ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04282343Updated May 3, 2023

DISCO Application for the Improvement of Financial Outcomes in Patients With Hematologic Cancer

An interventional study of The DISCO App and Usual Care in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive and Plasma Cell Myeloma, sponsored by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-03.

Sponsored by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase II trial studies how well the DIScussion of COst (DISCO) application (app) works in improving financial outcomes in patients with hematologic cancer. The DISCO app is an electronic, highly scalable and tailorable education and communication intervention that may help researchers learn more about improving how patients and oncologists discuss cancer treatment costs

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess the effectiveness of the DISCO app on prompting patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions during patient-physician interactions (as observed in video recordings), patient outcomes related to financial toxicity immediately after the patient-oncologist interaction, and at a 3-month follow up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive
  • Plasma Cell Myeloma
03

In context

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

1,648 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; 245 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 40 across 1,356 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell.

Browse Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ONCOLOGISTS: Eligible if they treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), or multiple myeloma (MM) cancers
  • PATIENTS: Able to read and write in English
  • PATIENTS: Have a confirmed diagnosis of CLL, CML, or MM cancers
  • PATIENTS: Are scheduled to see an oncologist at Karmanos Cancer Institute (KCI) Detroit or KCI Farmington Hills/Weisberg for an initial or change in treatment discussion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Arm I- Usual care

    Patients receive usual care consisting of general cancer treatment information on a sheet of paper before attending video-recorded meetings with their oncologist to discuss treatment plans.

    Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Other
    Arm II - DISCO app

    Patients use the DISCO education and communication app before attending video-recorded meetings with their oncologist to discuss treatment plans.

    Behavioral: The DISCO App

Interventions

  • BehavioralThe DISCO App

    Patients will receive an individually-tailorable cancer treatment cost education and communication intervention delivered on an iPad just prior to meeting with their oncologist.

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    Patients randomized to this arm will receive usual care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of cost discussion observed via video recordings of patient-physician treatment discussions.

    Number of participates who have a treatment cost discussion will be evaluated with a validated observational scale. This is an investigator-developed scale and its called the Discussion of Cost (DISCO) scale. A higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: Observed during the video-recorded patient-physician interaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Referrals for financial or psychological support

    Number of participants who receive a referral for financial or psychological support will be evaluated with a self-report item. This an investigator-developed yes/no one-item response. A "yes" response is a better outcome than a "no" response.

    Time frame: Immediately after the patient-physician interaction

  2. Self-efficacy in managing treatment cost

    How efficacious each participant feels about managing treatment costs will be evaluated with an adapted validated self-report scale and its title is: Managing Treatment Cost Self-Efficacy scale. This an investigator-adapted scale, and a higher score means a better outcome (max =7; min = 1).

    Time frame: Immediately after the patient-physician interaction

  3. Self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions

    How efficacious each participant feels about interacting with physicians will be evaluated with a validated self-report scale, and its title is: Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI). A higher score means a better outcome.(max =50; min = 10)

    Time frame: Immediately after the patient-physician interaction

  4. Treatment cost distress

    How distress each participant feels about how much their treatment will cost them will be evaluated with an investigator-developed validated self-report scale, and its title is: Treatment Cost Distress Scale. A higher score means a worse outcome. (max =7; min = 1)

    Time frame: Immediately after the patient-physician interaction

  5. Anticipated material hardship

    How much anticipated material hardship each participant feels they may experienced due to treatment costs will be evaluated with a validated self-report scale, and its title is: Economic Hardship Scale. A higher score means a worse outcome. (max =7; min = 1)

    Time frame: Immediately after the patient-physician interaction

  6. Financial toxicity

    How much material and psychological hardship the patients experiences due to treatment cost will be evaluated with a validated self-report scale, and its title is: Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). A higher score means a worse outcomes. (max=7; min=1)

    Time frame: 3 months after the patient-physician interaction

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2020 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 31 months.

Of 38 interventional studies with no phase under Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 128. This study's 31 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2020
First posted
Feb 24, 2020
StartActual
Feb 25, 2020
Primary completionActual
Oct 21, 2022
CompletionActual
Oct 21, 2022
Last update
May 3, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04282343
Responsible party
Lauren Hamel (Principal Investigator, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2020
Start date
Feb 25, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2022
Completion
Oct 21, 2022
Last update
May 3, 2023

Study contacts

Lauren Hamel, PhD
principal investigator · Barbara Ann Karmanos Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion