ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07001423COFFEEUpdated Sep 16, 2026

ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly

An interventional study of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Choledocholithiasis and Cholelithiasis, sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Recruiting at 12 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 75 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
75 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus wait-and-see policy after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in elderly. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome: Death or major postoperative complications or recurrent biliary disease within 1 year after randomization.

Read the detailed description

Elderly patients with common bile duct stones are asked to participate this randomized trial after successful endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones. The hypothesis of the study is that wait-and-see policy is non-inferior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Four hundred patients are randomized 1:1 to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy group or wait-and see group. Cholecystectomy is done on the same admission or within two weeks after randomization. One interim analysis is planned for the trial after 100 randomized patients to assess safety. The trial is terminated if there is a statistically significant difference in primary outcome with p\<0.001 (chi-square test) between the study arms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Cholelithiasis
03

In context

Choledocholithiasis

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledocholithiasis; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 100 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Choledocholithiasis.

Browse Choledocholithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 311 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
75 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Common bile duct stones cleared after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP)
  • Age >= 80 years or age 75-79 years with a Charlson Comorbidity index >=2
  • gallbladder in situ

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute Cholecystitis
  • Biliary Pancreatitis
  • Severe or moderately severe post-ERCP pancreatitis
  • Chronic pancreatitis
  • Bile duct pathology
  • Widespread
  • Unable to give consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cholecystectomy

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is done within 2 weeks after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones.

    Procedure: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • No intervention
    Wait-and-see

    After endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones, patients are managed non-operatively. During the follow-up cholecystectomy will be available on demand.

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 weeks after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with composite outcome of death, major complication or recurrent biliary event

    The primary outcome is a composite outcome including death within 1 year after randomization, the occurrence of major complications within 30 days from surgery and recurrent biliary event requiring hospitalization. within 1 year after randomization. A recurrent biliary event refers to cholecystitis, pancreatitis, cholangitis, or bile duct stones. Major complications were defined as infectious, cardiovascular and pulmonary complications, and surgical complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher)

    Time frame: From randomization to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of good days

    Number of days alive and out of hospital

    Time frame: From randomization to 1 year

  2. EQ VAS value

    Quality of life is measured using EuroQOL EQ-5D-5L instrument, EQ VAS values are compared. 0 represents the worst health a person can imagine and 100 represents the the best health a person can imagine. EQ-5D-5L dimension responses are reported as a descriptive data

    Time frame: at 30 days, 180 days and 365 days after randomization

  3. Survival

    Survival is measured using Kaplan-Meier analysis

    Time frame: From randomization to 1 year

  4. Number of patients with major complications

    Number of patients with major complications defined as infectious, cardiovascular, and pulmonary complications, and surgical complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher)

    Time frame: From randomization to 1 year

  5. Number of patients with recurrent biliary event

    Number of patients with recurrent biliary event (cholecystitis, pancreatitis, cholangitis, or symptomatic bile duct stones)

    Time frame: From randomization to 1 year

  6. Composite outcome of death or occurrence of major complications or recurrent biliary event requiring hospitalization

    The same as primary outcome, but after 2 years follow-up

    Time frame: From randomization to 2 years

  7. Number of patients with uncomplicated biliary pain or post cholecystectomy pain

    Uncomplicated biliary pain/ post cholecystectomy pain. Specific 5 criteria of biliary pain include : 1. severe pain attacks, 2. lasting 15 to 30 minutes or longer, 3. location in epigastrium or right upper quadrant, 4. pain radiating to the back, 5. a positive pain response to simple analgesics

    Time frame: At 30, 180 and 365 days after randomization

  8. Healthcare costs

    Healthcare costs related to bile stones; including laboratory tests, imaging (ultra sound, computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging), procedures (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP), laparoscopic cholecystectomy), emergency visits and hospital days.

    Time frame: From randomization to 1 year

07

Study locations

2 of 12 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kivivuori A, Mattila L, Siiki A, Laukkarinen J, Rantanen T, Ukkonen M. Wait-and-see strategy is justified after ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in elderly patients with common biliary duct stones. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Mar 1;94(3):443-447. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003852. Epub 2022 Dec 14. PubMed 36524923 ↗
  • Costi R, DiMauro D, Mazzeo A, Boselli AS, Contini S, Violi V, Roncoroni L, Sarli L. Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk? Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0169-2. Epub 2006 Nov 16. PubMed 17111279 ↗
  • Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Sep 7;360(9335):761-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09896-3. PubMed 12241833 ↗
  • Bass GA, Gillis AE, Cao Y, Mohseni S; European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) Cohort Studies Group. Patients over 65 years with Acute Complicated Calculous Biliary Disease are Treated Differently-Results and Insights from the ESTES Snapshot Audit. World J Surg. 2021 Jul;45(7):2046-2055. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06052-0. Epub 2021 Apr 3. PubMed 33813631 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07001423
Responsible party
Panu Mentula (MD, PhD, Head of Emergency Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2025
Start date
Oct 9, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Panu Mentula, MD, PhD
Contact
panu.mentula@hus.fi
+358504270183
Päivi Siironen, MD, PhD
Contact
paivi.siironen@hus.fi
+358504271343
Panu Mentula, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Helsinki University Central Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion