CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04444830Updated Jul 29, 2022

Sprix for Postoperative Pain Control Following Gynecologic Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Sprix in Post Operative Pain Control, Narcotic Use and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by University of Louisville. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-29.

Sponsored by University of Louisville · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Study never opened to enrollment. Study never IRB approved.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The ongoing opioid epidemic has altered both how physicians prescribe narcotics and patients' perceptions of those prescriptions. Along with increased scrutiny regarding the quantity of opioids that be may prescribed after acute injury, for chronic conditions and following surgery the healthcare industry as a whole continues to search for alternative medications that provide adequate pain relief and have a reduced tendency for abuse/dependence/addition. To that end this study has the following aims:

  1. To evaluate the amount of opioids consumed following minimally invasive, female pelvic surgery when patients' postoperative pain is managed via:

    1. Acetaminophen plus Ibuprofen plus breakthrough pain opioids (Standard protocol)
    2. Acetaminophen plus Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine plus opioids for breakthrough pain (Sprix protocol)
  2. Patient satisfaction with the aforementioned methods
  3. Evaluate and compare pain scores via validated questionnaire

Hypothesis:

Primary:

  1. Patients prescribed intranasal Ketorolac (Sprix protocol) will consume significantly less Morphine Milliequivalents (mEqs) of narcotics compared to the standard protocol following minimally invasive female pelvic surgery.

Secondary:

  1. Patients in the Sprix protocol will have lower Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measures of pain which will be measured on a 0-10 scale where 0 denotes no pain and 10 denotes maximum experience of pain
  2. Patients in the Sprix protocol will have lower numeric pain score and on POD#4
  3. Patients in the Sprix protocol will have higher Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40 )scores on POD#1
  4. Patients in the Sprix protocol will have higher QoR-40 scores on POD#4
  5. Patients will not have any significant difference in overall surgical satisfaction on POD#1 and POD#4 using a numerical satisfaction score
  6. Patients in the Sprix protocol will be more likely to consume no narcotics at all once discharged to home
02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Pain Control
  • Narcotic Use
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Urinary Incontinence , Stress
  • Surgery

Keywords

  • Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
  • Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
  • Post Operative Pain Control
  • Narcotic Reduction
  • Opioid Reduction
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Stress Urinary Incontinence
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Louisville is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Of its 20 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (35%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Weight ≥ 110lbs
  3. English Speaking and Reading
  4. All consecutive, consenting female patients undergoing Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) surgery - vaginal prolapse surgery, laparoscopic vaginal prolapse surgery or robotic assisted vaginal prolapse surgery - with or without Bilateral or Unilateral Salpingoopherectomy, with or without concomitant hysterectomy, with or without urinary anti-incontinence surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients taking opioids chronically at the time of surgery
  2. History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
  3. History of peptic ulcer disease or bleeding in the stomach or intestines
  4. History of asthma attack, hives, or other allergic reaction with aspirin or any other Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID)
  5. Uncontrolled hypertension at the time of consent and/or surgery
  6. History of renal impairment as defined by blood creatinine of 1.1 or greater at any time
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard

    To compare the total amount of opioid consumption, as measured by morphine mEq, consumed in patients immediately postoperative from minimally invasive female pelvic reconstructive surgery - they will be prescribed a "standard" postoperative regimen of Acetaminophen 650 mg PO q 6-8 hours + Ibuprofen 600 mg PO q 6-8 hours + rescue narcotics (Oxycodone 5-10 mg PO q 4-6 hours or if allergic to Oxycodone, Norco 5-10mg/325mg PO q 4-6 hours) for breakthrough pain

  • Experimental
    Sprix

    To compare the total amount of opioid consumption, as measured by morphine mEq, consumed in patients immediately postoperative from minimally invasive female pelvic reconstructive surgery - they will be prescribed regimen of Sprix 30.5mg Intranasal q 6-8 hour up to 4 times daily + Acetaminophen 650 mg PO q 6- 8 hours + rescue narcotics (as above) for breakthrough pain during the day of surgery and the following 4 postoperative days.

    Drug: Sprix

Interventions

  • DrugSprix

    Intranasal Ketorolac - used as directed for an appropriate, previously established indication

    Also known as: Intranasal Ketorolac

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Morphine mEqs

    The amount of narcotics consumed postoperatively as measure by Morphine milliequivalents

    Time frame: As measured from the day of surgery to 4 days post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Evaluate patient satisfaction using the validated QoR 40 (Quality of Recovery) Scale - wherein a minimum score of 40 indicates that a patient perceives there recovery to be very poor and a maximum score of 200 indicates that the patient perceives that the quality of their recovery is excellent

    Time frame: Day of surgery to 4 days postoperative

  2. Patient's perception of current pain

    The patient's pain will be subjectively scaled on a 0 (indicating no pain) to 10 (indicating maximum/severe pain) scale. The patient will be asked to scale their pain preoperatively, on postoperative day #1 and on Postoperative day #4

    Time frame: Day of surgery to 4 days postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Louisville Hospital
    Louisville, Kentucky 40203, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Singla N, Singla S, Minkowitz HS, Moodie J, Brown C. Intranasal ketorolac for acute postoperative pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Aug;26(8):1915-23. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.495564. Erratum In: Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):1052. PubMed 20557145 ↗
  • Pergolizzi JV Jr, Taylor R Jr, Raffa RB. Intranasal ketorolac as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative pain. Pain Pract. 2015 Apr;15(4):378-88. doi: 10.1111/papr.12239. Epub 2014 Aug 28. PubMed 25169467 ↗
  • Pollack CV Jr, Diercks DB, Thomas SH, Shapiro NI, Fanikos J, Mace SE, Rafique Z, Todd KH. Patient-reported Outcomes from A National, Prospective, Observational Study of Emergency Department Acute Pain Management With an Intranasal Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug, Opioids, or Both. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):331-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.12902. PubMed 26782787 ↗
  • Moodie JE, Brown CR, Bisley EJ, Weber HU, Bynum L. The safety and analgesic efficacy of intranasal ketorolac in patients with postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2025-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318188b736. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):991. Dosage error in published abstract; MEDLINE/PubMed abstract corrected; Dosage error in article text. PubMed 19020154 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04444830
Lead sponsor
University of Louisville
Responsible party
Sean Francis, MD (Chairperson & Professor, University of Louisville) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 24, 2020
Start date
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 21, 2021
Completion
Sep 21, 2021
Last update
Jul 29, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion