CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04434053Updated Jun 16, 2020

Adjustable Gravitational vs. Adjustable Differential Pressure Valves in iNPH

An interventional study of MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, sponsored by Military University Hospital, Prague. Status unknown at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-16.

Sponsored by Military University Hospital, Prague · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2020, registered Jun 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the study is to verify theoretical benefit of ventriculoperitoneal shunting with MIETHKE M.blue® valve in patients with iNPH. The study is designed to assess walking and balance, urinary function, cognitive performance and quality of life before and after shunting and compare the results between the patients with MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valves.

Read the detailed description

Patients who will be referred to Military University Hospital Prague with suspicion of normal pressure hydrocephalus will be tested by conventional methods to consider implantation of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. This testing is performed during hospitalization and includes clinical examination of the patient by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist including neuropsychological questionnaires or tests - MoCA, AVLT, ROCFT, TMT A + B, Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (N, K, P), Semantic Fluence Test (animals, vegetables), subtest of battery WAIS III and GDS. Clinical examinations are followed by magnetic resonance imaging. Functional testing of cerebrospinal fluid circulation is initiated on the second day unless another cause of the patient's symptoms (AD, Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, tumor, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst etc.) is present. The functional testing will involve lumbar infusion test and subsequent external lumbar drainage (ELD) for 120h, including biochemical analysis of CSF during the ELD. After this time, the objective improvement of the patient's gait with the aid of the Dutch Gait Scale will be evaluated with respect to the subjective evaluation by the patient or family (changes in urinary incontinence / urgency, headaches, etc.). If the diagnosis of normotensive hydrocephalus is confirmed, the patient will be indicated for a VP shunt implantation, which is used for permanent derivation of cerebrospinal fluid into the peritoneal cavity. As a result of cerebrospinal fluid derivation, the clinical condition of most of the patients improves. The operation process described by Michael J. Fritsch (Fritsch et al. 2014) will be modified for various valve types in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and assumed conditions for proper valve adjustment. Patients will be randomly implanted with a M.blue® or proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valve (Christoph Miethke GmbH \& Co. KG) in a randomized manner to form two study groups. The efficacy and safety of the proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valve has already been confirmed in a randomized prospective study in patients with idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus (Lemcke et al. 2013). The theoretical benefit of the M.blue® valve lies in the targeted modification of the cerebrospinal fluid diversion during the active time of a day, when the opening pressure of the valve's gravitational unit is controlled according to the angle between the valve and the horizontal line. The basal opening pressure of the valve that has to be overcome in the supine position is controlled with a fixed differential pressure unit. ProGAV 2.0® is an adjustable differential pressure valve implanted with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®. The shunt-assistant represents a fixed gravity unit that increases the pressure in the standing position, which must be overcome for the cerebrospinal fluid flow through th shunt. The opening pressure of the valve could be selected according to the patient's height and sex. The basal opening pressure of the valve that must be overcome in the supine position is controlled with an adjustable differential pressure unit that can be adjusted before and after the shunt implantation. In both valves, the opening pressure is the sum of the opening pressures of the gravitational and differential pressure units. The theoretical benefit of the M.blue® valve is the possibility of changing the opening pressure of the gravitational unit regulated according to the position of the head in the space and thus aiming more at the pressure conditions when the valve is not parallel to the horizontal line.

Patients will not be familiar with the type of valve implanted with respect to subjective evaluation of patients during the follow-up. Initial valve settings will be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Follow-up of the patients will be guided in the usual regime according to the natural history of the disease: at one month of follow-up an outpatient clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, including brain CT scan; at three-months of follow-up an evaluation during a two-day hospitalization including collection of the following questionnaires, brain MRI, clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist and collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber for the biochemical analysis; at six-months an outpatient examination by a neurosurgeon; at one year of follow-up an evaluation during a two-day hospitalization including collection of the following questionnaires, brain MRI, clinical examination by a neurosurgeon, neurologist and neuropsychologist and collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber valve for biochemical analysis; at two-years of follow-up an outpatient clinical examination by neurosurgeon and neuropsychologist including brain CT scan including collection of the following questionnaires and collection of the cerebrospinal fluid from the pre-chamber of the valve for biochemical analysis.

For the purpose of the study, the Dutch Gait scale (gait), UI-SF (incontinence) and MoCA (dementia) will be used to assess the outcome of the shunt operation to monitor the severity and nature of the main symptoms during the follow-up in pre-implant, three months, one year and after two years. The SF-12V2 will be used in a similar mode to monitor the quality of life of the patients. Severity of the symptoms will also be assessed by the Kiefer Scale, which was developed directly to monitor patients with idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus. Charlson comorbidity index will be used to monitor covariates. All clinical examinations by a neurosurgeon will monitor early and late complications of the short-circuit operation (infection, hemorrhage, overdrainage, underdrainage, shunt malfunction), the number of valve setting changes and their range, unscheduled checks and shunt revisions and other unexpected events.

The expected number of patients who will undergo all examinations after an annual check is 40 (20 and 20).

The expected benefit of the study is in particular to confirm the theoretical assumptions of an adjustable gravitational valve in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and thus in improvement of the quality and life expectancy of these patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Keywords

  • iNPH
03

In context

Hydrocephalus

210 studies on the registry are indexed under Hydrocephalus; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 105 interventional studies indexed under Hydrocephalus.

Browse Hydrocephalus studies →

Lead sponsor

Military University Hospital, Prague is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age of patients (between 60 and 85 years old)
  • Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait and one other symptom from Hakim-Adams triad (incontinence or dementia)
  • maximal initial pressure of 20 cmH2O during lumbar infusion test
  • Rout during LIT >9mmHg/ml*min
  • at least 15% improvement in Gait scale score after ELD
  • Conclusion of neuropsychological examination suggestive of iNPH (based on MoCA, Test of phonemic and verbal fluency, RAVLT, ROCFT, TMT A and B, Subtest of WAIS III, GDS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aetiology of hydrocephalus other than idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus - history of meningitis or subarachnoid haemorrhage, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst)
  • Intracranial tumor
  • Other neurodegenerative diseases may be present (AD, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, Progressive supranuclear palsy and cerebrovascular diseases), however have to be mild and evaluated in neurological, neuropsychological examinations and on MRI
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MIETHKE M.blue®

    Device: MIETHKE M.blue®

  • Active comparator
    MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    Device: MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

Interventions

  • DeviceMIETHKE M.blue®

    The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE M.blue® valve.

  • DeviceMIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® valve that will be implanted together with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Dutch Gait scale in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    The Gait Scale, a useful quantitative measure of gait impairment in NPH patients, is a component of a larger measure developed as part of the Dutch normal pressure hydrocephalus study (Boon et al., 1997). The Gait Scale evaluates various aspects of gait, including walking speed, number of steps, stride length, stance, foot-floor clearance, balance, tandem walking ability, turning ability, and start hesitation in 10m of walking. (Ravdin et al., 2008) The score consists of 3 subcategories and ranges 2-40 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.

    Time frame: Month 3/Year 1

  2. Change in MoCA in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It was created in 1996 by Ziad Nasreddine in Montreal, Quebec. The MoCA assesses several cognitive domains. Score ranges 0-30 points with lower scores indicating more severely impaired cognitive skills.

    Time frame: Month 3/Year 1

  3. Change in ICIQ UI-SF in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity, impact on quality of life (QoL) and simple estimation of a cause of urinary incontinence in men and women. The score ranges 0-21 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.

    Time frame: Month 3/Year 1

  4. Change in Kiefer Score in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    The Kiefer is a modified clinical grading tool that measures the severity of the three key symptoms (mental deficits, gait disturbance, incontinence) and two additional minor symptoms (headache and dizziness). The overall score may reach values between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment

    Time frame: Month 3/Year 1

  5. Change in SF12 v 2.0 Health Survey in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    The SF-12® V2 Health Survey (SF-12 v2.0) (Ware, Kosinski, Turner-Bowker, \& Gandek, 2002) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. Generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures like the SF-12 assess general health and well-being \[or health-related quality of life (HRQOL)\], including the impact of any and all illnesses on a broad range of functional domains. The SF-12 v2 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) (Ware \& Sherbourne, 1992; Ware, Snow, Kosinski, \& Gandek, 1993) covering the same eight domains of health outcomes, including physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH).

    Time frame: Month 3/Year 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative changes in valve settings in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    Any change in the valve settings postoperatively will be recorded together with a degree of individual changes.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  2. Overdrainage in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    Headaches, dizziness, subdural effusions on imaging methods (MRI, CT) and any unplanned visits will be recorded. Chronic subdural haematomas will be divided to symptomatic/asymptomatic and number of drainages will be recorded.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  3. Shunt revisions in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    Any shunt revisions will be recorded together with a cause (malfunction etc.)

    Time frame: 1 Year

  4. Shunt related infections in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)

    Any shunt related infection will be recorded.

    Time frame: 1 Year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Neurosurgical department of the Central Military Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University
    Praha, 16902, Czechia
    • Petra Zajíčková · Contact · nchr@uvn.cz · +420973202963
    • Petr Skalický, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04434053
Lead sponsor
Military University Hospital, Prague
Responsible party
Ondřej Bradáč (M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D., Military University Hospital, Prague) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 16, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2020

Study contacts

Ondřej Bradáč, M.D, M.Sc., Ph.D
Contact
ondrej.bradac@uvn.cz
+420777600923

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion