ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04436978WOEST-3Updated Dec 15, 2023

What is the Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI?

A Phase 4 interventional study of 30-day DAPT and Guideline-directed therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by St. Antonius Hospital. Recruiting at 20 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-15.

Sponsored by St. Antonius Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The optimal antithrombotic management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. AF patients are treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), i.e. aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor, to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with AF undergoing PCI were traditionally treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT, i.e. OAC plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) to prevent ischemic complications. However, TAT doubles or even triples the risk of major bleeding complications. More recently, several clinical studies demonstrated that omitting aspirin, a strategy known as dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is safer compared to TAT with comparable efficacy.

However, pooled evidence from recent meta-analyses suggests that patients treated with DAT are at increased risk of MI and ST. Insights from the AUGUSTUS trial showed that aspirin added to OAC and clopidogrel for 30 days, but not thereafter, resulted in fewer severe ischemic events. This finding emphasizes the relevance of early aspirin administration on ischemic benefit, also reflected in the current ESC guideline. However, because we consider the bleeding risk of TAT unacceptably high, we propose to use a short course of DAPT (omitting OAC for 1 month). There is evidence from the BRIDGE study that a short period of omitting OAC is safe in patients with AF. In this study, these patients are treated with DAPT, which also prevents stroke, albeit not as effective as OAC. This temporary interruption of OAC will allow aspirin treatment in the first month post-PCI where the risk of both bleeding and stent thrombosis is greatest.

The WOEST 3 trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of one month DAPT compared to guideline-directed therapy consisting of OAC and P2Y12 inhibitor combined with aspirin up to 30 days. We hypothesise that the use of short course DAPT is superior in bleeding and non-inferior in preventing ischemic events. The primary safety endpoint is major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the ISTH at 6 weeks after PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis at 6 weeks after PCI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Atrial Flutter
  • STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI
  • Bleeding
  • Stroke
  • Stent Thrombosis
  • Embolism
  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Atrial Flutter
  • STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI
  • Oral Anticoagulant
  • NOAC - Novel Oral Anticoagulant
  • DOAC - Direct Oral Anticoagulant
  • DAPT - Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
  • Antithrombotic Therapy
  • Dual Therapy
  • Triple Therapy
  • Bleeding
  • Thrombosis
  • Stroke
  • Stent Thrombosis
  • Systemic Embolism
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Coronary artery disease
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 200 across 865 interventional studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Antonius Hospital is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years
  2. Undergoing successful PCI (either ACS or elective PCI)
  3. History of or newly diagnosed (\<72 hours after PCI/ACS) atrial fibrillation or flutter with a long-term (≥ 1 year) indication for OAC

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contra indication to edoxaban, aspirin or all P2Y12 inhibitors
  2. Current indication for OAC besides atrial fibrillation/flutter (e.g. venous thromboembolism)
  3. \<12 months after any stroke
  4. CHADSVASc score ≥7
  5. Moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis (AVA ≤1.5 cm2)
  6. Mechanical heart valve prosthesis
  7. Intracardiac thrombus or apical aneurysm requiring OAC
  8. Poor LV function ( \<30%) with proven slow-flow
  9. History of intracranial haemorrhage
  10. Active bleeding on randomization
  11. History of intraocular, spinal, retroperitoneal, or traumatic intra-articular bleeding, unless the causative factor has been permanently resolved
  12. Recent (\<1 month) gastrointestinal haemorrhage, unless the causative factor has been permanently resolved.
  13. Known coagulopathy
  14. Severe anaemia requiring blood transfusion or thrombocytopenia \<50 × 109/L
  15. >40 or bariatric surgery
  16. Kidney failure ( \<15)
  17. Active liver disease (, ASP, AP >3x or active hepatitis A, B or C)
  18. Active excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
  19. \<1 year
  20. Pregnancy or breast-feeding women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    First month DAPT

    30-day DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor). After 30 days all patients will be treated with edoxaban and P2Y12 inhibitor. Selection of P2Y12 inhibitor is at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on both bleeding and ischemic risk. Dosage of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is according to local guidelines. NOAC of choice will be edoxaban. Patients will be treated with the recommended dose of 60mg once daily or the reduced dose of 30mg once daily.

    Drug: 30-day DAPT

  • Active comparator
    Guideline-directed therapy

    Standard guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients). After 30 days all patients will be treated with edoxaban and P2Y12 inhibitor. Selection of P2Y12 inhibitor is at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on both bleeding and ischemic risk. Dosage of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is according to local guidelines. NOAC of choice will be edoxaban. Patients will be treated with the recommended dose of 60mg once daily or the reduced dose of 30mg once daily.

    Drug: Guideline-directed therapy

Interventions

  • Drug30-day DAPT

    DAPT (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor) during the first 30 days following PCI. After 30 days, all patients will be treated with edoxaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor.

  • DrugGuideline-directed therapy

    Guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin limited to in-hospital use or up to 30 days in selected high-risk patients)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary safety endpoint

    Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Primary efficacy endpoint

    Composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bleeding complications

    Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Thrombotic complications

    Composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Net clinical benefit

    Composite of major bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism all-cause death and stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Clinical symptom severity

    CCS grade

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  5. All-cause death

    All-cause death as defined by ARC-2 and SCTI

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  6. Myocardial infarction

    Myocardial infarction as defined by the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  7. Stroke

    Stroke as defined by VARC-2 definitions

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  8. Systemic embolism

    Systemic embolism according to ENTRUST-AF PCI definition

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  9. Stent thrombosis

    Stent thrombosis as defined by ARC-2

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  10. Major bleeding

    Major bleeding as defined by BARC 3 or 5

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  11. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding

    CRNM as defined by BARC 2

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire

    EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

07

Study locations

18 of 20 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Will individual participant data be available? Yes What data in particular will be shared? Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). What other documents will be available? Study Protocol, informed consent form, clinical study report When will data be available (start and end dates)? Within 1 year following article publication. End date to be determined. With whom? Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. For what types of analyses? To achieve aims in the approved proposal. By what mechanism will data be made available? Proposals should be directed to as.verburg@antoniusziekenhuis.nl. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Within 1 year following article publication. End date to be determined.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04436978
Lead sponsor
St. Antonius Hospital
Collaborators
Daiichi Sankyo
Responsible party
Jurriën M. ten Berg, MD, PhD (Professor dr., St. Antonius Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2020
Start date
Jan 11, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 15, 2023

Study contacts

Ashley Verburg, MD
Contact
as.verburg@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
+31 (0)88 320 0925
Jurriën M ten Berg, Prof, MD
principal investigator · St. Antonius Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion