ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06953674FLUID-TBIUpdated Aug 26, 2026

Saline Versus Balanced Crystalloid in Traumatic Brain Injury

A Phase 3 interventional study of Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl) and balanced crystalloid in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, sponsored by University of Louisville. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by University of Louisville · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine which crystalloid (saline or balanced) should be used in the critical management of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in moderate or severe TBI patients. This trial will determine whether the use of saline or balanced crystalloids is associated with improved outcomes in TBI patients.

Participants will

  1. be given fluids through the veins, either saline or balanced fluid will be given.
  2. From the first day to the day 14 of the hospitalization (or discharge, whichever comes first), vital signs, laboratory values, treatments given, and other medical data will be collected from the medical record.
  3. Six months later, your final disability, if any, will be assessed during your follow-up with a doctor. It involves answering a short survey that will take about 5 minutes or less.
02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 52 across 1,088 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Louisville is the lead sponsor of 291 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (37%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Trauma patients presenting to the Emergency Room for initial care
  • Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12
  • Head CT with skull fracture(s) and/or hemorrhage(s) (>1cm in any single dimension) with a reported mechanism of trauma

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe visceral trauma dictating mortality (visceral injury severity score > brain injury severity score)
  • Non-survivable brain injury based on the treating physician's judgment
  • Emergent visceral operative intervention before complete trauma assessment
  • Concern for ruptured intracranial vascular malformation
  • Patients who are transferred from another facility
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Normal Saline

    normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) administered intravenously

    Drug: Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl)

  • Active comparator
    Isotonic Crystalloid

    balanced crystalloid intravenous fluid therapy

    Drug: balanced crystalloid

Interventions

  • DrugNormal Saline (0.9% NaCl)

    For the primary purpose of fluid therapy or resuscitation in the emergency room and during hospitalization. The interventions will be administered intravenously whenever isotonic intravenous fluid administration is ordered by the treating provider for fluid resuscitation and/or maintenance in the emergency room and during inpatient hospitalization. Assignment to the intervention arm will be adhered to from enrollment to discharge. The total volume, rate, initiation, cessation, and co-interventions will be left to the discretion of the treating provider. Adherence will be ensured by dual interventions at the level of pharmacy IV fluid supply and physician order. The fluids will be physically administered according to the standard intravenous procedures and those outlined in the manufacturer's instructions.

  • Drugbalanced crystalloid

    For the primary purpose of fluid therapy or resuscitation in the emergency room and during hospitalization. The interventions will be administered intravenously whenever isotonic intravenous fluid administration is ordered by the treating provider for fluid resuscitation and/or maintenance in the emergency room and during inpatient hospitalization. Assignment to the intervention arm will be adhered to from enrollment to discharge. The total volume, rate, initiation, cessation, and co-interventions will be left to the discretion of the treating provider. Adherence will be ensured by dual interventions at the level of pharmacy IV fluid supply and physician order. The fluids will be physically administered according to the standard intravenous procedures and those outlined in the manufacturer's instructions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurological Outcomes

    Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) 8-point scale. Glasgow Outcome Scale has been widely accepted as the standard assessment scale of global outcomes after severe brain injury because it captures well how the injury affects functioning in major areas of life. Using the manual for the GOSE interview, we will conduct our primary efficacy assessment at 6 months after ICU admission in person or over the phone. Outcomes on the GOSE scale do not change past the 6-month mark in moderate and severe TBI patients. The 8-point ordinal GOSE scale for the primary efficacy assessment will be dichotomized into favorable (GOSE score 4-8) and unfavorable (GOSE 1-3) outcomes. The primary analysis model will be a logistic regression model where the outcome of interest is the dichotomized GOS-E evaluated at 6 months to reflect favorable and unfavorable outcomes. The covariate of interest is a randomization assignment.

    Time frame: 6 months post injury

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inpatient mortality

    We will assess the inpatient mortality of the participants. We will note the time from admission to death or discharge. The secondary outcome (inpatient mortality) will be analyzed using two approaches. The primary analysis model will be a logistic regression model where the outcome of interest is the vitality status (alive or dead) at discharge. The covariate of interest is a randomization assignment. The secondary analysis will be a time-to-death analysis comparing the survival curves between the two randomized groups using a log-rank test.

    Time frame: randomization to hospital discharge typically 2 weeks.

Other outcomes

  1. To compare delayed interventions to treat Intracranial pressure (ICP).

    Surgical or medical ICP-related therapeutic interventions. Events of acute kidney injury, cerebral edema, and in-patient mortality, will be captured.

    Time frame: randomization to hospital discharge, typically 2 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Timeframe for sharing undecided at this early stage

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2029, 48 months after the start.

Of 30 phase 3 interventional studies under Brain Injuries, Traumatic, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 69. This study's planned 48 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2025
First posted
May 1, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Aug 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06953674
Collaborators
Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Board
Responsible party
Akshitkumar MIstry (Assistant Professor Term, University of Louisville) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 1, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Study contacts

Mechelle Kaufman, BSN, RN
Contact
mechelle.kaufman@louisville.edu
502-588-2329
Akshitkumar Mistry, M.D.
Contact
a.mistry@uoflhealth.org
Akshitkumar Mistry, MD
principal investigator · Assistant Professor Term

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion