  53. strength

    Assessing factors regarding fitness are related to strength

    Time frame: Year 10

  54. leptin variation

    Blood analyses on leptin

    Time frame: Year 10

  55. ghrelin variation

    Blood analyses on ghrelin

    Time frame: Year 10

  56. NPY variation

    Blood analyses on NPY

    Time frame: Year 10

  57. adiponectin variation

    Blood analyses on adiponectin

    Time frame: Year 10

  58. Evaluation of CCK level

    Blood analyses on CCK

    Time frame: Year 10

  59. Evaluation of VEGF level

    Blood analyses on VEGF

    Time frame: Year 10

  60. Evaluation of PAI1 level

    Blood analyses on PAI1

    Time frame: Year 10

  61. insulin level

    Blood analyses on insulin

    Time frame: Year 10

  62. HbA1c level

    Blood analyses on HbA1c

    Time frame: Year 10

  63. blood glucose level

    Blood analyses on blood glucose

    Time frame: Year 10

  64. albumin level

    Blood analyses on blood albumin

    Time frame: Year 10

  65. transthyretin level

    Blood analyses on transthyretin

    Time frame: Year 10

  66. Homeostasis

    Blood analyses on Homeostasis (Fibroblast growth factor 23)

    Time frame: Year 10

  67. Osteoresorption

    Blood analyses on Osteoresorption (C-terminal Telopeptide of Type I collagen)

    Time frame: Year 10

  68. Osteoformation

    Blood analyses on Osteoformation (decarboxylated osteocalcine and BSAP)

    Time frame: Year 10

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04453098
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Collaborators
University Hospital CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 58 rue Montalembert 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France, Université d'Auvergne, LaPSCo laboratory, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress" team, UMR CNRS 6024, Clermont-Ferrand, France, LaPEC laboratory (EA 4278), University of Avignon, Avignon, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2020
Start date
Sep 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2020

Study contacts

Lise LACLAUTRE
Contact
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
+33473754963
Frédéric Dutheil
principal investigator · University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion