ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04416412Updated Jul 29, 2026

ICG Fluorescence Imaging in Open Fracture Trauma Patients

An observational study in Trauma Injury, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
124
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective observational study that will evaluate the association between bone and tissue perfusion, as measured by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, and complications, in an effort to develop ICG fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool to quantitatively guide operative debridement.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective observational study that will evaluate the association between bone and tissue perfusion, as measured using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging, and complications. This will be used to develop ICG fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool to objectively and quantitatively guide operative debridement. The study population includes all open fracture patients regardless of race, ethnicity, or sex/gender. Primary outcome measure is all-cause re-operation and secondary outcome measure is surgical site infection. All patients will be followed for a total of 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trauma Injury

Keywords

  • Immunofluorescence
  • Orthopaedic
  • Trauma
  • Open Fracture
03

In context

Accidental Injuries

128 studies on the registry are indexed under Accidental Injuries; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is below the median of 170 across 59 observational studies indexed under Accidental Injuries.

Browse Accidental Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 488 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients 18 years of age or older who present with an open fracture will be considered for the open fracture cohort.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients 18 years of age or older.
  2. Open extremity fracture.
  3. Planned definitive fracture management with external fixation, internal fixation, or joint fusion.
  4. Open fracture wound management that includes formal surgical debridement within 72 hours of their injury.
  5. Will have all planned fracture care surgeries performed by a participating surgeon or delegate.
  6. Provision of .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability of patient to provide
  2. Fracture of the hand.
  3. Iodine allergy.
  4. Received previous surgical debridement or management of their fracture at a non-participating hospital or clinic.
  5. Open fracture managed outside of the participating orthopaedic service.
  6. Chronic or acute infection at or near the fracture site at the time of initial fracture surgery.
  7. Burns at the fracture site.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Open Fracture Cohort

    Patients 18 years of age or older. Open extremity fracture. Planned definitive fracture management with external fixation, internal fixation, or joint fusion. Open fracture wound management that includes formal surgical debridement within 72 hours of their injury. Will have all planned fracture care surgeries performed by a participating surgeon or delegate. Provision of informed consent.

    Other: Immunofluorescence Imaging

Interventions

  • OtherImmunofluorescence Imaging

    Patients will be administered FDA approved ICG through intravenous injection and imaged by a FDA approved surgical microscope (Spy Elite) which is 0.5 meter away from the subject. Both ICG fluorescence and the two imaging systems have been used for routine clinical practice for many years. Figure (a) shows the Schematic sketch of the imaging systems. ICG fluorescence imaging utilizes intravenously injected ICG, which is a fluorescent dye that is FDA-approved for clinical use, illuminated with near-infrared light. The ICG dye is indirectly activated and the dynamic fluorescence due to bone perfusion can be captured by a video rate imaging system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants who undergo an unplanned fracture-related reoperation

    All unplanned reoperations will be documented using a specific case report form

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of participants who experience a post-procedure surgical site infection

    Post-procedure surgical site infection using Centers for Disease Control criteria will be documented at each follow-up

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of California, Irvine
    Irvine, California 92614, United States
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore R. Cowley Shock Trauma
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 021115, United States
  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 69 months.

Of 33 non-industry observational studies under Accidental Injuries, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60. This study's 69 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 39 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 21, 2020
First posted
Jun 4, 2020
StartActual
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04416412
Collaborators
Dartmouth College, United States Department of Defense, Brigham and Women's Hospital, University of California, Irvine, University of Maryland, Baltimore
Responsible party
Ida Leah Gitajn (Physician, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2020
Start date
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026
Completion
Jul 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Ida L Gitajn, MD
principal investigator · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion