ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07818174Bath-MinUpdated Sep 14, 2026

Graded Motor Imagery Effects on Body Perception Disturbance in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome : a Randomised Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Graded Motor Imagery + Therapeutic exercises and Sham-GMI (non-motor mental imagery) + Therapeutic exercises in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 20 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in France — 6 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Complex Regional Pain Syndromes · France.

Planned enrollment
5th of 13
80 · median 60
Started
2026
with 1 other
No phase
10 of 17
4 open now
Registered
17th of 17
by date

Among the 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in France, this one is the 5th largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2026, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 17th registered.

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 55 are open to participants now.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 6 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 39 Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies recruiting now, 17 (44%) set no upper age limit and 16 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating pain condition that usually develops following trauma. Patients with CRPS experience intense, continuing, disproportionate pain and multiple symptoms such as changes or asymmetry in colour, temperature or oedema, as well as stiffness, tremors or dystonia and body perception disturbances. Body perception disturbances are now recognised as part of the typical presentation of CRPS and have been shown to correlate, in particular, with pain intensity.

Managing CRPS is challenging and treatment options are limited. Among these, treatments aimed at cortical reorganisation, such as Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), have shown evidence of efficacy in terms of pain and function. However, with regard to body perception disorders, the evidence is limited and emerging.

Our aim is to evaluate the effects of Graded Motor Imagery on body perception disorders in patients with upper limb CRPS. Method: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intervention group - therapeutic exercises plus GMI for 6 weeks (implicit motor imagery, explicit motor imagery followed by mirror therapy) - with a control group - therapeutic exercises plus sham-GMI (non-motor mental imagery) for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures: body perception disorders (Bath Scale), pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale), quality of life (PROMIS 29), catastrophising (PCS), fear of pain, CRPS Severity Score, patient-reported global impression of change, medication use and self-efficacy. Interventions are carried out in private practice by independent physiotherapists. Assessors are blinded for the primary outcome. A qualitative component will explore the experiences and perceptions of patients and therapists regarding body perception disturbances, GMI and participation in a research project.

This study aims are to improve treatment options for the management of SDRC and to improve the recognition and treatment of body perception disorders in SDRC.

03

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Keywords

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • Primary chronic pain
  • Body perception disturbances
  • Graded Motor Imagery
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years
  • Upper limb unilateral CRPS (Budapest criteria)
  • No prior use of GMI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Not confident with written/spoken French
  • Not confident with smartphone use
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group "Graded Motor Imagery + Therapeutic exercises"

    Graded Motor Imagery (left/right discrimination, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy) and exercises (15 minutes, 3 times per day, 6 weeks)

    Other: Graded Motor Imagery + Therapeutic exercises

  • Sham comparator
    Group "Sham-GMI (non-motor mental imagery) + Therapeutic exercises"

    Sham-GMI (non-motor mental imagery) + Therapeutic exercises

    Other: Sham-GMI (non-motor mental imagery) + Therapeutic exercises

Interventions

  • OtherGraded Motor Imagery + Therapeutic exercises

    Functional, mobility, strengthening, and mobilization exercises, both passive and active. The exercises are designed to improve mobility and function in the affected limb. In addition to this standard treatment, the intervention group will receive care using Gradual Motor Imagery. The protocol lasts 6 weeks (3 sessions of 15 minutes per day), divided into 3 phases: implicit motor imagery, explicit motor imagery followed by mirror therapy

  • OtherSham-GMI (non-motor mental imagery) + Therapeutic exercises

    Functional, mobility, strengthening, and mobilization exercises, both passive and active. The exercises are designed to improve mobility and function in the affected limb. In addition to this standard treatment, the control group will receive a non-motor mental imagery intervention (visual imagery or sham-GMI), designed not to stimulate the sensorimotor areas of the brain while resembling IMG (3 sessions of 15 minutes per day for 6 weeks).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Body perception disorders (Bath Scale)

    Assessment of body perception disturbances; 7 items

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body perception disorders (Bath Scale)

    Assessment of body perception disturbances; 7 items

    Time frame: 3 months after intervention (M3)

  2. Mean pain intensity (Numeric rating scale)

    Mean pain during the last week, mean pain during the last week during movement, mean pain during the last week at rest

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  3. QuickDash

    Self-reported assessment of upper limb function :

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  4. PROMIS 29

    Self-reported assessment of quality of life (7 domains, 29 items)

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  5. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    Self-reported assessment of pain catastrophizing

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  6. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (short form)

    Self-reported assessment of fear of movement (6 items)

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  7. Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)

    Self-reported assessment of confidence in performing activities despite ongoing pain

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  8. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Self-administered questions asking respondents to rate how their condition has changed since the intervention

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

  9. Medication Quantification Scale (MQS)

    MQS quantifies pain medication use and provides a score.

    Time frame: End of intervention (Week 6), 3 months after intervention (M3)

07

Study locations

20 sites
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie AMBON 56190 3b route de Lauzach
    Ambon, 56190, France
    • Amaury BRIDOUX, Physical therapist · Contactamaury.bridoux@gmail.com · 02 97 68 70 54
    • Amaury BRIDOUX, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, CAEN 14000 41 av. père Charles de Foucauld
    Caen, 14000, France
    • Guillaume GALLIOU, Physical therapist · Contactguillaume.galliou@gmail.com · 02 31 83 48 02
    • Guillaume GALLIOU, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 85610 CUGAND 19bis rue du président auguste durand
    Cugand, 85610, France
    • Victor DUPONT, Physical therapist · Contactvictor.dupont@hotmail.fr · 02 51 42 11 92
    • Victor DUPONT, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, ERAGNY 95610 5 allée Rosa Luxemburg
    Éragny, 95610, France
    • David MERCIER, Physical therapist · Contactdav_mercier@hotmail.fr · 01 39 09 14 73
    • David MERCIER, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, ERAGNY 95610 5 allée Rosa Luxemburg
    Éragny, 95610, France
    • Audrey VIERS, Physical therapist · Contactaudrey.viers@outlook.com · 01 39 09 14 73
    • Audrey VIERS, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 56520 6 place Louis le Montagner
    Guidel, 56520, France
    • Germain PICHOT, Physical therapist · Contactpichot.germain@gmail.com · 02 97 02 92 53
    • Germain PICHOT, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 20220 L'ILE ROUSSE 8 Bd Pasquini
    L'Île-Rousse, 20220, France
    • Florian SANTOS, Physical therapist · Contactsantos_florian@hotmail.fr · 04 95 60 00 41
    • FLORIAN SANTOS · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 69008 LYON 16 rue du transvaal
    Lyon, 69008, France
    • Aissaoui TESSADIT, Physical therapist · ContactTessadit.aissaoui@gmail.com · 09 82 41 60 55
    • Aissaoui TESSADIT, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 34000 Montpellier, 22, avenue du Pont Juvénal
    Montpellier, 34000, France
    • Fabrice ERNOUL, Physical therapist · Contact73fabrices@gmail.com · 04 67 27 75 43
    • Fabrice ERNOUL, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie du Mail Pablo Picasso, 5 Rue Nina Simone,
    Nantes, 44000, France
    • Sessi ACAPO, Doctor of Science · Contactsessi.acapo@gmail.com · +33 02 51 83 11 72
    • Sessi ACAPO, Doctor of Science · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 44100 NANTES 7 RUE DU SIMOUN
    Nantes, 44100, France
    • Clotilde SANDER, Physical therapist · ContactClotilde.sander@gmail.com · 02 51 84 87 71
    • Clotilde SANDER, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • cabinet de kinésithérapie, 44100 NANTES 8ter rue de la convention
    Nantes, 44100, France
    • Maeva GELU, Physical therapist · Contactmaeva.gelu.mk@gmail.com · 06 98 32 97 00
    • Maeva GELU, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • cabinet de kinésithérapie, NANTES 44100 2-4 route de Paris
    Nantes, 44100, France
    • Emeline LEBOEUF, Physical therapist · Contactkine.e.leboeuf@gmail.com · 02 28 16 88 47
    • Emeline LEBOEUF, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 45100 Orléans 44 avenue de la Mouillère
    Orléans, 45100, France
    • Nolwenn POQUET, Physical therapist · Contactpoquet.nolwenn@gmail.com · 0238635472
    • Nolwenn POCQUET, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, PARIS 75019 2, rue de Sadi Lecointe
    Paris, 75019, France
    • Kader NDIAYE, Physical therapist · Contactkader.ndiaye.kine@gmail.com · 06 68 51 97 52
    • Kader NDIAYE, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 44400 REZE 15 avenue Louise Michel
    Rezé, 44400, France
    • Damien HRYNKOW, Physical therapist · Contactdamien.hrynkow@gmail.com · 02 40 40 80 52
    • Damien HRYNKOW, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • cabinet de kinésithérapie, 44800 St Herblain Boulevard charles gautier
    Saint-Herblain, 44800, France
    • Léa GUILBEAU, Physical therapist · Contactlea.guilbeau@laposte.net · 02 51 84 87 71
    • Léa GUILBEAU, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • cabinet de kinésithérapie, 03270 SAINTYORRE 10, rue de la République
    Saint-Yorre, 03270, France
    • Philippe DEAT, Physical therapist · Contactphilippe.deat@gmx.fr · 04 70 41 04 37
    • Philippe DEAT, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • cabinet de kinésithérapie, 64121 Serres Castet 7 bis chemin de Liben
    Serres-Castet, 64121, France
    • Willy ERUAM, Physical therapist · ContactWilly.eruam@hotmail.fr · 02 40 80 00 33
    • Willy ERUAM, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
  • Cabinet de kinésithérapie, 64121 Serres Castet 7 bis chemin de Liben
    Serres-Castet, 64121, France
    • Florent JACQUEMIN, Physical therapist · ContactJacquemin.florent@yahoo.fr · 05 47 41 43 68
    • Florent JACQUEMIN, Physical therapist · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for May 2028, 19 months later.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 15, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2028
Last update
Sep 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07818174
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 15, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Sessi ACAPO, Doctor of Science
Contact
sessi.acapo@gmail.com
+33 02 51 83 11 72

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion