CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04439669Updated Jul 3, 2024

CRPS - Diagnostics, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and Response to Treatment With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

An interventional study of Sham nrTMS and open phase and Active nrTMS and open phase in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of Upper Limb (Disorder), sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-03.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a sham controlled, randomized, double-blind, navigated repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nrTMS) study for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS types 1 and 2). The investigators study factors that may contribute to development, maintenance, or treatment responses with clinical, sleep, and psychiatric questionnaires and clinical examinations, quantitative sensory testing and neurophysiologic recordings, genetics, and MRI techniques.

Read the detailed description

rTMS hypothetically disrupts the default networks related to chronic pain and renders the brain more susceptible to drugs, rehabilitation, or cognitive behavioral therapy. In addition, there is experimental evidence that rTMS releases factors that are involved in endogenous top-down modulation of pain and neural plasticity. Thus, the analgesic effect of rTMS may be mediated via enforcing endogenous pain control systems at the brain level, in addition to its effects on neuroplastic effects.

For active, navigated stimulation targets the investigators have the parietal opercular cortex overlying the secondary somatosensory cortex ("S2") and the primary motor cortex (M1).

The investigators randomize participants to first receive nrTMS to the right "S2" or sham stimulation. After ten sessions the investigators follow up the participants up to three months. At three months, if the average pain is ≥5/10 in numeric rating scale (NRS), the participant is offered an active, open nrTMS treatment phase depending on which treatment the participant first received. If the participant benefits from the open label treatment, a maintenance therapy is offered (6 months with gradually reducing nrTMS treatment frequency). The symptoms and quality of life are followed with questionnaires and diaries. After the maintenance period, the RN calls a structured interview at 1, 3, and 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of Upper Limb (Disorder)

Keywords

  • TMS
  • CRPS
  • pain
  • fMRI
  • quality of life
  • mood
  • cognitive function
  • DNA
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • CRPS 1 or 2 of the upper limb
  • Duration ≥ 6 months
  • Mean pain (NRS) intensity ≥5/10
  • Medical and other therapies have failed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other stimulation therapies apart from transcutaneous nerve stimulation
  • psychotic disorder
  • severe depression
  • use of strong opioids
  • epilepsy
  • any contraindication for MRI
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs
  • ongoing insurance or other entitlement cases
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Starts with active stimulation

    Active nrTMS is given to "S2" at the right side (10 sessions in a three week period). Thereafter, a new, open label phase will start if the average pain at 3 month follow-up is ≥5/10. Then, the nrTMS will be targeted to M1 contralateral to the side of pain. After 5 stimulation sessions the response is evaluated. If pain is still ≥510, the investigators change the target to the "S2" on the left side for five sessions. If there is response with pain relief, a maintenance therapy with this target is offered for 6 months with gradually reducing stimulation sessions.

    Device: Active nrTMS and open phase

  • Placebo comparator
    Starts with sham stimulation

    Sham nrTMS will be targeted to the "S2" on the right side, but using a sham box/coil. Stimulation period is similar than for the active comparator. Similarly, thereafter, a new, open label phase will start if the average pain at 3 month follow-up is ≥5/10. Then, the nrTMS will be targeted to "S2" at the right side. After 5 stimulation sessions the response is evaluated. If pain is still ≥5/10, the investigators change the target to M1 on the contralateral side of the pain and furthermore to "S2" at the left side after 5 stimulation sessions, if pain is still ≥5/10.

    Device: Sham nrTMS and open phase

Interventions

  • DeviceSham nrTMS and open phase

    Navigated repetitive TMS treatment (10 sessions during a three-week period) randomized to sham. In the following open phase stimulation the treatment targets are the right "S2"-contralateral M1-left "S2".

    Also known as: Starts with sham stimulation

  • DeviceActive nrTMS and open phase

    Navigated repetitive TMS treatment (10 sessions during a three-week period) randomized to "S2". In the following open phase stimulation the treatment targets are contralateral M1 and left "S2". If the patient benefited from active "S2" stimulation, but the treatment effect faded in follow-up, the open phase stimulation starts with right "S2".

    Also known as: Starts with active stimulation

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 15-item quality of life measure

    Quality of life (15D questionnaire) with 15 question items with 5 alternatives in each. The scores range between 15 to 75 with 15 the best and 75 the worst quality of life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at one month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean pain intensity and interference

    Numeric rating scale (NRS, 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Baseline, during stimulation, and two weeks after the intervention

  2. Weekly pain intensity and interference

    Pain questionnaires (numeric rating scale (NRS, 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after intervention

  3. Sleep interference and quality

    Insonnia severity index (ISI). There are seven questions with scale 0 to 4 (0 with no symptoms and 4 with the worst symptoms). The scores are added up to get a total score ranging from 0 to 28. A higher score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1,2,and 3 months after intervention

  4. Clinical neurophysiology measures

    Quantitative sensory testing (QST) with standardized reporting

    Time frame: Baseline and one week after intervention

  5. Cognitive assessment A

    Cognitive function assessment by Cogstate, a computer based detection and identification task. Answers yes or no, standard reporting.

    Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention

  6. Hand strength

    Hand motor function measured e.g. by Jamar (kg)

    Time frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention.

  7. Biochemical tests

    Blood samples: inflammatory markers (e.g. high sensitivity CRP, proteomics). Standard reporting

    Time frame: At baseline

  8. Brain imaging: Default mode networks

    Resting state fMRI

    Time frame: Baseline and one week after intervention

  9. CRPS symptom severity

    CRPS severity scale (CSS, 0=no symptoms or signs, 17=maximum score with symptoms and signs)

    Time frame: Baseline and at one month

  10. Patient global impression of change

    Global impression of change (GIC, 1=very much improved, 7= very much worse)

    Time frame: 1, 2, and 3 months and through study completion, an average of 1 year

  11. Screening of psychiatric symptoms and diagnostics

    Psychiatric interveiw (SCID II) with symptom and diagnostic description. Nine questions, answers yes or no, standard reporting. The more "yes"-answers, the worse the outcome.

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  12. Hand mobility

    Angles of the joints in the hand (degrees)

    Time frame: Baseline and one week after intervention

  13. Cognitive assessment B

    Wechsler Memory Scale III (WMS-III) subtest: digit span. Number of digits recalled. Standard reporting.

    Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention

  14. Cognitive assessment C

    Wechsler Memory Scale III (WMS-III) subtest: word list. Number of words recalled. Standard reporting.

    Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention

  15. Cognitive assessment D

    Bourdon-Wiersma (Attention and concentration): number of visual stimuli found.

    Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention

  16. Cognitive assesment E

    Trail-Making Test (Parts A and B): time spent (seconds) for visual scanning task. Standard reporting.

    Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention

  17. DNA

    DNA analysis. Standard reporting.

    Time frame: At baseline

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Helsinki University Hospital, Pain Clinic
    Helsinki, Uusimaa 00029, Finland
  • Turku University Hospital, Pain Clinic
    Turku, Varsinais-Suomi 20014, Finland
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Erratum In: Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1168-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.003. PubMed 31901449 ↗
  • Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed 25034472 ↗
  • Jaaskelainen SK, Lindholm P, Valmunen T, Pesonen U, Taiminen T, Virtanen A, Lamusuo S, Forssell H, Hagelberg N, Hietala J, Pertovaara A. Variation in the dopamine D2 receptor gene plays a key role in human pain and its modulation by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):2180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Aug 29. PubMed 25180011 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The Ethics committee doesn't allow that due to privacy agreements.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04439669
Lead sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Collaborators
Turku University Hospital
Responsible party
Hanna Harno (Principal Investigator, Helsinki University Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2020
Start date
Aug 28, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 29, 2021
Completion
Aug 25, 2022
Last update
Jul 3, 2024

Study contacts

Eija Kalso, Professor
study chair · Helsinki University Hospital, Pain Clinic
Satu Jääskeläinen, Professor
study chair · Turku University Hospital, Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology
Hanna Harno, MD, PhD
study director · Helsinki University Hospital, Pain Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion