CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04412681Updated Mar 22, 2021

Precision Medicine for Prediction & Prevention of Early Pre-eclampsia

An interventional study of Enhanced PE Screening in Pre-Eclampsia, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-22.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a clinical model for precision screening of early pre-eclampsia into the current prenatal screening service at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC).

Read the detailed description

Pre-eclampsia (PE) represents a pregnancy-specific systemic disorder that affects 3-8% of all pregnancies. In developed countries PE is considered a major public health problem responsible for severe maternal complications such as coagulopathy, renal and liver failure, stroke, and maternal death (>76,000 maternal death annually).

The traditional approach to screening for preeclampsia endorsed by national guidelines is based on a combination of maternal characteristics along with medical, obstetric and family history.

However, although these methods are simple and easy to perform, maternal factors can only identify less than 35% of all preeclampsia and approximately 40% of preterm-preeclampsia at a false- positive rate of 10%.

More recently, multivariate analysis has been used to develop predictive models for preeclampsia that can be applied as early as 11-13+6 weeks gestation. One such algorithm, developed by the Fetal Medicine Foundation UK(MFM UK), incorporates maternal risk factors, uterine artery doppler, mean arterial pressure, and serum markers of placental function and placental growth factor. The FMFUK algorithm has been shown to predict approximately 75-90% of those women destined to develop preeclampsia prior to 37 and 34 weeks respectively, at a false positive rate of 10%. This algorithm has been validated prospectively in several studies, including the prediction of other placental mediated complications of pregnancy, such as fetal growth restriction and perinatal death.

The new clinical model will include the following additions to the existing first trimester screening for aneuploidy:

  • Additional Clinical History
  • Blood pressure measurements
  • Ultrasound for uterine artery Doppler measurements
  • Expanded prenatal screening requisition
  • Quality assurance training of ultrasound technicians for the uterine artery doppler measurements
  • Fetal Medicine Foundation validated risk calculation algorithm
  • Communicate results of the risk calculation algorithm from NYGH to SHSC and participant health care providers.

While the ultimate goal will be to scale up and adapt this new clinical model, this protocol focuses on the feasibility of implementing the new clinical model at a single centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pre-Eclampsia
03

In context

Eclampsia

328 studies on the registry are indexed under Eclampsia; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 120 across 169 interventional studies indexed under Eclampsia.

Browse Eclampsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 566 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women with a singleton pregnancy > 18 years old
  2. Not on low dose aspirin
  3. Carrying a live fetus with crown rump length (CRL) between 41 and 84mm
  4. Able to provide informed consent
  5. Having a nuchal translucency ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with a singleton pregnancy \< 18 years old
  2. Women currently taking low dose aspirin
  3. Women declining a nuchal translucency ultrasound
  4. Women unable to provide informed consent
  5. Women with a multiple pregnancy
  6. Women with a demised fetus or a CRL \<41mm and >84mm
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PE Enhanced Screening

    The PE screening program entails the following for all participants: * provision of additional demographic and risk factors * provision of mean arterial pressure * standard nuchal translucency scan as part of their first trimester screening (FTS) with the addition of the measurement of the uterine artery Doppler by a certified sonographer * standard blood sample (as part of the FTS) * results of the PE screening (in the format of a screening report) will be provided to the study team and participant's healthcare provider

    Diagnostic Test: Enhanced PE Screening

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testEnhanced PE Screening

    To better identify women at risk for pre-eclampsia during pregnancy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Screening Tool

    Implementation of the screening: To assess the feasibility, the investigators will judge success if the full screening process without deviation is completed for at least 90% of consented participants.

    Time frame: 11.3-13.6 weeks gestation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of Screening

    Reproducibility of the FMFUK studies. Planning a recruitment of 1000 participants and anticipating a 10% positive rate, the invetigators expect to follow 100 screen positive and 900 screen negative pregnancies.

    Time frame: 11.3-13.6 weeks gestation

  2. Acceptability of Screening Tool to Participants

    Proportion of acceptance/offer to implementation study. The investigators expect to obtain consent from 80% of pregnant women eligible for the study.

    Time frame: 11.3-13.6 weeks gestation

  3. Compliance with low dose ASA for screen positive participants.

    The investigators will assess the rate of initiation and maintenance of low dose ASA ( SHSC standard of care) as measured by phone follow-up at 16,22,26,32 and 36 weeks gestation, (2) follow-up at placental scan visit and (3) follow-up at delivery. Success will defined as 80% compliance.

    Time frame: 16-36 weeks gestation

Other outcomes

  1. Duration of the assessment

    The investigators will assess the duration (in minute) required for completing data questionnaire, measuring arterial blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler

    Time frame: 11.3-13.6 weeks gestation

  2. Turnaround time from assessment to results

    The investigators will measure the turnaround time (in business day) from screening requisition reaching laboratory to report issued to SHSC via fax

    Time frame: 11.3-16 weeks gestation

  3. Participant Satisfaction

    The investigators will assess participant satisfaction with screening and care through a satisfaction survey with a 10 score scale where 1 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satified

    Time frame: 11.3-40 weeks gestation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wright D, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and medical history. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):62.e1-62.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Feb 25. PubMed 25724400 ↗
  • O'Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Alvarado M, Carbone IF, Dutemeyer V, Fiolna M, Frick A, Karagiotis N, Mastrodima S, de Paco Matallana C, Papaioannou G, Pazos A, Plasencia W, Nicolaides KH. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):756-760. doi: 10.1002/uog.17455. Erratum In: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):807. doi: 10.1002/uog.18950. PubMed 28295782 ↗
  • Park FJ, Leung CH, Poon LC, Williams PF, Rothwell SJ, Hyett JA. Clinical evaluation of a first trimester algorithm predicting the risk of hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Dec;53(6):532-9. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12126. Epub 2013 Aug 6. PubMed 23919594 ↗
  • Mosimann B, Pfiffner C, Amylidi-Mohr S, Risch L, Surbek D, Raio L. First trimester combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age - a single centre experience and validation of the FMF screening algorithm. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Aug 25;147:w14498. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14498. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28871576 ↗
  • O'Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D, Jani J, Molina FS, de Paco Matallana C, Papantoniou N, Persico N, Plasencia W, Singh M, Nicolaides KH. Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):751-755. doi: 10.1002/uog.17399. Epub 2017 May 14. Erratum In: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):807. doi: 10.1002/uog.18950. PubMed 28067011 ↗
  • Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Wapner RJ. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ. 2013 Nov 7;347:f6564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6564. PubMed 24201165 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04412681
Lead sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Collaborators
North York General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 22, 2021

Study contacts

Ronzoni
Contact
stefania.ronzoni@sunnybrook.ca
4164804920
Ronzoni
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion