An interventional study of Modified perineal linear stapler resection for external rectal prolapse in Rectal Prolapse, sponsored by Zagazig University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 48 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-03.
Sponsored by Zagazig University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
from December 2016 to July 2019, 36 elderly co-morbid patients with rectal prolapse were involved in this study which is performed in the GIT surgery unit of Zagazig University Hospital. the investigators used a modified linear stapler resection technique for the rectal prolapse. Postoperative follow up was done for one year to evaluate functional outcome, operative time, hospital stay and complications
The study was done in the GIT Unit of the General Surgery Department of Zagazig University Hospital in the period from December 2016 to July 2019. The hospital Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol. Thirty-six old, co-morbid and short life expectancy patients were included in the sample. They were evaluated for PSP. Informed consent was signed by all patients or first-degree relatives after full discussion of the advantage and disadvantage of the operation. Preoperative bimanual examination was done for rectal prolapse to rule out enterocele or cystocele and this was confirmed by MRI. The routine preoperative evaluation was done for all patients (physical examination, complete blood tests, ECG and chest x-ray). Bowel preparation was done for all patients.
Regarding bowel function, all patients were evaluated for fecal incontinence by Wexner score and for constipation by Rome II criteria. Prophylactic intravenous cephalosporin and metronidazole was given one hour before operation. The operation was done under spinal anesthesia in the lithotomy position with slight Trendeleburg to prevent trapping of abdominal organs between walls of rectum. All operations were done by the same surgical members of the unit. Hospital stay, Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. All patients started oral fluids in the second day. Follow up was done for patients every 1,3,6,9 and 12 months in the outpatient clinic.
55 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Prolapse; 12 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 55 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Prolapse.
Browse Rectal Prolapse studies →Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 459 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
ASA physical status
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
old co-morbid patient with complete rectal prolapse unfit for abdominal operation
Other: Modified perineal linear stapler resection for external rectal prolapse
After anesthesia and patient position, the prolapse was pulled out Two vertical incision were made in both the inner and outer walls of the prolapse (at 3and 9 o'clock)1-2 cm in size approximately 2 cm above the dentate line. We used a reloadable linear cutter stapler (GIA 100mm Covidien, Mansfield, Mass., USA) passing through the tunnel to cut the anterior aspect of the prolapse . Then, after reload the stapler by the new cartridge, we used it to do the same for posterior wall and the prolapsed rectum was completely transected . We ensure that the stapler did not fire at the dentate line to avoid post-operative pain. Multiple 3-0 PDS intermittent full thickness sutures were done for hemostasis. The prolapsed rectum falls back into place spontaneously.
treatment of rectal prolapse
patients satisfaction after operation - no mass coming form anus - no previous complications like bleeding and constipation
Time frame: 30 dyas
post operative complications
bleeding - infection - constipation-incontinence- recurrence
Time frame: one year
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.