ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07784179Updated Aug 25, 2026

Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Hydrocephalus in Pediatric Patients

An interventional study of PAUS imaging in Hydrocephalus in Infants and Hydrocephalus in Children, sponsored by Michael McDowell. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 0 Days to 3 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Michael McDowell · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
0 Days to 3 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to out find out the capabilities and limitations of the combined photoacoustic and ultrasound (PAUS) imaging device for diagnosing hydrocephalus in children. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • can PAUS imaging allow for new and better ways to rapidly diagnose hydrocephalus?
  • Can PAUS imaging be used to confirm that treatments for hydrocephalus are working? PAUS imaging has been FDA approved for other medical conditions, but this is the first study to evaluate it for hydrocephalus detection.

Participants will undergo imaging through the anterior fontanelle with the dual-mode PAUS imaging device. Each imaging session will take about 30 to 60 minutes. These sessions will take place once before and once after hydrocephalus treatment, as the participant is willing. In some cases, if a patient is having cerebrospinal fluid removed at the bedside, an additional imaging session will occur to monitor the procedure in real-time, if the participant is willing.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this research study is to understand the capabilities of the photoacoustic ultrasound (PAUS) imaging device for hydrocephalus detection. For each subject, the PAUS imaging of CSF fluid will be performed. From the obtained imaging data, such as patency of CSF outflow, function of CSF diversion devices, and resolution of symptomatic hydrocephalus will be quantified to serve as potential hydrocephalus diagnostic biomarkers. For this purpose, each of these biomarkers will be compared with available standard test results such as MRA, XRA and ultrasound blood flow measurements. In addition, the imaging data will be used to study the changes in imaging depth, spatial resolution and contrast across different patients.

A total of 250 hydrocephalus patients will be recruited and imaged at the Penn State Children's Hospital Hershey campus.

The clinical staff at Hershey will use the available hydrocephalus medical records of patients admitted to Penn State Children's Hospital to confirm their eligibility. Before imaging, the parent/guardian of the patient will be informed through consent process that the clinical staff will have access to their medical records.

All subjects will be imaged at rest using the PAUS system that provides multiparametric photoacoustic imaging metrics. This will be done once prior to each surgery/hydrocephalus treatment and once afterwards provided it does not interfere with patient care. Each measurement will be obtained no more than 7 days from the time of treatment. Patients undergoing repetitive, temporizing procedures (serial lumbar punctures, reservoir taps) at the bedside will have the opportunity to participate in real time measurement of the effect of the procedure while it is happening. This will be a secondary component of the study that will be specifically consented for in patients that this is the case. Refusal of this portion of the study will not prevent involvement in the other parts. These results will be quantitatively evaluated and tabulated for each recruited patient, along with the standard test results such as fontanelle fullness and occipito-frontal circumference as well as any other non-imaging and imaging results available for the patient's neurologic health.

These initial pilot studies on 250 hydrocephalus patients at Penn State will help provide preliminary data for ultimately demonstrating clinical effectiveness of this technology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hydrocephalus in Infants
  • Hydrocephalus in Children

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hydrocephalus
  • Photoacoustic Ultrasound Imaging
  • PAUS Imaging
03

In context

Hydrocephalus

190 studies on the registry are indexed under Hydrocephalus; 52 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 41 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Hydrocephalus.

Browse Hydrocephalus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Michael McDowell as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Days to 3 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of hydrocephalus by a neurosurgeon
  • Age ≤ 3 years
  • Admitted to Penn State Health Children's Hospital with plans for definitive hydrocephalus treatment while inpatient, including shunt placement surgery, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, shunt revision, external ventricular drain placement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 3 years
  • No open anterior fontanelle or fontanelle is obstructed for clinical purposes
  • Too unstable to undergo diagnostic testing equivalents (i.e. standard ultrasonography)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PAUS imaging

    Patients in this arm will undergo PAUS imaging before and after hydrocephalus treatment procedures and, if applicable, during cerebrospinal removal procedures at the bedside.

    Diagnostic Test: PAUS imaging

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPAUS imaging

    PAUS imaging will be conducted before and after hydrocephalus treatment procedures and, if applicable, during cerebrospinal removal procedures at the bedside.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PAUS Imaging Depth Prior to Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS imaging depth (mm), obtained prior to surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the pre-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days prior to hydrocephalus treatment.

  2. PAUS Imaging Depth Following Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS imaging depth (mm), obtained following surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the post-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days after hydrocephalus treatment.

  3. PAUS Spatial Resolution Prior to Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS spatial resolution (mm), obtained prior to surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the pre-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days prior to hydrocephalus treatment.

  4. PAUS Spatial Resolution Following Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS spatial resolution (mm), obtained following surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the post-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days after hydrocephalus treatment.

  5. PAUS Imaging Contrast Prior to Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS imaging contrast (dB), obtained prior to surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the pre-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days prior to hydrocephalus treatment.

  6. PAUS Imaging Contrast Following Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS imaging contrast (dB), obtained following surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the post-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days after hydrocephalus treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. CSF Outflow Patency Prior to Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Qualitative assessment of CSF outflow patency on PAUS imaging, obtained prior to surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the pre-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days prior to hydrocephalus treatment.

  2. CSF Outflow Patency Following Hydrocephalus Treatment

    Qualitative assessment of CSF outflow patency on PAUS imaging, obtained following surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the post-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days after hydrocephalus treatment.

  3. Function of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Diversion Device

    Qualitative assessment of CSF diversion device function on PAUS imaging, obtained following surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the post-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days after hydrocephalus treatment.

  4. PAUS Assessment of Hydrocephalus Resolution

    Qualitative assessment of resolution of hydrocephalus on PAUS imaging, obtained following surgery or other hydrocephalus treatment.

    Time frame: During the post-treatment PAUS imaging session, occurring within 7 days after hydrocephalus treatment.

  5. PAUS Imaging Depth During Bedside Procedure

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS imaging depth (mm), obtained during a temporizing bedside procedure such as lumbar puncture, Ommaya reservoir tap, or CSF removal through a previously placed external ventricular drain.

    Time frame: During the bedside procedure.

  6. PAUS Spatial Resolution During Bedside Procedure

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS spatial resolution (mm), obtained during a temporizing bedside procedure such as lumbar puncture, Ommaya reservoir tap, or CSF removal through a previously placed external ventricular drain.

    Time frame: During the bedside procedure.

  7. PAUS Imaging Contrast During Bedside Procedure

    Quantitative measurement of PAUS imaging contrast (dB), obtained during a temporizing bedside procedure such as lumbar puncture, Ommaya reservoir tap, or CSF removal through a previously placed external ventricular drain.

    Time frame: During the bedside procedure.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Steinberg I, Huland DM, Vermesh O, Frostig HE, Tummers WS, Gambhir SS. Photoacoustic clinical imaging. Photoacoustics. 2019 Jun 8;14:77-98. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.05.001. eCollection 2019 Jun. PubMed 31293884 ↗
  • Wang LV, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 2012 Mar 23;335(6075):1458-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1216210. PubMed 22442475 ↗
  • Lin L, Hu P, Shi J, Appleton CM, Maslov K, Li L, Zhang R, Wang LV. Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast. Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 15;9(1):2352. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04576-z. PubMed 29907740 ↗
  • Zhang HF, Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang LV. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Jul;24(7):848-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt1220. Epub 2006 Jun 25. PubMed 16823374 ↗
  • Galanzha EI, Menyaev YA, Yadem AC, Sarimollaoglu M, Juratli MA, Nedosekin DA, Foster SR, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Siegel ER, Makhoul I, Hutchins LF, Suen JY, Zharov VP. In vivo liquid biopsy using Cytophone platform for photoacoustic detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with melanoma. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jun 12;11(496):eaat5857. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5857. PubMed 31189720 ↗
  • Reber J, Willershauser M, Karlas A, Paul-Yuan K, Diot G, Franz D, Fromme T, Ovsepian SV, Beziere N, Dubikovskaya E, Karampinos DC, Holzapfel C, Hauner H, Klingenspor M, Ntziachristos V. Non-invasive Measurement of Brown Fat Metabolism Based on Optoacoustic Imaging of Hemoglobin Gradients. Cell Metab. 2018 Mar 6;27(3):689-701.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.002. PubMed 29514074 ↗
  • Dasa MK, Markos C, Maria M, Petersen CR, Moselund PM, Bang O. High-pulse energy supercontinuum laser for high-resolution spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging of lipids in the 1650-1850 nm region. Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Mar 20;9(4):1762-1770. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.001762. eCollection 2018 Apr 1. PubMed 29675317 ↗
  • Allen TJ, Hall A, Dhillon AP, Owen JS, Beard PC. Spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging of lipid-rich plaques in the human aorta in the 740 to 1400 nm wavelength range. J Biomed Opt. 2012 Jun;17(6):061209. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061209. PubMed 22734739 ↗
  • Xu Z, Li C, Wang LV. Photoacoustic tomography of water in phantoms and tissue. J Biomed Opt. 2010 May-Jun;15(3):036019. doi: 10.1117/1.3443793. PubMed 20615021 ↗
  • Yan Y, Gomez-Lopez N, Basij M, Shahvari AV, Vadillo-Ortega F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Hassan SS, Romero R, MehrMohammadi M. Photoacoustic imaging of the uterine cervix to assess collagen and water content changes in murine pregnancy. Biomed Opt Express. 2019 Aug 19;10(9):4643-4655. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.004643. eCollection 2019 Sep 1. PubMed 31565515 ↗
  • Paulus LP, Buehler A, Wagner AL, Raming R, Jungert J, Simon D, Tascilar K, Schnell A, Rother U, Eckstein M, Lang W, Hoerning A, Schett G, Neurath MF, Waldner MJ, Trollmann R, Woelfle J, Bohndiek SE, Regensburger AP, Knieling F. Contrast-Enhanced Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography for Functional Assessment of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Aug;10(23):e2302562. doi: 10.1002/advs.202302562. Epub 2023 Jun 8. PubMed 37289088 ↗
  • Manwar R, Kratkiewicz K, Mahmoodkalayeh S, Hariri A, Papadelis C, Hansen A, Pillers DM, Gelovani J, Avanaki K. Development and characterization of transfontanelle photoacoustic imaging system for detection of intracranial hemorrhages and measurement of brain oxygenation: Ex-vivo. Photoacoustics. 2023 Jul 27;32:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100538. eCollection 2023 Aug. PubMed 37575972 ↗
  • Srivastava S, Yu B, Giraud D, Dighe M, Dhyani M, Barr RG. Overview of Diagnostic Ultrasound Safety: Review for Research and Institutional Review Boards. J Ultrasound Med. 2026 Mar;45(3):487-496. doi: 10.1002/jum.70085. Epub 2025 Oct 8. PubMed 41059940 ↗
  • Agrawal S, Johnstonbaugh K, Clark JY, Raman JD, Wang X, Kothapalli SR. Design, Development, and Multi-Characterization of an Integrated Clinical Transrectal Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Device for Human Prostate Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 7;10(8):566. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080566. PubMed 32784534 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Patient data will be coded.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07784179
Lead sponsor
Michael McDowell
Responsible party
Michael McDowell (Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Michael M McDowell, MD
Contact
mmcdowell1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu
717-531-7123
Ryan S Biskowitz, BS
Contact
rbiskowitz@pennstatehealth.psu.edu
484-999-1614
Michael M McDowell, MD
principal investigator · Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli, PhD
principal investigator · Penn State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion