ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07785362NMJFP protocolUpdated Aug 25, 2026

Neuro-modulation of Central Pain Pathways in Non Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Pain Syndrome

An interventional study of Neuro-modulation of central pain pathways in non inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndrome (NMJFP) in Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia and CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes), sponsored by Istituto Giannina Gaslini. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Istituto Giannina Gaslini · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to see if transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can help reduce pain and improve quality of life in children and adolescents (ages 10-21, both sexes) with juvenile fibromyalgia or other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The main questions are whether active tES works better than sham (placebo) stimulation for pain relief and whether it leads to measurable changes in brain activity.Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active or sham tES for 20 minutes a day over two weeks. They'll complete questionnaires about their pain and quality of life, do some simple physical and motor tests, and undergo non-invasive brain measurements before and after the intervention. The results will help understand if tES is a safe and effective option for managing chronic pain in young people.

Specific Aims:

Aim 1a. transcranial stimulation will be associated with significant improvements in pain and functioning (e.g., 30% or greater symptom relief or 20% or greater improvement in QoL) Aim 1b. For each tES condition, estimate mean changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes induced by TMS stimulation.

Aim 2. Compare the tES conditions (Active, Sham) in terms of the mean changes in MEP amplitude.

Aim 3. Obtain statistical estimates of variance components needed for the planning of a future study. Therefore, we hypothesize that anodal tES stimulation decreases MEP amplitudes compared to sham tES condition. We further hypothesize that MEP amplitudes are positively correlated. This study will be the first randomized, double-blind, controlled study of tES technology in children as an adjunctive pain management strategy for MPS.

Data from this trial will likely yield information regarding the feasibility and efficacy of tES as a chronic pain-management approach.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial investigates the efficacy and safety of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) as a non-pharmacological intervention for pain management in pediatric patients (ages 10-21, both sexes) with juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) and other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes (MPS). These conditions are characterized by chronic, widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive and psychological symptoms, and significantly reduced quality of life. Current management strategies are multidisciplinary, but there is no gold standard treatment, especially for pediatric patients.The study is a 24-month, open-label, randomized, actively controlled, mono-center, prospective, superiority trial. Forty-six participants will be randomly assigned to one of two arms: Active tES or Sham tES. The primary aim is to determine whether active tES leads to significant improvements in pain (≥30% reduction) and quality of life (≥20% improvement) compared to sham stimulation. Secondary aims include evaluating changes in neurophysiological markers (such as motor evoked potentials, MEPs) and functional outcomes.Participants will undergo a comprehensive assessment including behavioral, neurophysiological, and patient-reported outcome measures. Behavioral assessments include quality of life questionnaires (J-FiMAR), physical and motor function tests (6-Minute Walking Test, Shuttle Run, Sit-up, Long Jump, Flamingo Balance Test, Functional Mobility Scale), and patient-reported outcomes (pain, fatigue, sleep, mood). Neurophysiological assessments involve transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electromyography (EMG) to measure cortical excitability and MEPs before and after the intervention.The intervention consists of 10 consecutive daily sessions (over 2 weeks) of either active or sham tES. Active tES is delivered for 20 minutes per session, with the anodal electrode placed over the left primary motor cortex (C3, 10-20 EEG system) and the reference electrode over the contralateral supraorbital region. Sham tES mimics the initial sensation of stimulation but does not deliver active current after the first minute. Both protocols use CE-certified, pediatric-appropriate equipment and follow international safety guidelines.Randomization is performed using random permuted blocks via Random.org to ensure balanced group allocation. The study includes interim analysis after 50% enrollment. Data analysis will use appropriate statistical methods (t-tests, ANOVA, non-parametric tests, Bonferroni correction) to compare outcomes between groups and assess effect sizes.Risks associated with tES and TMS are minimal, with the most common adverse effects being mild and transient (e.g., headache, tingling). Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and continuous monitoring ensure participant safety. Ethical conduct is maintained according to international guidelines, with informed consent/assent required from all participants and their guardians.The results of this trial will provide valuable evidence on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of tES as a pain management strategy in young people with JFM and related conditions. The study also aims to identify objective neurophysiological and functional markers that could guide future personalized interventions and improve quality of life for affected patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Syndrome
  • Fibromyalgia
  • CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)
  • Neuromodulation
  • Juvenile
  • Physical Disability
  • Physical Inactivity

Keywords

  • Pain syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Complex regional Pain Syndrome, Neuromodulation, Juvenile, Physical Disability, Physical Inactivity
03

In context

Fibromyalgia

1,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 46 is below the median of 60 across 937 interventional studies indexed under Fibromyalgia.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto Giannina Gaslini is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects aged between 10 and 21 years.Patients with fibromyalgia according to the 1990 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology or Patients with other types of non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes.Patients who reported a mean pain score > 4 on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) during the two weeks preceding the clinical trial.Disease duration for more than 6 months, no change in drug treatments during the last month, and lack of response to conventional treatments.

Exclusion Criteria: iagnosis of epilepsy or at risk of seizuresPresence of a cardiac pacemakerPresence of an implanted infusion pump, metal plates in the skull, or metal objects in the eye and skull (e.g., after neurosurgical interventions)Past or present history of substance abusePast or present history of neuropsychiatric disorders (major depression and schizophrenia)

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active tES

    Active tES (transcranial electrical stimulation) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that involves applying a low-intensity electrical current (up to 2 mA) to specific areas of the cerebral cortex through electrodes placed on the scalp. In this study, the active tES protocol delivers current for 20 minutes per session, over 10 consecutive days (2 weeks), with the anodal electrode placed over the left primary motor cortex (C3 position, according to the 10-20 EEG system) and the reference electrode over the contralateral supraorbital region. The goal is to modulate cortical excitability and reduce pain in patients with juvenile fibromyalgia or other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The procedure is safe, well-tolerated, and monitored for adverse effects

    Other: Neuro-modulation of central pain pathways in non inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndrome (NMJFP)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tES

    Sham tES (transcranial electrical stimulation) is a placebo-controlled procedure designed to mimic the experience of active tES without delivering a sustained electrical current. In this study, for the sham protocol, electrodes are placed in the same positions as for active stimulation. After an initial ramp-up period of 30 seconds, the stimulation fades out over the next 30 seconds, so participants feel the initial tingling sensation but receive no active current for the remainder of the session. At the end of the sham session, stimulation fades in again for 30 seconds and then ends with a final 30-second ramp-down. This method reliably simulates the sensations of active tES and helps reduce expectation bias, while ensuring that no actual neuromodulatory effect is delivered

    Other: Neuro-modulation of central pain pathways in non inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndrome (NMJFP)

Interventions

  • OtherNeuro-modulation of central pain pathways in non inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndrome (NMJFP)

    Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used in this study to investigate its effects on central pain processing in pediatric patients with juvenile fibromyalgia and other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The intervention is integrated within a multidisciplinary approach that combines behavioral assessments, neurophysiological measurements, and quality of life evaluations. The study aims to assess the impact of tES on pain reduction, functional improvement, and neurophysiological markers, while ensuring safety and tolerability in a young population. The intervention is delivered using CE-certified equipment and follows international safety guidelines

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity from Baseline to Post-Intervention in Pediatric Patients with Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes Treated with Non Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS)

    The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate whether non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), specifically transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), can significantly reduce pain in children and adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia or other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The intervention aims to modulate brain circuits involved in pain perception using safe, non-pharmacological techniques. Changes in pain (30% or greater symptom relief, misured by Visual analogue scale - 0= worse/10= better) will be measured before and after treatment, comparing active and sham stimulation groups.

    Time frame: Primary outcomes will be assessed at four time points: before the first tES session (baseline), immediately after the last session (post-intervention, after 2 weeks), and at 1 month and 3 months after

  2. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life from Baseline to Post-Intervention in Pediatric Patients with Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes Treated with Non Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS)

    The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate whether non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), specifically transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), can significantly reduce pain in children and adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia or other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The intervention aims to modulate brain circuits involved in pain perception using safe, non-pharmacological techniques. Changes in QoL quality of life (20% or greater improvement in QoL, misured by Visual analogue scale - 0= worse/10= better) will be measured before and after treatment, comparing active and sham stimulation groups.

    Time frame: Primary outcomes will be assessed at four time points: before the first tES session (baseline), immediately after the last session (post-intervention, after 2 weeks), and at 1 month and 3 months after

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in multidimensional patient-reported outcomes from baseline to follow-up.

    The secondary outcome measures in this study are designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on multiple aspects of functioning and well-being in children and adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia and other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes patient-reported outcomes including fatigue, sleep quality, mood, and cognitive function, as well as physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns.

    Time frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at four time points: before the first tES session (baseline), immediately after the last session (post-intervention, after 2 weeks), and at 1 month and 3 months after

  2. Change in functional and motor performance from baseline to follow-up.

    The secondary outcome measures in this study are designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on multiple aspects of functioning and well-being in children and adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia and other non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes in functional and motor performance through standardized tests (6-Minute Walking Test= meters; Shuttle Run= Seconds; Sit-up= number, Long Jump= meters, Flamingo Balance= number, FMS= meters).

    Time frame: Secondary outcomes will be assessed at four time points: before the first tES session (baseline), immediately after the last session (post-intervention, after 2 weeks), and at 1 month and 3 months after.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in TMS-derived neurophysiological indices (SICI, ICF, sICF, LICI, IHI, MEP amplitude, time-to-baseline) before and after intervention

    TMS-derived neurophysiological indices-including SICI, ICF, sICF, LICI, IHI, MEP amplitude, and time-to-baseline-are measured before and after the intervention to objectively assess changes in cortical excitability and connectivity. These outcomes provide insight into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in pediatric patients with non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain syndromes

    Time frame: Others outcomes will be assessed at four time points: before the first tES session (baseline), immediately after the last session (post-intervention, after 2 weeks), and at 1 month and 3 months after

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ronchetti Anna Bruna
    Genova, GE 16147, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 436 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fibromyalgia, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 449 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2026
First posted
Aug 25, 2026
StartActual
Mar 31, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2028
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07785362
Lead sponsor
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2026
Start date
Mar 31, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion