ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04194060ERASEUpdated Mar 18, 2022

ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT

An interventional study of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery group and Conventional in Peptic Ulcer Perforation, Perforated Bowel and Post-Op Complication, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-18.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares 2 different ways of perioperative management in patients of peptic perforation. Experimental arm is the ERAS arm( Enhanced recovery after surgery) and the comparative arm is Conventional arm.

Read the detailed description

While the conventional approach to perioperative management can potentially prolong the post operative hospital stay, ERAS(Enhanced recovery after surgery), a multi-modal and multispeciality approach to perioperative management may reduce the length of hospital stay. In the preoperative period, patients will be counselled regarding the operative procedure and particulars of the perioperative management.In the intra-operative period short acting general anesthetic agents and short acting muscle relaxants will be used.Intravenous fluid administration will be goal directed. After the operative procedure, bilateral rectus sheath block will be administered. Patient will also receive post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Nasogastric tube will be removed immediately after the operative procedure. In the post operative period, patients will be encouraged to ambulate early. Enteral nutrition will be initiated as early as possible. Indwelling catheters will be removed in the early post-operative procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peptic Ulcer Perforation
  • Perforated Bowel
  • Post-Op Complication
  • Emergencies
  • Perioperative Complication

Keywords

  • ERAS
  • Emergency surgery
  • Fast track surgery
  • Perioperative Care
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
03

In context

Peptic Ulcer Perforation

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Peptic Ulcer Perforation; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 16 interventional studies indexed under Peptic Ulcer Perforation.

Browse Peptic Ulcer Perforation studies →

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient diagnosed with peptic perforation intra -operatively
  2. Perforation of size \<=1 cm
  3. Patient age more than 18 years
  4. score of I or II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. septic shock at presentation.
  2. Known Chronic kidney disease/ Chronic liver disease patients
  3. Pregnant patients.
  4. Patients with history of chronic abuse.
  5. Intraoperatively

    • Patient with coexistent peptic perforation with bleeding ulcer.
    • Peptic perforation requiring procedure other than Omental patch repair.
    • Sealed perforations.
    • Malignant perforation.
  6. Patient requiring Positive Pressure Ventilator support post operatively for more than 12 hours.
  7. Patient requiring urinary catheterization for other indications.
  8. Coexistent neurological or psychiatric illness or unable to understand the study.
  9. Patient refusing for consent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enhanced recovery after surgery group

    ERAS GROUP * Tracheal intubation. * Short acting anesthetic agents,avoid opioid agents * Omental patch repair with placement of sub hepatic drain * Bilateral Transverse abdominis plane block/ Rectus sheath block immediately after surgery. * Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. * Encourage to mobilize out of bed after effect of general anesthesia has weaned off. * Initiation of feeding-Oral sips on day 1, step up day 2 onward * Removal of nasogastric tube-immediately after surgery after aspirating the gastric content through nasogastric tube. * Removal of urinary catheter-after weaning from the effect of general anesthesia. * Sub hepatic drain removal -anytime within 24 hours;drain will not be removed if fluid is bilious or pus. * Avoid opiod analgesics.

    Combination Product: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery group

  • Active comparator
    Conventional group

    CONVENTIONAL GROUP * Tracheal intubation * Short acting anesthetic agents, avoid opiod anesthesia agents. * Omental patch repair along with sub hepatic drain placement. * Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. * Ambulation-as per patients' own request. * Initiation of oral feed- after passage of 1st flatus. * Nasogastric tube removal-output \<300ml/day with resolution of ileus. * Removal of urinary catheter- when patient sits on bed side/ambulate. * Removal of sub hepatic drain-when patient tolerates unrestricted amount of liquid diet and drain output is less than 200 ml /day. * Patient will receive opiod analgesics. I

    Combination Product: Conventional

Interventions

  • Combination productEnhanced Recovery after Surgery group

    * Tracheal intubation and with General anesthesia * Short acting anesthetic agents,avoid opioid agents * Omental patch repair with placement of sub hepatic drain * Bilateral Transverse abdominis plane block/ Rectus sheath block immediately after surgery. * Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. * Encourage to mobilize out of bed after effect of general anesthesia has weaned off. * Initiation of feeding-Oral sips on day 1, step up day 2 onward * Removal of nasogastric tube-immediately after surgery after aspirating the gastric content through nasogastric tube. * Removal of urinary catheter-after weaning from the effect of general anesthesia. * Sub hepatic drain removal -anytime within 24 hours;drain will not be removed if fluid is bilious or pus. * Avoid opiod analgesics.

  • Combination productConventional

    Tracheal intubation * Short acting anesthetic agents, avoid opiod anesthesia agents. * Omental patch repair along with sub hepatic drain placement. * Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. * Ambulation-as per patients' own request. * Initiation of oral feed- after passage of 1st flatus. * Nasogastric tube removal-output \<300ml/day with resolution of ileus. * Removal of urinary catheter- when patient sits on bed side/ambulate. * Removal of sub hepatic drain-when patient tolerates unrestricted amount of liquid diet and drain output is less than 200 ml /day. * Patient will receive opiod analgesics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Duration from the time of operation to time of discharge

    Time frame: Post operative period up-to one month.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recovery of functional parameters

    * Time of withdrawal of nasogastric tube (hours) * Time to first bowel sound (hours) * Time to first flatus (hours) * Time to first stool (hours) * Time to removal of drain(hours) * Time to first fluid diet (hours) * Time to first solid diet (hours) * Time to stoppage of IV fluids(hours) * Time of removal of urinary catheter (hours) * Time to ambulation(hours)

    Time frame: Post operative period up-to one month.

  2. Post operative complications

    * Anastomotic leakage * Pneumonia * Ileus * Obstruction * Wound infection * Abdominal sepsis * Burst Abdomen * Need for reinsertion of nasogastric tube * Need for reinsertion of urinary catheter * Need for drainage of abdominal collection * Readmission * Re operation * Mortality

    Time frame: Post operative period up-to three months.

Other outcomes

  1. Quality of life scoring and assessment

    Quality of life assessment will be done using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (Euroqol 5 dimensions and 5 levels). It has 2 components, descriptive and objective. Descriptive component comprises of 5 dimensions which are mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels, namely no problem, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Objective component is also called Euroqol visual analog scale. Score ranges from zero to hundred.The endpoints are labelled as 'the best health participant can imagine' and 'the worst health participant can imagine'. It will be assessed on the day of discharge, follow up at one month and follow up at third month in the post operative period.

    Time frame: Post operative period - at day of discharge, at one month follow up and at third month follow up.

  2. Intra-abdominal collection

    Ultrasonography abdomen will be done at one month to look for any intra-abdominal collection and if any collection is found, will be repeated at third month follow up.

    Time frame: Post operative period-at one month and at third month in post operative period.

  3. Hematological parameter

    Total leukocyte count will be measured at follow up at one month.If the value is more than 11,000 cells/mm cube or less than 4000 cells/mm cube, then it will be measured again at third month of follow up.

    Time frame: Post-operative period up-at one month and at third month.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tushar S Mishra
    Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751019, India
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mohsina S, Shanmugam D, Sureshkumar S, Kundra P, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. Adapted ERAS Pathway vs. Standard Care in Patients with Perforated Duodenal Ulcer-a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):107-116. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3474-2. Epub 2017 Jun 26. PubMed 28653239 ↗
  • Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency colorectal surgery: Review of literature and current practices. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):41-52. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.41. PubMed 30842811 ↗
  • Agarwal A, Jain S, Meena LN, Jain SA, Agarwal L. Validation of Boey's score in predicting morbidity and mortality in peptic perforation peritonitis in Northwestern India. Trop Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct-Dec;36(4):256-60. doi: 10.7869/tg.300. PubMed 27509704 ↗
  • Gonenc M, Dural AC, Celik F, Akarsu C, Kocatas A, Kalayci MU, Dogan Y, Alis H. Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in emergency surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2014 Jun;207(6):807-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Oct 10. PubMed 24119887 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2020 to primary completion in May 2021, 15 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 22, 2019
First posted
Dec 11, 2019
StartActual
Jan 20, 2020
Primary completionActual
May 15, 2021
CompletionActual
Jun 15, 2021
Last update
Mar 18, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04194060
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
Responsible party
Tushar Subhadarshan Mishra (Additional Professor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 11, 2019
Start date
Jan 20, 2020
Primary completion
May 15, 2021
Completion
Jun 15, 2021
Last update
Mar 18, 2022

Study contacts

TUSHAR S MISHRA, MBBS,MS
principal investigator · All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion