ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04421300Updated May 14, 2024

A Randomized Study of Smile Exercise for Dry Eye

An interventional study of smile exercise and 0.1% sodium hyaluronate eye drop in Dry Eye, Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca and Eye Diseases, sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-14.

Primary conditionKeratoconjunctivitis SiccaRegistry: Dry Eye SyndromesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Dry Eye Syndromes — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, a narrower term within Dry Eye Syndromes.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
299
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of laughter therapy in relieving the symptoms of dry eye disease.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed to: Test the hypothesis that smile exercise is an effective treatment for Dry Eye Disease (DED) . Better understand the status of emotion, quality of sleep and life in DED patient by describing and evaluating a comprehensive set of features and treatment over 2 months of observation in a well-characterized group of patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye
  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
  • Eye Diseases
  • Corneal Diseases
  • Conjunctival Diseases

Browse trials for

03

In context

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca Reclassified

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 299 is above the median of 82 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Browse Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Compared within Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Dry Eye Syndromes. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Sign the approved by the Ethics Committee,
  2. 18 to 45 years of age,
  3. Meetting the dry eye diagnostic criteria of DEWs Ⅱ and demonstrating the following 2 condition in the same eye at screening and baseline visits (Same signs must present at both in Screening visit and Baseline visit). The same signs must be present in the same eye on both visits. The following parameters:.

    • Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score: 18-80 at and baseline visit.
    • Tear film break up time (TFBUT)\<8s.
  4. Best corrected visual acuity ≥10/20 in each eye
  5. Intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥5mmHg and≤21mmHg in each eye
  6. Women of must agree to use a reliable method of during study participation and must demonstrate a negative urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit.
  7. Feasible for all visits and willing to follow instructions from the study investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Corneal fluorescein staining present >5 score.
  2. Contact lens wearing history:

    • Used contact lenses within last 14 days prior to the Screening Visit.
    • Unwilling to avoid using contact lenses druing the study.
  3. Any corneal surgery within 12 months before Screening Visit .
  4. Participation in other medical studies 3 months before screening Visit.
  5. Current or previous diagnosis of any following ocular conditions in 3 months:

    i). acute allergic conjunctivitis ii). infection (e.g. bacterial, viral, protozoan or fungal infection of the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, lacrimal sac or eyelids) iii). inflammation (e.g., retinitis, macular inflammation, choroiditis, uveitis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis)

  6. Eyelid abnormalities that affect lid function (e.g. lagophthalmos, blepharospasm, ectropion, entropion, severe trichiasis, etc.)
  7. Extensive ocular surface scarring or condition that may compromise ocular surface integrity such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosions, persistent corneal epithelial defects, prior ocular trauma, etc.)
  8. Currently diagnosis of glaucoma and under glaucoma medication or surgery treatment
  9. Currently using, or intent to have any specific treatments for dry eye disease
  10. Fluorescein sodium allergy
  11. Pregnant, nursing, or lactating
  12. Neurological or psychiatric disorders (moderate anxiety, depression and sleep disorders)
  13. Uncontrolled ocular or systemic diseases
  14. History of epilepsy .
  15. The researchers did not consider the patient is appropriate for inclusion in this study
  16. Cognitive or psychiatric defect that precludes or ability to perform requirements in the investigation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
299 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    smile exercise

    smile exercise, 4 times a day,8 weeks

    Behavioral: smile exercise

  • Active comparator
    0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops

    0.1% sodium hyaluronate, 4 times a day, 8 weeks.

    Drug: 0.1% sodium hyaluronate eye drop

Interventions

  • Behavioralsmile exercise

    Launch the "smile face recognition" APP on smart phone, after user guidance and pretest, a smile exercise will display on the phone, while facing the front camera on the phone, participant will do an exercise emphasizing facial movements, as exaggerated as possible. The exercise last for 8 weeks and 4 times a day

  • Drug0.1% sodium hyaluronate eye drop

    0.1% sodium hyaluronate, 4 times a day, the time is in the morning, lunchtime, afternoon and evening. the interval between two training time is 2 hours, 1 hour before and after can be added or subtracted by users, 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score

    OSDI scores from 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks minus values from baseline. OSDI scores range from 0 to 100, score 0 indicating no ocular discomfort and higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. The minimal clinically significant change is 10 points.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants with 10 Points or More Decreased in OSDI

    Proportion of participants with at least 10 points decreased from baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change from Baseline in Lipid layer thickness (LLT)

    LLT from 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks minus values from baseline among eyes that qualified for the study. The interferometer LLT measurement is a non-invasively and objectively method that produces numeric value. The range of the value is 0-100+; lower value indicates thinner lipid layer.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Change in Non-invasive Tear film breakup time (NI-BUT)

    In this measurement, NI-BUT is measured using the keratography machine. NI-BUT is recorded as the number of seconds that elapse between the last blink and the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film. Change is record as the values at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks minus values at baseline visit. Possible range of score is 0-\>20. Lower values indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Change in Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) by Keratography

    Assessment of the tear film meniscus is a quantitative measurement of tear film quantity. In this measurement, TMH is measured using the keratography machine. Change is the values at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks minus values at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Change in Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

    Corneal Flourescein Staining Score from 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks minus values from baseline visit among eyes that quality that qualified for the study. Possible range of scores is 0-15; higher scores indicate more severe.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Change in Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)

    Medical Outcomes from study 20-Item Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. This scale range is 0-100 with lower scores indicating better self-reported mental health. Change is the score at 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Change in Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS)

    Medical Outcomes from study 20--Item Self-Rating Depression Scale. This scale range is 0-100 with lower scores indicating better self-reported mental health. Change is the score at 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Change in Subjective Happiness Scale

    A 4-item scale designed to measure subjective happiness. Each of item is completed by choosing one of 7 options that finish a given sentence fragment. Change is the score at 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Change is the score at 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at the baseline visits. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3, and the total PSQI scores range from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Change in SF-36 Physical Health Subscale

    Medical Outcomes from study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Health Subscale. Subscale range is 0-100, with higher scores indicating better self-reported physical health-related quality of life. Change is the score at 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. Change in SF-36 Mental Health Subscale

    Medical Outcomes from study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscale. Change is the score at 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Tear Cytokine Level

    Change in levels of tear cytokines (mainly in inflammation cytokines, such as iL-17, TNF-alpha, etc.,). Change is the values from 8 and 12 weeks minus the the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change in Lid Margin Abnormalities

    Lid margin abnormalities were scored from 0 to 4 Change in lid margin abnormalities is the score from 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Change in Meibum Quality

    To evaluate meibum quality,five glands of the central part of the upper lid were assessed on a scale of 0-3 for each gland (total score range, 0-15).Change is the total score from 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Change in Meibomian Gland Expressibility

    The score of meibomian gland expressibility is range from 0-3. Change is the total score from 4, 8 and 12 weeks minus the score at baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Change in Tear Film Break up Time, in Seconds (fluorescein staining)

    Tear film break up time from1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks minus values from baseline visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Change in Meibomian gland structure by Keratography

    Change in Meibomian gland structure measured using the keratography machine. Change is the score from 8 and 12 weeks minus the values at baseline visit

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zhonshan Ophthalmic Centre
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2020 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 9 months.

Of 10 interventional studies with no phase under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median); a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 17. This study's 9 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2020
First posted
Jun 9, 2020
StartActual
Jul 2, 2020
Primary completionActual
Apr 2, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 2, 2021
Last update
May 14, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04421300
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2020
Start date
Jul 2, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 2, 2021
Completion
Apr 2, 2021
Last update
May 14, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion